Steve's Soapbox

Friday, July 30, 2004

Columbus Day Celebration ?

Published on Monday, October 11, 2004 by Common Dreams

Columbus Day Celebration? Think Again...
by Thom Hartmann

  "Gold is most excellent; gold constitutes treasure; and he who has it does all he wants in the world, and can even lift souls up to Paradise."
-- Christopher Columbus, 1503 letter to the king and queen of Spain.

"Christopher Columbus not only opened the door to a New World, but also set an example for us all by showing what monumental feats can be accomplished through perseverance and faith."
--George H.W. Bush, 1989 speech

If you fly over the country of Haiti on the island of Hispaniola, the island on which Columbus landed, it looks like somebody took a blowtorch and burned away anything green. Even the ocean around the port capital of Port au Prince is choked for miles with the brown of human sewage and eroded topsoil. From the air, it looks like a lava flow spilling out into the sea.

The history of this small island is, in many ways, a microcosm for what's happening in the whole world.

When Columbus first landed on Hispaniola in 1492, virtually the entire island was covered by lush forest. The Taino "Indians" who loved there had an apparently idyllic life prior to Columbus, from the reports left to us by literate members of Columbus's crew such as Miguel Cuneo.

When Columbus and his crew arrived on their second visit to Hispaniola, however, they took captive about two thousand local villagers who had come out to greet them. Cuneo wrote: "When our caravels… where to leave for Spain, we gathered…one thousand six hundred male and female persons of those Indians, and these we embarked in our caravels on February 17, 1495…For those who remained, we let it be known (to the Spaniards who manned the island's fort) in the vicinity that anyone who wanted to take some of them could do so, to the amount desired, which was done."

Cuneo further notes that he himself took a beautiful teenage Carib girl as his personal slave, a gift from Columbus himself, but that when he attempted to have sex with her, she "resisted with all her strength." So, in his own words, he "thrashed her mercilessly and raped her."

While Columbus once referred to the Taino Indians as cannibals, a story made up by Columbus - which is to this day still taught in some US schools - to help justify his slaughter and enslavement of these people. He wrote to the Spanish monarchs in 1493: "It is possible, with the name of the Holy Trinity, to sell all the slaves which it is possible to sell…Here there are so many of these slaves, and also brazilwood, that although they are living things they are as good as gold…"

Columbus and his men also used the Taino as sex slaves: it was a common reward for Columbus' men for him to present them with local women to rape. As he began exporting Taino as slaves to other parts of the world, the sex-slave trade became an important part of the business, as Columbus wrote to a friend in 1500: "A hundred castellanoes (a Spanish coin) are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and it is very general and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten (years old) are now in demand."

However, the Taino turned out not to be particularly good workers in the plantations that the Spaniards and later the French established on

Hispaniola: they resented their lands and children being taken, and attempted to fight back against the invaders. Since the Taino where obviously standing in the way of Spain's progress, Columbus sought to impose discipline on them. For even a minor offense, an Indian's nose or ear was cut off, se he could go back to his village to impress the people with the brutality the Spanish were capable of. Columbus attacked them with dogs, skewered them with pikes, and shot them.

Eventually, life for the Taino became so unbearable that, as Pedro de Cordoba wrote to King Ferdinand in a 1517 letter, "As a result of the sufferings and hard labor they endured, the Indians choose and have chosen suicide. Occasionally a hundred have committed mass suicide. The women, exhausted by labor, have shunned conception and childbirth… Many, when pregnant, have taken something to abort and have aborted. Others after delivery have killed their children with their own hands, so as not to leave them in such oppressive slavery."

Eventually, Columbus and later his brother Bartholomew Columbus who he left in charge of the island, simply resorted to wiping out the Taino altogether. Prior to Columbus' arrival, some scholars place the population of Haiti/Hispaniola (now at 16 million) at around 1.5 to 3 million people. By 1496, it was down to 1.1 million, according to a census done by Bartholomew Columbus. By 1516, the indigenous population was 12,000, and according to Las Casas (who were there) by 1542 fewer than 200 natives were alive. By 1555, every single one was dead.

This wasn't just the story of Hispaniola; the same has been done to indigenous peoples worldwide. Slavery, apartheid, and the entire concept of conservative Darwinian Economics, have been used to justify continued suffering by masses of human beings.

Dr. Jack Forbes, Professor of Native American Studies at the University of California at Davis and author of the brilliant book "Columbus and Other Cannibals," uses the Native American word wétiko (pronounced WET-ee-ko) to describe the collection of beliefs that would produce behavior like that of Columbus. Wétiko literally means "cannibal," and Forbes uses it quite intentionally to describe these standards of culture: we "eat" (consume) other humans by destroying them, destroying their lands, taking their natural resources, and consuming their life-force by enslaving them either physically or economically. The story of Columbus and the Taino is just one example.

We live in a culture that includes the principle that if somebody else has something we need, and they won't give it to us, and we have the means to kill them to get it, it's not unreasonable to go get it, using whatever force we need to.

In the United States, the first "Indian war" in New England was the "Pequot War of 1636," in which colonists surrounded the largest of the Pequot villages, set it afire as the sun began to rise, and then performed their duty: they shot everybody-men, women, children, and the elderly-who tried to escape. As Puritan colonist William Bradford described the scene: "It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fire and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stink and scent thereof; but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they [the colonists] gave praise therof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully..."

The Narragansetts, up to that point "friends" of the colonists, were so shocked by this example of European-style warfare that they refused further alliances with the whites. Captain John Underhill ridiculed the Narragansetts for their unwillingness to engage in genocide, saying Narragansett wars with other tribes were "more for pastime, than to conquer and subdue enemies."

In that, Underhill was correct: the Narragansett form of war, like that of most indigenous Older Culture peoples, and almost all Native American tribes, does not have extermination of the opponent as a goal. After all, neighbors are necessary to trade with, to maintain a strong gene pool through intermarriage, and to insure cultural diversity. Most tribes wouldn't even want the lands of others, because they would have concerns about violating or entering the sacred or spirit-filled areas of the other tribes. Even the killing of "enemies" is not most often the goal of tribal "wars": It's most often to fight to some pre-determined measure of "victory" such as seizing a staff, crossing a particular line, or the first wounding or surrender of the opponent.

This wétiko type of theft and warfare is practiced daily by farmers and ranchers worldwide against wolves, coyotes, insects, animals and trees of the rainforest; and against indigenous tribes living in the jungles and rainforests. It is our way of life. It comes out of our foundational cultural notions. So it should not surprise us that with the doubling of the world's population over the past 37 years has come an explosion of violence and brutality, and as the United States runs low on oil, we are now fighting wars in oil-rich parts of the world.

That is, after all, our history, which we celebrate on Columbus Day. It need not be our future.

Excerpted and slightly edited from "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight: The Fate of the World and What We Can Do Before It's Too Late" by Thom Hartmann. www.thomhartmann.com

source: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1011-27.htm

Quote

"In the faces of men and women I see God."
~Walt Whitman

Quote

"Difference of opinion is helpful in religion."

~ Thomas Jefferson

On this Columbus Day (" most history gets told from the vantage point of the victors, not the vanquished " )

Genocide of the American Indian Peoples

The Anglo-American genocide of Indian peoples is actually part of the 500-year tradition of Hispanic genocide begun by the bestial, satanic “conquistadors” — which continues to this day.

The first section of this well-written and researched article by Peter Montague describes the horrific sadism of Christopher Columbus and his men. The second section describes the English/American tradition of genocide.

source: http://free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/usgenocide/IndianPeoples.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Published on Monday, October 11, 2004 by the Minneapolis Star-Tribune

Why Columbus Offers the Best History Lesson

by Warren Goldstein

 
Although I studied to be an American historian for a decade, it never occurred to me that one of the most important things I'd ever do in a classroom would be to teach about Christopher Columbus. For me, Columbus meant a three-day weekend.

But the unorthodox text I'd assigned in an introductory U.S. history course some years ago, Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States" -- since made famous by Matt Damon in the movie "Good Will Hunting" -- starts with Columbus, so I gave it a whirl.

Here's how Zinn begins: "Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder, emerged from their villages onto the island's beaches and swam out to get a closer look at the strange big boat."

Aside from its literary quality, the hint of Eden, and guesswork about the natives' state of mind, the passage asks us to look at the "discovery" upside-down: from the point of view of the people being "discovered."

Zinn tells the now familiar story of violence and mayhem and greed, how Columbus seized land and prisoners, embarked on a futile, relentless search for gold, finally, when that failed, took slaves.

According to the distinguished historian Samuel Eliot Morison, a Columbus admirer and biographer, "The cruel policy initiated by Columbus and pursued by his successors resulted in complete genocide."

Year after year, students are as deeply affected by this story as by anything else they learn during the course. Why?

First, they're embarrassed. After all, 1492 is one of the very few dates burned into their memories. At the drop of a hat they can all recite, sing-song, "In fourteen hundred and ninety-two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue." No such litany accompanies "In 1776 ... ."

Most are shocked to learn that relations between Columbus and the Indians were anything but trusting and peaceful. "But I thought they all had a big Thanksgiving dinner," one protested, confusing 1492 and 1621.

"Why weren't we told this?" they then want to know, initiating one of the most important discussions we have all semester. The answer, if simple, is far-reaching: because most history gets told from the vantage point of the victors, not the vanquished. Native Americans north and south lost their battles with Columbus, with Cortes and Pizarro and, later, with the United States of America. That's why our children learn that Columbus "discovered" rather than "invaded" America. (I once had a student raised in Puerto Rico, who told the class she'd learned that Columbus discovered American in 1492 but invaded Puerto Rico in 1493.)

Students go on: "What else weren't we told?" they demand to know. Another good question. The answer, of course, is plenty. Most important, their curiosity is engaged, and they begin seeing that history, like politics and the Constitution, has been a battleground, that much of what they've been taught is the result not of balanced analyses of the American past but of struggles over power and meaning that some groups won and others lost.

The Columbus story enables them to wonder why they learned the significance of the date 1620 (the landing of the Mayflower) but not the equally momentous 1619 -- the date African captives were first sold to North American colonists -- at Jamestown.

The point is not to make students feel guilty, but rather to help them think about their history -- and their present -- in a different light. They ask about other heroes. They realize that the history they've learned might not be adequate for an adult (or a child, for that matter). Those training to be teachers vow not to let Columbus become simply an occasion for cut-out hats and pretty pictures of the Niña, Pinta and Santa Maria.

Others worry about how to broach the subject in their families. "My father's from Italy," said one young man, "and there's no way I can tell him this. Just no way." To get this point across, and many want to, they have to think like teachers, which is never a bad exercise.

Months later I ask students to write down the most significant things they've learned in the course. Most come back to Columbus. It's rare that a teacher happens onto a single story that teaches so much, and engages students so thoroughly. I suspect the Knights of Columbus wouldn't approve, but I love Columbus Day.

Warren Goldstein, a former fellow of the University of Minnesota Humanities Institute, teaches American history and chairs the history department at the University of Hartford.

© 2004 Star Tribune
source: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1011-23.htm

Christopher Columbus: Hero or Terrorist ?

Was Christopher Columbus an adventurer who discovered America or was his actions more in line with the "exceeding dreadful" beast of Daniel 7:19. What really happened when Christopher Columbus came to America?

The event is fraught with misinformation. Let us start with the voyage itself. Contrary to the myth the weather was quite good and the Pinta, Nina and Santa Maria had clear sailing. This is confirmed by Columbus’ own journal. Second, the ships themselves were fully suited for their purposes and hardly the small tiny ships that we have been led to believe. Third, the voyage only took one month not two and the crew was not on the verge of near mutiny but were simply getting on each others' nerves. The Columbus biographer Samuel Eliot Morison confirms this.

Upon arriving the natives went out to meet Columbus. They were friendly and gregarious. How did Columbus react? Well he said, "I could conquer them with fifty men and govern them as I please." So he kidnapped several of them and took them back to Spain where they met the queen. This was enough, along with the promise of gold, to finance another voyage by Columbus.

When Columbus returned he demanded gold. To ensure cooperation those who refused or committed a minor offense had their nose and ears cut off. His men demanded their women for sexual purposes and raped them. Finally, the Arawaks had enough and resisted. This turned into an outright slaughter by Columbus. He turned his attack dogs loose who ripped the resisters apart. Finding no gold he captured about 1,500 natives, took them from their families and set off to Spain where 500 of them would die along the way. Now Columbus brought the name of God into the picture, "In the name of Holy Trinity, we can send from here all the slaves and brazil-wood which could be sold." Columbus acted in a manner that was more devil like than God like. How often are atrocities performed in the name of God? This is simply Satan working to deceive people.

But the worst was yet to come and Columbus instituted a reign of terror. He demanded that the natives pay the crown a tribute. Those who did not had their hands cut off. Pedro de Cordoro wrote back to the King about what was happening and said, "As a result of the sufferings and hard labor they have endured, the Indians choose and have chosen suicide." He went on to say that, rather than give birth, women killed themselves and their newborn infants. The men of Columbus brought with them diseases as well. This was an ecological disaster that caused the death of over 3,000,000 Arawaks in the course of fifty years. To fill the vacancy left by this, Columbus brought slaves from Africa. So, Columbus was directly responsible for the introduction of the slave trade to the New World. This was the start of capitalism. The Catholic Church backed this genocide and European rule replaced a Utopia. These are the thoughts of Sir Thomas More who challenged European hierarchy with the examples of the native Americans.

Christopher Columbus was an ungodly man who behaved more like the antichrist than an adventurer who wanted to prove to the "queen" that the world was round. Yet the United States honors this man with a holiday each year. The USA screams for Bin Laden's head (and rightly so) while at the same time having a national holiday for a terrorist. Ironic isn't it?

source: http://www.anunseenworld.com/christophercolumbus.html

Tuesday, July 27, 2004

"Where the rubbber meets the road" !

" Eventually, there is no safety in looking away, seeking the quiet life by ignoring the struggles
and oppression of others. "
President G.W. Bush-United Nations-Sept. 21, 2004

The above quote was printed in the Brownwood Bulletin - September 25, 2004 - Church Page Ad for Steves' Market and Deli
---------------------------------
Note from Steve: Mr President, I couldn’t agree more with your words !
------------------------------------
“ The focus of this statement is on hate crimes related to 9/11. We wish not to dismiss other acts of hate that have been leveled against people of color and the gay and lesbian community in Texas.
For one example, the ACLU, with local concerned citizens, is currently investigating a rash of hate crime in Brownwood, Texas. We suspect at least 10 hate crimes in that town alone-including murders and even murders of witnesses to those hate crimes. Local officials have repeatedly refused to investigate or prosecute these crimes according to the mandates of the the Hate Crimes Act. In one instance, a field officer drafted a crime report which clearly documented race as the motive of the violent crime. Nevertheless, the local District Attorney's office still refused to prosecute this at all, much less as a hate crime. Our conclusion is that the law alone is not enough. The Texas Attorney General, or some external body, must be vested with full authority to prosecute these crimes or at least monitor the law's enforcement in some meaningful way. ”

William Harrell, Esq. Executive Director, ACLU of Texas
To the House Judicial Affairs Committee Regarding
The Committee's Oversight of the Texas Attorney General's Office

August 15, 2002 San Antonio, Texas

source: House Judicial Affairs Committee
[PDF/Adobe Acrobat]
... the ACLU, with local concerned citizens, is currently investigating a rash of hate crime in Brownwood,. Texas. We ...

archive.aclu.org/news/2002/harrell_statement.pdf
------------------------------------------------------
Note:

Brown /Mills County District Attorney Sky Sudderth (Republican) resigned
May 24 as part of a plea agreement in which three felony indictments against him - charges of aggravated perjury, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and tampering with a government record - were dismissed.

source: http://www.woai.com/news/state/story.aspx?content_id=
2E2EB83E-DC23-42CF-A4CA-4EF22CF7777F

Quote

"In order to rally people, governments need enemies. They want us to be afraid, to hate, so we will rally behind them. And if they do not have a real enemy, they will invent one in order to mobilize us."

~ Thich Nhat Hanh

page 3 bwd hate crime#B581F


page 3 bwd hate crime#B581F
Originally uploaded by photosteve.

page 2 bwd hate crime#B581B


page 2 bwd hate crime#B581B
Originally uploaded by photosteve.

page 1 bwd hate crime#B5816


page 1 bwd hate crime#B5816
Originally uploaded by photosteve.

Friday, July 23, 2004

What about the "Draft" ?

Since 1973, America has relied on an all-volunteer military. But current retention issues, recruiting problems, and over-extension have pushed our armed forces to the limit. General Richard A. Cody recently told members of the House Armed Services Committee that our military has reached a breaking point. He stated, “Are we stretched thin with our active and reserve component forces right now? Absolutely.”
The next logical contingency for military planners is the draft (link). A recent poll called “The State of Our Nation’s Youth” by the Horatio Alger Association indicates that most high-school students believe that the government will restart the military draft during their lifetimes. Among teenagers, 55% say young Americans will be required to serve in the military, up from 45% last year.

for more facts please visit: http://www.optruth.org


------------------------

Letter to the editor - Dallas Morning News

Draft boards ready

Until recently, the law requiring young men to register with the Selective Service System seemed like an insurance policy – one that is wise to have but that you hope you never have to use. With the military stretched thin and facing recruiting and retention challenges, the possibility of having to use the draft seems more likely.
The same law that requires youths to register also established procedures for drafting people. But the rules are different than they were during the Vietnam era. This time the rules that allowed Vice President Dick Cheney to get student deferments don't exist. College seniors would finish the current school year; others would be deferred only until the end of the current semester.
If Congress activates the draft, then 20-year-old men would be called first. A lottery, by birth date as during the Vietnam draft, would be used to determine the sequence within each year. If there are not enough 20-year-olds in a year, then 21-year-olds would be called next, followed by those aged 22, 23, 24, 25, 19 and finally 18. Individual deferment requests could be heard by local boards.
Twenty-year-old men could start receiving orders to report for an armed forces examination within about two weeks of a draft being instituted.
Bernard Mayoff, member,Local board 031,
Selective Service System,
Richardson

Nation not serious

When the House rejected the draft by an astounding 402-2 vote this past week, I knew that the American people did not believe they are at war for their survival. They believed that 9-11 was a fluke and that all the alerts are scare tactics.
It will probably take an even larger 9-11 to convince Americans that this war on terrorism is a true war, that our Islamic enemy means to kill us in any way because we are the great Satan.
If Americans really believed that this was a war for survival, they would all be willing to put their sons and daughters in harm's way. You believe in a war only when you are willing to put everything on the line to win it.
The word "sacrifice" is never used by our leaders. Americans complain that this war costs too much as they go right on using millions of barrels of gas for their big cars. Oil feeds terrorists. This is a sure sign Americans do not believe that this is a war for survival because they sacrifice nothing.
Peter J. Riga, Houston


source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/letters/stories/101004dneditlet.70849.html

Quote

"A good heart is better than all the heads in the world."

~ Edward Bulwer-Lytton

" Drunk With Power "

The New York Times
October 2, 2004

DeLay Cases Could Imperil His Climb Within the House
By CARL HULSE and SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

WASHINGTON, Oct. 1 - Representative Tom DeLay, the majority leader rebuked by House ethics officials for pressuring a fellow member to switch his vote on a health care bill, still faces potentially more serious accusations, subjecting him to a new scrutiny that even some Republicans say could complicate his political future.

Mr. DeLay, the take-no-prisoners Texan known for maintaining strict discipline in his caucus, is entangled in a series of inquiries here and in Texas regarding his fund-raising and other activities. In Texas, three of his top aides have been indicted; in Washington, the House ethics panel is deciding whether to initiate a formal investigation.

On Friday, Republicans publicly rallied around their leader, though some said privately that the surprise ethics rebuke on Thursday - the second for Mr. DeLay, who was previously chastised for pressuring interest groups to hire Republicans - could hinder the leader if he tried to become speaker.

Democrats, who are already making Mr. DeLay an issue in their campaigns, attacked him on Friday for what Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, called a "continued abuse of power.'' She said there was "an ethical cloud over this Capitol because of how he is conducting business here.''

The fracas is evoking memories of past ethics battles that have roiled Capitol Hill, and contributed to the ouster of two previous House speakers, Jim Wright, a Democrat, and Newt Gingrich, a Republican. Both ultimately faced calls from their own party members to step down, which is not the case with Mr. DeLay.

"If there is any pattern, it is that whenever anybody gets in power and becomes an effective leader in Washington, the other side, rather than beating them with ideas and philosophy, does a flank movement on ethics charges,'' said Representative Jack Kingston of Georgia, the vice chairman of the House Republican Conference.

Mr. Kingston predicted that by Monday the ethics rebuke would be a "nonstory.''

But more than one Republican, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear they would anger their party's powerbroker, said Mr. DeLay's ethics history might make it difficult for him to become speaker someday.

"There are a lot of folks who want to see that happen, and they're a little depressed right now," one said.

A spokesman for Mr. DeLay, Stuart Roy, dismissed the Democratic criticism as politically motivated, and said the leader was not worried about the speaker's job. "He has said in the past that the only job he ever wanted was whip,'' Mr. Roy said, "and he has let everything else take care of itself.''

The rebuke, issued Thursday night, stems from last year's vote on the Medicare prescription drug bill. The committee found that as the bill appeared headed to defeat, Mr. DeLay offered to endorse the son of a Michigan congressman, Representative Nick Smith, in a Congressional primary in return for Mr. Smith's vote in favor of the measure. Mr. Smith, a Republican who considered the bill too expensive, refused; he was admonished for what the panel said was exaggerating the pressure and inducements made to him.

The bill passed; Mr. Smith's son lost the primary.

For the ethics panel, which is composed of five members of each party, investigating the House majority leader is a task so delicate that the panel made public its 62-page report practically under cover of darkness, dropping it off in the House press gallery without comment.

In fact, the House had been awaiting the ethics panel's decision on a separate complaint, filed by Representative Chris Bell, Democrat of Texas, that accuses Mr. DeLay of illegally soliciting campaign contributions, laundering campaign contributions to influence state legislative races and improperly using his office to influence federal agencies. An announcement could come as early as next week.

The admonishment was particularly surprising since Mr. DeLay had not figured prominently in the controversy surrounding Mr. Smith. "It is like a second hurricane," one Republican official said.

Some wondered if a trade was afoot - a public slap in the Smith case in exchange for a decision not to pursue Mr. Bell's complaint. Others said the ethics panel now had no choice but to look into those accusations.

"Mr. DeLay has a track record now in the ethics area, and it's a bad one," said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, a watchdog group that has called for the ethics panel to hire an independent counsel to investigate Mr. DeLay. "There's just no basis on which the House ethics committee can do anything now but seriously move forward with an investigation into the ethics complaint pending before it."

Democrats are encouraging their candidates to invoke Mr. DeLay's name in campaigns. Since the indictments, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has demanded that Republican candidates return donations from Mr. DeLay.

"He hasn't reached the stage of Newt Gingrich, but he has reached the center of gravity, where people do see him as representing the Republican Party in the House of Representatives, and as somebody who abused the rules of the House," said the committee's chairman, Representative Robert T. Matsui of California, in an interview on Friday.

source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/02/politics/
02delay.html?pagewanted=print&position=


------------------Letter to the editor - Waco Tribune----------------
Unholy alliance

McLennan County voters have a personal interest in last week's indictments of Tom DeLay's lieutenants (three officials in his political action committees) alleging criminal use of corporate money in gutting our electoral process.

What voters should know is that one of the willing recipients of money from DeLay's PACs is congressional candidate Arlene Wohlgemuth.

She got $1,000 from DeLay's Texans for a Republican Majority PAC for her state campaign. She grabbed another $10,000 from Americans for a Republican Majority PAC for her congressional campaign.

If the unholy alliance between government and wealth ever would seep into Wohlgemuth's sermons, her toes would be black and blue. Not since the Sharpstown stock-fraud scandal has Texas politics been this sullied.

For a man who warned parents in 2002 that Baylor and Texas A&M were not "godly" institutions, Tom DeLay has a peculiar double standard in his religious ethic.

Rev. Brian Burton

Dallas

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/newsfd/auto/feed/news/2004/10/05/1096954705.18121.8841.3284.html

--------------
Ethics panel rebukes DeLay second time in a week
By LARRY MARGASAK
Associated Press Writer
ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON — The House ethics committee Wednesday criticized House Majority Leader Tom DeLay for conduct that appeared to link political donations to legislation and for improperly contacting U.S. aviation authorities for political purposes, House sources said Wednesday.

The committee's findings were an extraordinary second rebuke of the Texas Republican's ethical conduct in just six days.

The committee of five Democrats and five Republicans deferred to Texas authorities allegations that DeLay violated state campaign finance rules.

The committee's findings — a letter admonishing his conduct — nonetheless spared him a lengthy investigation by the ethics panel.

Last Thursday the same committee, in an investigative report, admonished DeLay for offering to support the House candidacy of a Michigan lawmaker's son, in return for the lawmaker's vote for a Medicare prescription drug benefit.

The committee acted on a three-part complaint from Rep. Chris Bell, D-Texas. The allegations accused DeLay of soliciting political contributions from Westar Energy, a Kansas company, in return for legislative favors; violating Texas laws prohibiting corporate political donations; and improperly contacting aviation authorities to track down a plane carrying Texas Democratic legislators who were trying to defeat a DeLay-engineered congressional redistricting plan.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the report had not yet been released.

Westar executives made a $25,000 donation to an organization affiliated with DeLay just before attending a two-day get-together at a Virginia resort with the House GOP leader.

Described by a DeLay spokesman as "a golf fund-raising event," several executives from the Topeka-based company went to the 15,000-acre Homestead resort in early June 2002 for what participants said was an energy issues roundtable.

source: http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/gen/ap/DeLay_Ethics.html

Saturday, July 17, 2004

We Supported Colin Powell

    Powell Criticises Iraq Troop Levels and Rift with Europe
    By Robin Gedye
    The Telegraph U.K.

    Saturday 26 February 2005

Colin Powell, the former US secretary of state, has for the first time publicly criticised troops levels in Iraq and spoken of the rifts between himself and Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, that undermined his role as architect of American foreign policy.

    Mr Powell, in his first interview since resigning last November, also told The Telegraph of his "dismay" at the deterioration in relations between America and Europe and of his "disappointment" with France.

    While holding back from blaming Mr Rumsfeld by name for the problems that eventually persuaded him to resign, Mr Powell showed that much of the innuendo and leaks surrounding his volatile relationship with the defence secretary had been well-founded.

    Admitting that Mr Rumsfeld's controversial plan to fight the war with limited troop numbers had been an outstanding success, Mr Powell said the "nation building" that followed had been deeply flawed.

    There had been "enough troops for war but not for peace, for establishing order. My own preference would have been for more forces after the conflict."

    Mr Powell said he had warned President George W Bush over dinner in August 2002 that the problem with Iraq was not going to be the invasion but what followed.

    He told him: "This place will crack like a goblet and it will be a problem to pick up the bits. It was on this basis that he decided to let me see if we could find a United Nations solution to this."

    Mr Powell told Charles Moore, the former editor of The Telegraph who conducted the interview outside Washington, that he regretted the fall-out with Europe over the Iraq war.

    He also found Mr Rumsfeld's reference to "New Europe" and "Old Europe" unfortunate.

    "I never used the phrase," he said. "It just wasn't a useful construct. I don't think the president ever used it.

    "We've got a lot more work to do with European public opinion."

"A Reverse Brownwood Mafia " ? Steve Nash

A person can never get all the facts from just one newspaper, and unless you have all the facts, you cannot make proper judgements about what is going on. "
-Harry S Truman, Mr. Citizen, 1960

“ Nothing is so damaging to a government's legitimacy as the misuse of government power against innocent people.”

Dallas Morning News Editorial
Saturday October 23, 2004

Letter to the Editor,

" Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness, but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a came l !
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence....
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. Even so you too outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. "

Matthew 23: 23-25,27-28

Regarding Steve Nash’s Column “Gotta go” (Brownwood Bulletin - 02.26.04),
I ask “ Does every town have a reporter that tows the “ neighborly ” line ?
I agree with Mr Nash that the majority of law enforcement officials are professional, courteous and dedicated who are also brave, unheralded and often under-appreciated. We know them personally and have worked to help them in many ways. Cameras are now mounted in patrol cars which came about from recent racial profiling legislation. Bullet proof vests are now in compliance. Both of which, by the way, are safety and liability issues for this community.

I‘m also a realist and believe that when “injustice” is delivered by any member of the law enforcement community (local or otherwise), the damage to the community is tremendous because the “ faith and trust ” is broken with those members of the community (US Attorney General John Ashcroft refers to this as a “compound fracture”). Mr Nash describes these cases of headline grabbing injustice’s such as Tulia and many other communities across our state and country as “ sickening of course ”. Mr Nash obviously does not understand that “ local ” reporters often play a huge role in simply reporting what they are
“ fed ” and fail to be the “ check and balances ” of the community agencies charged with treating everyone equally, fairly and justly. I believe, based on my numerous experiences with Mr Nash, that Greg Palast said it best in his writing :

Things Like That Do Happen Here
The New York Times Sunday, June 7, 1998

“ Live here long enough and you discover that at the heart of small-town life there is special form of communal cowardice. It's called "being neighborly," a coded phrase for enforced silence about our sins, failures and nasty secrets. This small-town omerta enshrouds all acts, from child abuse to abuse of our countryside.”

I believe Mr Nash is often “being neighborly” via his reporting in the Brownwood Bulletin. Mr Palast’s writing, I believe, applies to “local reporters & publishers” as well as the community at large.

Do I trust Mr Nash’s reporting to give me the whole story ? Absolutely not ! I depend on the Abilene Reporter News, The Star Telegram, The Dallas Morning News and “ outside ” reporters (see Bill Crists Bulletin 2/22/04 column “ Balance of news makes for a tough call ” ) to report on the “obvious” local issues that Mr Nash does not accept as even a possibility !

“And by the way” Mr Nash, if working daily on “ justice for all ” issues in Brownwood & Brown County makes me a member of “ a subculture out there - a reverse Brownwood Mafia ” (your words to be exact !) then I’m perfectly ok with you defining me in such a manner: (Subculture-A group of people with shared value systems based on common life experiences and situations.). Maybe, just maybe, the work many of us are doing will prevent you, or one of your loved ones, from being targeted because of differences (real or perceived !).

Regarding Mr Nash’s “cute, compassionate and conservative” comments on hate crimes , I’ll reserve my comments for a later date and a different publication !

Regards,
Steve Harris

Friday, July 16, 2004

US 'Never' Had Enough Troops in Iraq: Bremer

Published on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 by Agence France Presse

US 'Never' Had Enough Troops in Iraq: Bremer

The former US governor of Iraq has admitted the United States "never" had enough ground troops in Iraq to establish firm control of the country, directly contradicting assertions by President George W. Bush and top Pentagon officials that the US military had what it needed to win the war.

Paul Bremer has admitted the United States "never" had enough ground troops in Iraq to establish firm control of the country, directly contradicting assertions by President George W. Bush and top Pentagon officials that the US military had what it needed to win the war. (AFP/POOL/Laszlo Balogh)
The admission, made in a speech Monday, was certain to add fuel to already heated exchanges between President George W. Bush and his Democratic rival, John Kerry, who has repeatedly accused th president of failing to adequately plan for post-war Iraq.

"We never had enough troops on the ground," Ambassador Paul Bremer told a conference of insurance professionals in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia.

He said the lack of adequate patrolling in the aftermath of the fall of Baghdad had resulted in what he called "horrid" looting.

"We paid a big price for not stopping it because it established an atmosphere of lawlessness," Bremer said.

The remarks echoed a charge made by the Massachusetts senator during the nationally-televised pre-election debate last Thursday, in which he insisted the administration had ignored pre-war advice even from top military professionals, including former Army chief of staff general Eric Shinseki.

Shinseki told Congress in February 2003 that the occupation of Iraq could require "several hundred thousand troops" -- only to be rebuked by his civilian boss, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz.

"Instead of listening to him, they retired him," Kerry fumed. "They didn't do the planning."

Bremer's remarks drew a stark contrast with repeated upbeat statements by Bush, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other top administration officials, who have insisted the United States had enough forces in Iraq.

About 133,000 US troops are currently deployed in Iraq, forming the bulk of an international coalition that toppled the government of Saddam Hussein, according to top defense officials. Other coalition forces have a total of 23,500 soldiers in the country.

The US failure to find alleged Iraqi weapons of mass destruction notwithstanding, Bremer said he agreed with Bush's decision to use force in Iraq because there was a "real possibility" Saddam Hussein might have provided these weapons to terrorist groups that had vowed to kill Americans.

"The status quo was simply untenable," he insisted. "I am more than ever convinced that regime change was the right thing to do."

He dismissed charges that the administration had no plans for post-war Iraq, but acknowledged that many of these plans were inadequate.

"There was planning, but planning for a situation that didnt arise," he said, mentioning pre-war fears of a large-scale refugee crisis or the possibility that Saddam Hussein might blow up Iraqs oil fields.

"Could it have been done better?" the former Iraq administrator went on to ask. "Frankly, I didnt spend a lot of time looking back."

In publicly acknowledging shortcomings in pre-war planning Bremer joins a long list of US officials and military experts, who have accused the administration of trying to conduct the war on the cheap -- and eschewing a politically nettlesome and expensive decision to boost the size of the military.

Republican Senator John McCain and his Democratic colleague, Joseph Biden, have been long campaigning to have least two new Army divisions added to the existing 10.

Retired General Barry McCaffrey, commander the 24th Mechanized Infantry Division during the 1991 Gulf War, has said the United States entered Iraq with a "grossly anemic" military force.

Even Rumsfeld, speaking in New York Monday, admitted that there were "some things that worked very well and some things that don't work quite so well" in Iraq.

source: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1005-02.htm

Quote

"Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd."

~ Bertrand Russell

"Nobody can just violate Texas law, brag about it and then get away with it."

October 11, 2004 New York Times
In Texas Case Linked to DeLay, Prosecutor Welcomes Spotlight
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL

AUSTIN, Tex. - A man who once thought he recognized Ronnie Earle in a restaurant sent a waitress over to ask "if you're the district eternity of Austin."

It can sure seem that way to voters here in the Texas capital. Mr. Earle, 62, has been the Travis County prosecutor since Jimmy Carter won the White House and is now running without major opposition for an eighth four-year term.

In that time, Mr. Earle, a onetime Eagle Scout who is not above sharp-elbowing his adversaries, has collected the scalps of prominent fellow Democrats as well as Republicans, while managing to fend off attacks on his own. And as if an embodiment of the city's unofficial slogan, "Keep Austin Weird," he once even prosecuted himself.

Now, having put off dreams of retirement and a return to his small ranch outside Austin to chop cedar, Mr. Earle is in the spotlight as he pursues a case with ties to one of the most powerful Republicans in the country, Representative Tom DeLay, whose ethical problems in Washington - the biggest faced by any House majority leader since Newt Gingrich in 1998 - could help Democratic House candidates.

The Travis County case, which Mr. Earle calls the most important of his career, involves corporate contributions that he says were used to illegally shape Texas politics. "I honestly think the future of democracy is at stake," he said in an interview in his unadorned office near the Capitol.

On Sept. 21, after nearly two years of investigation, the latest of three successive grand juries indicted three top fund-raisers and eight corporate givers for contributions to the political action committee of Texans for a Republican Majority, a group that is linked to Mr. DeLay, of the Houston suburb of Sugar Land, and Tom Craddick of Midland, a fellow Republican who is speaker of the Texas House. The charge is funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars in illicit corporate money to Republican statehouse candidates in 2002.

The candidates' victories set off a redistricting effort to solidify Republican control of Congress in 2004. "Clearly corporate money was used in political campaigns, and that's against the law," Mr. Earle said.

The Texas Association of Business, another group involved in the inquiry, boasted in a 2002 newsletter that it "blew the doors off the Nov. 5 general election using an unprecedented show of muscle that featured political contributions and a massive voter education drive."

Mr. Earle said, "Nobody can just violate Texas law, brag about it and then get away with it."

To no one's surprise, his inquiry has plunged Mr. Earle into the kind of politically charged melee that has marked much of his career.

Mr. DeLay, who along with Mr. Craddick and the defendants have denied wrongdoing and denounced the charges as election-inspired, called Mr. Earle a "runaway district attorney" with "a long history of being vindictive and partisan," to which Mr. Earle retorted, "Being called vindictive and partisan by Tom DeLay is like being called ugly by a frog."

"The only people I antagonize more than Republicans are Democrats," Mr. Earle said later. He said the record showed he had prosecuted 12 Democratic officials and 4 Republican officials, although for much of his time in office, he acknowledged, Republicans were on the outs. "We prosecute abuses of power," he said, "and you have to have power to abuse it."

With a fourth grand jury taking up the investigation in October, Mr. Earle declined to say whether it was headed to Mr. DeLay. "It goes where it's going," he said. "Anybody who's committed a crime is a target."

[Mr. DeLay is already under attack in Washington, where the House ethics panel admonished him twice in a week. On Sept. 30 he was rebuked for trying to trade a favor for a congressman's vote on a health care bill. On Oct. 6 he was scolded for engaging in fund-raising activities that created the appearance of impropriety and for using his position to exert influence over a federal agency for political gain.]

Mr. Earle went to work for Gov. John Connally after law school and was appointed a night judge in Austin municipal court. In 1973 he won a special election for a vacancy in the Texas House.

In 1976 he left to run a winning race for district attorney, and he has kept on winning since. When Lloyd Bentsen's appointment as Treasury secretary in 1993 opened up a Senate seat, Mr. Earle said he briefly fancied himself in Washington. "By the time I got out of the shower," he said, "I was feeling positively senatorial." But Ann Richards, then the governor, selected another Democrat.

Mr. Earle said the events had nothing to do with his decision in 1994 to prosecute Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, the former Republican state treasurer who won the special election for the Senate in 1993, on charges of having misused her state office for political gain.

With no assurance that the judge would admit the prosecution's evidence, Mr. Earle refused to open his case in court, leading to a directed acquittal. Then, seizing on an invitation by Ms. Hutchison at a news conference to make available "all the correspondence and my thank-you notes for flowers," he led reporters on a tour of the evidence he was not able to present in court.

Ms. Hutchison, who won the election, has not forgotten, her spokesman, Kevin Schweers, said. "It was a nakedly partisan attempt to win a Senate seat in the courtroom rather than the ballot box," Mr. Schweers said, saying it cast a cloud over Mr. Earle's actions in the current contributions inquiry.

Mr. Earle disputed the charge. "I did at the time what I thought was right,'' he said.

Dick DeGuerin, the lawyer who represented Ms. Hutchison, called the prosecution "just an excuse to prevent her from being elected" and said Mr. Earle got pressure from Ms. Richards and other Democrats after Mr. DeGuerin moved to subpoena telephone logs of the governor and the Democrats to show they ran their offices the same way Ms. Hutchison did.

Mr. Earle denied any pressure from Ms. Richards to drop the case. At any rate he had also clashed with her a few years before on an ethics bill that she signed but that he called "a new rug to sweep things under."

Mr. Earle has been recognized as an innovator for working, sometimes with his wife, Twila, to mobilize communities to fight crime. "Mostly, I got tired of waiting for something terrible to happen before I could do anything," Mr. Earle told a 2002 conference on drugs at Rice University.

Meanwhile, he racked up some other prominent prosecutions of Democrats, winning a guilty plea for misuse of office against State Treasurer Warren G. Harding in 1982; a guilty plea on financial disclosure violations from the Texas House speaker, Gib Lewis, in 1992; and various convictions against state legislators of both parties. But he lost a felony bribery case against Attorney General Jim Maddox, a Democrat, acquitted in 1985.

He took considerable heat in the 1990's for his capital murder prosecution of an 11-year-old Austin girl, LaCresha Murray, charged with killing a toddler in her care. Two convictions were successively overturned, in part over disputes about the girl's statements to the police.

The girl's supporters said she was railroaded, but Mr. Earle said the facts permitted him no other course.

Among those he successfully prosecuted was himself. As he announced in a news release on March 14, 1983: "I have discovered that my officeholder campaign finance reports were not filed for 1981 and 1982." He filed them belatedly, he said, apologizing to his constituents for the misdemeanor and adding: "I have today caused a complaint to be filed against me in this matter and this afternoon I expect to pay a fine assessed by the court." It came to $212, including court costs.

source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/11/national/11earle.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print&position=
---------------------
No Speaker DeLay: Ethics rulings should cap majority leader's rise

01:31 AM CDT on Tuesday, October 12, 2004-Dallas Morning News Editorial

GOP House Majority Leader Tom DeLay escaped an independent counsel investigation last week. But the Texas Republican's now damaged goods. It's hard to see him ever becoming speaker of the House.
The House voted along party lines to reject siccing an outside counsel on Rep. DeLay. That's just as well. The vote was a Democratic trick to get Republicans to support their controversial colleague, knowing they could use the vote against Republicans in tight congressional races.
An outside counsel's not necessary because the House ethics committee has all but stopped the Sugar Land representative's rise to the speaker's job. Look at the panel's vote. All 10 members of the panel, which included five Republicans and five Democrats, supported rebuking Mr. DeLay for three violations.
The committee got him for offering an endorsement for a colleague's vote. They slapped him for using a federal agency to track down Texas Democrats during last year's redistricting debate. And they reprimanded him for appearing to give donors access before an energy bill debate.
When you add those rulings to the two warnings Mr. DeLay drew during the 1990s for retaliating against a lobbyist and soliciting contributions on federal property, the man's got a problem. Even sympathetic Republicans would have a hard time voting for a speaker candidate with five citations.
Sure, the skillful legislator has built up chits. That's partly because the conservative's been pragmatic enough to reward both conservative and moderate Republicans. The Hammer's not all firebrand.
But the sheer volume of charges is hard to ignore. It smacks of a pattern of abuse. Worse, it reveals a contempt for how the House should work. This business of getting an agency to track down Texas Democrats was about as brazen as it gets.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/101204dnedidelay.8ddba.html

Friday, July 09, 2004

Quote

"He drew a circle that shut me out -- Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout. But love and I had the wit to win: We drew a circle that took him in."

~ Edwin Markham