Kinky Friedman's 1, 2, & 3: " The Perfect Storm " !

Opinion

Texarkana gets Kinky on the campaign trail

Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:46 AM CDT

Kinky Friedman is on a mission to take back Texas.
He brought that crusade to Texarkana this week.
If you didn’t go out to see gubernatorial candidate Friedman Tuesday at Texarkana’s Cinema 218 you missed a treat.
Most political rallies are dry affairs, at best. Everyone on their best behavior, the candidate making a nice speech sure not to ruffle too many feathers, punctuated by polite applause from an audience that already knows what to expect.
Kinky’s rally was a little different. But so is Kinky.
He’s been a musician and a bestselling mystery author, but his real job is as a Texas icon: a straight-shooting rebel with a black cowboy hat and a long cigar who isn’t afraid to say what he thinks no matter who he offends.
He was greeted in Texarkana by a very large crowd for a political rally. An enthusiastic crowd at that.
Thunderous applause greeted Kinky after an elaborate introduction. He covered much the same ground he does at all rallies—what he calls his common sense plan for education and health care, opposition to high property taxes, a plan to raise money for the state by legalizing casino gambling, a get-tough policy on immigration and support for police, firefighters, veterans and teachers—but he has the ability to engage the crowd, to speak their language.
He’s a polished speaker, but in a carefully unpolished way. He knows what his audience is thinking, he knows what they want and he knows how to speak to their concerns in colorful language that cuts to the heart of the matter. And he knows when to duck and weave and still leave his audience happy.
Kinky may not be a professional politician, but a professional entertainer knows how to play to the crowd. And the crowd loves Kinky Friedman.
After his speech, he answered a few questions then repaired to the front of Cinema 218 and readily signed anything anyone wanted to put in front of him—hopefully, of course, a campaign item that was available for purchase—and posed for photographs with the many who attended the rally. The line was long and slow moving; Kinky seemed to be in no great hurry, and everyone who attended got to meet the candidate and chat a bit. The crowd was left with the kind of personal memory that could translate well come election day
After his speech, he answered a few questions then repaired to the front of Cinema 218 and readily signed anything anyone wanted to put in front of him—hopefully, of course, a campaign item that was available for purchase—and posed for photographs with the many who attended the rally. The line was long and slow moving; Kinky seemed to be in no great hurry, and everyone who attended got to meet the candidate and chat a bit. The crowd was left with the kind of personal memory that could translate well come election day.
That personal touch is Kinky’s ace in the hole. He seems to be having a great time on the campaign trail, and that shows. He really connects with the public.
Kinky appeals to voters who are fed up with the political status quo, much the same way former presidential contender H. Ross Perot ignited a grassroots movement by portraying himself as someone outside the political mainstream.
Don’t discount the constituency. A lot of Texans—a lot of Americans overall—are sick of business-as-usual political chicanery.
And Kinky, unlike Perot, shows every sign of being in for the long haul. You won’t see him pulling out of the race.
Some think Kinky Friedman’s candidacy is a joke. Why should he be governor? He’s just an entertainer. Besides, he’s running as an independent and has no shot at winning the race.
Well, they said the same thing about Jesse Ventura and Arnold Schwarzenegger. But look what happened in Minnesota and California.
And if you’re old enough to recall, they said the same thing about another former actor who ran for governor of California back in the 1960s. But Ronald Reagan surprised them all. He did all right for himself on the national scene, too.
So when all is said and done, the real question is, “What does Kinky stand for?”
The way I see it, he stands for Texas: the independent spirit that made Texas great, the independent spirit the state could use a lot more of.
Kinky’s campaign slogan is “Why the hell not?”
Indeed, why not? Texas could do a lot worse than electing Kinky Friedman as governor. Texas has done a lot worse in the past.
Most observers and pundits don’t give Friedman much chance on election day. But it’s still a long time until November, and Kinky will be out meeting and connecting with voters across the state until the race is decided. And the more people who meet Kinky Friedman in person, the better his chances are of winning.

source: http://www.texarkanagazette.com/articles/2006/07/13/local_news/opinion/opinion02.txt
-----------------------
A FRIEDMAN WIN
COULD BE THE DAWNING OF A NEW COALITION

By: Sean Scallon

If you are an independent candidate running for public office, you know your campaign has the potential to win if a combination of three things happens: 1). You are well-known and charismatic; 2). You face a very unpopular incumbent and 3). One of the major parties is in rough shape.

Thus, for those reasons, does one Richard "Kinky" Friedman, find himself in the potential catbird seat in the upcoming Texas gubernatorial election. 1). Incumbent Republican Governor Rick Perry is unpopular, polling at 35%; 2). Friedman is well-known and charismatic and 3). The Texas Democratic Party is in horrible shape.

Friedman's now in second place in the polls. Yes, the man who once sung such classics as "They Ain't Making Jews like Jesus Anymore," and "I'm Proud to Be an Asshole from El Paso," and who once called the good citizens of his hometown of Kerrville, Texas "Kerrverts" could very well be the first independent governor of Texas since Sam Houston won as an indy in 1859. Given the fact that two of his advisers, Dean Barkley and Bill Hillsman, helped get the feather-boa wearing former professional wrestler Jesse "The Body" Ventura elected governor of Minnesota, then anything's possible.

The fact that Friedman and another independent candidate, State Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, in recent polls have captured 40% of the vote combined is just another example of how the once powerful Texas Democratic Party has been reduced to a shell. The Dems hold no statewide offices, no U.S. Senate seats, are a minority in the legislature and in the U.S. House delegation and outside big cities like Houston, Dallas, Austin, El Paso and San Antonio, barely exist. Their gubernatorial candidate, former Congressman Chris Bell, has only raised barely over $300,000 so far compared to Friedman's $1.15 million and many Democrat big shots in Texas aren't even supporting his campaign.

But it wouldn't be all bad news for the Democrats if Friedman won for in his victory they could find the seeds of a new governing coalition they could ride herd over if, and this is a big if, they were smart enough to understand what it's all about.

When asked where he stood on the issue of homosexual marriage, Friedman responded with the line "Why not? They have the right to be as miserable as the rest of us." And yet when asked about his stand on prayer in school he said. "Why not, why should one atheist dictate something for everyone else? You know what they say about atheists when they die? 'All dressed up with no place to go.'"

It's these two seemingly contradictory statements that are at the heart of Friedman's campaign and the heart of a possible new coalition of voters. Simply put, it's "Do Your own Thing." Your town or state wants gay marriage? Fine then. Just don't make me recognize it if I don't want to. Your town wants prayer in school or the Ten Commandments on the courthouse wall? Fine then, too. It's your decision, not mine.

All of this falls into line with Bill Kauffman's paleoconservative slogan "Let San Francisco be San Francisco and let Utah be Utah." For a public wearied of the seemingly endless Culture Wars and the polarization of U.S. society, such an attitude expressed by Friedman would, I think, be warmly welcomed and the basis of a new governing coalition. If conservatives can handle the fact that abortion will still exist even without Roe v. Wade, then there's no reason why liberals should go into an apoplexy if there happens to be just one little school district in one little town that allows for prayer before class. If such a truce could be called, could you not then combine locally empowered Democrats outside of D.C. and state capitols, along with Libertarians who may very well have shed the anarchic and unpalatable aspects of their party at their recent conventi on in Portland, along with just plain, old conservative boys and girls who are starting to have a hard time finding their place in a party of Baptists and county clubbers and the snot-nosed, bratty punks and asses who inhabit so much of the GOP and right-wing infrastructure from the punditry class to the office staffers who support a war they won't enlist to fight in? Could not the LP be a wing of the Democrats in districts that are demographically Republican?

It may very well be a long shot to put such groups together from a demographic standpoint, but Friedman could well be the one to do it. He seems to be the candidate the Democrats can only wish they had, someone who's just as comfortable in a roadhouse as he would be at a book reading with a quick wit and pleasant disposition. But more importantly, he seems to represent regular folks who are tired of being whipped up and used every two to four years by the major parties, consultants, special interest groups and other powers that be to work their rears off for campaigns that, even if successful, will never achieve the kind of society or policies they claim they want on a nationwide basis, never in a thousand years. If persons are willing to settle for their little corner of paradise in this big country of ours (and there's plenty of space to go around), then ultimately they'll support candidates who promise to create such spaces or at least let people be what they want to be without taking them to court. Of all the Democrats who are or are planning to run for President in 2008, only Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) has some grasp of this potential coalition (When asked if he supported homosexual marriage, Feingold said he wasn't opposed to it because "it doesn't hurt me." ). A Friedman win might alert others to it as well.

Contrary to popular opinion (popular on the left anyway) Texas is not a Talibanized state, at least not so long as Kinky Friedman is around to call it home. And he wants to make sure it stays that way along with end ing one-party rule. "I just want to get rid of the apathy," Friedman said, noting that only 36% of Texas voted in 2002. To most Texas voters, Chris Bell seems like just another politician and a weak one at that. Kinky comes across as authentic and honest and that's the only way and independent has a chance to beat the entrenched machine that the GOP has constructed in the Lone Star State. As one voter stated in a Time Magazine article during the last state-wide election in Texas from four years ago: "Unless you stand out or give people a reason to vote for you, people are going to vote the ways they've always voted." Or not even vote in that case. But just as Jesse Ventura was helped by a massive turnout of non-voters on election day, any increase well above 40% will help the Kinkster reserve a room in the governor's mansion. And perhaps help the Democrats find the majority governing coalition they've been searching for the past 35 years.

source: http://www.etherzone.com/2006/scall071406.shtml