Steve's Soapbox

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Senator Hillary Clinton & Brownwood Soldier In Need of Help

The following request for help was sent to Texas Republican Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn and to Brownwood's Congressman, Republican Mike Conaway at www.congress.org. After noticing the failure of this request to be publicly posted, I decided to request help from Senator Clinton. Below is the request posted on Senator Clinton's site:
--------------------
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY)
1st-term Democrat from New York.
· More Letters to
Sen. Clinton

· Search All
Letters

Letters To Leaders
All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Defense/Military:
Subject:
Can you help this Texas Soldier in Need

To:
Sen. Hillary Clinton

June 30, 2005

Dear Senator, We are asking that you please see what you can do to help this soldier and his family. The following story was thankfully published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram:

Posted on Sun, Jun. 26, 2005

A war within
A GI's story illustrates the challenges the military faces in delivering mental health services to troubled soldiers
By Chris Vaughn
Star-Telegram Staff Writer
BROWNWOOD - Pfc. Jacob Hounshell wrote his goodbye on notebook paper, wrapped it around a photo of himself in uniform, left it on his bed and climbed into his pickup. ¶ He was supposed to be heading back to Fort Hood. But he had no plans to make it that far. He'd already figured out what he would do -- drive as fast as he could into an oncoming 18-wheeler. ¶ Less than three months after returning from a 14-month hitch in Iraq, Hounshell had come undone.

He could barely remember the excitement he carried to Iraq in early 2004. He was an excellent soldier, by most accounts, even though he was only 18 when he left. On one memorable night, his quick thinking helped his platoon defeat a group of insurgents in Baghdad.

Today, the same soldier, now 20, is wanted for desertion, a particularly loathsome act during wartime and one that could bring a prison sentence.

Hounshell's problems began after he returned to Texas in late February. He couldn't sleep, often wandering through Killeen's all-night Wal-Mart. He had panic attacks and sometimes exploded in anger at the slightest change in plans. He played chicken with other drivers on Central Texas highways.

When he asked the Army for help, he said, he was greeted mostly with indifference.

"I told them numerous times, 'I'm having problems here. I'm seeing ... [things] at night.' They didn't take it seriously," he said. "They did the minimum thing they had to do."

Finally, in May, at the end of an emergency leave, he vowed never to go back to Fort Hood.

It was May 15 when he wrote the suicide note. His mother found it before he could leave the driveway. She jumped in the pickup and wouldn't let him leave.

His family is desperate to get him help, but they have no idea where to turn.

"We're not trying to hurt our soldiers overseas, and we didn't want this fight with the Army," said his mother, Bobbie Hounshell. "But my son had problems when he came home, and all he was told was, 'Drive on.' "
rest of the story @ http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/state/11990650.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp
---------------------------
On behalf of The Brownwood Human Rights Committee and other concerned residents of Central Texas, I urge you to help this family, and our neighbors, who are in need.

Regards,
Steve Harris
Brownwood Human Rights Committee

brownwood , TX
  • read the post here...
  • "Speechless" on the Brownwood Airwaves !

    I have never heard Brownwood's Talk Radio Owner, Phil Watts, speechless until today. After a week of calling the recent supreme court ruling regarding eminent domain as "communist & unchristian and the fault of the Democrats and Liberals", when several callers have pointed out that this is exactly what George Bush and his business partners utilized in Arlington Texas in the building of Texas Rangers Stadium, Phil and Jessee Jones go speechless and change the topic post haste. So when all of these "Neo-con Bush Supporting Republicans" (heard on KXYL) call this ruling "communist and unchristian" they don't even realize that they are speaking to the character of their President ! I'm not surprised that Phil and his followers don't want to really explore the topic and would choose to talk about "Hollywood" Movies ! The KXYL Cornpone is Stale ! " You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is." - Mark Twain
  • read more here...

  • ------------------
  • read more here...
  • Tuesday, June 28, 2005

    KXYL's James Williamson's Propoganda & Urban Legends

  • read more here...
  • Just imagine how Brownwood Talk Radio Hosts & Students would treat him ?

    After combat, sailor redraws battle lines

    Charlie Anderson hands out information at a table in front of the Naro theater in Norfolk this month. Not all passers-by supported his cause, though 50 or so signed up for information. CHRIS TYREE PHOTOS/THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT
    By KATE WILTROUT, The Virginian-Pilot
    © June 27, 2005
    VIRGINIA BEACH — Against the marbled greens of Charlie Anderson’s camouflage shirt rest a handful of brightly colored ribbons .
    They represent nine years as a Navy hospital corpsman: individual commendation, good conduct, combat action, service in national defense, the war on terror, deployment at sea. Another set of colorful rectangles – bumper stickers – plastered to the gate of Anderson’s pickup exhibit a far different sentiment.
    “Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam.” “I love my country but fear my government.” “What liberal media?” “Lead, follow or get out of the way.”
    Anderson, who left the Navy in March as a petty officer second class and lives in Virginia Beach, embodies both displays. He is both a combat veteran and an outspoken opponent of the war in Iraq.
    Being an anti-war activist in a pro-military region has its challenges, but Anderson, 28 , isn’t deterred.
    “This is where the veterans are,” said Anderson, southeastern coordinator for Iraq Veterans Against the War . “There is somebody like me in every unit. They’re just waiting for somebody to invite them out.”
    His views may reflect what appears to be broader disillusionment with the war.
  • read more here...
  • Difficult Issues in Brownwood Left to Outside Media to explore !

    Bush Budget Shortchanges Vets
    By Michael Standaert and Josh Wilson
    from The New Hampshire Gazette Vol 249, No 12, March 11, 2005
  • read more here...

  • ---------------------------

    " All issues are Local " but are not always coverd by local media !


    Posted on Sun, Jun. 26, 2005
    Fort Worth STAR-TELEGRAM/TOM PENNINGTON

    A war within
    A GI's story illustrates the challenges the military faces in delivering mental health services to troubled soldiers
    By Chris Vaughn
    Star-Telegram Staff Writer

    BROWNWOOD - Pfc. Jacob Hounshell wrote his goodbye on notebook paper, wrapped it around a photo of himself in uniform, left it on his bed and climbed into his pickup. ¶ He was supposed to be heading back to Fort Hood. But he had no plans to make it that far. He'd already figured out what he would do -- drive as fast as he could into an oncoming 18-wheeler. ¶ Less than three months after returning from a 14-month hitch in Iraq, Hounshell had come undone.
    He could barely remember the excitement he carried to Iraq in early 2004. He was an excellent soldier, by most accounts, even though he was only 18 when he left. On one memorable night, his quick thinking helped his platoon defeat a group of insurgents in Baghdad.
    Today, the same soldier, now 20, is wanted for desertion, a particularly loathsome act during wartime and one that could bring a prison sentence.
    Hounshell's problems began after he returned to Texas in late February. He couldn't sleep, often wandering through Killeen's all-night Wal-Mart. He had panic attacks and sometimes exploded in anger at the slightest change in plans. He played chicken with other drivers on Central Texas highways.
    When he asked the Army for help, he said, he was greeted mostly with indifference.
    "I told them numerous times, 'I'm having problems here. I'm seeing ... [things] at night.' They didn't take it seriously," he said. "They did the minimum thing they had to do."
    Finally, in May, at the end of an emergency leave, he vowed never to go back to Fort Hood.
    It was May 15 when he wrote the suicide note. His mother found it before he could leave the driveway. She jumped in the pickup and wouldn't let him leave.
    His family is desperate to get him help, but they have no idea where to turn.
    "We're not trying to hurt our soldiers overseas, and we didn't want this fight with the Army," said his mother, Bobbie Hounshell. "But my son had problems when he came home, and all he was told was, 'Drive on.' "
    An Army spokesman said Hounshell got help and should have taken the initiative if he needed more. His commander took his situation seriously enough to begin the process of discharging him early, Maj. Scott Bleichwehl said.
    "The bottom line is, he got the counseling," said Bleichwehl, spokesman for the 1st Cavalry Division, to which Hounshell was assigned. "He had the attention of the command. He had access to all the services and counseling that all soldiers do.
    "The vast majority of our soldiers make the right decisions, and they don't go AWOL."
    Whatever happened to Pfc. Hounshell, his story illustrates a challenge facing the U.S. military amid the first massive, extended deployment of troops in a war zone since Vietnam.
    Thousands of soldiers are returning home mentally and emotionally spent, some of them with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
    The Pentagon is making unprecedented efforts to help them deal with the trauma, including sending counselors to the battlefield. But the military's culture keeps many troops from seeking help, fearful of being labeled weak or damaging their careers.
    "Some commands are sensitive to the fact that not everybody is Superman," said Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resource Center in Silver Spring, Md., and a retired Army Ranger. "But those soldiers that do need help should not be belittled. They should not feel as if the military does not support them.
    "Because none of us should forget that the soldier supported the nation."
    Soldiers' symptoms
    American troops in Iraq are dealing with an unpredictable and unseen enemy, close-up urban fighting, complicated rules of engagement and yearlong deployments. The conditions have taken a toll on many soldiers and Marines on a scale not seen since the late 1960s.
    One in six soldiers and Marines reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression or anxiety after deployment in Iraq, according to researchers at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Maryland. The findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine last summer.
    Things might be worse now, some experts said.
    Walter Reed conducted its survey in 2003, well before the insurgency escalated and before the deadly Sadr City uprising and the bloody attack on Fallujah in 2004.
    The Army is trying new approaches in the field of mental health, including sending professionals to Iraq for on-scene counseling and quizzing every soldier about potential problems when they come home -- part of a process known as reintegration training.
    But several advocates for soldiers said getting help still requires a sympathetic chain of command, which is not always present in the Army's warrior culture.
    A majority of soldiers who reported mental health problems in the Walter Reed study said they had no intention of seeking help because they would be viewed as weak, their commanders would blame them or their leaders would treat them differently.
    Martha Rudd, an Army spokeswoman at the Pentagon, said the Army's leaders are working to lessen the fear of stigma.
    "Command influence is the most powerful tool," she said. "When a commander tells his staff that something is important to him, they will pay attention to it. That's the way the Army works."
    Deploying to Iraq
    Hounshell enlisted in June 2003, eager to follow in the footsteps of his grandfather, who fought in World War II. He selected the infantry, knowing that he would go straight to Iraq.
    The thought of war excited him. He was, after all, a kid from a sleepy farming community north of Brownwood. His town, May, had one blinking traffic light.
    Hounshell flew out of Fort Hood on Jan. 9, 2004, with a cast on his right foot. He had broken his ankle in a fight during Christmas break and needed crutches to climb the stairs to the plane.
    He trained for almost a month in Kuwait until his unit -- D Troop, 9th Cavalry Regiment -- prepared to move into Iraq at the beginning of February. It took them three days to drive to Baghdad, escorting a group of non-combat Army units.
    Hounshell drove a Humvee the entire trip, braking with his left foot because of the cast on his right.
    In Baghdad, Hounshell monitored the radios and did desk jobs in the headquarters platoon until his cast came off in late March.
    His commanders told him he'd be going to 1st Platoon and driving for a highly experienced combat veteran and sniper, Sgt. Daniel Osborne.
    "Me and him got along great," he said. "We were both from Texas. He was older, probably in his late 20s, and he knew a lot. He'd been on, like, seven combat deployments. He was an ex-Marine. I didn't have to watch what I said with him. I trusted him."
    Their newfound friendship was forged April 8.
    Five trucks and 18 soldiers were patrolling an area north of Abu Ghraib in Baghdad, "an area in constant combat between Coalition and anti-Iraqi Forces," according to the Army's report of the incident.
    At 9:15 p.m., the lead truck spotted 20 insurgents armed with rocket-propelled grenades and rifles preparing a roadside bomb. The platoon attacked. Osborne did not have a night-vision scope on his rifle and couldn't see.
    Hounshell gathered all of the flares from the platoon and shot them into the air with his grenade launcher, a tactic that no one had taught him.
    Osborne, suddenly able to see, killed six insurgents, and the platoon captured numerous weapons as well as bomb-making material.
    "Hounshell was directly responsible for the platoon's victory," read the citation for an Army Commendation, signed by his company commander.
    His picture appeared in Stars and Stripes after he and another soldier stopped a car carrying makeshift bombs, and his father proudly recounted his son's wartime exploits in the Brownwood Bulletin newspaper.
    Louis Vivian was a sergeant in D Troop during the Iraqi deployment and remembers Hounshell favorably.
    "I thought he was a good soldier," Vivian said. "He followed orders."
    On his 19th birthday, Hounshell received a four-day pass to relax in the "Green Zone" of Baghdad, where he ate a whipped cream pie and called his mother during a mortar attack.
    "I never had any problems over there," he said.
    Still, it was a war zone, and 2004 was a tough year for the 1st Cav and its units.
    Hounshell rolled down "IED alley" virtually every day, waiting to see which coalition vehicle would be the target of a roadside bomb, or "improvised explosive device," as the Army calls them. He picked up the rotting bodies of Iraqis killed for collaborating with the Americans.
    He stood guard at roadblocks, wondering whether the next car might carry a suicide bomber or if he might get in trouble for shooting an innocent civilian who made a threatening gesture.
    He killed people, too. He keeps a photograph of his first in the back of his scrapbook.
    Seeking help
    Once back home, in late February, he couldn't sleep or eat at first. Then, during his scheduled leave in March, he began jumping at loud noises. He screamed at his family for inexplicable reasons and had panic attacks in crowds.
    "His 30-day leave here was a nightmare," his mother said.
    In early April, he was hospitalized in Brownwood for a bacterial infection in his intestines, his family said.
    About a week later, his mother met with D Troop's first sergeant, William C. Davis. Her son was under tremendous stress, she told Davis, struggling to adjust after Iraq and weighed down by a series of medical crises in his family.
    The meeting, as she described it, did not go well. Davis, she said, was curt and seemed disinterested. Frustrated, she cursed at him and went with her son to a psychiatrist on post, she said.
    Hounshell said he answered a series of questions on a computer and was told that he had three disorders, including paranoid schizophrenia. The doctor, he said, told him she would forward her recommendations to his company commander, Capt. William O. Hickok.
    "I never saw any paperwork, though," he said. "She told me she couldn't let me see it."
    Shortly after, he went to see an Army chaplain, at the suggestion of his commander.
    "He told me the same crap -- you're OK. It'll pass. There's nothing wrong. If you need someone to talk to, call this hot line," Hounshell said. "It was the same crap they give you at reintegration training."
    At the same time, family pressures were bearing down on Hounshell.
    His older brother's first child was stillborn, and he didn't get permission to attend the funeral. His father had gallbladder surgery. His mother had to quit her job at a dry cleaners to handle the family's medical problems.
    His commanders, he said, were unsympathetic.
    "The Army says they support families," Hounshell said. "It's true, if you're married. They'll bend over backward to support a soldier who's married. But if your family is your parents, your family don't matter."
    The Army declined to make Davis or Hickok available for an interview. Hickok responded generally to questions through Bleichwehl, the division's public affairs officer.
    Bleichwehl said he would not engage in a "he said, she said" regarding Hounshell's account. But he said Hounshell's commanders communicated often with him and tried to help, including granting the emergency leave in early May.
    "He's had access to all the same post-deployment training and services that all soldiers do," Bleichwehl said. "If he wasn't getting it, there are recourses other than going AWOL.
    "You could call the IG [inspector general]. You could call the 800 numbers. You could go to the walk-in clinic. It's ludicrous to say that they prevented him from doing any of it."
    Hounshell was also told that he was "being processed for separation," a non-punitive method of granting soldiers an early release from their enlistment, Bleichwehl said.
    It sometimes happens, officials said, when a soldier is no longer fit for duty. They are told to seek care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, said Jaime Cavazos, a spokesman for the Army Medical Command in San Antonio.
    "It's not a case of the military wanting to get rid of the individual," he said. "If the Army has done what it can, at some point the decision is made to refer them to the VA. ... We're interested in caring for soldiers. We wouldn't have all these programs in place if we didn't."
    But Robinson, of the National Gulf War Resource Center, said that, too often, busy top sergeants and commanders in front-line combat units expect soldiers "to buck up and move on." Junior enlisted troops are in no position to say otherwise, he said.
    "What the Army has to recognize -- and I was part of the Army -- [is] that we have this mentality that 'if I can't use you, you're not worth anything to me,' " Robinson said. "But you want these guys to recover. You want to help them recover. There is treatment and care to get these guys back on their feet."
    Going AWOL
    Hounshell went AWOL a few weeks before he probably would have been discharged.
    After he contemplated suicide, his parents sought help at a hospital in San Angelo but said they were told that the hospital couldn't admit an AWOL service member unless given approval by the soldier's commander.
    A hospital spokeswoman said last week that she was unaware of such a policy.
    It's unclear what will happen now.
    "I want my son back," Bobbie Hounshell said. "I'm a strong woman, but this is very hard. He deserves a normal life."
    Hounshell mostly spends his days tinkering with electronics and doing odd jobs for petty cash. He began using methamphetamine, he said, because it's the only thing that helps him control his anxiety.
    His family is in financial difficulty. Jacob Hounshell had been the primary wage earner, his parents said, and his father, Larry, is disabled and doesn't work.
    His military health benefits and pay ceased when he went AWOL, so he has yet to see a mental health professional or drug treatment counselor. He probably ruined his chances of receiving care from the VA, which does not treat veterans who have been dishonorably discharged.
    He knows there will eventually be other consequences.
    "What happens to me, I don't care," he said. "But I want parents to know that the Army is not helping their kids the way they're supposed to. You're a piece of equipment to the Army. If you're broke, they throw you away."
    IN THE KNOW
    Casualties of war
    Conditions in Iraq -- including close-in urban warfare, harassment from a sometimes-invisible enemy and longer tours of duty -- have created tremendous stress for U.S. troops on the battlefield, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs and a study by Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
    "Taken together, these unique features of the war in Iraq create the conditions whereby stress hormones are released excessively, with unknown, but likely significant, consequences regarding health maintenance, restoration and coping capacity," said Brett T. Litz, author of a VA report.
    Here are some facts about the toll on today's military:
    • Almost 20 percent of soldiers and 17 percent of Marines qualified as having "moderate or severe" mental health problems when surveyed in late 2003 after returning from Iraq.
    • Of those, 65 percent said they would not seek help because they would be seen as weak, and 51 percent said their leaders would blame them for the problem. "Rather than focusing on their medical needs, they must weigh the risk of self-reporting mental health concerns and the possible career stigma attached to it. The military is aware of service members' fears of career stigma, but to date has not broken down this crucial barrier to care," wrote Steve Robinson of the National Gulf War Resource Center in a report titled Hidden Toll of the War in Iraq.
    • One of the most common illnesses is post-traumatic stress disorder, which results from exposure to an extreme stress involving threat of death or serious injury. The trauma, although most often associated with combat, can also happen after rapes or other violent crimes.
    • Symptoms of PTSD include sleeplessness, extreme anxiety or hyperalertness, frightening dreams, depression, social withdrawal and outbursts of anger.
    • Studies suggest that most people who experience even horrifying combat adjust, adapt and do well in life. But others, particularly if the PTSD is untreated, are more likely to be unemployed, have lower incomes, show poor problem-solving capabilities, express violent tendencies and use more government and medical services in their lives, a VA study said.
    • Through April 2005, the Army had evacuated 1,118 soldiers from Iraq for psychiatric reasons, mostly depression, PTSD and suicidal thoughts. That represented 6 percent of the total medical evacuations. The Army prefers to treat and counsel soldiers in Iraq, as close to their units as possible.
    • The Department of Veterans Affairs has treated and/or counseled 6,400 men and women for PTSD who served in Iraq or Afghanistan and are no longer in the military.
    • The Army's suicide rate fell from 12.8 per 100,000 in 2003 to 11 in 2004. So far this year, the rate is 6.7. The Marine Corps' rate rose from 13.8 in 2003 to 16.6 in 2004. So far this year, the rate is 14.7.
    • Forty soldiers and nine Marines have committed suicide in Iraq since March 2003. At least 20 soldiers and 23 Marines have committed suicide after returning from Iraq.
    • Most of those troops commit suicide at their home installations, and the majority use firearms. The largest number of suicides were in two age categories -- 21 to 25 and 36 to 40.
    • Desertions -- defined as being absent without leave for longer than 30 days -- have decreased significantly in recent years. In 2001, 4,597 soldiers deserted. In 2003, 3,680 deserted. In 2004, the number had dropped to 2,436.

    Chris Vaughn, (817) 390-7547 cvaughn@star-telegram.com
    source: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/state/11990650.htm

    Republicans " We fiddle while Rome burns. "

    June 26, 2005
    Guest Viewpoint: The party's over for betrayed Republican
    By James Chaney

    As of today, after 25 years, I am no longer a Republican.
    I take this step with deep regret, and with a deep sense of betrayal.
    I still believe in the vast power of markets to inspire ideas, motivate solutions and eliminate waste. I still believe in international vigilance and a strong defense, because this world will always be home to people who will avidly seek to take or destroy what we have built as a nation. I still believe in the protection of individuals and businesses from the influence and expense of an over-involved government. I still believe in the hand-in-hand concepts of separation of church and state and absolute freedom to worship, in the rights of the states to govern themselves without undo federal interference, and in the host of other things that defined me as a Republican.
    My problem is this: I believe in principles and ideals which my party has systematically discarded in the last 10 years.
    My Republican Party was the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Barry Goldwater, and George H.W. Bush. It was a party of honesty and accountability. It was a party of tolerance, and practicality and honor. It was a party that faced facts and dealt with reality, and that crafted common-sense solutions to problems based on the facts as they were, not as we wished them to be, or even worse, as we made them up. It was a party that told the truth, even when the truth came hard. And now, it is none of those things.
    Fifty years from now, the Republican Party of this era will be judged by how we provided for the nation's future on three core issues: how we led the world on the environment, how we minded the business of running our country in such a way that we didn't go bankrupt, and whether we gracefully accepted our place on the world's stage as its only superpower. Sadly, we have built the foundation for dismal failure on all three counts. And we've done it in such a way that we shouldn't be surprised if neither the American people nor the world ever trusts us again.
    My party has repeatedly ignored, discarded and even invented science to suit its needs, most spectacularly as to global warming. We have an opportunity and the responsibility to lead the world on this issue, but instead we've chosen greed, shortsightedness and deliberate ignorance.
    We have mortgaged the country's fiscal future in a way that no Democratic Congress or administration ever did, and to justify the tax cuts that brought us here, we've simply changed the rules. I matured as a Republican believing that uncontrolled deficit spending is harmful and irresponsible; I still do. But the party has yet to explain to me why it's a good thing now, other than to say "... because we say so."
    Our greatest failure, though, has been in our role as superpower. This world needs justice, democracy and compassion, and as the keystone of those things, it needs one thing above all else: truth.
    Republican decisions made in 2002 and 2003 have killed almost 2,000 of the most capable patriots our country has to offer - volunteers, every one. Support for those decisions was gathered through what appeared at the time to be spin and marketing, but which now turns out to have been deliberate planning and falsehood. The Blair government's internal documentation only confirms what has been suspected for years: Americans are dying every day for Republican lies first crafted in 2002, expanded and embellished upon in 2003, and which continue to this day. This calculated deception is now burned into the legacy of the party, every bit as much as Reagan's triumph in the Cold War, or Nixon's disgrace over Watergate.
    I could go on and on - about how we have compromised our international integrity by sanctioning torture, about how we are systematically dismantling the civil liberties that it took us two centuries to define and preserve, and about how we have substituted bullying, brinksmanship and "staying on message" for real political discourse - but those three issues are enough.
    We're poisoning our planet through gluttony and ignorance.
    We're teetering on the brink of self-inflicted insolvency.
    We're selfishly and needlessly sacrificing the best of a generation.
    And we're lying about it.
    While it has compiled this record of failure and deception, the party which I'm leaving today has spent its time, energy and political capital trying to save Terri Schiavo, battling the threat of single-sex unions, fighting medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide, manufacturing political crises over presidential nominees, and selling privatized Social Security to an America that isn't buying. We fiddle while Rome burns.
    Enough is enough. I quit.

    James Chaney is a Eugene attorney who has been in private practice for more than 20 years, and who has been a registered Republican since 1980.

    source: http://www.registerguard.com/news/2005/06/26/ed.col.chaney.0626.html

    " kiss my liberal soldier ass. "

    Enduring Freedom Veteran: How My Conversations with Conservatives Go

    From the mailbag:

    I'm an Enduring Freedom vet and I'm soon to be and Iraqi Freedom vet as well. I joined the Army "Reserves" shortly after 9/11 so I could do my part in the war, and look after one of my high school buddies that was about to be deployed. I've been on active duty since late 2002, doing constant tours. My last one was a stateside tour that I volunteered for because I got home when the recession peaked (late 2003), and no one wanted to hire somebody in the Reserves for fear of losing an employee to the war.

    Since then I've volunteered for several liberal groups, such as MoveOn, Democracy For America, and a few local grassroots organizations. I also volunteered with the Democrats for John Kerry.

    Whenever I get into an argument with a conservative, the story is always the same. First, they tell me I'm unamerican and unpatriotic. After I show them my military ID and mention I was in OEF, their next response is to say that I'm hurting my fellow soldiers. Then I confront them and ask them what they've done for the troops. Have they petitioned congress to make sure that the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan have all the armor they need? Do they make sure that the Reservists still have jobs when they come home? Do they lift a finger to look out for soldiers families while they're away? Did they even send a care package? So far, everyone I've debated has given me a no to all of these questions.

    Then I ask them why they haven't stood up and fought against Bush when he slashed veterans benefits. Why don't they care about troops being undermanned and underequipped in Iraq? Their answer is always the same: Vet's have all they need, and troops in Iraq are doing just fine. Nevermind all of the reports and newspaper stories saying otherwise. Nevermind that soldiers are dying. We're doing just fine over there.

    Finally, I ask them why they don't go and fight the war themselves if it is so great. I get all kinds of excuses for this one. If they are over 38 they simply say that they are too old. I respond by telling them "Halliburton is hiring." They make excuses for not wanting to go to Iraq as a civilian.

    In the end it's all the same. I'm sure that there are some conservatives out there that do genuinely support the troops. But I have yet to meet one. The ones I know are all wimps who don't have the balls to enforce the policy that they believe in.

    Karl Rove is no exception. When I heard his words I was livid. I didn't think the Bush administration could ever say something to make me hate them more than I already do. That changed with Rove's comments.

    Don't worry, Karl. While your punk ass is hiding behind the safe walls of the White House, I'll protect America. In the meantime you can kiss my liberal soldier ass.

  • kiss my ass...
  • Brownwood & Eminent Domain: Follow the Money, It's Bi-partisan !

    Heard the conversation on Brownwood Talk Radio this morning regarding the recent Supreme Court Ruling on Eminent Domain. Not surprised that the majority of the callers and hosts would frame the issue as a "blame it on the Liberals and Democrats". Was it a "Liberal" issue when George Bush utilized (for huge profits!) eminet domain to push people off their property in Arlington Texas to build their new baseball stadium ? Mr Gomez called in and asked about the local implications to the recent ruling since he owns land that could be taken away by "developers" using the same tactics that Bush used in Arlington. Mr Gomez should talk to the folks in Arlington who were forced to sell their land. Anyone who tries to frame this as a liberal or Democratic issue is beyond reason. This issue is a Greed issue which is found in both political parties and usually found to be abused more by those in the majority party ! Does it matter what political party the greed driven developer is a member of when he forces you off your property ? Why does the KXYL owner, Phil Watts, Kloak for the Republicans ?
  • bite my ass...
  • Veterans, Bush, & Health Care

    Funds for Health Care of Veterans $1 Billion Short
    2005 Deficit Angers Senate Republicans, Advocacy Groups
    By Thomas B. Edsall
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, June 24, 2005; Page A29

    The Bush administration, already accused by veterans groups of seeking inadequate funds for health care next year, acknowledged yesterday that it is short $1 billion for covering current needs at the Department of Veterans Affairs this year.

    The disclosure of the shortfall angered Senate Republicans who have been voting down Democratic proposals to boost VA programs at significant political cost. Their votes have brought the wrath of the American Legion, the Paralyzed Veterans of America and other organizations down on the GOP.

  • more here...
  • Monday, June 27, 2005

    Tactics of the "Hateful Christians" & Brownwood Talk Radio

    Read the Letter Here:
  • rest of story...

  • Now read the responses. Note Hoot_baker (be quick because hoot likes to post and then erase ! It must be an "Art" Form ! I don't think redeemed posts and erases.
  • rest of story...

  • -------------------------
    Notice how the "Neo Conservative" will attack the way the person looks as opposed to speaking to the issues the writer or caller brings to the table. This is a very familar tactic in Brownwood and is used frequently by what I consider to be the "Hateful Christians" !

    I suggest hoot_baker listen to the tapes of the show. The truth will set you free hoot ! Why is it Hoot, when "Hateful Christians" are challenged, they go into the victim mode and try and convince everyone that "Christians" are under attack ? Hoot the victim ? Hoot plays it well or as well as an anonomyous poser (Poster) can !

    Republican Politicians, Trans Texas Corridor, & "Kloaking @ KXYL" ?

    Big Money Paves the Way for the Trans-Texas Corridor
    Submitted by patrick on Thu, 05/12/2005 - 10:49am.
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    May 12, 2005
    CONTACT:
    Patrick Hansen, Campaigns for People, 512-472-1007
    Linda Stall, Corridor Watch, 832-861-9021
    Groups Release Report on Road-Builder Contributions Leading to the Nation's Most Expensive Toll Project
    Click Here for the full report (182K)
    Click Here for Appendices A-C & F (877K)
    Click Here for Appendix D (298K)
    Click Here for Appendix E (254K)
    Austin, Texas — At a press conference today at 10:00 AM at TxDot’s headquarters (the Dewitt Greer building, at the corner of 11th & Brazos), CorridorWatch.org, the TexasTollParty.com, Citizens Against the Trans Texas Corridor and Campaigns for People released a report detailing the political contributions of road building interests that are lining up for a piece of the $183.5 billion Trans Texas Corridor (TTC).
    The report, "Big Money Paves the Way for the Trans-Texas Corridor," documents political contributions from Texas’ Top 10 Road Contractors as well as the Bidders on TTC-35 (the largest Trans-Texas Corridor contract to date). In the past four years, these road-building interests alone gave over $2.7 million in contributions to executive and legislative candidates for Texas state office. The State’s leadership (the Governor, Lt. Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller, and House Speaker) received over $1.2 million and the applicable Senate and House Committee members over $215,000.
  • more here...

  • ----------------------
    "Kloaking for Republicans @ KXYL ?"- I guess this is just too much information for the listeners of Brownwood Talk Radio. Former KXYL CO-host, Connie Carmichael, used to always encourage her students to "follow the money". In her honor, I post the above information. Come on Phil, shoot sraight with your audience (don't expect one since they can't even shoot straight about why Marion Bishop and Connie Carmichael are no longer "on the air" at KXYL!). As I write this I hear Rick Perrys Ads playing on Watts Communications Airwaves ! Surprise, Surprise......Do you think Phil will "Bite the Hand" that feeds him ?
    ------------------
  • more here...

  • ------------------
    If you self identify as a "Republican", this is for you !
  • more here...
  • Sunday, June 26, 2005

    Republican Hagel: "Iraq could be worse than Vietnam"

  • in her words...
  • Republican Candidate Calls Bush Administration “Nazis”

    Politics : Republican Candidate Calls Bush Administration “Nazis”
    Posted by Editor on 2005/6/23 10:37:44
    Cary, NC - A candidate for North Carolina Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court has announced on her campaign's blog that she is leaving the Republican Party and denounced the Bush administration's policy on troop withdrawal from Iraq. Rachel Lea Hunter, a Republican and a candidate for Chief Justice, likens Bush’s administration to the “Nazis” and says that all who disagree with the administration are being branded as “traitors”.
    Hunter is an attorney in Durham, NC with the firm of Browne, Flebotte, Wilson, Horn & Webb. Hunter’s web page says she offers pre-paid legal services. Hunter ran unsuccessfully in 2004 for the North Carolina Appeals Court. She recently announced her intent to run for the Supreme Court.
    In her statement, Hunter expresses anger at former Charlotte Mayor Richard Vinroot for unsubscribing to her campaign’s email list. Hunter, who is a former volunteer for Vinroot’s gubernatorial campaign, was angry that Vinroot asked to unsubscribe to her campaign’s email list after an announcement that she was recovering from a recent surgery.
    Hunter continues her assault on other elected Republicans as well as party leaders. The letter launches criticisms at NCGOP Chairman, Ferrell Blount, for a lawsuit that was brought against the NC Republican party for an illegal contribution it received from a national group. The NC party agreed to pay a $10,000 fine and return the money. The GOP however never spent the money donated because of questions as to whether it was legal.
    The statement also alludes to Hunter’s apparent departure from the Republican Party. She states that: “I will unsubscribe from the party. I do not want to be associated with such individuals as these any longer.”
    The long tirade against Hunter’s political enemies even includes quotes attributed to her pet. While criticizing the Republicans throughout the state, Hunter says that: “Max the dog says, they will be reduced to four people meeting in a phone booth at this rate.”
    The candidate also takes time to blame “COPAM” for past criticisms of Hunter. “COPAM” is an acronym passed along on Internet message boards for a number of Republican leaders and operatives in North Carolina. No such group officially exists but the myth of such an organization has been perpetuated by campaign operatives of Hunter’s organization.
    Hunter does not allude to which party she may join when and if she leaves the Republican Party.
  • more here...

  • ------------
  • in her words...
  • Baghdad to Brownwood: A Soldiers Message to you ? You decide !

  • read and listen here...

  • -----------------
  • more here...
  • Saturday, June 25, 2005

    "one in six Humvees" ?

  • rest of story...
  • 9/11 Families Agree: Bush Admin. Has Failed America

    Will Bush's Karl Rove attack these family members ? or you, or me for listening to their interviews ?
  • rest of story...
  • Will Bush's Rove call me a Communist for posting this ?

    Funds for Health Care of Veterans $1 Billion Short
    2005 Deficit Angers Senate Republicans, Advocacy Groups
    By Thomas B. Edsall
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, June 24, 2005; A29

    The Bush administration, already accused by veterans groups of seeking inadequate funds for health care next year, acknowledged yesterday that it is short $1 billion for covering current needs at the Department of Veterans Affairs this year.

    The disclosure of the shortfall angered Senate Republicans who have been voting down Democratic proposals to boost VA programs at significant political cost. Their votes have brought the wrath of the American Legion, the Paralyzed Veterans of America and other organizations down on the GOP.

  • rest of story...
  • Brownwood "Talk Radio": Feels Like Home ?

    Friday June 24, 2005
    Op Ed: Letters To The Editor

    Friendlier airwaves would be a better impression

    Dear Editor:

    I agree with the Bulletin's recent editorial on tourist season (June 12), especially with the ideas that "the community welcome mat should be swept in plain view, figuratively speaking," and that "A kind word or deed from a single person can prove to be the best promotional investment a region can make." Conversely, unkind words or deeds may roll up that welcome mat, and give a visitor or traveler passing through that uneasy, cold feeling of hostility. What would be the effect, then, of a local radio show that actually intends to make its audience, or part of it anyway, uncomfortable?

    Weekday afternoon listeners in this area may hear such a show on 96.9 FM. "News and Views," a live call-in show hosted by James Williamson, imitates the formats of popular conservative talk-radio hosts, but from its first moments on air it is clear that it is in a lesser league all its own. Williamson's slogan is "We're going to make liberals uneasy today, because we're going to shine light into all their darkness." With bitter sarcasm and a sinister chuckle, Williamson reviles and vilifies gays, lesbians, civil libertarians, feminists, Muslims, pagans, environmentalists, socialists, commies and Democrats, and generally anyone who he thinks disagrees with his opinion or opposes the Bush administration. At the same time, he exaggerates, oversimplifies, and misrepresents the liberal perspective, and perpetuates old stereotypes, a favorite one being that any criticism of American foreign policy is "America bashing."

    What does the show intend to achieve by making liberals uneasy? Is it merely to irritate and annoy, or to intimidate and bully? Callers who disagree with the host are called names, misquoted and personally attacked on the air by Williamson and his audience. Indeed, the very existence and apparent popularity of the show calls the whole notion of a "community welcome mat" into serious question.

    While tolerance of diversity and civil public debate are among the great strengths of our democracy, Williamson ridicules the very concept of diversity, and fosters a mean-spirited and sophomoric discourse reminiscent of the playground. Naturally, he is entitled to his own opinion, which is as valid as anyone else's. The only issue being raised here is how his show reflects this community.

    Tune in sometime and judge for yourself. Would you like to visit his town?

    Daniel Graham
    Brownwood
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/06/25/op_ed/letters_to_the_editor/letter01.txt
    ---------------------
    and now for the community dialogue !
  • read more here...
  • Brownwood "No Child Left Behind Act": Military Recruiters & "Opt Out Form"

    "All we want is for parents to be notified that they have this option,"
  • read more here...

  • -------------------------
  • here's the form...
  • Brownwood, Bush, "Bite My Ass" & Eminent Domain Ruling

    Eminent domain: A big-box bonanza?
    Court's ruling OKed land grab for business like Target, Home Depot, CostCo, Bed Bath & Beyond
    June 23, 2005: 4:59 PM EDT
    By Parija Bhatnagar, CNN/Money staff writer
    NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The Supreme Court may have just delivered an early Christmas gift to the nation's biggest retailers by its ruling Thursday allowing governments to take private land for business development.
    Retailers such as Target (Research), Home Depot (Research) and Bed, Bath & Beyond (Research) have thus far managed to keep the "eminent domain" issue under the radar -- and sidestep a prickly public relations problem -- even as these companies continue to expand their footprint into more urban residential areas where prime retail space isn't always easily found.
    Eminent domain is a legal principle that allows the government to take private property for a "public use," such as a school or roads and bridges, in exchange for just compensation.
    Local governments have increasingly expanded the scope of public use to include commercial entities such as shopping malls or independent retail stores. Critics of the process maintain that local governments are too quick to invoke eminent domain on behalf of big retailers because of the potential for tax revenue generation and job creation.
    The Supreme Court's decision Thursday clarified that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses -- even against their will -- for private and public economic development.
    The ruling would seem to offer new opportunities to retailers. However, some industry watchers caution that with Thursday's decision thrusting the eminent domain issue into the national spotlight, companies using eminent domain risk a very public backlash.
    Craig Johnson, president of retail consulting group Customer Growth Partners, said that retailers shouldn't interpret the high court's decision to be a green light to aggressively expand even into those neighborhoods where a big-box presence is unwelcome.
    "Even with the Supreme Court's decision potentially in their favor, smart retailers would rather go into communities wearing a white hat rather than a black one," said Johnson.
    The appropriate move for companies would be to selectively use eminent domain as a last resort, he said, not as a first course of action. "I think companies have learned a few lessons from Wal-Mart's public relations struggles," he said.
    Where's the space crunch?
    According to industry watchers, retailers face a different type of expansion problem on the East Coast versus the West Coast.
    "On the West Coast, land availability takes a back seat to labor union issues and that's why Wal-Mart has consistently run into problems in California," Johnson said. "On the East Coast, because of population density it's very hard to get big open space and the zoning is more restrictive," Johnson said.
    Industry consultant George Whalin said that's one reason that Target, the No. 2 retailer behind Wal-Mart, (Research) has resorted to using eminent domain to set up shop in a few East Coast markets.
    Target and Wal-Mart could not immediately be reached for comment.
    "Wal-Mart and Target have both been criticized for their eminent domain use," said Burt Flickinger, a consultant with the Strategic Resources Group. "Target has used eminent domain in some cases because it made the stupid mistake of not relocating its bankrupt box locations in the late 1990s. As a result, it has fallen behind some of its key competitors in terms of growth."
    Meanwhile, eminent domain opponents called the high court ruling a "big blow for small businesses."
    "It's crazy to think about replacing existing successful small businesses with other businesses," said Adrian Moore, vice president of Los Angeles-based Reason Public Policy Institute, a non-profit organization opposed to eminent domain.
    "There are many, many instances where we've found that the cities that agreed to eminent domain use not only destroyed local businesses but the tax revenue that the local government had hoped to generate did not come to pass," Moore said.
  • read more here...

  • ------------------
    In 55 N.J. towns, planners watch as the light turns green
    Friday, June 24, 2005
    BY ALEXANDER LANE
    Star-Ledger Staff
    To a growing number of New Jerseyans, yesterday's Supreme Court decision was a very personal defeat.
    They are those whose towns have instructed them to hand their property over to private developers, for the greater good.
    Many are struggling small business owners in the grittier parts of town -- not the sort who normally make time to follow Supreme Court decisions.
    But they were waiting for this one.
    "It's sort of shocking to read what these judges have come up with on that there New London (Connecticut)," said Sal Quagliariello, an 83-year-old Edison man fighting an attempt to turn his bus company into a Walgreens. "It seems like money has got the best of the laws."
    By the same token, planners all over the state sighed with relief at the decision. Many New Jersey towns -- at least 55 since 2003 -- are counting on their condemnation power.
    Without it, they say, they would never be able to accommodate the grand designs they have hatched with developers.
    "You can't assemble large tracts of land without the power of eminent domain," said Christopher Paladino, president of the New Brunswick Development Corp., a quasi-public agency that has redeveloped much of the city's downtown. "It's not practical."
    The court decided by a 5-4 margin that the city of New London could use its power of eminent domain to condemn perfectly good homes and businesses and turn the property over to a developer. The prospect of a more vibrant city and a bigger tax base satisfied the constitutional requirement that land seizures be for a "public use," the majority said.
    New Jersey's Constitution is more restrictive than Connecticut's, and allows towns to seize only "blighted" property for redevelopment. But the state Legislature defines that term broadly, and a growing number of towns are getting aggressive with their condemnation power.
  • read more here...

  • ---------------------
    Note from Steve:

    Is the Supreme Court trying to unite Liberals and Conservatives with this decision ? It's interesting to hear local talk show hosts and participants make this a "Liberal" issue ( Blame everything on a liberal mantra ! ) Using their own thought process, where were these "Neo-con Republicans" when it came time to throw local tax incentives at Big Box Retailers & "Developers" ?

    Here ya go Byron (KXYL's "New" Neo-con Republican spokesperson). Bush and Eminant Domain ? The love of money and greed is a Bi-partisan issue ! Those who feed at the trough of Eminent Domain slide back and forth between Political Parties and will always be keeping the company of the Majority Party !
  • read more here...

  • -------------------
    Has Bush or Rove commented on the Supreme Court Ruling ? Looks like the Supreme Court has followed President Bush's lead (see his history in Arlington Texas !)

    " contrived to use the power of the state to claim eminent domain over 270 acres - most of which was not needed for the stadium. Families who lost their land so that Bush and his partners could profit from the development potential are still mad at him for the land-grab and the ordeal of court hearings they had to initiate before getting a fair price. Maree Fanning, who lost the family horse farm, told a reporter: "If I saw him today, I'd say 'Bite my ass'."
  • read more here...

  • --------------------
  • read more here...

  • ----------------
    After hearing Dr Williams call on this afternoons show (KXYL) where he stated that the Supreme Court Justices should be lined up against a wall and "be done away with" (because of their eminent domain ruling). What is it with Dr Williams calling for public officials (Clinton recently) to be lined up and "done away with". I wonder what Dr Williams will call for when he discovers Bush and his involvement with eminent domain to handsomly profit off its use. Will he call for the same punishment as he did for the Supreme Court Justices and Clinton ?
    ---------------
    Next time you drive by the stadium in Arlington you can remember this:

    "I think when it is all said and done, I will have made more money than I ever dreamed I would make," Bush told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. And he's making millions because the Ballpark at Arlington is a gigantic, taxpayer-supported, cash machine. Last year, Financial World magazine named the Ballpark the most profitable venue in baseball. Hicks didn't buy the Rangers because he wants Juan González's autograph. He bought them because he can make a lot of money at the stadium that George W. Bush takes credit for building.
    In 1993, while walking through the stadium, Bush told the Houston Chronicle, "When all those people in Austin say, 'He ain't never done anything,' well, this is it." But Bush would have never gotten the
    stadium deal off the ground if the city of Arlington had not agreed to use its power of eminent domain to seize the property that belonged to the Mathes family. And evidence presented in the Mathes lawsuit suggests that the Rangers' owners --
    remember that Bush was the managing general partner -- were conspiring to use the city's condemnation powers to obtain the thirteen-acre tract a full six months before the ASFDA was even created.
  • read more here...
  • Friday, June 24, 2005

    " Code Red, Code Red: Breast Alert ! "

    Ashcroft Gone, Justice Statues Disrobe
    By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer
    Friday, June 24, 2005
    (06-24) 16:24 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

    With barely a word about it, workers at the Justice Department Friday removed the blue drapes that have famously covered two scantily clad statues for the past 3 1/2 years.
    Spirit of Justice, with her one breast exposed and her arms raised, and the bare-chested male Majesty of Law basked in the late afternoon light of Justice's ceremonial Great Hall.
    The drapes, installed in 2002 at a cost of $8,000, allowed then-Attorney General John Ashcroft to speak in the Great Hall without fear of a breast showing up behind him in television or newspaper pictures. They also provoked jokes about and criticism of the deeply religious Ashcroft.
    source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/06/24/national/w155645D10.DTL

    Karl Rove attacks "Liberal" Brownwood Congressman Mike Conaway ?

    June 23, 2005
    Rove Criticizes Liberals on 9/11
    By PATRICK D. HEALY

    " Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers," Karl Rove, senior political adviser to President Bush.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/23/politics/23rove.html?ei=5090&en=be050f4c6a1d0259&ex=1277179200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
    ---------------
    Note:
    Republican Bill Lester attached the "Liberal" label to Republican Mike Conaway in his campaign. Bill Lester won Brown County. Mike Conaway won the district. Is Karl Rove telling us that anyone left of his "hard right" position is Liberal ? This is the typical MO of the Republican Neo-Cons: Blame everyone else ! See our Ad (below) for background info. on the "clean" race between Lester and Conaway.
    -----------
    Karl Rove Smears Anti-War Conservatives Too, But Don’t Expect Mainstream Media to Notice
  • read more here...
  • Stars and Stripes Letters: Opinions from the Front Lines

    Iraqis must fight for freedom

    How does the current war in Iraq relate to the freedom of the Iraqi people? Well, simply put, it doesn’t.
    I’m serving in Mosul, Iraq, so I’ve seen what the Iraqi people do with the American brand of freedom. When early Americans wanted freedom from English rule, they fought for it. When early Mexicans wanted their freedom from Spain, they fought for it. When early Scots wanted their freedom from the English, they fought for it. When blacks and other minorities wanted freedom from slavery and other racist policies, they fought for it.
    Other than the Kurds in the north, who fought for the freedom of the Iraqi people? Yes, America did.
    The Iraqis will not know what to do with freedom until they have to fight for it. You can’t just give it to them on a silver platter. America should be the helping hand of freedom, not the rock. The rock comes from the people seeking freedom.
    Look at the situation in the country now. At best, it’s mild chaos. The Iraqi people don’t see us as liberators. We are occupiers. Liberators liberate and then leave. We seem to be having a problem with the latter. The Iraqi people may have hated Saddam, but they hate us more. That’s why my fellow soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines are dying.
    There are two things they hate most in this part of the world. The first is Jews, and the second is the West. America is the poster child of the West. How can you liberate that? You can’t.

    Staff Sgt. Kevin Washington
    Mosul, Iraq

    http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=29867

    Thursday, June 23, 2005

    Brownwood Congressional Race: Neo-Con vs Mainstream Republican

    Karl Rove & Bill Lester defining Liberal ?
    I don't think so !

    AngelAction, Hateful "Christians" & Hateful "Politicians" and Peace, Compassion & Love !

    Kansas group to spew hate at local soldiers' funerals
    By O’Ryan Johnson
    Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - Updated: 05:39 AM EST

    A radical Midwestern hate group plans to protest at the funerals of two local soldiers killed in action, claiming the slain heroes ``were cast into hell to join many more dishonorable Americans.''
    The Westboro Baptist Church, proclaiming ``thank God for IEDs'' or roadside bombs, claims the 9/11 attacks and American deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan are God's vengeance on a nation that is tolerant of homosexuality.
    ``It's going to shock and enrage every person who sees it. That is our goal,'' said Margie Phelps, daughter of WBC leader Fred Phelps. The group is based in Topeka, Kansas, and has made headlines protesting homosexuality at school events, graduations and mainstream churches.
    But when told about the group's plans, John Maloney, the father of slain Marine Capt. John Maloney, said his son died in Iraq to protect free speech, no matter how offensive.
    ``He fought and died for their right to do what they do,'' he said. ``I may not agree with what they do. This is still the United States of America, isn't it?''
    In addition to protesting Maloney's funeral, the group also plans to protest the Marblehead funeral of Staff Sgt. Christopher N. Piper, a Green Beret, killed in Afghanistan.
    ``This kid was an American hero,'' Marblehead veterans service agent David Roberts said. ``I don't understand people like that. Any disrespect shown towards him and his family is beyond my imagination.''
    Margie Phelps said her father is a self-declared prophet.
    ``He hasn't been sent to save. He's been sent to condemn,'' she said, adding that group members have protested the funerals of 11 slain soldiers across the nation in the past two weeks.
    Phelps said the protests may be disruptive to family members but ``as long as it's being made into a public ordeal, then all bets are off.''
    She added, ``Thank God for the mortar. Thank God for the shell that came from the gun. Thank God for the fact that it killed the fruit of America to punish it for its sins.''
    But Maloney, still grieving for his son, said simply, ``I think they're misdirected. I'll pray for them.''
  • source...

  • -----------------
  • angel action...

  • ----------------
    Who on the Brownwood Texas airwaves is considered by some to be a "prophet" ? Ask Roy from Deleon !
  • "prophet of hate?"...
  • Brownwood: Is this being discussed at your dinner table ?

    Iraq Creating New Breed of Jihadists, says CIA
    by Ewen MacAskill, Duncan Campbell and Richard Norton-Taylor

    The war in Iraq is creating a new breed of Islamic jihadists who could go on to destabilize other countries, according to a CIA report.
    The CIA believes Iraq to be potentially worse than Afghanistan, which produced thousands of jihadists in the 1980s and 1990s. Many of the recruits to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida had fought in Afghanistan.
    The sobering caution came as a senior British anti-terrorism source warned that those trained in terror techniques in Iraq could use their newly-acquired skills in Britain at the end of the war.
    The CIA report, completed last month, remains classified. But a CIA source yesterday confirmed that its broad conclusions, disclosed by the New York Times yesterday, were accurate.
    The concern expressed in the CIA report contrasts with the optimism of US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld two years ago when he welcomed the prospect of Iraq as a magnet for jihadists.
  • rest of story...

  • -------------------
    Pentagon Creating Student Database
    Recruiting Tool For Military Raises Privacy Concerns
    By Jonathan Krim
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Thursday, June 23, 2005; Page A01

    The Defense Department began working yesterday with a private marketing firm to create a database of high school students ages 16 to 18 and all college students to help the military identify potential recruits in a time of dwindling enlistment in some branches.
    The program is provoking a furor among privacy advocates. The new database will include personal information including birth dates, Social Security numbers, e-mail addresses, grade-point averages, ethnicity and what subjects the students are studying.
  • rest of the story...

  • ------------------
    " According to the Pentagon, less than 1 per cent of the army has deserted from the Iraq war. Of those 6,000 soldiers, 150 are believed to be seeking refugee status in Canada. "
  • rest of the story...

  • -----------------
    U.S. Army slips further behind recruiting goals
    By Will Dunham Fri Jun 10, 5:06 PM ET
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has slipped further behind its recruiting goals amid the Iraq war, figures released on Friday showed, as officials developed proposals to double cash bonuses and offer mortgage aid for enlisting.
  • rest of story...

  • -----------------
    Abizaid disputes Cheney's insurgency claim
    June 23, 2005
    BY LIZ SIDOTI ASSOCIATED PRESS

    WASHINGTON-- The top American commander in the Persian Gulf told Congress on Thursday that the Iraqi insurgency has not grown weaker over the past six months, despite a claim by Vice President Dick Cheney that it was in its "last throes."
    Gen. John Abizaid's testimony came at a contentious Senate Armed Services Committee hearing at which Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld clashed with members of both parties, including a renewed call by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts for him to step down.
    Citing what he called repeated "gross errors and mistakes" in the U.S. military campaign in Iraq, Kennedy told Rumsfeld: "In baseball, it's three strikes, you're out. What is it for the secretary of defense?"
    "Isn't it time for you to resign?" Kennedy asked.
    "I've offered my resignation to the president twice," Rumsfeld shot back, saying that President Bush had decided not to accept it. "That's his call," he said.
  • rest of story...

  • -----------------
    How Cheney Fooled Himself
    By E. J. Dionne Jr.
    Tuesday, June 21, 2005; Page A21

    President Bush planted the seeds of the destruction of his Iraq policy before the war started. Salvaging the venture will require an unprecedented degree of candor and realism from a White House that was never willing to admit -- even to itself -- how large an undertaking it was asking the American people to buy into.
    The notion that the president led the country into war through indirection or dishonesty is not the most damaging criticism of the administration. The worst possibility is that the president and his advisers believed their own propaganda. They did not prepare the American people for an arduous struggle because they honestly didn't expect one.
    How else to explain the fact that the president and his lieutenants consistently played down the costs of the endeavor, the number of troops required, the difficulties of overcoming tensions among the Sunnis, the Shiites and the Kurds? Were they lying? The more logical explanation is that they didn't know what they were talking about.
    Because the White House failed to prepare Americans for what was to come, the administration now faces a backlash. Over the weekend Bush said that the terrorists in Iraq were seeking to "weaken our nation's resolve." But the rising impatience about which Bush complains is a direct result of the administration's blithe dismissal of those who warned just how tough the going could get.
  • rest of story...

  • ------------------
    Posted on Thu, Jun. 23, 2005
    Iraq sees increase in car bombings
    PATRICK QUINN
    Associated Press

    BAGHDAD, Iraq - A 12-year-old, his left leg missing below the knee, sat screaming on the sidewalk in a howling sandstorm as a man offered comfort. Laith Falah was buying bread just after daybreak Thursday when he was wounded by one of eight car bombs that struck the capital since dusk - a furious pace all too familiar in today's Iraq. Falah was lucky to be alive; 38 others were killed by the attacks over the 12-hour period.
    Car bombers have struck Iraq 479 times in the past year, and a third of the attacks followed the naming of a new Iraqi government two months ago, according to an Associated Press count based on reports from police, military and hospital officials.
    The unrelenting attacks, using bombs that can cost as little as a carton of American cigarettes each, have become the most-favored weapon of the government's most-determined enemies - Islamic extremists.
  • rest of story...

  • -----------------
    Troop morale in Iraq hits 'rock bottom'
    Soldiers stress is a key concern as the Army ponders whether to send more forces.
    By Ann Scott Tyson | Special to The Christian Science Monitor
    WASHINGTON – US troops facing extended deployments amid the danger, heat, and uncertainty of an Iraq occupation are suffering from low morale that has in some cases hit "rock bottom."
    Even as President Bush speaks of a "massive and long-term" undertaking in rebuilding Iraq, that effort, as well as the high tempo of US military operations around the globe, is taking its toll on individual troops.
    Some frustrated troops stationed in Iraq are writing letters to representatives in Congress to request their units be repatriated. "Most soldiers would empty their bank accounts just for a plane ticket home," said one recent Congressional letter written by an Army soldier now based in Iraq. The soldier requested anonymity.
    In some units, there has been an increase in letters from the Red Cross stating soldiers are needed at home, as well as daily instances of female troops being sent home due to pregnancy.
    "Make no mistake, the level of morale for most soldiers that I've seen has hit rock bottom," said another soldier, an officer from the Army's 3rd Infantry Division in Iraq.
  • rest of story...

  • -----------------
    Poll: In wake of Iraq war, allies prefer China to U.S.
    Friday, June 24, 2005; Posted: 7:28 a.m. EDT (11:28 GMT)
    The Iraq war and wariness about U.S. foreign policy caused a slip in world opinion, an international poll says.
    Image:
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States' image is so tattered overseas two years after the Iraq invasion that communist China is viewed more favorably than the U.S. in many long-time Western European allies, an international poll has found.
    The poor image persists even though the Bush administration has been promoting freedom and democracy throughout the world in recent months -- which many viewed favorably -- and has sent hundreds of millions of dollars in relief aid to Indian Ocean nations hit by the devastating December 26 tsunami.
    "It's amazing when you see the European public rating the United States so poorly, especially in comparison with China," said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, which surveyed public opinion in 16 countries, including the United States.
  • rest of the story...

  • ----------------
    Neocon's 7-Year March to Iraq
  • rest of the story...

  • -----------------
  • what Karl Rove hopes you won't read...

  • ---------------
    " Why should we hear about body bags and deaths and how many, what day it's going to happen, and how many this or what do you suppose? Oh, I mean, it's, not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that? -- Barbara Bush, former First Lady, on ABC/Good Morning America, March 18, 2003 speaking about the prospect of news coverage of the war prior to the invasion of Iraq."
  • the rest of the story...

  • --------------
    Since May 1, 2003, when President Bush declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended, 1,589 U.S. military members have died, according to AP's count. That includes at least 1,220 deaths resulting from hostile action, according to the military's numbers.
  • rest of the story...

  • ----------------
    “Change the channel”
    - Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt's advice to Iraqis who see TV images of innocent civilians killed by coalition troops.
    [NYT 12th April 2004]
  • rest of the story...

  • --------------
    Soldier challenges the War Planners ( in Brownwood he'd be called a Communist Liberal by the Neo-con Republican supporters! )
  • rest of the story...

  • ---------------------
  • rest of the story...
  • Wednesday, June 22, 2005

    Small Towns & Paying Respect to Fallen Heroes

    Note the similarities posted below as they relate to Brownwood's recent show of respect for fallen Marine, Mario Castillo.......Public displays of respect are universal and transcend all bounderies (natural & man made).
    ----------
  • to read comments...

  • ----------
  • to read comments...

  • -----------
  • to read comments...

  • ---------
  • to read comments...

  • ---------
  • to read comments...
  • Lawmaker: Small Towns Pay Higher War Price

    (Note : As this story relates to Brownwood)

    Published Sunday, March 13, 2005
    Lawmaker: Small Towns Pay Higher War Price
    By Cory Reiss
    Ledger Washington Bureau
    WASHINGTON -- Patty Steve says her son Brian Buesing was a typical small-town teenager.
    A bit bored in Cedar Key, a fishing and recreation town on Florida's Gulf coast. Flirting with trouble. Uncertain about his prospects after high school.
    So after a recruiter for the Marine Corps visited Cedar Key School, she gave permission for Brian to join under age, at 17, right after graduation in 2000.
    She says she was nervous. But then she thought: "It's not fair for somebody else's kid to be in the infantry and not my son."
    She still believes that, almost two years after Brian became one of the first casualties in the Iraq war, on March 23, 2003. About 1,200 people turned out for the funeral of Lance Cpl. Brian Buesing. Fewer than 800 people live in the town.
    As the conflict grinds on with near daily casualties, some members of Congress continue to worry that the cost of war is meted out disproportionately. One member, Rep. Ike Skelton, a Democrat from rural Missouri, says small towns are paying more than their share.
    "I want there to be a broader appreciation throughout our country of the contribution that rural America is making within the military," Skelton said.
    Skelton makes an occasional tally of the war dead, cross-referencing home towns with Census data. His statistics show that 43 percent of those killed in action in Iraq and 44 percent killed in Afghanistan through mid-February came from towns of 20,000 people or fewer. Less than 23 percent of the U.S. population lives in towns that size.
    As the military ramps up recruiting efforts and boosts signing bonuses, experts say the question of who is being enticed becomes more relevant.
    The Army, for example, missed its recruiting goal last month for the first time in five years, by 1,900 recruits out of a goal of 7,050. Casualties in Iraq are widely regarded as a reason for the recruiting problems.
    The Army responded by boosting enlistment bonuses from $8,000 to $10,000 -- $15,000 for some hard-to-fill specialties -- and is in the midst of increasing the number of recruiters by 950, or 25 percent.
    David Segal, director of the Center for Research on Military Organization at the University of Maryland, said if the economy were not improving, the military might face charges of "economic conscription" by enticing people who can least afford to say no.
    Many people join the military for financial reasons, an old story in economically depressed rural areas. Segal said lawmakers should be watchful.
    "They should be concerned about whether our military operations are placing a disproportionate burden in terms of recruits, casualties, on any particular part of the population," he said.
    Experts on the military, including Segal, quibble with Skelton's data because it certainly includes small towns that are part of larger metropolitan areas. But they also say it probably reflects genuine trends in who signs up for duty in an all-volunteer force. These questions remain a matter of dueling statistics.
    "It reflects a reality of military recruiting and particularly now that we're making so much use of the National Guard," Segal said.
    The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, has consulted with Segal on a broad study of military demographics. Segal said researchers have struggled with how to properly define geographic and other data.
    Skelton and Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, a Democrat who has sponsored legislation to restore the draft, asked for the report.
    The Army, which has the bulk of the deployed forces, cites statistics that suggest the picture is not nearly as skewed as Skelton's figures suggest. The service has done its own analysis based on Census definitions of "urban" and "rural" that use population density rather than raw counts. An urban area can include less-dense populations if the Census considers them tied to very dense urban centers.
    That study says 74 percent of enlisted soldiers were from urban areas last year and 26 percent were from rural areas. That would mean rural areas are over-represented in the Army by only 5 percentage points when compared to populations of people ages 17-39.
    Beth Asch, a military recruiting expert at RAND Corp., a think tank, said the services are very sophisticated in how they deploy recruiters and target advertising. The military does tend to recruit strongly in less populous states, especially in the South, she said.
    "We actually have a pretty good sense of who is likely to volunteer," she said. "Those characteristics are not randomly spread across the United States."
    A study coauthored by Segal in December said that military recruits from Southern states represented 42 percent of the military's new members in 2002, although those states only had 36 percent of the nation's young people ages 18-24. The Northeast had 18 percent of the nation's young people but was underrepresented, with 14 percent of the recruits. Midwestern states showed a lower recruitment of 2 percentage points, and recruitment from Western states was equal to the population group.
    Experts say people in small towns, and the South in particular, are more apt to join because there may be fewer job opportunities. The restlessness of youth is another reason. And parents tend to be pro-military and emphasize patriotism in those areas.
    "We have to take a serious look on Capitol Hill at the overall recruitment policy to make sure that our country does right by all those serving in the military so that it's equally appealing," said Rep. Mike McIntyre, a North Carolina Democrat on the Armed Services Committee who also is co-chairman of the Congressional Rural Caucus.
    Paul Oliver, mayor of Cedar Key, said military deaths shake towns his size more deeply than big cities.
    "I don't think there's any greater impact on individuals, but as far as the greater community, I think the small towns are impacted more," he said.
    source: http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050313/NEWS/503130448/1039

    Tuesday, June 21, 2005

    Brownwood's Only "Fair and Balanced" Talk Radio is Satellite Talk Radio

    Look at these selections which have diverse opinions behind the microphones....
  • to read comments...

  • ------------------
    Who is Ed Schultz ?

  • to read comments...
  • Brownwood, when will we talk about it openly & honestly ?

  • to read the story...

  • -----------------
    Bush didn't give Marine units in Iraq enough equipment
    by John in DC - 6/21/2005 10:41:00 AM

    Yeah, the Republicans really love our troops. That's why it's Democratic blogs who are the ones so irate about stories like these. Think about that, any of your servicemembers who might be reading this today. You won't hear people pushing to alleviate this problem on the conservative blogs, or from the Bush administration.

    From the Boston Globe:
    Marine Corps units fighting in some of the most dangerous terrain in Iraq don't have enough weapons, communications gear, or properly outfitted vehicles, according to an investigation by the Marine Corps' inspector general provided to Congress yesterday.
    The report, obtained by the Globe, says the estimated 30,000 Marines in Iraq need twice as many heavy machine guns, more fully protected armored vehicles, and more communications equipment to operate in a region the size of Utah.
    The Marine Corps leadership has ''understated" the amount and types of ground equipment it needs, according to the investigation, concluding that all of its fighting units in Iraq ''require ground equipment that exceeds" their current supplies, ''particularly in mobility, engineering, communications, and heavy weapons."

    source: www.americablog.org
  • to read comments...

  • ---------------------
    You may ask yourself why this is not being discussed in the local (Brownwood) media ? As we, a community, prepare to lay to rest Brownwood Marine Mario Castillo who was killed in Iraq, these discussions seem to be taking place everywhere else except in Brownwood ! Patriotism is found in many ways, from attending candlelight services, lining streets with flags & yellow ribbons, etc., but it also is publicly challenging our elected leaders when they put our troops in harms way needlessly and without proper equipment (so they can do their jobs in the safest manner possible). As a local example, these challenges are the same ones we used when our local law enforcement officers were allowed to wear expired bulletproof vests by the elected leaders charged with supplying them with properly maintained equipment ! American Patriotism is not limited to Flags and Yellow Ribbons and is not defined by one segment of the population or political party (local, state, or national) ! At the risk of being labled "Communists" by the local hate mongers, we choose to not remain silent !
    -----------------
  • read more here...
  • * "The Criminal Justice System in Texas is so cracked it makes an Armadillo look smooth"

    The U.S. Supreme Court rules yet again that another Texas case was wrongfully decided — this time because 19 of 20 blacks had been knocked off the jury pool — and I'm asked to explain what's wrong with criminal justice in Texas, in 750 words. Sure, no problem.
    I don't like to be cynical, but one can get a little tired after a long time watching justice meted out in this state. The story doesn't change much, and nothing seems to get better. But for what it's worth, here's what's at the bottom of it.
    (1) Racism. In 1998, James Byrd Jr. was dragged to death behind a pickup truck for being black in Jasper. Two of the three men responsible got the death penalty. This was not first time in Texas a white man was given the death penalty for killing a black man. It was the second.
    (2) More racism. In 1999, about one-fifth of the adult black citizens of Tulia, population 5,000, were arrested and accused of cocaine dealing on the uncorroborated testimony of a bent narc and notorious liar. No one even stopped to ask how a town that size could support 46 cocaine dealers until a reporter from the Texas Observer showed up.
    (3) We elect our prosecutors. There are 254 counties in Texas, nearly every one with its own elected district attorney. The way to get elected is to be "Tuff on Crime." The way to lose is to be "Soft on Crime." In the big cities — Houston, Dallas and San Antonio, among the 10 largest in the nation — we get the usual plead-out mill: perp's public defender advises him to cop to reduced charges, anything to avoid a trial.
    But in the small towns and rural areas where heavy crime is rare, a D.A. has to whup on whoever gets caught. Sometime in the '80s, a guy in Lubbock stole 12 frozen turkeys. They were recovered, still frozen. Not only no damage, but no defrost. The guy bought 75 years, which works out to 6.3 years per bird. Don't steal a turkey in Lubbock.
    (4) We elect our judges. Only way to get elected is to be Tuff on Crime. Only way to lose is to be Soft on Crime. In the Case of the Sleeping Lawyer, a guy on death row appealed on grounds his lawyer had slept through his trial, thus providing him with less than adequate counsel. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that even though the lawyer slept through much of the trial, he didn't sleep during the important parts, so the conviction stood.
    (5) An appeal process that isn't worth squat. If you're in, you can't get out. If you draw the death penalty in Texas, you effectively have 30 days to present new evidence. After that, you're toast. Doesn't matter if someone else confesses on Day 31. Doesn't even matter if you could provide DNA evidence proving it wasn't you. (The Legislature is still trying to fix that one.) Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas are of the opinion that actual innocence is not necessarily a bar to execution (Herrera vs. Collins). It took a near-miracle to get the Tulia drug defendants out.
    (6) Gutless politicians. Texas runs one of the largest prison system on Earth. Texas executed the retarded, the insane and people who were children when they committed their crimes, until the Supreme Court stopped that only three months ago. Texas executes foreigners without notifying their home countries. Every poll shows Texans do not want to execute people in these categories. Politicians are afraid to stop it for fear someone will say they're Soft on Crime.
    You've met Labrador retrievers brighter than some of the people we execute. We had a guy on the row who thought he was going to die because he couldn't read. He spent hours on his bunk trying to memorize the ABCs. Never could do it. We execute people easily as crazy as the one in Florida who spent years crawling around on all fours, barking, under the impression that he was a black dog in the seventh circle of hell. But I'm sure they understand right from wrong, and know why they're being punished. Arf.
    (7) A bent system. For years, Texas used an expert witness most people called "Dr. Death." Never saw a perp he couldn't guarantee would be a mortal menace for the rest of his days. Only one solution: Kill him. Just one little hitch: In many of those cases, Dr. Death never examined the accused, never talked to the accused, never got near the accused. He was reprimanded twice in the 1980s by the American Psychiatric Association, then expelled from the group in 1995 because his evidence was found unethical and untrustworthy.
    In another case, the Supremes threw out the death sentence because the psychologist said the perp was a danger on account of being Latino. Then there was the Houston police lab, so unbelievably sorry, sloppy and just plain maliciously wrong that the courts had to throw out a bunch of those cases too.
    But please don't get the idea that just because a few of these errors were caught on long-shot appeals, justice actually works here. We know about so many more miscarriages it would make you vomit, and can't even guess at how many we don't know about.
    I'm at 932 words, and I haven't even gotten to the 5th Circuit, the parole board, why you can spend months in jail without ever seeing a lawyer . . .
    -------------------
    Ivins is based in Austin. She wrote this column for the Los Angeles Times.
    source:
    COMMENTARY
    Ivins: Explain Texas' justice system? Here it goes
    Molly Ivins, SYNDICATED COLUMNIST
    Advertisement
    Tuesday, June 21, 2005
    ---------------
    * Quote from Dallas Morning News Editorial regarding the injustice in Tulia Texas.
    -------------
  • as it relates to local issues...
  • Iraq & Vietnam: Comparing the words & language.

    As this relates to KXYL's Byron Norris comment Monday morning that "Presidents Bush is a 60's Democrat":
    In 1965, US Ambassador to South Vietnam, Henry Cabot Lodge, spoke to reporters. Swap out the words Vietnam for Iraq and see if you hear the similarities !
  • listen here...
  • Monday, June 20, 2005

    Brownwood Marine Mario Castillo Candlelight Service

    Monday June 20, 2005
    News
    Community candlelight service tonight for Castillo
    By Candace Cooksey Fulton -- Brownwood Bulletin
    A community candlelight vigil honoring Lance Cpl. Mario A. Castillo, who was killed June 10 in Iraq, is set for 8:30 p.m. today at the Douglas MacArthur Academy of Freedom.
    Organizers have asked that those wishing to honor Castillo please bring their own candle and holder.
    Castillo's flag-draped coffin was flown to the Dallas/Fort Worth airport late Friday, where a funeral coach from Davis-Morris Funeral Home was waiting to deliver the fallen Marine to his hometown of Brownwood. Texas Department of Public Safety officials gave escort from the airport to Davis-Morris.
    Castillo's widow, Angela Portillo Castillo, arrived at D/FW on Friday from their home at Camp LeJeune, N.C.
    "We have been so touched, we are so grateful for everything everyone has done for us," Angela Castillo said Saturday. "Every town, every city we came through the traffic was stopped. Police and firefighters stood by the side of the road with their hats off, over their hearts, as we passed by.
    "We were so honored."
    Angela Castillo also said her husband "would have wanted to be remembered as a man and a Marine. He is a hero."
    Lance Cpl. Castillo will lie in repose at Davis Morris Funeral Home until his funeral service at 10 a.m. Wednesday at St. Mary's Catholic Church. Two dress blue uniformed Marines will keep constant vigil through the service and Castillo will be buried with full military honors, including a rifle salute, at Eastlawn Memorial Park.
    As of Wednesday, 155 Texans had been killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom, but Castillo, who is a 2003 Brownwood High School graduate and the son of Guadalupe and Maria Castillo, is the first from this area.
    "It is so important that we honor our fallen heroes who are making the ultimate sacrifice to protect the freedoms that we as Americans enjoy," said Billy Murphey, Brown County Veterans Service Officer, and also a former Marine.
    The candlelight service will be on the grassy area that is actually behind the Douglas MacArthur Academy of Freedom, at the corner of Austin Avenue and Coggin.
    There is a planned program with prayers, readings and music, but organizers have said a time will be set aside for friends or family members to give personal tributes or share memories.
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/06/20/news/news03.txt

    Brownwood's Republican Congressman on Fox News & "Someone Else's Child" Column

    from an email I got this morning from Brownwood's Congressman Republican Mike Conaway's Office:

    WATCH CONGRESSMAN CONAWAY ON FOX NEWS TODAY

    At 12:15pm Texas Time ! The Congressman will be debating the War in Iraq on Dayside with Linda Vester
    From: mikeconaway@qismessenger.com
    Subject: Watch Congressman Conaway on Fox New Today, 12:15 p.m.
    Date: June 20, 2005 8:16:10 AM CDT
    To: steve_squared@verizon.net
    Reply-To: mikeconaway@qismessenger.com

    -------------------------
    Question: Will Our Congressman talk about these ? :

    Monday, June 20, 2005

    US Military telling recruits to have their parents buy them armor
    by John in DC - 6/20/2005 11:49:00 AM
    What's next, a bake sale?
    Good God, what has George Bush done to our military? And 70% of you people voted for him? Do you military folks out there realize that the ONLY candidate and the ONLY media and the ONLY grassroots talking about the body armor problem in Iraq were LIBERALS? FOX News wasn't on Bush's case for not giving you the armor you needed. But Dan Rather was. Candidate Bush said you had all the body armor you needed. Candidate Kerry said that was a lie.
    I'm serious about this. The GOP has screwed our military and put our troops at risk, while denying the problem from day one. It's now gotten so bad that they need to have these kids' parents buy the armor themselves, like these are their school supplies (I wonder if they make those cool yellow raincoats in kevlar?)
    source: americablog.org or

  • to read the story...

  • ---------------------------
    Someone Else's Child
    By Bob Herbert
    The New York Times
    Monday 20 June 2005

    It has become clearer than ever that Americans do not want to fight George W. Bush's tragically misguided war in Iraq.
    You can still find plenty of folks arguing that we have to stay the course, or even raise the stakes by sending more troops to the war zone. But from the very start of this war the loudest of the flag-waving hawks were those who were safely beyond military age themselves and were unwilling to send their own children off to fight.
    It's easy to be macho when you have nothing at risk. The hawks want the war to be fought with other people's children, while their own children go safely off to college, or to the mall. The number of influential American officials who have children in uniform in Iraq is minuscule.
    Most Americans want no part of Mr. Bush's war, which is why Army recruiters are failing so miserably at meeting their monthly enlistment quotas. Desperate, the Army is lowering its standards, shortening tours, increasing bonuses and violating its own recruitment regulations and ethical guidelines.
    Americans do not want to fight this war.
    Times Square in Midtown Manhattan is the most heavily traveled intersection in the country. It was mobbed on V-E Day in May 1945 and was the scene of Alfred Eisenstaedt's legendary photo of a sailor passionately kissing a nurse on V-J Day the following August. There is currently an armed forces recruiting station in Times Square, but it's a pretty lonely outpost. An officer on duty one afternoon last week said no one had come in all day.
    Vince Morrow, a 10th grader from Allentown, Pa., was interviewed across the street from the recruiting station, on Broadway. He said he had once planned to join the military after graduating from high school, but had changed his mind. "It's the war," he said. "Going over and never coming back. Before the war you'd just go to different places and help people. Now you go over there and you fight."
    His mother, Michelle, said: "I'd like to see him around awhile. It was different before the war. It's the fear of not coming home. Our other son just graduated Saturday and he was planning to go into the Air Force. They told him college was included and made him all kinds of promises. They almost made him sign papers before we had decided. We thought about it and researched it and decided against it."
    Last week's New York Times/CBS News Poll found that the mounting casualties and continuing turmoil in Iraq have made Americans increasingly pessimistic about the war. A majority said the U.S. should have stayed out of Iraq and only 37 percent approved of the president's handling of the war.
    What hasn't changed is the fact that the vast majority of the parents who support the war do not want their children to fight it. A woman in the affluent New York suburb of Ridgewood, N.J., who has a daughter in high school and a younger son, said: "I would not want my children to go. If there wasn't a war it would be different. I support the war and I think we need to be there. But it's not going well. It's becoming like Vietnam. It's a very bad situation. But we can't leave."
    I don't know how you win a war that your country doesn't want to fight. We sent too few troops into Iraq in the first place and the number of warm bodies available for Iraq and other military missions going forward is dwindling alarmingly. The Bush crowd may be bellicose, but for most Americans the biggest contribution to the war effort is a bumper sticker that says "support our troops," and maybe a belligerent call to a talk radio station.
    The home-front "warriors" who find it so easy to give the thumbs up to war endanger the truly valorous men and women who are actually willing to put on a uniform, pick up a weapon and place their lives on the line.
    The president and these home-front warriors got us into this war and now they don't know how to get us out. Nor do they have a satisfactory answer to the important ethical question: how do you justify sending other people's children off to fight while keeping a cloak of protection around your own kids?
    If the United States had a draft (for which there is no political sentiment), its warriors would be drawn from a much wider swath of the population, and political leaders would think much longer and harder before committing the country to war.
    -------
    E-mail: bobherb@nytimes.com.
    source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/062005G.shtml

    Families of Dead Soldiers Demand Truth from Bush

    The Times Herald-Record
    by Beth Quinn

    The one reservation I had last week when I wrote about the Downing Street Memo was this: How will the loved ones of the soldiers who've died in Iraq feel when they read this?
    How much more pain will it cause them to know we now have strong evidence that George Bush knew all along there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? That he made the "facts" fit his personal plan for war?
    How does your mind accept what surely breaks your heart? And how much harder to know that your child, your spouse, your parent died in a war that a growing number of Americans are questioning?
    Since that column ran, the loved ones of two soldiers, dead in Iraq, have told me.
    Their words are far more meaningful than anything I could say, so I will turn this column over to them.
    From Lauren Bowker of Middletown:
    "As a loved one of Joseph Tremblay of New Windsor, who died April 27 in Iraq doing what he considered his duty for his country and fellow Marines, I have feelings of such loss and sadness – and also extreme anger.
    "The article (on the Downing Street Memo) has helped me understand my anger towards the President and his underhanded, dishonest and dangerous policies in Iraq.
    "I urge every American to demand that President Bush be made to answer these allegations regarding what has become known as the Downing Street Memo. I sent in the petition (demanding a hearing) and called all my family and friends, urging them to do the same.
    "I am very proud of Joey and the ultimate price he paid for our country, but if President Bush had not lied and been so determined to invade Iraq, Joey would be here with his loved ones, planning his wedding and looking forward to what a young man with such promise could have contributed to the world.
    "My question to President Bush is – how do you look yourself in the mirror every morning with a clear conscience knowing that 1,700 young Americans are dead based on a lie?"

    From Karen Meredith of Mountain View, Calif.:

    "My only child, Lt. Ken Ballard, was 26 years old when he was killed in Najaf, Iraq, on 5-30-04. My son saved the lives of 60 men that horrible night – they all got to go home to their families. He was one of three soldiers in his battalion killed after they were extended with the First Armored Division.
    "After I read the notes from the meeting at Downing Street, I knew that his fate was decided and he was a dead man in July 2002, when that meeting took place.
    "How sad that I didn't know then – just two months after he was commissioned an officer in the U.S. Army, just two months after he took an oath to obey the orders of the President of the United States – that his fate was already determined by a corrupt administration. Members of the Bush Administration lied repeatedly to this country when they told us time and again that no decision to go to war had been made.
    "And how devastating to know that if the administration had planned for more ground strength, my son might be alive today.
    "I belong to a group called Gold Star Families for Peace. The most difficult thing we encounter when we speak out against the war is that most of us are not anti-military and would never malign the soldiers or their service to this country. My son was a fourth-generation Army officer.
    "But our members provide witness to the lies that resulted in our children being killed. We are all trying to put some sanity in this world gone mad. "
    Our soldiers in Iraq are dying on average of two per day.
    How can the rest of us do nothing to protest this travesty when our silence means that, today, two more families will know such pain?
    source: http://www.recordonline.com/archive/2005/06/20/bethcolj.htm

    KXYL's New "Talking Head" Trio & French Bashing: What they're not talking about !

    What they're not talking about locally even though the French Fry/American Fry story played for weeks on local talk radio. Who's surprised at their silence and the silence of their best students ? Since Brownwood Neo Conservative Talk Radio won't touch this, we will !
    -------------------------
    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-jones19jun19,0,5962996.story?coll=la-home-headlines
    THE NATION

    In a Military Stronghold, a War Hawk Circles Back
    By Paul Richter
    Times Staff Writer
    June 19, 2005
    JACKSONVILLE, N.C. — With its sprawling military bases and huge population of military retirees, eastern North Carolina has believed in the Iraq war, and sacrificed for it, like few other regions.
    But as summer heat has settled over the piney lowlands in recent days, a debate has unexpectedly come to life about a U.S. mission that is two years old and counting.
    New doubts and divisions have come into view.
    It started this month, when Republican Rep. Walter B. Jones, an original supporter of the war, said he had lost confidence in the effort and would sponsor legislation calling on the administration to more clearly define how, and when, it intended to bring the war to a close.
    Coming from the staunch conservative who renamed French fries "freedom fries" on congressional menus, the announcement shocked many.
    Back home, his change of heart brought denunciations and stirred trouble for Jones within his local Republican Party.
    But it also became clear that others in North Carolina's 3rd Congressional District were uneasy about the war, for one reason or another.
    Service members' families, watching violence surge, fear it will drag on indefinitely. Others worry it is damaging the military — or that it has been prosecuted foolishly.
    Jones "was right to go after the administration," said retired Marine Col. Jim Van Riper, a veteran of Vietnam and Desert Storm who supported the U.S. presence in Iraq but faulted the war plan. "Rumsfeld and the neo-cons have fouled it up from the beginning."
    The debate is occurring in a place where support for the military is apparent to the most casual visitor. The highways around Jacksonville, near the entrance to the Marines' huge Camp Lejeune, are lined with car dealerships, military surplus stores, barber shops and other businesses festooned with American flags. Signs urge Americans: "Honk for the Troops" and "Pray for Our Heroes."
    As tobacco farming has declined in recent decades, the military has become more important as a part of the local economy. About 60,000 retirees live in the 3rd District, which in addition to Camp Lejeune is home to the Marine Corps Air Station in Cherry Point, Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, and New River Marine Corps Air Station.
    But these days, residents' anxieties, as well as their pride, are near the surface.
    In the steamy parking lot of Jacksonville's Wal-Mart, Christy May, the wife of a Marine serving in Iraq, loads plastic summertime toys for her kids into the trunk of her car. She said she thought it would be a mistake to set a fixed time for withdrawal.
    "History shows that it wouldn't make sense for us to walk away all of a sudden," said May, 42, of Jacksonville.
    But she also acknowledges that she and her husband, a supply and logistics specialist, are split over whether the United States should be there at all. May is particularly anxious on this day, because her husband told her that insurgents had blown up his unit's communications hardware, forcing the Marines to travel by ground convoy rather than in aircraft. "I'm really worried about him today," she said.
    Nearby, Kerri Hassell of Jacksonville, a 32-year-old single mother of three, said she was worried about the effect the war had on a number of close friends who were Marines, including one who was godfather to her children. She said she knew three young Marines who were about to leave the service. All have doubts about continuing the war, she said.
    "Every one wants it to end," said Hassell, a community college student with a hairdressing business. "They don't know why they're over there."
    In her view, "the government uses the word 'terror' and it just sends us all into a frenzy."
    At the same time, the many in the area who support a continued U.S. effort have been outspoken, and the debate has seeped into local levels of government.
    Joe McLaughlin, a former Army Ranger who sits on the Onslow County Board of Commissioners, has proposed having the county board officially declare its opposition to a fixed withdrawal date. He is pressing to have the board vote on the issue at a meeting Monday.
    "The worst thing we can do is to announce that we're going to pull out by a certain date," said McLaughlin.
    Tuesday, McLaughlin called for Jones to resign his post over his proposal; later in the week, he reconsidered and withdrew that request.
    McLaughlin's stance split the county commissioners. The board's chairman, Lionell Midgett, argued that picking a fight with Jones could backfire when the area needed federal money for dredging a wetland or help in fighting a proposal to cut back military facilities.
    Martin Aragona Sr., the county Republican chairman, said he had been polling members of a key party committee to decide how to respond to Jones' proposal. He said all those he'd reached wanted to take a position strongly opposing Jones. "This is not the time to be second-guessing the commander in chief," Aragona said.
    Retired Army Maj. Gen. Hugh R. Overholt, who practices law in nearby New Bern, describes himself as a strong supporter of Jones who "has some concerns" about setting a fixed date for withdrawing from Iraq.
    But Overholt, a former judge advocate general of the Army, said he was concerned about what the fight had been doing to the military, both the reserves and the active-duty force.
    "I'm very concerned about our force," he said. The administration should do what's required and "get it over as soon as possible."
    The signs of anxiety in North Carolina's military heartland come at a time when national polls suggest that more Americans are turning against the war as the insurgency flares and costs to taxpayers show little sign of abating.
    Meanwhile, a U.S. Congress that has been reluctant to challenge the administration on the war is suddenly pressing for answers. Jones was joined last week by a bipartisan group in favor of a proposal that would require the White House to submit a plan for withdrawal by the end of the year and to begin troop reductions by October 2006.
    In some ways, Jones' own history shows what makes the issue so tough for people in his district.
    The son of a 14-term House member, Jones has built his congressional career in large part on advocacy for the military. He voted to authorize the war, displays pictures of the dead outside his Capitol Hill office, and has written condolence letters to the families of hundreds of service members. The anguish of the families was a major reason he turned against the war.
    "After 2 1/2 years, it's right to take a fresh look," he told reporters Thursday. "We have a right to ask, 'What are the goals?' "
    The doubts are part of the discussion in other parts of Jones' district, including the resorts on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, an area that includes many wealthy areas and newcomers from the North. Sometimes, arguments here head in a different direction.
    Jack Ubert, a retiree from Amityville, N.Y., who owns a home on the beach in well-off Emerald Island, N.C., admires Jones for "taking a pretty tough stance." Yet he fears that in the end the United States will "probably not win anything" from the Iraq fight — "like in Vietnam."
    "Saddam deserves whatever he gets," said Ubert, but added: "I was never sure why we had to go in there and dictate to them. It's just like with nuclear weapons: We think we're the only ones who should have them. We want to make all the rules."
    The debate is intensifying in North Carolina, as it is in other parts of the country.
    "Members are hearing more from people who are patriotic and really want to see this thing turn out right, but are worried about how long it's going to go on," said Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.). "They don't see that light at the end of the tunnel."
    Some congressional strategists said that while they still didn't expect large numbers of Republicans to break with the president over the war, there was a palpable nervousness as members looked to next year's midterm elections and worried that opinion might be shifting.
    Lawmakers want the administration to lay out specific goals they can point to as a way to reassure uneasy constituents, said one Republican strategist.
    "You're hearing from some members, 'We don't know what these [upcoming] milestones and markers are,' " said David Winston, a GOP pollster who advised the congressional Republican leader. What they are seeking is "not so much an exit strategy, but the sequence of things that are going to move us closer to safety and security."
    While the public's deepening pessimism is beyond dispute, it is not clear whether the country has reached a turning point, as it did with the Vietnam War in 1968.
    Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, said polls were showing that people were paying close attention to developments in Iraq, and that the number of people who preferred withdrawal was steadily rising.
    "What I see in Iraq is a steady drip, drip, drip of eroding support for the war as the casualties mount and the instability continues," Kohut said.
    Yet he noted that Pew research showed that 52% said the troops should stay, and he said the polls could still move in a more favorable direction. Other polls are more pessimistic.
    "I don't think opinion is entrenched," Kohut said. "There is still a public capacity to rethink Iraq."
    In North Carolina, public opinion is anything but entrenched. Andrew deGrandpré, city editor of the Daily News of Jacksonville, said that although the city's bonds with the military made it distinctive, the sentiments resembled the uneasy national conversation.
    "I think deep down this place is a lot like any other in America, and people have been debating the war and the human cost that's being paid," DeGrandpré said. "Nobody wants to back out … but these questions are out there."
    *
    Times staff writer Tyler Marshall in Washington contributed to this report.
    -------------------
    Bronwyn Lance Chester: A conservative asks: When will we be done in Iraq?
    10:01 PM CDT on Sunday, June 19, 2005
    By BRONWYN LANCE CHESTER
    Say what you will, U.S. Rep. Walter B. Jones is no squish.
    He's Mr. Freedom Fries, the man who persuaded Capitol Hill cafeterias to change the name of fried potatoes over France's opposition to the Iraq war.
    That was then. This is now.
    The soft-spoken North Carolina Republican, whose rambling district stretches from the northern Outer Banks to the Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune, has introduced legislation calling on President Bush to begin withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq by the autumn of 2006.
    Get one thing straight: Mr. Jones is no moderate. He's perceived on the Hill not as a loose cannon but as a solid, common-sense conservative concerned with military pay, states' rights and balanced budgets.
    In recent years, he has sponsored legislation to boost enlisted pay and improve the military's Tricare health-care system. He recently voted against stem-cell research.
    But he also has demonstrated flashes of independence. Mr. Jones was a gutsy Republican co-sponsor of the Democratic bill to restore House ethics rules changed to protect Majority Leader Tom DeLay. And he has taken the Bush administration to task for misleading Congress on the need for war.
    In announcing his intentions on ABC's This Week, Mr. Jones said:
    "When I look at the number of men and women who have been killed – it's almost 1,700 now, in addition to close to 12,000 have been severely wounded – and I just feel that the reason for going in for weapons of mass destruction, the ability of the Iraqis to make a nuclear weapon, that's all been proven that it was never there."
    According to his spokeswoman, Kristen Quigley, Mr. Jones' bill contains two timetables. The first would establish a date by which Mr. Bush must formulate specific goals for exiting from Iraq. The second would be for the plan's implementation.
    Predictably, critics have started to pounce. A message board under Mr. Jones' bio on Congress.org is filled with outraged missives such as, "A timetable for our withdrawal would be placed on the calendar of every terrorist on the planet!"
    But Ms. Quigley says that's a misconception. "It's a long timeline. The completion would be left up to, within reason, Bush's discretion." And the schedule can slip, according to events.
    It's no coincidence that Mr. Jones, who represents one of America's most military districts, is putting his foot down.
    After two years, soldiers and civilians alike still have no idea what success in Iraq looks like. Is it a written constitution? Full democracy for the entire country? Military self-sufficiency? Total defeat of the insurgency?
    Mr. Jones clearly is trying to force the administration to define what our Iraq endgame is. And for that, he deserves praise, not opprobrium.
    His plan is indicative of two larger issues. The first is a loss of public faith in the war in Iraq. A recent Gallup Poll revealed that nearly six in 10 Americans believe we should withdraw some or all of our troops. A similar ABC-Washington Post poll found that two-thirds of respondents believed the U.S. military is now bogged down.
    And consider that Mr. Bush's popularity is at an all-time low. Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, a conservative and former Bush Cabinet member, has broken with the White House on closing the Guantánamo Bay prison. And a New York Times story revealed just how unready-for-prime-time many Iraqi troops are.
    These factors could spill over to the second issue: House members and one-third of the Senate are up for re-election next year.
    With America's growing queasiness about the war, many GOP lawmakers are having night sweats envisioning a redux of 1994, when public discontent swept incumbent Democrats from power.
    Many Americans are looking at Iraq and wondering when we'll be done. And that's exactly what Walter Jones is trying to find out.
    Bronwyn Lance Chester is a columnist for The Virginian-Pilot in Norfolk. Her e-mail address is bronwyn.chester@pilotonline .com.
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/062005dnedichester.26845fcd.html

    Saturday, June 18, 2005

    Iraq: " The White House is completely disconnected from reality"

    6/27/05
    Hit by friendly fire
    With his polls down, Bush takes flak on Iraq from a host of critics--including some in his own party
    By Kevin Whitelaw
    Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel is angry. He's upset about the more than 1,700 U.S. soldiers killed and nearly 13,000 wounded in Iraq. He's also aggravated by the continued string of sunny assessments from the Bush administration, such as Vice President Dick Cheney's recent remark that the insurgency is in its "last throes." "Things aren't getting better; they're getting worse. The White House is completely disconnected from reality," Hagel tells U.S. News. "It's like they're just making it up as they go along. The reality is that we're losing in Iraq."
    In Fallujah, Americans and Iraqis are brothers in arms.
    That's strikingly blunt talk from a member of the president's party, even one cast as something of a pariah in the GOP because of his early skepticism about the war. "I got beat up pretty good by my own party and the White House that I was not a loyal Republican," he says. Today, he notes, things are changing: "More and more of my colleagues up here are concerned."
    Indeed, there are signs that the politics of the Iraq war are being reshaped by the continuing tide of bad news. Take this month in Iraq, with 47 U.S. troops killed in the first 15 days. That's already five more than the toll for the entire month of June last year. With the rate of insurgent attacks near an all-time high and the war's cost set to top $230 billion, more politicians on both sides of the aisle are responding to opinion polls that show a growing number of Americans favoring a withdrawal from Iraq. Republican Sens. Lincoln Chafee and Lindsey Graham have voiced their concerns. And two Republicans, including the congressman who brought "freedom fries" to the Capitol, even joined a pair of Democratic colleagues in sponsoring a bill calling for a troop withdrawal plan to be drawn up by year's end. "I feel confident that the opposition is going to build," says Rep. Ron Paul, the other Republican sponsor and a longtime opponent of the war.
    Sagging polls. The measure is not likely to go anywhere, but Hagel calls it "a major crack in the dike." Whether or not that's so, the White House has reason to worry that the assortment of critiques of Bush's wartime performance may be approaching a tipping point. Only 41 percent of Americans now support Bush's handling of the Iraq war, the lowest mark ever in the Associated Press-Ipsos poll. And the Iraq news has combined with a lethargic economy and doubts about the president's Social Security proposals to push Bush's overall approval ratings near all-time lows. For now, most Republicans remain publicly loyal to the White House. "Why would you give your enemies a timetable?" asks House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. "[Bush] doesn't fight the war on news articles or television or on polls."
    Still, the Bush administration is planning to hit back, starting this week, with a renewed public-relations push by the president. Bush will host Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim Jafari and has scheduled a major speech for June 28, the anniversary of the handover of power to an Iraqi government from U.S. authorities. But Congress's patience could wear very thin going into an election year. "If things don't start to turn around in six months, then it may be too late," says Hagel. "I think it's that serious."
    Bush's exit strategy--which depends on a successful Iraqi political process--got a boost last week when Sunni and Shiite politicians ended weeks of wrangling over how to increase Sunni representation on the constitution-writing committee. Now, however, committee members have less than two months before their mid-August deadline. And given how long it took to resolve who gets to draft the document, it's hard to imagine a quick accord on the politically explosive issues they face.
    With Ilana Ozernoy and Terence Samuel
    source: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050627/27bush.htm

    Dad picks up $600 tab to get Marine battle ready

    Jun. 18, 2005 12:00 AM
    John Tod of Mesa had been prepared to face Father's Day worrying about his son's pending date with the war in Iraq.
    Then Uncle Sam stepped in with more disappointing developments.
    Marine Pfc. Jeremy Tod called home with news that his superiors were urging him and fellow Marines to buy special military equipment, including flak jackets with armor plating, to enhance the prospects of their survival.
    The message was that such purchases were to be made by Marines with their own money.
    "He said they strongly suggested he get this equipment because when they get to Iraq they will wish they had," Tod said.
    Total estimated cost: $600.
    Tod said his son's call about two weeks ago from the Marine Corps Air Station-Yuma was a sobering reminder that the military is not prepared to equip Pfc. Tod and fellow Marines with the best equipment.
  • rest of the story...
  • "Operation Iraqi Freedom": Accurate Death & Desertion #'s ?

    06.18.2005 Jim Lampley

    A Bush-watcher website identified as TBRNews.org is reporting under the byline of "domestic intelligence reporter" Brian Harring that the Department of Defense is using a cynical tactic to mislead the public regarding the true death toll for American military personnel in Iraq. Harring claims he has an internal pdf. file from the D.O.D. which establishes that nearly 9000 Americans have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom, but that the official number has been held to 1713 by designating as Iraq deaths only those who perish on Iraqi soil. The remainder, he says, are military personnel who have died en route to Germany or in German hospitals-- casualties of the war, but not listed in the official death toll.
    If this is true it would explain the apparent statistical discrepancy between dead and wounded. A combat action which produces nearly eight times as many officially wounded-- 13000 plus-- as officially dead...well, it's not the norm. It goes without saying it would also further jolt a public majority already disturbed by the war's "progress" and eager to see the troops come home.
    How to validate or invalidate Harring's incendiary claims? In his report Harring asserts he will begin publishing, in sections, the Defense Department's official list of war dead from Iraq. Relatives and other loved ones of those whose lives are gone will be asked to examine the lists to see if the names of those they've lost appear there. The Defense Department has, according to Harring, properly notified the loved ones of those who have died in Germany or en route to hospital, but has neglected to inform them that the casualty is not a part of the official death toll.
    This is the way to find out, and gradually we in the blogosphere may get a picture of whether this most cruel of deceptions has really taken place. You have to hope not. But in light of everything we've learned, do you think this is beyond them? An Administration which forbids photographs of returning coffins? An Administration whose President has yet to attend a single Iraq-related funeral or memorial? It appears almost nothing is beyond them.
    There's more at the site. Harring also asserts more than 5500 American military personnel assigned to Iraq have deserted, most to Ireland and Canada. But I am at a loss to figure the origin of this site or the validity of its information without help, and that is what the rest of you can provide by taking a look, filtering it into the growing documentation of Iraq War deceit, and locating those who might be able to gather whether their loved one's death was honestly and fairly recorded for the act of combat heroism it may have been. In my heart I sincerely hope Harring is wrong.
    source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/jim-lampley/the-ultimate-deception_2838.html

    Brownwood's Republican Senators did not support Senate lynching apology !

    U.S. Senate apologizes for 100 years of lynchings
    By Frank James Washington Bureau Tue Jun 14, 9:40 AM ET
    The Senate apologized Monday to lynching victims and their descendants, a belated attempt to make amends for what some lawmakers acknowledged was the Senate's shameful 19th and 20th Century history of blocking efforts to end the grisly practice of lynching African-Americans.
    With the survivor of a lynching and families of victims watching from the Senate's visitors' gallery, Sen. Mary Landrieu (news, bio, voting record), a Louisiana Democrat and main sponsor of the legislation calling for a rare Senate apology, spoke with an unusual visual aid. It was a gruesome 1930s-era photo of a black lynching victim hanging from a tree as a white mob, including children, looked on, with many of them smiling.
    "The Senate was wrong not to act," she said, referring to the chamber's repeated failure over a nearly 100-year period to support the efforts of the House and seven presidents to make lynching a federal crime.
    Those efforts were undone over the decades by filibusters by Southern senators, either racists themselves or unwilling to anger racist constituents. Available records indicate mobs, often with the complicity of local officials, lynched at least 4,742 people, three-fourths of them black, between 1882 and 1968.
    "That was wrong to not stand in the way of the mob," Landrieu said. "We lacked courage then. We perhaps don't have all the courage we need today to do everything that we should do.
    "But I know that we can apologize today," she said. "We can be sincere in our apology to the families, to their loved ones, and perhaps now we can set some of these victims and their families free and most of all set our country free to be better than it is today."
    But even as a majority of the Senate--80 lawmakers as of the time of Monday night's vote--signed onto Landrieu's resolution, there was a sense of the unfinished business still before America when it comes to race relations.
    That all 100 senators didn't unanimously sign onto the apology seemed to bear out writer William Faulkner's line that "the past is never dead; it's not even past."
    As a condition of getting the apology legislation to a point where it could be approved by the Senate, its supporters had to settle for a voice vote instead of the more typical roll-call vote where each vote is individually recorded. There was, however, no audible opposition when the vote was taken.
    Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), the Democratic 2004 presidential nominee, said, "I think it's critical that we take the step we're taking and have taken, but at the same time wouldn't it have been just that much more extraordinary and significant if we were having a recorded vote with all 100 senators recording their votes? We're not."
    Many of the senators cited the book "Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America" as a major spur to the action.
    Landrieu and others cited the casual brazenness of the spectators and perpetrators as one of the most troubling aspects of the photos because it suggested they had little to fear of being brought to justice. The traveling photographic exhibit on which the book is based is on display at the Chicago Historical Society.
    In one of the day's many ironies, it was two Southern senators who spearheaded the apology, Landrieu and Sen. George Allen (news, bio, voting record) (R-Va.).
    "This august body has a stain on its history," Allen said of the Senate's previous failures to take a stand against lynching. "And that stain is lynching."
    Another irony was that the apology was approved on the same day as the start of the Mississippi trial of Edgar Ray Killen, a reputed Ku Klux Klan leader who is charged in the murders of three civil rights workers in 1964. Philip Dray, author of another book on lynchings, "At the Hands of Persons Unknown," said it's uncertain what would have happened if the Senate had passed anti-lynching legislation, but its failure had the effect of galvanizing opposition to lynching.
    Lynchings and legal inaction led to the creation of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. It also gave a major impetus to the civil rights movement.
    Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), the Senate's only African-American, said, "I do hope that as we commemorate this past injustice that this chamber also spends some time however doing something concrete and tangible to heal the long shadow of slavery and the legacy of racial discrimination so that 100 years from now we can look back and be proud and not having to apologize once again."
    "There are more ways to perpetrate violence than simply a lynching," he said. "There's the violence that we subject young children to when they don't have any opportunities, when they have no hope . . . . That's the kind of violence this chamber could do something about."
    Descendants of victims seemed inclined to accept the Senate's action, as did James Cameron, 91, of Milwaukee, who was lynched in Marion, Ind., in 1930, when he was 16, but survived.
    "We believe an apology is the beginning," said Doria Dee Johnson, 44, of Evanston, Ill. Her great-great-grandfather, Anthony Crawford, was a farmer in Abbeville, S.C., and pillar of the black community, who was lynched in 1916 after a dispute with a white farmer.
    "It takes a lot for people to admit when they're wrong" she said. "For the Senate to do it as a body I think is courageous. We haven't seen this sort of statement from the U.S. Senate."
    fjames@tribune.com
    source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/chitribts/20050614/ts_chicagotrib/ussenateapologizesfor100yearsoflynchings;_ylt=ApyObK8XZtmpMIX7oykG2u_pbr8F;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
    -----------------
    Why are some Black folks so happy to hear an apology from people who don’t mean it?

    There are nearly a million African Americans in prison – one out of eight inmates on the planet – a gulag of monstrous proportions, clearly designed to perpetuate the social relations that began with slavery. We demand an end to those relations, not an insincere, risk-free “apology” that sets not one prisoner free.
    It is appropriate that the great anti-lynching leader, Ida B. Wells (1862-1931), who documented the murder of nearly 5,000 Blacks at the hands of white mobs in the terror-filled years that followed the death of Reconstruction, be verbally honored by Louisiana Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu and Virginia Republican Senator George Allen. Yet both Senators supported laws that will impose draconian equivalents of post-Civil War “Black Codes” on inner city youth, who will now be designated as criminal conspirators if they congregate in groups of three or more.
    No thank you, Senators Landrieu and Allen – the crime you committed against us in May vastly outweighs your weak apology in June. You have guaranteed that hundreds of thousands more young Black people will be interned in your gulag – a crime against humanity. And both of you are determined to commit more crimes. Should we ask for an apology in advance?
    There can be no absolution for those who continue to profit from past crimes, and plot new ones. Lynch law was the effective law of the South – and, truth be told, the rest of the United States – and the “lawful” authorities sanctioned it by refusing to pass 200 anti-lynching bills. The terror of lynching created the social relationships that resulted in white households accumulating ten to twenty times as much wealth as Black households – our collective national inheritance. An apology will not do.
    Is that what our movement has been about all of these generations – to get an apology from people who became rich on our backs? There is a method to this racist madness, an assumption that African Americans can be bought by a simple nod from a few white people. Some of these racists will not even give us a nod – the twelve or sixteen senators who did not join in the anti-lynching vote, all but one of them Republicans. The Republican Senate Leader made sure that no member would have to go on record against lynching. However, are we supposed to be grateful for a non-binding resolution that admits thousands of murders were committed with the complicity of the United States government, but that does not redress the wrongs in any way.
    Where is the sense of justice in this apology? What do the descendants of the terrorized class expect? That wrongs be righted, or that those who have profited gain absolution?
    Lynching was genocide
    The United States Senate did not ratify the Convention on Genocide until 1988, 40 years after African Americans circulated the petition, “We Charge Genocide,” in an effort to make international law applicable to the U.S. By this time, most of the former Dixiecrats had become Republicans, and felt safe in blaming their former party for their own crimes.
    The United States, controlled by a Republican majority and feckless minority of white Democrats whose greatest fear is their Black constituents, is now engaged in a grand venture to export the ideology of white terror, planet-wide. They have not learned a thing. Having never practiced democracy on their own shores, they claim a copyright to the concept. The fact that nobody believes their claims does not phase them, because they are marching to the tune of Manifest Destiny – the white man’s right to rule. It is that belief that drew tens of thousands of whites to the lynching fields of Georgia and Indiana, for the sport of Negro-killing. Now they are in Iraq and Afghanistan, claiming moral authority.
    The march of civilization goes on, leaving the United States behind. The bubble of news communication fools only those inside. The rest of the globe sees its own interests, and recognizes white arrogance, intuitively.
    This intuitive knowledge, born of gruesome experience, also informs Black Americans. Although surrounded by the same bubble of misinformation as the rest of Americans, Blacks smell the lie. The vast bulk of us see the “apology” for what it is – a scam, with no substantial benefits, and less good faith. But there is a class that is paid to say “Yes sir,” on command. Most of us pay them no attention.
    Lynch law was no law at all. It was pure white power – the right to declare oneself a higher form of being, and reduce the “other” to charcoal. The current rulers of the United States are spreading lynch law to the far reaches of the planet. They claim the right to “pre-emptive” warfare, and reject all other people’s rights to live under collectively accepted rules. They wage war against the concept of international law, just as they violated every law that did not enshrine white privilege.
    Nothing has changed, except the world. We will not tolerate such criminality, anymore. In fact, we have collectively called the behavior that white folks in the United States routinely engaged in, criminal. It’s far too late for the U.S. Senate to pass a non-binding resolution announcing some vague objection to lynching, when they pass legislation that makes it a crime to be Black and a youth, vote billions to fund a military machine that seeks to enslave the planet, and rejects the authority of the World Criminal Court. In doing so, they have made themselves outlaws.
    We will not forgive, or accept an apology that does not come with a change in power relationships. And we will reject any so-called Black leadership that makes its own deal.
    BlackCommentator.com Co-Publishers Glen Ford and Peter Gamble are writing a book on Barack Obama and the Crisis of Black Political Leadership.
    source: http://www.blackcommentator.com/142/142_cover_lynching_pf.html
    -----------------
  • more here...
  • Andrew Rice for Oklahoma Senate

  • to read comments...

  • --------------------
    NOVEMBER 18, 2002
    BROWNWOOD, TEXAS
    1-5pm
    Fundraiser for Peaceful Tomorrows
    Speaking: Andrew Rice of Peaceful Tomorrows
    Sponsored by Brownwood Human Rights Committee
    Location: 110 East Chandler, Brownwood, Texas
    Contact: Steve Harris at 915-646-5576 for more information
  • go here...
  • Brownwood Juneteenth Celebration & Other Activities

    Saturday June 18, 2005
    Juneteenth parade rolls this morning
    "If we are going to make a difference as fathers, we need to do it now. The decision is practical. It has to do with bedtimes, Saturday football games, stories, and hamburgers; and it has to do with carving those times out of busy lives -- today." -- Rob Parsons, American author
    By Candace Cooksey Fulton -- Brownwood Bulletin
    Who knew? We would no more than blink last Saturday, and here it is Saturday again. This, of course, is an important Saturday in June -- the third one of the month -- the day before the third Sunday of June, which is Father's Day.
    Of course, it's happened before in June, in Texas, and it will happen again, that Father's Day coincides with Juneteenth, which is always June 19, the anniversary of the day in 1865 when Union Gen. Gordon Granger read the Emancipation Proclamation in Galveston, thus belatedly bringing about the freeing of 250,000 slaves in Texas.
    Here in Brown County, today, Juneteenth celebrations and support and fund-raising activities to benefit the R.F. Hardin Museum will be going on.
    But there are plenty of other activities too. So keep reading, and as soon as possible, start doing.
    Mini Job Fair
    Demand Staff is sponsoring a mini job fair from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. at Wal-Mart. Several Brownwood businesses and manufacturers will have job applications available for prospective employees. Texas Workforce Commission will be there providing job applications for Kohler, Superior Essex and other area industries.
    Serious about compost?
    Here's your chance to learn how easy it is to compost and how it will benefit your garden. Keep Brownwood Beautiful is offering a class on "how to compost" at 6 p.m. this evening at the demonstration site, the City of Brownwood Sanitation Department and KBB built at the recycling center on FM 45.
    Compost improves the texture of any type of soil and provides a number of benefits, such as, allowing the soil to hold more water for a longer period of time, acting as a slow-release fertilizer, providing a wide range of nutrients, enzymes, and vitamins, drawing beneficial insects and earthworms, keeping the soil cooler in the summer and reducing what goes into the landfill.
    In Texas, almost 25 percent of the solid waste produced is yard waste and food scraps, explained Cary Perrin, executive director for KBB.
    "That means the majority of citizens throw items into the landfill system that could be used a better way -- like for compost," Perrin said.
    The class this evening will consist of the basics of why composting is a good idea, what compost is, how to compost, what to compost, and also, examples of various composting systems.
    Each participant is encouraged to bring yard waste and food scraps. The site is outdoors, so wear sturdy shoes and be prepared for mosquitoes.
    By the way, each participant will be entered into a drawing for a home composting bin, and, after class, there will be refreshments.
    Juneteenth Parade ... and more
    It's an important remembrance for all who cherish freedom, and today, a Juneteenth parade, which begins at 11 a.m. at the Brownwood Coliseum and will circle around downtown and conclude at Cecil Holman Park, is intended to celebrate the occasion. At the parade's conclusion, at the park, a program on the history of the day will be presented. Featured will be a recitation of the Emancipation Proclamation by Tom Bowden, music by Herb Colbert, a presentation by children and remarks by Harriett Wilson.
    Throughout the day Saturday, starting as early as 9 a.m., the park will host a children's area, car show, softball game, obstacle course and swimming. Free hot dogs will be served from 2 to 3 p.m.
    The local Juneteenth" celebration has for a number of years been a fund-raising effort for the R.F. Hardin Museum, and more than 100 diners enjoyed a soul food lunch on Friday at the Bennie Houston Community Center. Anyone wishing to contribute to that fund may send a check or money order to the R.F. Hardin Museum, Inc.; P.O. Box 1968; Brownwood, TX 76804.
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/06/18/news/news04.txt

    “This war was based on lies and deception,”: Stars & Stripes & Downing Street Memo

    Saturday, June 18, 2005
    Relatives of some troops killed in Iraq seek hearings on Downing Street memo
    By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes
    Pacific edition, Friday, June 17, 2005

    WASHINGTON — Several parents of soldiers killed in Iraq visited Capitol Hill on Wednesday to ask for congressional hearings on the Downing Street memo, which one mother called President Bush’s “Watergate.”
    Critics say the document, which contains minutes from a meeting in July 2002 between British Prime Minister Tony Blair and top aides, shows that Bush was determined to go to war with Iraq and ignored evidence that showed the country had no weapons of mass destruction.
    “Military action was now seen as inevitable,” the memo reads. “Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”
    The memo was first revealed by the Sunday Times of London in May. Earlier this month, both Bush and Blair dismissed the accusations, saying that the war in Iraq was justified because Saddam Hussein was ignoring international law.
    But members of Military Families Speak Out, whose members are relatives of troops killed in Iraq, said Congress must investigate whether the president lied to the country to justify military action.
    “This war was based on lies and deception,” said Celeste Zappala of Philadelphia, whose son was killed in April 2004 while providing security for investigators searching for WMD. “The only way we can understand how we’ve come to this disastrous position is to find out what the truth is.”
    The group, which has frequently criticized the administration, met with congressmen and left flyers petitioning for a full investigation at the offices of Republican House leaders.
    “I envy the parents who support this war, because if I did I’d sleep better,” said Dianne Davis Santorello, a Pennsylvania resident whose son was killed in August 2004. “But I don’t sleep well. My son died for a lie.”
    She said the Downing Street memo would “bring down the house of cards” if lawmakers choose to investigate it, and compared it to the Watergate scandal which eventually forced President Richard Nixon from office.
    Rep. James McGovern, D-Mass., said if true the allegations in the memo are “shameful” and told the parents, “Those who are responsible should be held accountable.”
    “This clearly wasn’t a war of necessity; it was a war of choice,” he said.
    The group also petitioned lawmakers to set a specific date for the full withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., and other Republicans who last month supported an unsuccessful measure to mandate an exit date were presented with a certificate of thanks from the group.
    Jones, who plans to introduce similar legislation on Thursday, said he was “heartsick” at the families’ loss and pledged to help them in their efforts.
    Also on Thursday, Democrats have planned a meeting concerning the memo, to be followed by a rally outside the White House.
    source: http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=28991&archive=true

    Political Pulpit Pandering

    Friday, June 17, 2005
    Editorial: Pulpit parties

    Relationship wrong for politicos, illegal for churches
    William Pate, a student at St. Edwards University, got quite an education when he attended a Republican rally in Austin last spring. The rally took place in Westover Church of Christ.
    Pate wasn't there to participate but to observe for a class project. What he saw was an incredible mingling of church and politics, the kind that tax-code laws are supposed to prevent.
    He saw church collection plates passed, for the GOP.
    He heard the state Republican chairwoman tell those gathered, “you are here tonight by divine appointment,” and, “all Republican success is a credit to God's leadership.”
    He heard the Republican Party's state treasurer tell the audience, “God is preparing us for the battle to come.”
    Curious, the student looked into the law and contacted Americans United for Separation of Church and State. It filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service.
    The next time the Republicans sought to stage a rally at the church, it declined. Westover asserts it hasn't broken any tax laws.
    The over-the-top entanglement between Westover Church of Christ and the GOP comes to mind with Gov. Rick Perry's choosing Calvary Christian Academy in Fort Worth to sign an abortion consent measure.
    Perry's wasn't a partisan event per se, but it was clearly an embarking point for Perry's re-election effort.
    The governor sent out an e-mail inviting thousands of “pro-family Christian friends” to attend the event. We're curious why he didn't invite Jews, Buddhists or Muslims to the event. Are they not “pro-family”?
    Such pandering is an embarrassing statement from a governor who should represent all Texans.
    The Republican Party has not been alone in this type of entanglement of religion in politics.
    Americans United filed a complaint last fall against a Boston church in which the pastor endorsed John Kerry from the pulpit.
    Predominantly black congregations have been among the most egregiously political on behalf of parties and candidates.
    In 1996 Americans United formed Project Fair Play, which has filed dozens of complaints against churches that forget their non-partisan obligation under the law.
    Having 501(c)3 nonprofit designation giving them a tax exemption, churches are forbidden to engage in partisan politics or electioneering.
    Attempts have been made to reverse such laws, which have been in place for half a century. Needless to say, we need them as never before.
    Church members should object strongly when their church becomes a partisan vehicle. And pastors should know the law and respect the privileges afforded to them relative to taxable status.
    And, by the way, governors aren't elected to be pastors.
    source: http://www.wacotrib.com/opin/content/news/opinion/stories/2005/06/17/20050617waceditorial17.html

    Politics & Pulpit Propaganda: Who delivers the message in your community ?

    Catapulting the propaganda
    JUDITH KRIEGER
    I recently received one of those chain e-mails which implored me to pass on a set of heart-breaking photos of soldiers in Iraq. The e-mail also contained a plea to participate in a prayer wheel. “Of all the gifts you could give a US Soldier, Sailor, Coastguardsman, Marine or Airman, prayer is the very best one.”
    Though I understand the sentiment, I think prayer falls quite bit short of being the best gift. The best gift to soldiers being put in harm’s way would have been honesty from the commander in chief, instigator of this war. Since it’s too late for that, the second-best gift would be an American public that demanded honesty from that same commander in chief.
    Though Mr. Bush doesn’t do nuance and he often fights a losing battle with syntax and pronunciation, he somehow makes it all work to potent political effect. “See, in my line of work,” he has said, “you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda . . .”
    This folksy bit of arrogance helps explain his talent for communication. While FDR insisted that repetition does not transform a lie into a truth, Bush has persevered, brazened out and repeated lies that meeker men might have buckled under. He has hidden the truth in plain sight, wrapped in the cult of personality and patriotism and been rewarded for his efforts. His hand-picked audiences respond with thunderous applause. They relish the president’s jovial delivery, happy just to let the propaganda sink in and work its magic. Cares be gone. God bless America.
    The confluence of religious fanaticism, war, fear and corporatism, have indeed proven ripe for catapulting his propaganda. The Iraq war has cost the lives of 1,683 soldiers and the lives of untold numbers of civilians. More than 12,000 Americans have been wounded and the war has a price tag of $300 billion and counting.
    It’s a war that Mr. Bush decided to wage nearly a year before he breathed his first lie about the weapons of mass destruction. The Downing Street Memo, a document containing meeting minutes transcribed during the British Prime Minister’s meeting on July 23, 2002 revealed that “Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than half that of Libya, North Korea and Iran.” At the time the memo was written, Mr. Bush was claiming that war was a last option. All along it was actually the only option. Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. Repetition of the WMD lie sank into the American public and the war was catapulted into our lives.
    Adding insult to injury, Donald Rumsfeld has reduced his own criminal negligence in the execution of this war to his succinct and cold homily that freedom is untidy. His attitude about death and destruction makes me wonder how he’d describe the tsunami in Southeast Asia. Questions about the lack of body armor and armored Humvees were met with the glib rebuttal, “You go to war with the Army you have not the Army you might want or wish to have.” He may as well have claimed his dog had eaten the war plans, so little was his regard for the question.
    The evangelical political movement has provided backup more substantial than mere prayer wheels. Dr. Frank Wright, CEO of the National Religious Broadcasters, says about the 141 million listeners and viewers they reach, “We don’t just tell them what the news is, we tell them what it means. And that’s appealing to people, especially in moments of cultural instability.”
    NRB passed a resolution during their 2003 conference which stated, “We recognize in all of the above that God has appointed President George W. Bush to leadership at this critical period in our nation’s history, give Him thanks.” Needless to say, telling their audience what it all means likely does not include skepticism about anything Mr. Bush says or does.
    Yes, the Bush administration has a way with words that would merit awe if it weren’t so shameless. But there’s a sign of life on the horizon. George W. Bush’s approval rating is now a full 20 points lower than Bill Clinton’s was on the day he was impeached. Bill Clinton had a way with words, too. He lied about a consensual sexual affair that destroyed nothing but his dignity but which still led to impeachment. I’m thinking now of the pictures of those soldiers and how they remind me of my own children and yours, too. Instead of praying for them, I wrote this letter.
    Judith Krieger lives in York Township.

    For more news visit ydr.com.
    ---------
  • here's a few of the messengers...
  • Friday, June 17, 2005

    Brownwood's Republican Senators assailed on Lynching Apology

    Brownwood's Lynching History - Who killed Lawrence Earl Jackson ?
    ------------
    " Central Texas was practically ground zero for lynchings during the Jim Crow era. Of the approximately 4,700 documented lynchings – mostly of African-Americans between 1880 and 1930 – about 500 took place in Texas. That's more than any state other than Georgia and Mississippi, and our senators should have been at the forefront. "
    see entire article posted below: Patricia Bernstein: Legacy of shame
    --------------

    NAACP criticizes Hutchison, Cornyn
    Senators assailed on lynching apology; aides say they backed measure
    08:34 PM CDT on Thursday, June 16, 2005
    By TODD J. GILLMAN / The Dallas Morning News
    WASHINGTON – The nation's leading civil rights group criticized Texas' senators on Thursday for not co-sponsoring the Senate's apology for its failure to outlaw lynching decades ago.
    All but 14 of 100 senators signed onto the resolution of apology, which passed unanimously this week – without objection and without a roll call vote. Neither Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison nor John Cornyn were among the co-sponsors.
    "There's clearly a difference between not objecting and working to see to its passage," said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington bureau. "The position they took seems to be one of indifference. If you look at the problem of lynching when it was in its heyday, it was a problem because good people did nothing. ... And they [the Texas senators] did nothing."
    Senate records show that 18 of the co-sponsors signed the day the resolution was passed, and seven signed a day or two afterward, taking advantage of a little-used rule. Liberal blogs have excoriated the holdouts, accusing them of insensitivity or overt racism.
    The Texas senators, both Republicans, maintain they supported the apology but saw no reason to co-sponsor it.
    "You don't need to co-sponsor something to be in favor of it. There's many things that pass the Senate every day that many people don't co-sponsor," said Hutchison spokesman Chris Paulitz. "Sen. Hutchison abhors lynching and believes it was a horrific part of our past – and as we saw with the James Byrd [Jr.] incident, [in] our not too distant past."
    In 1998, Mr. Byrd, a black man, was chained to a pickup by three white men and dragged to death in Jasper, Texas. Ms. Hutchison was the highest-ranking state official at his funeral.
    Passage was assured by the time it was circulated to Ms. Hutchison's office, Mr. Paulitz said, and aides saw no need to urge her to sign, especially since she rarely co-sponsors bills that she didn't help write.
    Cornyn spokesman Don Stewart said a number of misguided complaints have reached the office in the past few days, from callers who wanted to know why he supports lynching. Some erroneously believed that he voted against the resolution.
    "It was a unanimous vote, and his vote shows that he supported what the resolution said," Mr. Stewart said. "Lynching is illegal at the local, state and federal level and has been for a long time. This was a resolution about what the Senate filibustered years ago. ... This was supposed to be a somber, sincere reflection on the mistakes of the past, and it's become a political cudgel for some that want to misconstrue the nature of the process."
    Mr. Cornyn inserted comments of support in the Senate record, calling the "era of widespread lynching in our nation's history deplorable."
    According to the NAACP, there were 4,742 documented lynchings in 43 states from 1882 to 1968.
    From 1920 to 1940, the U.S. House passed anti-lynching bills three times. But Southern lawmakers choked the proposals in the Senate. Historians and civil rights groups – including the NAACP, founded as a direct response to lynchings – blame the Senate's inaction for later waves of violence and for resistance to voting rights and desegregation.
    The resolution of apology was written by Sens. George Allen, a Virginia Republican, and Mary Landrieu, a Louisiana Democrat.
    E-mail tgillman@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/washington/stories/061705dnnatlynching.17db2820.html
    ------------------------
    Patricia Bernstein: Legacy of shame
    In 1916 in Waco, a crowd of thousands cheered as a 17-year-old was lynched. 'We're sorry' is only a start.
    12:02 AM CDT on Friday, June 17, 2005
    It is refreshing to see that the Senate has passed a resolution apologizing for its role, over many decades, in blocking federal anti-lynching legislation. Of course, it says a lot about the glacial pace of racial healing that this moment didn't arrive until 2005, but it is a positive move, nonetheless.

    Oddly, neither Texas senator is among the 85 resolution co-sponsors, although the office of Sen. Mary Landreau, D-La., the sponsor, says Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison did sign on late as a "supporter."
    Central Texas was practically ground zero for lynchings during the Jim Crow era. Of the approximately 4,700 documented lynchings – mostly of African-Americans between 1880 and 1930 – about 500 took place in Texas. That's more than any state other than Georgia and Mississippi, and our senators should have been at the forefront.
    One of the worst atrocities of the lynching era was the public torture and murder of an illiterate 17-year-old black farm laborer named Jesse Washington on May 15, 1916, behind Waco City Hall. He was beaten, stabbed, hanged and burned in front of 10,000 cheering spectators. The shouts, one newspaper account read, "were like those a crowd will give when leading a triumphal procession from a ball game that has been a big victory."
    The fledgling NAACP, founded only seven years earlier, used this episode to launch a vigorous anti-lynching campaign. Elisabeth Freeman, a young white veteran of the militant wing of the women's suffrage movement, was sent to Waco to investigate. Using wiles she had acquired in years of street-corner speechmaking and demonstrating, she got the names of the lynch-mob leaders and photos taken by a local commercial photographer.
    W.E.B. Du Bois then wrote about the incident in unflinching detail in a special supplement to the NAACP magazine, The Crisis. The NAACP sent that supplement to President Woodrow Wilson, his Cabinet, every member of Congress and a long list of newspapers.
    Efforts to find a Texas lawyer to bring charges against the mob leaders failed, but the NAACP was learning that even without legal action, publicity could shame a town into taking action to prevent future lynchings. Towns like Waco, which Mr. Du Bois described as "alert, pushing and rich," were learning that lynchings, when widely publicized, were bad for business.
    The NAACP's most effective tool in those dark days was publicity, because local juries simply would not convict lynchers. In the South, it was unusual for a lynch-mob leader to be indicted, much less convicted, and local officials often orchestrated or even participated in lynchings. Thus, the campaign for federal legislation.
    In January 1922, less than six years after Jesse Washington was slain and partly because of the hard work of the NAACP, the U.S. House passed an anti-lynching bill that provided for fines and imprisonment of officials who allowed lynchings to occur or failed to prosecute lynchers.
    Similar bills passed the House in 1937 and 1940. Each time, Southern senators prevented the bill from even coming up for a vote in their chamber.
    Federal legislation, had it passed and been enforced, might have helped bring a quick close to the lynching epidemic. Because of the power of racist Southern senators, however, lynching petered out slowly, retreating from daylight and larger towns and public squares to smaller communities and rural areas, where it was performed in secret, often in the dead of night, by small groups of increasingly marginalized characters.
    There's no way to know how many lives might have been saved if anti-lynching legislation had been passed and enforced in 1922. But the failure to pass it was, beyond question, one of the Senate's more inglorious chapters. How sad that even today, the tragic story of Jesse Washington and nearly 500 other Texas victims did not interest our senators enough for them to vigorously co-sponsor the apology resolution.
    Many communities today struggle to deal with these ugly old stories, some now being exposed or told in detail for the first time. These episodes of barbarity must be recognized and atoned for in some way, most importantly to educate our children about the consequences of allowing bigotry to flourish unchecked.
    Waco and other lynching towns should follow the Senate's lead and find a way – whether it be a marker, a memorial, a garden or a scholarship – to formally acknowledge and apologize for the worst horrors of Jim Crow.
    Houston author Patricia Bernstein wrote "The First Waco Horror: The Lynching of Jesse Washington and the Rise of the NAACP" (Texas A&M University Press). Her e-mail address is patricia@patriciabernstein.com.
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/061705dnedibernstein.177fe37f.html

    Thursday, June 16, 2005

    Rick Perry Tactics & Politics of the Texas Republican Taliban

    Letters to the Editor - Fort Worth Star Telegram
    Posted on Fri, Jun. 10, 2005

    Politics and religion
    When Gov. Rick Perry appeared Sunday at Calvary Christian Academy to sign legislative measures, the news reports suggested the event was about morals. This wasn't about morals! It was about furthering the political career of a weak and hypocritical governor.
    We should all be appalled that he would travel to a church school to conduct our state business. Calvary Cathedral should be especially appalled that he would use its facilities in such a shallow way. He tried to make his efforts seem to be good vs. evil.
    Perry should realize that many good people of this great state are very hurt and disappointed that he would be so concerned about one little slice of life that he would ignore the urgent needs of our 4.4 million public school children. When will the "good" politicians of the far right begin to care about the big picture?
    It's time we opted out of the useless No Child Left Behind Act and put the joy of learning and respect for our hard-working teachers back into our schools. I say our schools because our tax dollars pay for them and they're our best great hope for the future.
    God help Texas!

    Sara R. Fulks, Fort Worth
    -------------------------

    Thanks to Bud Kennedy for the concise, well-written June 2 column about "Pastor" Perry and his shameful antics at the Calvary Christian Academy ("Perry taking politics through church doors.")
    Bring on Kinky Friedman. Where's Ann Richards when we really need her? And all this coming from a registered Republican.
    Seriously, I feel sorry for the confused flock that bought into this bit of chicanery and just hope that its members don't spend all their hard-earned money on the discounted books and DVDs that were so graciously offered.
    I'm sure that these literary gems will be registered in the Library of Congress, except I'm not sure what category they would be under - maybe the P.T. Barnum section.
    I guess if this country survived Prohibition and Jimmy Swaggart, we'll survive our current state of self-righteous euphoria.
    Sorry about my own small diatribe, but it's much less expensive than my therapist and certainly more beneficial.

    Brian Rutledge, Fort Worth
    ----------------------

    On Sunday, Perry signed into law a bill that will require minors to obtain parental consent before having an abortion.
    This law needs an additional clause - parents who refuse to consent to their daughter's abortion must make an 18-year financial commitment to financially support their grandchild. Also, make parents liable for any physical, emotional and financial damages that an unwanted pregnancy may incur.
    Of course, we could avoid all this by letting young women control their own bodies, but Perry would rather cater to mush-headed religious fanatics.

    Rebecca A. Morris, Fort Worth
    ---------------------

    Although I don't share Bud Kennedy's embrace of the activist homosexual agenda, I do share his revulsion over Perry's decision to shamelessly exploit the fervor of Christian believers to his own political advantage. In truth, the Christian community has only itself to blame.
    By allowing one or two issues to dominate believers' thinking, the Christian voice has unwittingly allowed itself to be manipulated by political operatives.
    Rather than being salt and light in a culture that desperately needs both, the Christian community is reduced to caricature, and deservedly so.
    Wake up, fellow believers, and hold your elected officials accountable. That's your God-ordained responsibility.

    Chris Brammer, Austin
    ---------------------------

    The governor and his party didn't accomplish anything in the 79th Legislature on auto, home and health care insurance, education or other important issues. So now they fall back on scare tactics - that homosexuals are the main concern of this state.
    President Bush used the same tactic in the 2004 election.
    The protesters fall into the same trap. They give these unscrupulous politicians a free publicity stunt.
    These politicians who accomplished nothing in the 79th Legislature need a smoke screen to divert our attention away from their failure by using religion to gain votes.
    I hope the people of Texas see through this smoke screen and vote these rascals out of office.

    Gaetano Mezza, Fort Worth

  • go here...


  • for background information on Perry's Pandering to the Texas Taliban
  • go here...


  • What are the Texas Taliban Tactics and who are using them in the Texas Republican Party ? See what former Texas Lt Governor (Republican) Bill Ratliff - Mt Pleasant had to say about them and their tactics.
  • go here...


  • Look at the comment below Representative Randy Neugebauer (Republican-TX 19th) tried to delete from his site
    (censorship ?) as it relates to the comments from a fellow Republican !

    Congress.Org -- Elected Officials
    ... of the skinheads; this type of hate mongering is now being practiced by the al Qaeda
    and the Taliban." Republican Texas Lt Governor Bill Ratliff Source: The ...
    www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/ userletter/?id=141060&letter_id=111849936 - 38k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages

    source: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=141060&letter_id=111849936
    ------------
    Waco Tribune Herald
    Young: You might say stakes were more than political
    John Young
    Sunday, June 19, 2005
    Opinion page editor

    The story on Page 2B was tragic. The story on Page 3B was just sad.
    Not surprisingly, the tragedy got the smaller headline, being in the obituaries.
    The story on the opposite page? Some will say it's about morality. Actually, it's about power, and not a higher one.
    A higher power wouldn't be concerned with raw politics. That higher power would be intent on caressing and comforting those who hurt, and who cry out, someone like Bruce Ball.
    Unfortunately, the story placement demands that we discuss politics first under the heading: “Perry backs anti-gay marriage group.”
    That's Rick Perry, Texas governor. The story told about two men, John Colyandro and Jim Ellis, helping set up the Texas Marriage Alliance. The two recently were indicted on charges of money laundering on behalf of a political action committee set up by U.S. House Speaker Tom DeLay.
    Perry had filmed a testimonial for the Texas Marriage Alliance, saying a constitutional amendment on the Texas ballot is “your chance to protect marriage from fringe groups and liberal judges . . .”
    Gee. I wonder if they'll be raising money.
    Analysts call this “securing the base,” as was Perry's appearance at an Austin church for a bill-signing on the amendment (the signing signifies nothing; voters will have to make it law).
    At the event, Ohio evangelist Rod Parsley made disparaging remarks about homosexuals and got a squeeze on the shoulder from Texas' chief executive.
    You might call that inspiring. Then again, you might have agreed with Bruce Ball and me on the matter. It was just sad.
    I can't know, but I cringe to think that such sadness is what overwhelmed Ball. On May 31 in Texas' lovely capital city, he took his life. Ball, a longtime Waco florist, had moved to Austin two years ago to work at the Planned Parenthood clinic.
    No one who knew Ball will remember him as unhappy. Among friends, like the organization he helped found, the Waco chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), Ball was very much the jester.
    But if you are homosexual in Texas, sadness comes with the territory.
    “He was tired of fighting,” said Valerie Fallas, co-founder of PFLAG in Waco. Like many gays and lesbians, Ball took personally the slights aimed at a class of people. “The constant negative comments, he was tired of that.”
    Friends who wrote his obituary, there on Page 2B, included some of his anger:
    “His dream was of a human race that respected and honored ‘infinite diversity with infinite combinations,' ” they wrote, “but [he] yet left this planet disheartened, watching ‘Liberty die to the roar of thunderous applause.' “
    As to that story about politics on the page opposite Ball's obituary: It's a sad specter when leaders who have important things to do for us instead lead us on side-road parades.
    I can understand people's angst when on top of the personal issues of being marginalized, it becomes clear that the most convenient way a leader can find of “building the base” is to further marginalize people like you.
    As many friends as Bruce Ball had, he apparently died alone. Call the matter moot, but I wonder: If a marriage, or civil union, had conferred a lifetime bond on him and a partner, would the angst of the moment that took him away have passed without event?
    Another point: Rev. Parsley, the governor's rostrum partner, called gay sex “a veritable breeding ground of disease.” (Yes – and males and females don't share diseases, right?) In the age of AIDS, if you were concerned about disease, you'd promote laws that promoted monogamy, wouldn't you? Ah, but maybe the reverend's appearance with the governor wasn't really about public health.
    Maybe it was about power, at other's expense.
    Morality? You have your followers, Reverend. But I see the mirthful and inclusive Bruce Ball modeling it for me.

    John Young's column appears Thursday and Sunday. E-mail: jyoung@wacotrib.com.
    source: http://www.wacotrib.com/opin/content/news/opinion/stories/2005/06/19/20050619wacjyoung19.html

    Brownwood Horses, A Woman's Touch and Frozen Cappuccinos !

    What's being discussed at www.cityofbrownwood.com ? Here's a recent post:
    admin
    admin
    650 Posts
    Posted - June 16 2005 : 00:01:34
    I may give it a shot again, some friends of mine who they may remember Nanc and Will use to eat there alot and bring me some food back on occassion that i was in office as they were leaving to eat and i could fork over some money! LOL I remember the Frozen Cappuciano's rally well do they still ahve the machine for that?

    "Do Not Feed The Bears"
  • to read the posts...

  • ------------
    Who is that NanC ?

    A Woman's Touch
    Instructor leads horse training clinics designed with a more gentle, caring focus
    By Celinda Emison / Reporter-News Staff Writer
    June 16, 2005
    BROOKESMITH - NanC Mark is savvy when it comes to horses.
    But she also noticed while attending horse training clinics that most of the teachers are men, and most of the students are women.
    So Mark, who teaches a method developed by renowned horseman Pat Parelli that emphasizes gentle training techniques, launched her Cowgirl Savvy clinics.
    ''Because the two genders don't always speak the same language - something about Venus and Mars - the clinics can be intimidating and frustrating to the horsewomen in attendance,'' Mark said.
    That's where she comes in. While men are welcome, the horsewomen feel more at ease at her clinics.
    Several years ago, after working for 20 years in the corporate world, Mark decided to train horses and riders full-time at a cutting horse training facility in Kerrville owned by Leon Harrel, whom she called ''a world-class horseman.''

  • for the rest of the story...
  • Q: Who's "not" embracing the Changing faces of Brownwood ?

    Thursday June 16, 2005
    Op Ed: Columnist
    The changing faces of the people in Central Texas
    When Cynthia Rives arrived at the newspaper office for her appointment in late May, she brought a friend along. Rives and Ashraf Jafri sat down across the table from me to ask if the paper had any interest in running a series of articles that would feature several of the diverse families that now call the Stephenville area home. For a variety of reasons, many rural central Texas cities, including Brownwood, are finding that the demographics are changing. The two thought it would be a good idea to run the series around the Fourth of July holiday.
    The women first met through a series of meetings held at the Methodist church called Interfaith Dialogue. The two of them, who come from opposite corners of the world, still practice different religions and grew up speaking in different native languages, over time came to learn that they had more in common than they originally knew. In addition, they suspected that was also true of many of the other residents who originally came from around the globe, but now call the Cross Timbers area home.
    The problem was that many of those residents did not know it, and they hoped a series of articles in the paper would help spread that message.
    The ladies' new friendship certainly wouldn't be the first time barriers were broken down because two people got to know each other on a more personal level than just as part of a racial or ethnic group. How many times have we heard a comment along the lines of, "He's my neighbor and he (or she) is different from the rest of..."
    While speaking to a local radio personality here recently, I heard that type of comment about members of a certain political party. He was quick to point out that it was not the local members of the party his critical comments applied to, but to those around the rest of the nation. Again, the comments were an example of how we are more comfortable around, and maybe a little more accepting of, people we've gotten to know on a personal level. However it also showed that we still have a long way to go in overcoming stereotypes.
    The definition of stereotype is, "a fixed or conventional notion or conception." The word has taken on something of a negative meaning lately, and is often used when that notion or conception is incorrect. As Rives and Jafri found out, by talking with each other, they learned that they had so many things in common; as mothers they had the same hopes for their children and as women of faith they both tried to live their lives according to the beliefs they had grown up with. Perhaps most importantly, though, as citizens of this nation, the ladies wanted others to learn about what all of us have in common as opposed to how we are different.
    The idea was a good one, particularly as members of our society continue to polarize themselves along religious, racial and political lines. By and large, I think people still make exceptions to their stereotypes when it comes to someone they know. However, as the language declaring our position (whatever that position may be) as the only acceptable one grows stronger, it would appear that even that level of acceptance is in danger of waning.
    The real truth in the radio host's statement was not that his comments were accurate on a broad level, but in reality, are being echoed by people across the country. We may not be familiar with the beliefs, hopes and dreams of people who live in other parts of our world, or this nation or even a different neighborhood in this community, but I suspect we all have much more in common than not. Sometimes all it takes is sitting down at the table and visiting with someone to be reminded of that little truth.
    Bill Crist is associate publisher of the Brownwood Bulletin. He recently served as interim publisher of the Stephenville Empire-Tribune. His column appears on Wednesdays. He may be reached by e-mail at bill.crist@brownwoodbulletin.com.
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/06/15/op_ed/columnist/opinion04.txt
    ---------------
    My answer: Listen to (Brownwood Talk Radio 96.9 FM) KXYL's James Williamson (spokesperson for the Brown County Republican Party) News and Views and his morning show as well.
    --------------
    Note: James appeared very uneasy and severly aggitated ( went in to talk-over mode ! ) to the callers (David, Ben & Reggie) this morning who challenged his hateful attitudes, name calling, vile partisan attacks and his inability and unwillingness to accept his own darkness and the hypocricy that so many in this community see coming from talk show hosts which are being broadcast over the airwaves of Central Texas Via KXYL. It was refreshing to hear James' new co-host verbally challenge Hypocritical Republicans and their Shrill Talking Head Network ! WOW ! What's next for the Brownwood Airwaves, Ed Schultz ? I can think of many of James Williamson supporters who will scatter from hearing a voice of reason. You should hear how Ed Schultz handles opposing viewpoints ( he must have attended debate classes ! He's actually cordial and reasonable and allows them to make their points without all the interruptions and name calling !). Brownwood Talk Radio Fans on the X-treme Right would freak or have to go purchase some heavy duty Sunglasses ! Also found it interesting that when it comes to porn, pimps, closeted gays, crime,sex & corporate welfare oozing out of the Republican side of the aisle, James seems to go into a cloaking mode because he says it's not in his stack of stuff ! I wonder why it's not in his stack of stuff ? I'll suspect it's because James (supported by Phil Watts) is working from the *angle of The South Pacific Song:

    You've got to be taught
    To hate and fear,
    You've got to be taught
    From year to year,
    It's got to be drummed
    In your dear little ear
    You've got to be carefully taught.

    You've got to be taught to be afraid
    Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
    And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
    You've got to be carefully taught.

    You've got to be taught before it's too late,
    Before you are six or seven or eight,
    To hate all the people your relatives hate,
    You've got to be carefully taught
    source: http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/southpacific/youvegottobecarefullytaught.htm
    ----------------
    *the angle - always find a negative story about the chosen group or subject and drive home the point over and over again. This is also the style of Hitler's Propoganda Minister Joseph Goebels who used the airwaves to demonize anyone left of their hard right beliefs, faith & ideas !

    Wednesday, June 15, 2005

    Rallying the " Texas Taliban " ?

    Are Texas' two Republican Senators trying to motivate the same voters as Texas Governor Rick Perry ? I'm sure there are valid reasons for their not being co-sponsors of the Senate "Lynching Resolution" but have yet to hear either one articulate their lack of participation. I have called Senator Hutchinsons's office this morning and will post her reply.

    Here is the list of those not supporting the "Lynching Resolution":

    Lamar Alexander (R-TN) - (202) 224-4944
    Robert Bennett (R-UT) - (202) 224-5444
    Thad Cochran (R-MS) - (202) 224-5054
    John Cornyn (R-TX) - (202) 224-2934
    Michael Crapo (R-ID) - (202) 224-6142
    Michael Enzi (R-WY) - (202) 224-3424
    Chuck Grassley (R-IA) - (202) 224-3744
    Judd Gregg (R-NH) - (202) 224-3324
    Orrin Hatch (R-UT) - (202) 224-5251
    Kay Hutchison (R-TX) - (202) 224-5922
    Jon Kyl (R-AZ) - (202) 224-4521
    Trent Lott (R-MS) - (202) 224-6253
    Richard Shelby (R-AL) - (202) 224-5744
    John Sununu (R-NH) - (202) 224-2841
    Craig Thomas (R-WY) - (202) 224-6441

    source: http://www.americablog.org/
    -------------
    My letter to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican from Texas:

    Letters To Leaders
    All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Civil Rights:
    Subject:
    Senate Lynching Resolution Inquiry

    To:
    Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
    June 15, 2005

    It's my understanding that you are not one of the co-sponsors of the Senate Resolution regarding this nations despicable & recorded history of lynchings. As one of my representatives in Washington, I would appreciate the articulation of your position on this Resolution. As a courtesy, I would like to make available the Dallas Morning News Editorial regarding this issue:

    Todays Dallas Morning News Editorial

    Confronting Our Past: Decades later, a trial and a Senate apology
    12:03 AM CDT on Wednesday, June 15, 2005
    Anyone old enough to remember the slayings of civil rights workers Michael Schwerner, James Chaney and Andrew Goodman in the summer of 1964 also will recall the brazenness of the crime.
    The three young men were abducted and slain. Their bodies were found 44 days later, buried beneath an earthen dam in Philadelphia, Miss. All for helping African-Americans register to vote.
    Now, 41 years later, the state of Mississippi is bringing to trial 80-year-old Edgar Ray Killen, a reputed Klansman and accused mastermind of the grisly slayings. And by coincidence, the trial began as the U.S. Senate formally apologized for years of stonewalling anti-lynching laws.
    Such irony. Had the Senate joined the House to pass federal anti-lynching laws decades earlier – as at least seven U.S. presidents had sought – America's shameful racial history might look quite different. Lynching and segregationist state laws violently enforced the nation's racial divide, and the nation's racial scarring remains deep and lasting.
    That's why the murder trial and Senate apology are important. Whatever justice can be sought, must be sought. Just as Nazi hunters still relentlessly pursue perpetrators of the Holocaust, Americans must continue to unmask the ugly truth of America's dishonorable period.
    The Senate's apology is mostly a symbolic acknowledgment that lawmakers stymied efforts to stop the morally unjust, anonymous terrorism of Americans against other Americans. In hindsight, it is a shocking lack of courage. Likewise, the state's prosecution of Edgar Ray Killen isn't intended to send an old man to prison for his remaining years, but to fulfill the obligation to justice that the state of Mississippi failed to fulfill in the 1960s.
    Lives cannot be reclaimed. Broken families cannot be restored. But shameful legacies must be confronted – and exorcised – even after all these years.
    -------------------
    Brownwood Human Rights Committee
    Brownwood Texas

    source: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/letterslist/?id=552

    All Whitewash is local ! Listen you'll hear it.....Aids and Lynching

    Despite the Helms whitewash, we can still see the hood
    Tuesday, June 14, 2005
    By Tony Norman
    Yesterday, the U.S. Senate got around to apologizing for failing to enact anti-lynching legislation when a law against hanging one's neighbors would've meant something.
    Though a day late and 4,742 lives short, the Senate's apology was a chance for this generation of lawmakers to register how ashamed they are of their predecessors' inaction.
    Between 1882 and 1968, 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced. Seven presidents petitioned Congress to make lynching a federal crime. But the apostles of states rights and white supremacy boxed every piece of legislation in committee or on the Senate floor. The filibuster was once the bigot's best friend.
    The Senate apology comes just as excerpts from former Sen. Jesse Helms' autobiography "Here's Where I Stand" have begun circulating. One wonders how Helms would've voted if he were still dragging his knuckles across the floor of that august body.
    "I did not advocate segregation and I did not advocate aggravation," Helms wrote disingenuously, skirting his active campaign against integrating his church. "By that I mean that I thought it was wrong for people who did not know, who did not care, about the relationships between neighbors and friends to force their ideas about how communities should work on the people who had built these communities in the first place. I believe right would prevail as people followed their own consciences."
    In other words, trickle down brotherhood was better than civil rights legislation. Let the bigoted coffee shop owner decide on his own when he was ready to serve Negroes. That's the only way to guarantee that gobs of spit wouldn't end up in the coffee and key lime pie.
    Unfortunately, Helms' belated bid to be perceived as a more moderate bigot is undermined by statements he made in 1963 when he was just a race-baiting television commentator: "The Negro can't count forever on the kind of restraint that's thus far left him free to clog the streets, disrupt traffic, and interfere with other men's rights."
    It was that kind of veiled threat that distinguished the owlish-looking segregationist from the Kluxers who did the actual lynching, bombing and beating up of school children across Jefferson Davis' old Confederate Republic.
    In another section of his biography, Helms wrote: "We will never know how integration might have been achieved in neighborhoods across our land, because the opportunity was snatched away by outside agitators who had their own agendas to advance."
    Ah, the fabled outside agitators of Southern lore with their pesky demands for freedoms guaranteed to all by the Constitution. If only they had accepted the second-class status of the Negro, much of the violence that made anti-lynching legislation necessary would've abated. Racial brotherhood and democracy would've evolved faster without the iron boot of Rosa Parks and Rev. Martin Luther King pressing down on Jim Crow's fragile neck.
    In another coincidence of timing, Baptist preacher Edgar Ray Killen, 80, went on trial yesterday in Mississippi for his alleged role in the murder of "outside agitators" Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner and James Chaney a year after Helms announced that the white man's patience was wearing thin.
    One of the most tear jerking passages in Helms' book is about the time his father overheard the then 5-year-old son calling a playmate a nigger. "Gently, he taught me a lesson I've never forgotten," Helms quoted his father saying. " 'There's nothing you did that made you white and not a thing he did that made him colored. Son, I don't want to hear you say that word again'."
    Helms' recollection is out of sync with what he told substitute host Bob Novak on "Larry King Live" on Sept. 12, 1995 after this charming exchange with a caller from Alabama.
    Caller: "Mr. Helms, I know this might not be politically correct to say these days, but I think you should get a Nobel Peace Prize for everything you've done to keep down the niggers."
    Novak: "Oh, dear."
    Helms: "Whoops! Well, thank you, I think."
    Novak: "That was a bad word. That was politically incorrect. We don't condone that kind of language, do we?"
    Helms: "No. My father didn't condone it when I was a little boy. One of the worst spankings I ever got was when I used that word, and I don't think I've ever used it since."
    So, which one was it? Was it a spanking or a gentle admonition from his father that convinced the future senator to stop using the slur within earshot of black people? And how did a 5-year-old get it in his head to use "nigger" with such impunity? He must have heard the word somewhere.
    Age hasn't mellowed him. Helms is prepared to meet his Maker wearing the white hood he's kept hanging in the closet for special occasions. After working hard in the Senate for three decades to keep blacks consigned to second-class status in America, Jesse Helms is too old to start lying about it now.
    (Tony Norman can be reached at 412-263-1631 or tnorman@post-gazette.com.)
    source: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05165/521081.stm
    -------------------
    Note: Is KXYL's James Wiliamson cloaking again. Could he not find this to use along with his diatribe this morning on a gay quarantine ?

    Attention Brownwood KXYL "Ditto Heads" (You know who you are!)

    Can you hear them fainting at the Watts Communications Studios ?

    Radio vets purchase Ed Schultz; Liberal talk gains business cred
    RAW STORY
    By John Byrne
    Two radio executives who made Clear Channel and Rush Limbaugh household are to announce today they have purchased The Ed Schultz show, America’s fastest-growing talk show in the country, RAW STORY has learned.
    Veteran radio execs Randy Michaels and Stu Krane purchased the show from Democracy Radio, a non-profit which helps seed progressive talk radio hosts. Michaels’ and Krane’s new company, P1 will now carry the show. The protracted sale has been in the works since March.
    The deal puts the North Dakota talker in the driver’s seat of a burgeoning liberal radio revolution, a sign that those who made right wing radio the ubiquitous voice it is today see financial promise in liberal talk.
    Michaels, formerly CEO of Clear Channel Radio, has been credited with the firm’s awesome radio growth; his critics say he has homogenized the medium on a national scale. Krane was a partner in the firm that developed Rush Limbaugh, and previously worked as Vice President for ABC and Premiere Radio.
    “I am excited to be back on the cutting edge of talk radio,” Krane said in a statement. “Ed Schultz is the ultimate personality to carry that format forward.”
    Schultz told RAW STORY he’d never imagined such a partnership could happen.
    “It’s unquestionably the biggest professional break that I’ve ever had in 27 years of the business,” he said.
    Schultz acknowledges some of his listeners will cry havoc when they hear the man who made Limbaugh a star has bought his show, but says it should be understood as a sign that progressive radio is here to stay.
    The 51-year-old talker has seen his fair share of praise and criticism. He draws senators up and down the Democratic aisle as guests, but hasn’t been afraid to call out those he finds issue with, such as MoveOn.org and recently Howard Dean.
    “I understand this is going to raise red flags for progressives, especially those out there on the blogosphere that have been comfortable taking shots at me from the very beginning,” Schultz said. “First they said I was owned and paid for by the Democratic Party, now they’re going to say I’m owned and paid for by people who are obviously Republicans.”
    “The conspiracy nuts can have their way with this, but what they really need to know is this is still going to be just me, my two Fargo-based producers, my wife and I developing the content for the show every day,” he added. “Hell, I don’t use talking points. You just get my take on what’s happening in the news.”
    Schultz’s producer James Holm, who hails from the straight-talking vein, says he’s interested to see how the right will respond.
    “This is going to be a hard pill for established right-wing media to swallow,” Holm told RAW STORY. “They’ve championed the talk-down culture and I guarantee you that Drudge is not going to touch this, because there is no way for the right to spin this story to make progressive radio or Ed Schultz look bad. This is a clear victory, and it’s gotta have them shaking in their boots.”
    Schultz, too, believes the deal demonstrates progressive talk radio’s profitability and permanence. He says he’s looking forward to being part of the conversation in the midterm 2006 elections and the 2008 presidential race.
    “I remember back in January I was on Fox News with Bill O’Reilly, and he pretty much took a shot at me, saying that we weren’t a commercial venture and that we were running our show on political money,” Schultz remarked. “And I told him we were a commercial venture.
    “If O’Reilly is fair and balanced,” he added, “he’ll ask me to come back on the air—not to mention that I’m beating him in Denver.”
    Terms of the agreement were not disclosed. A recent Newsweek article stated Schultz has the fastest-growing radio show since Limbaugh’s—currently in 95 markets, he’s shooting for 200 by year’s end.
    The show will continue to be syndicated by Jones Radio Networks, a Denver-based distributor.
    source: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Radio_vets_purchase_Ed_Schultz_Liberal_talk_gains_business_0613.html
    ---------------------
    Note to Brownwood's Talking Head James Williamson: Do you see that light coming down the tracks ? That the light of truth that's exposing ("projecting") the lies of those who have said their is no market for progressive talk radio. Some folks seem to think their is no darkness in the lives of "Neo-conservative" Republicans posing as talk show hosts (present and former !) !

    Tuesday, June 14, 2005

    Mario Castillo Brownwood Texas

  • to read comments...
  • The Voice of the American Taliban: "God killed Cpl. Carrie French"

    Note: Where in Brownwood can you hear some of these same attitudes expressed ? I suggest tuning to 96.9 FM( Brownwood's "Hate" Radio ) !

    Tuesday, June 14, 2005
    His church was bombed, and now he protests funerals of the war dead
    Kansas preacher says he's coming to Idaho
    By CHUCK OXLEY
    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    BOISE, Idaho -- A Kansas preacher and gay rights foe whose congregation is protesting military funerals around the country said he's coming to Idaho tomorrow to picket the memorial for an Idaho National Guard soldier killed in Iraq.
    A flier on the Web site of Pastor Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church claims God killed Cpl. Carrie French with an improvised explosive device in retaliation against the United States for a bombing at Phelps' church six years ago.
    "We're coming," Phelps said yesterday.
    Westboro Baptist either has protested or is planning protests of other public funerals of soldiers from Michigan, Alabama, Minnesota, Virginia and Colorado. A protest is planned for July 11 at Dover Air Force Base, the military base where war dead are transported before being sent on to their home states.
    Phelps gained national notoriety in 1998 when he picketed the funeral of Matthew Shepard, the gay college student beaten to death in Wyoming.
    Since then, Phelps said his church has been the target of hateful words and actions, including a bomb attack six years ago.
    Phelps' church has picketed the funerals of AIDS victims for more than a decade.
    French, 19, was a Caldwell High School graduate and varsity cheerleader. She was killed June 5 in the northern city of Kirkuk. French served as an ammunition specialist with the 116th Brigade Combat Team's 145th Support Battalion.
    Phelps said the fact that French led an all-American life gives him all the more reason to picket her final public tribute.
    "An all-American girl from a society of all-American heretics," he said.
    "Our attitude toward what's happening with the war is the Lord is punishing this evil nation for abandoning all moral imperatives that are worth a dime," Phelps said.
    Caldwell Police Chief Bob Sobba said he cannot bar Phelps from going to the public funeral, which is scheduled for 1 p.m. at the Albertson College of Idaho in that city.
    "While we respect Mr. Phelps' right to protest, we would hope that he would respect the family and friends of this young person by not disrupting the memorial," Sobba said.
    Idaho Air National Guard Lt. Tony Vincelli, acting as spokesman for French's family, said there were no plans to change the funeral arrangements.
    The Rev. Brian Fischer, pastor of Boise's Community Church of the Valley, and himself a past target of protest by the Westboro Baptist Church, decried Phelps' plan.
    "What Phelps is doing is a reprehensible thing, to take a funeral and turn it into a photo op for his hate cause," Fischer said.
    "We hope everyone will ignore Phelps' group."
    In 2003, Phelps demanded that he be allowed to erect an anti-gay monument in a Boise public park. To avoid a lawsuit from his group, city officials voted in 2004 that a Ten Commandments monument be moved out of the park.

    source: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/228401_westboro14.html?source=rss

    Brownwood's Dr John Dunn "Needs to get a grip" !

    " wingers like to compare KIA in Iraq to traffic accidents in the US ": as it relates to Brownwood's Dr John Dunn "on air" statements heard on James Williamsons "News & Views" where he brought up US traffic deaths when discussing the recent combat death of Brownwood Marine Mario Castillo and others. Apparently, according to his words, anyone who disagrees or challenges Dr John Dunn needs "to get a grip". At least according to him ! This is the same Dr Dunn who believes that the only time the ACLU did anything of value was when he was a member ! Anyone seeing the pattern of a mob/zealot mentality ? Listen for the ones calling (on air @ KXYL) for the round up & detention of "all muslims" in the United States !

    as it relates to Dr Dunn's comparison:
    American Deaths in Iraq Surpass Early Vietnam Total
  • you decide...

  • -------------------------
    Note to Brownwood's Dr Williamson regarding your on air comments on todays "News & Views": You really want to question peoples "class" and accuse folks like Marion of "politicising this war" ? You really want to go there ?
    "Mission Accomplished" ?
    ------------------------
    I'm amazed, but not surprised, that it took KXYL Talk Show Host, James Williamson, two days to mention the tragic death of Brownwood's Marine Mario Castillo even though the news had front page coverage in both the Abilene and Brownwood Newspapers. Listen to the taped shows and listen as he talked about the front page stories and failed to pick up on Marios death. It makes one question the "Chicken Hawk Mentality" of talk show hosts & supporters who have a history of bashing everyone left of their hard right positions and opinions !

    What/Who are "ChickenHawks" ?
  • you decide...
  • What do KXYL's Phil Watts & James Williamson want to keep you from hearing ?

  • tell em both you saw it here...
  • Mother of dead soldier vilifies Bush over war

    Posted on Tue, Jun. 14, 2005
    Mother of dead soldier vilifies Bush over war
    PRESIDENT RIDICULED AT INTERFAITH RALLY
    By Frank E. Lockwood
    HERALD-LEADER STAFF WRITER

    The president of Gold Star Families for Peace, a mother who lost a son in Iraq, criticized the United States' "illegal and unjust war" yesterday during an interfaith rally in Lexington.
    Cindy Sheehan of Vacaville, Calif., accused President Bush of lying to the nation about a war which has consumed tens of billions of dollars and claimed more than 1,700 American lives -- including the life of Army Specialist Casey Austin Sheehan.
    Sheehan was one of more than a dozen activists who were scheduled to speak at yesterday's anti-war rally at the Red Mile, which was organized by the Clergy and Laity Network and co-sponsored by dozens of liberal religious organizations.
    Sheehan ridiculed Bush for saying that it's "hard work" comforting the widow of a soldier who's been killed in Iraq.
    "Hard work is seeing your son's murder on CNN one Sunday evening while you're enjoying the last supper you'll ever truly enjoy again. Hard work is having three military officers come to your house a few hours later to confirm the aforementioned murder of your son, your first-born, your kind and gentle sweet baby. Hard work is burying your child 46 days before his 25th birthday. Hard work is holding your other three children as they lower the body of their big (brother) into the ground. Hard work is not jumping in the grave with him and having the earth cover you both," she said.
    Since her son's death, Sheehan has made opposition to the Bush administration a full-time job.
    "We're watching you very carefully and we're going to do everything in our power to have you impeached for misleading the American people," she said, quoting a letter she sent to the White House. "Beating a political stake in your black heart will be the fulfillment of my life ... ," she said, as the audience of 200 people cheered.
    The "Freedom and Faith Bus Tour" -- which brought Sheehan to Lexington, has already visited New York, Chicago and Indianapolis. The next stops include Columbus, Pittsburgh and Cleveland.
    Other speakers included state Rep. Kathy Stein, D-Lexington, Clergy and Laity Network executive director Rev. Albert Pennybacker of Lexington, Kentucky Council of Churches executive director Nancy Jo Kemper and Baptist Seminary of Kentucky Professor Glenn Hinson.
    Quoting scripture and Franklin D. Roosevelt, Hinson suggested the nation is greedy and morally bankrupt and warned that America's fear of terrorism is excessive and unhealthy. Denouncing "fear that immobilizes, fear that causes you to lash out mindlessly, fear that prompts a nation to launch a preemptive strike against an imagined enemy, fear in excess," Hinson said, "Only God's love can bring that kind of fear under control."

    Reach Frank Lockwood at (859) 231-3211 or 800-950-6397 x3211 or flockwood@herald-leader.com
    source: http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/local/11888623.htm

    Monday, June 13, 2005

    Mario Castillo Brownwood Texas

    Our thoughts and prayers for the family and friends of Brownwood Marine, Mario Castillo. We have added his name to our "spirit of the sunrise" post:
  • go to our post...

  • ---------------
    to post your own comments in honor of Mario Castillo please
  • go here...
  • Subjects the * "Brownwood War Hawks" Are not Talking About !

    Mario Castillo killed in Iraq
    By Candace Cooksey Fulton -- Brownwood Bulletin
    Every Saturday -- without fail -- Maria Castillo's "mejo" called from halfway around the world to tell his mother he was OK. And to make sure she was well, too.
    But this weekend there wasn't a call.
    Instead, on Friday, two uniformed U.S. Marine officers came to the little house on Victoria Street to tell Guadalupe "Lupe" and Maria Castillo their son, 20-year-old Lance Cpl. Mario Alberto Castillo, had been killed by a roadside bomb at Saulawiyah, Iraq, a city west of Fallalujah.
    A 2003 graduate of Brownwood High School, Mario was the baby of the family, and, said his sister, "loved by everyone." Saturday as a stream of visitors stopped by the tiny home, Lupe Castillo would ease himself out of the homemade Adironback chair Mario had made and taken to State in building trades competition in high school, and lead the guests through the house already filled to overflowing with people who had come to offer their condolences to the family. And each new guest, brought a sad reminder to Maria Castillo that her baby, her boy, her "mejo" wasn't coming home alive.
    "So many people loved Mario," whispered Maria Castaneda, Lupe Castillo's sister. "Every time Maria sees the people she cries some more. This is very hard on her."
    Mario Castillo had decided as a junior in high school he would join the Marines, and, said his sisters, Sonia Sandoval and Julia Rodriguez, as soon as he could after graduating from high school.
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/06/13/news/news01.txt
    --------------------
    4 Bombings, Other Attacks Kill 10 in Iraq
    By PAUL GARWOOD, Associated Press Writer 33 minutes ago
    BAGHDAD, Iraq - Four suicide car bombings and other insurgent attacks Monday killed 10 people, and at least 16 Iraqis were wounded after militants opened fire on authorities trying to evacuate the injured from one of the blasts.
    The new wave of attacks in Baghdad, Samarra and Tikrit came as radical anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr met with the Russia ambassador and tribal chiefs from the insurgent hotbeds of Fallujah and Ramadi. Russia and al-Sadr fiercely opposed the war.
    ---
    Rep. Walter Jones (news, bio, voting record), R-N.C., said he will join congressmen introducing legislation this week calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.
    "When I look at the number of men and women who have been killed — it's almost 1,700 now, in addition to close to 12,000 have been severely wounded — and I just feel that the reason of going in for weapons of mass destruction, the ability of the Iraqis to make a nuclear weapon, that's all been proven that it was never there," Jones, who voted for the war, said Sunday on ABC's "This Week."
    "I feel that we've done about as much as we can do," he said.
    The four American soldiers attached to Marines units died Saturday in two roadside bombings west of Baghdad, increasing to at least 1,701 the number of U.S. forces who have died in Iraq since the war began in 2003. The number includes five military civilians.
    source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050613/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AuSxlcEUmpkF0UUnWNyX2bys0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2MTQ3MTFjBHNlYwN0cw--
    -----------
    Return of the Body Counts
    By Mark Benjamin
    Salon.com
    Saturday 11 June 2005

    With Americans souring on the war in Iraq, the US military has started talking up the number of insurgents killed. Are we headed down the same corrupting road we did in Vietnam?
    The body counts are back. For the first time since Vietnam, the US military has begun regularly reporting the number of enemy killed in the war zone - in contradiction, apparently, to prior statements by its own top brass.
    "Marines Kill 100 Fighters in Sanctuary Near Syria" was a front page headline in the Washington Post last month. The body count, coming from a Marine spokesman, was carried in other major papers that day. What was striking about the factoid, besides the elegantly even number, was that it showed how the US military has increasingly released body counts in reports depicting successful operations in Iraq - despite decrees from the highest levels of the Pentagon, throughout the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, that "we don't do body counts."
    As the bloody insurgency continues in Iraq, the US-led counterinsurgency campaign is yielding frustratingly few tangible ways to show progress to the American people. If anything, the insurgency seems firmly entrenched, from reports of its air-conditioned underground bunkers to its own Ho Chi Minh trail. Counting enemy bodies at least offers a number to grab on to, some sense of incremental victory.
    Note from Steve: Out thoughts and prayers for those family members and friends who have lost loved ones in this "misguided" military action. Finally, Republicans are beginning to speak up and challenge the direction that our "Neo-Con Republican" War Planners have taken us. I'm sure the "War Hawks" and their Talking Heads (KXYL's James Williamson in particular!) will accuse these fellow Republicans, as they do when it's a Democrat, Independent, or Liberal pointing out the same information, of being Pinko Commi, Ear ring wearing, pagan, ACLU lovin, baby killing, sodomite loving, anti-American, and Christian phobic !
    source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/061205B.shtml
    --------------------
    Army Aims to Catch Up on Recruits in Summer
    By Ann Scott Tyson
    The Washington Post
    Saturday 11 June 2005

    Numbers are down for fourth month.
    The Army announced yesterday that it missed its recruiting goal for the fourth consecutive month, a deepening manpower crisis that officials said would require a dramatic summer push for recruits if the service is to avoid missing its annual enlistment target for the first time since 1999.
    The Army will make a "monumental effort" to bring in the average 10,000 recruits a month required this summer, said Maj. Gen. Michael D. Rochelle, head of the Army's recruiting command. An additional 500 active-duty recruiters will be added in the next two months - on top of an increase of 1,000 earlier this year.
    The Pentagon is also considering asking Congress to double the enlistment bonus it can offer to the most-prized recruits - from $20,000 to $40,000 - and to raise the age limit for Army active-duty service from 35 to 40, he said.
    "The challenge is one of historic proportions," Rochelle said, acknowledging that he is not sure whether the traditional summer surge in Army recruits will take place, or how large it might be.
    Violent, long deployments to Iraq and a sound job market at home have combined to reduce what the Army calls the "propensity to enlist" - the percentage of young Americans willing to consider Army service - which dropped from 11 percent last year to about 7 percent this year.
    source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/061105D.shtml
    ------------------
    Poll: Bush Job Approval Dips to New Low
    By Will Lester
    The Associated Press
    Friday 10 June 2005
    Washington - When it comes to public approval, President Bush and Congress are playing "how low can you go." Bush's approval mark is 43 percent, while Congress checks in at 31 percent, an Associated Press-Ipsos poll found. Both are the lowest levels yet for the survey, started in December 2003.
    "There's a bad mood in the country, people are out of sorts," said Charles Jones, a presidential scholar and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "Iraq news is daily bad news."
    The public also is showing concerns about the direction of the country as the war in Iraq drags on. Only about one-third of adults, 35 percent, said they thought the country was headed in the right direction. Forty-one percent said they supported Bush's handling of the war in Iraq, also a low-water mark.
    Gail Thomas, an independent who leans Democratic from Prattville, Ala., said the war in Iraq was a distraction after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack ordered by Osama bin Laden.
    "They're not going after the one who did it," said Thomas. "They were too anxious to go after Saddam Hussein. All they're doing is getting our guys killed."
    Car bombings and attacks by insurgents killed 80 US troops and more than 700 Iraqis last month. Pentagon officials acknowledge the level of violence is about the same as a year ago, when they were forced to scrap a plan to substantially reduce the US troop presence in Iraq.
    While Bush has gotten generally low scores for his handling of domestic issues for many months, Americans have been more supportive of his foreign policy. Not any more.
    The poll conducted for AP by Ipsos found 45 percent support Bush's foreign policy, down from 52 percent in March.
    David Fultz, a Republican from Venice, Fla., is among those who are sticking with the president.
    "In terms of where we're going in the future, President Bush is laying out a plan," said Fultz, an assistant principal at a middle school. "When it's all said and done, we'll be where we want to be. We need to help establish democracy in the Middle East."
    Bush's popularity reached its zenith shortly after the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, when various polls found nearly 90 percent approved of the job he was doing. It was close to 80 percent when Ipsos started tracking attitudes about Bush at the start of 2002, and was just over 50 percent when the AP-Ipsos poll was started in December 2003.
    Approval for Congress has dipped from the 40s early this year into the low 30s now. A majority of Republicans and Democrats said they don't approve of Congress.
    Those figures, combined with Bush's low numbers, could make some lawmakers a little nervous.
    "Presidents who are low in the polls have a hard time getting Congress to go along with them," said Charles Franklin, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "He has to persuade the people in Congress to follow his legislative agenda and they're all worried about 2006."
    Support for Bush's handling of domestic issues remained in the high 30s and low 40s in the latest AP-Ipsos poll.
    Thirty-seven percent support Bush's handling of Social Security, while 59 percent disapprove. Those numbers haven't budged after more than four months of the president traveling the country to sell his plan to create private accounts in Social Security. Support for his handling of the economy was at 43 percent.
    The low numbers for Congress as an institution don't necessarily spell trouble for all incumbents.
    "It's easier to despise an institution than to work up animosity toward an individual lawmaker," said Ross Baker, a Rutgers University political scientist who studies Congress. "The institution is held in low regard, but many of the individual representatives and senators are held in high regard."
    The AP-Ipsos poll of 1,001 adults was taken June 6-8 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
    source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/061105F.shtml
    On the Net: Ipsos
    ------------
    * "Brownwood War Hawks" : Talking Heads at KXYL (Brownwood Talk Radio) and their Call-in "Warriors" who continually bash Mexicans, Blacks, Democrats, Gays and Lesbians, Moderate Republicans, etc..
    --------------
    What are the Brownwood War Hawks not talking about ?
  • info. not being discussed over the Brownwood airwaves...

  • http://www.optruth.org/main.cfm

    Friday, June 10, 2005

    Robert E Howard, Brownwood Texas, James Williamson, Rick Perry & "Gay Gossip"

    Who said he was GAY ? Was that the GOSSIP ?
  • rest of the story...

  • ---------------
    Fans of Robert E Howard should visit Brownwood and learn the History of Brownwood's Legendary Rae Bourbon ( Friend of Bob Hope and Mae West ) and Coach Paul Tyson (one of the winningest High School football coaches in the country). Rumors and gossip were heavily involved in their life stories as well. We have the history documented and make it available to anyone who is interested. We recommend viewing Luigi Pirandello's play "Right you are if you think you are" which is the play that shows how a community pays when it is driven by gossips to "find out" the private life of it's neighbors ( frequent verbal speculation of one's sexual orientation ? )

    right you are:
  • rest of the story...

  • -------------------
    as it relates to today's events, politics and Texas Governor Rick Perry and the rumors of his sexual orientation !

    Ultimately, the Community Pays
    Dear Editor,
    Winning votes for candidates or destroying others on the backs of targeted groups is not a new tactic and not exclusive to FreePAC. Gov. Perry signed the James Byrd Jr. Hate Crime Bill, and I do not believe that it is a stretch to connect the governor's current problems (rumors) to extreme members of his own party. All of this reminds me of Luigi Pirandello's writing, "Right you are if you think you are," which shows that a community pays when it is driven by gossips to find out "the truth" about people's private lives.

    Steve Harris
    Brownwood, Texas
  • rest of the story...

  • ----------------------
    KXYL's James Williamson spoke at length on the air this morning (w/Pat from BCI) about the upcoming Ron E Howard Celebration and knowing James's history of linking eveything to the Gay issue, I'm shocked that James didn't do his research or just make up something or paint with his predictable "wide brush" ! Wonder what kind of teasing & name calling James Williamson and his "minons" would have heaped on Robert Howard ? Here are some that I can hear James and his schoolyard bullies use against Robert Howard if he were living in Brownwood (Cross Plains) today: Mamas Boy, Girlie Man, Weak Willed Weeinie, Sissy. All Self Hate begins locally !
    ---------------------
    for more on the celebration in Cross Plains please visit
  • rest of the story...
  • Texas Ranger Nick Hanna on KXYL "Brownwood Hate Radio"

    Brownwood's Texas Ranger Nick Hanna was interviewed by James Williamson and JC this morning on KXYL. With all the Mexican bashing (not always "illegals") going on over the airwaves at KXYL, will the "hate mongers" now go after the Rangers Badges since they are made with Mexican Coins ?

    "The modern Texas Ranger dresses in civilian clothes and is recognized by his western hat and western boots. Badges, still made from a Mexican coin, can be seen pined to the shirt above the left pocket. Their duties vary by assignment but are generally criminal investigative responsibilities, which serve to support local law enforcement."
    source: http://www.texasrangers.org/Ranger_History.htm

    Question: I wonder if Texas Ranger Nick Hanna has ever heard the calls for violence (encited by James Williamson's show) directed against people and groups in the KXYL broadcast area ?

    Thursday, June 09, 2005

    Who am I ?

    Is gay marriage another one of those absolutes?

    The reality is that people like me have very strong feelings about the gay situation. I feel that the government should not be in the business of marrying anybody; that, in reality, what the government should do is recognize civil unions, both homosexual and heterosexual. That's what they do in Europe. You go down to the city hall and you become legally connected. You have a civil union there. Then, if you're religious, you go down to the church, and the church blesses the union. That gets the problem solved. I don't know of many evangelicals who want to deny gay couples their legal rights. However, most of us don't want to call it marriage, because we think that word has religious connotations, and we're not ready to see it used in ways that offend us. Now, I have to say this. My wife and I differ on this issue. She goes to a church that does marry gay people. I don't. We go to different churches. That's all right. It seems to me that a gay couple could go to a church like hers and get their marriage blessed. They couldn't come to mine and get their marriage blessed. But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.

    I'm a minister, and I serve as a minister in addition to being a university professor. I always found it very strange that, at the end of the ceremony, I had to say things like, "By the authority committed unto me by the state of Pennsylvania. ..." When did my authority come from the state of Pennsylvania? As a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ, I thought my authority came from God and from the Holy Scriptures. All of a sudden, the ball game changes and I am no longer a servant of God; I'm a servant of the state. That kind of duplicity upsets me. I contend the state ought to do its thing and provide legal rights for all couples who want to be joined together for life. The church should bless unions that it sees fit to bless, and they should be called marriages.
  • read this to find out who I am...
  • Ray Stone on Brownwood's KXYL

    ON Brownwood Talk Radio this morning: as they spoke about the role of women in the military, I wish someone would have asked the trio (James Williamson, JC, & Ray Stone) in the studios to define where the "war on terror" battleground is. Do you think that maybe the battleground is right here in Brownwood Texas in a country with pourous borders, a country that allows over 80 % of the containers rolling across our highways and railways to go un-inspected, etc.,etc.,etc. I want the best of the best serving in our military and that includes women ! I don't see this as "Political Correctness" ! We're all on this battleground and I find it amazing when "patriotic" Americans focus on dividing us driven by their own prejudice ! But we all have our own opinions, right ?

    Question: Are the "Terrorists" targeting all of us ? or just the Americans the *Religious Right are targeting ? * ask KXYL's James Williamson for the list !

    Howard Dean Comments & Brownwood Texas Politics

    Thursday, June 09, 2005
    Republicans: The Anti-Christian, Christian Party
    Stephen Crockett - Democratic Talk Radio
    Howard Dean has received a great deal of unfair criticism for calling the Republicans a “pretty much white Christian party.” Dean was actually far to mild in his comments and his description of the Republican Party in regards to their narrow demographic and ideological base.
    Personally, this writer does disagree with Dean on only one aspect of his comment. The Republicans calling themselves Christian are promoting an essentially anti-Christian agenda. While these so-called “Christian Right” political leaders claim to speak for the Christians of America, I think they are actually speaking only for a small minority of Christians who are placing Bush Republicanism above the teachings of Jesus Christ.
    I am a Southern, white Christian male. I am a fairly conservative Democrat. I completely oppose the entire Republican agenda because my Christian faith and values are deeply offended by the greed and intolerance of Bush Republicanism. These values and the Christian theology behind them were explored in my column “Faith in Politics” written back in October of 2001.
    Dean should not give the Republicans the benefit of exclusive use of the Christian label for an essentially anti-Christian political message. Real Christians love the poor and look down on anyone with a political agenda designed to benefit the wealthiest of the wealthy. The invasion of Iraq based on lying to the voters and deceiving our elected lawmakers is hardly the behavior of good Christians. A brief look at the Downing Street memo shows that Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair had already started a war with Iraq while the UN’s Weapons of Mass Destruction inspectors were still in Iraq and long before Congress voted to give Bush the legal power to launch his unwise military adventure. Are these the behaviors of good Christians?
    The politicization of the Christian church has benefited the Republican Party instead of the Christian church. It is an insult to many real Christians to call the attack on the Separation of Church and State a pro-Christian political agenda. Our Founding Fathers advocated this measure almost universally to protect both the government and our Churches. Politics and money are corrupting many churches especially those led by so-called “Christian Right” preachers.
    I urge all Democrats to challenge the Republican claim on the Christian label at every opportunity. I urge all Christians to challenge all their church leaders who seek to promote a partisan political agenda. I want to add my sincere admonishment to all Christians to look for passages in the Bible about helping the poor and not judging others faith or behavior in religious terms. Ask yourself if the Republican agenda financially benefits the poor and helpless versus the rich and powerful before you make the political choices. I think we need to ask ourselves, “What would Jesus do?”
    Written by Stephen Crockett ( co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com ). Mail: 7A Planville Drive, Fayetteville, TN 37334. Email: midsouthcm@aol.com . Phone: 443-907-2367.
    ------------------
    as Dean's comments relate to similar Brownwood Political dialogue coming from within the Republican Party speaking to the issue of people doing or saying anything in the name of GOD !

  • rest of story...
  • Wednesday, June 08, 2005

    Brownwood's Hoot_baker dining at the Whitehouse ?

  • rest of story...

  • -----------
    Question : If Brownwood's Hoot_baker were to visit the Whitehouse, which bathroom facilities would he/she utilize and would he/she be wearing a blue dress ? Would Jeff Gannon/Guckert be he/she's escourt ?

    The FAX ? Knight to Williamson ? Blame it all on the GAYS Talking Points !

  • rest of story...
  • Remember Kids, James Williamson and his "Blame it on the GAYS Mantra" !

    Soldiers' divorce rates up sharply
    By Gregg Zoroya, USA TODAY
    The number of active-duty soldiers getting divorced has been rising sharply with deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq.
    The trend is severest among officers. Last year, 3,325 Army officers' marriages ended in divorce — up 78% from 2003, the year of the Iraq invasion, and more than 3 1/2 times the number in 2000, before the Afghan operation, Army figures show. For enlisted personnel, the 7,152 divorces last year were 28% more than in 2003 and up 53% from 2000. During that time, the number of soldiers has changed little.
    The Army has no comparable data for past wars.
    The stress of combat, long separations and difficulty readjusting to family life are key reasons for the surge, Army officials say.
    "Rising through the ranks, every subsequent job gets more difficult, more intense and more demanding," says Col. Pamela Hart, an Army spokeswoman. "So the stressors are extreme in the officer corps, especially when we're at war, and officers have an overwhelming responsibility to take care of their soldiers as well as the soldiers' families. There's a lot of responsibility on the leaders' shoulders, which, I can assure you, takes away from the home life."
    "There is a deep concern and some significant resources aimed at helping families survive," says Lt. Col. Peter Frederich, a chaplain who has just been assigned to oversee policy and resources in the Army's family support programs.
    Col. Glenn Bloomstrum, another chaplain, says that five years ago, the Army instituted one-day workshops to help soldiers and spouses talk about war experiences and ease the transition from combat to home. More recently, weekend marriage-education retreats have been introduced.
    "There's a bonding that takes place between soldiers, and during that (family) reunion phase, you've got to make the transition from your buddies, who you relied on for life and death situations. Now, it's really time to spend time at home," Bloomstrum says.
    Dennis Orthner, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who has studied military families for 28 years, says he isn't surprised by the rise in divorces. "If the numbers are right, then we have more to worry about than just fighting a war," he says. "We're trying to fight a war with families that are struggling, and that's a real challenge."
    The Army recognizes that for its all-volunteer fighting force to remain viable, it is essential to keep marriages healthy, Frederich says. "It all hinges on soldiers being able to stay soldiers for a long time."
    source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-06-07-soldier-divorces_x.htm?csp=24&RM_Exclude=Juno

    KXYL's James Williamson & Brownwood's "pissed off straights" !

    Hoot_baker, a poster over at www.cityofbrownwood.com said: " The trouble is, in this area, he's pissing off more straights than actual homosexuals.". Hoot was speaking of KXYL's Talking Head and Brown County Republican Party Spokesperson James Williamson. Interesting comment by Mr/Mrs/Miss Hoot_baker ! I'm more interested in Mr Williamson's accomplished ability to provoke his "students" to call in and call for acts of violence against anyone left of their "hard right" positions. Oh, but God is on their side so they can do or say anything they want. I wonder if Watts is selling Gott Mit Uns Beltbuckles in their New "Idea Center" ?
    and on James' show tonight, Shayne H. from Trickham called in to talk about how annoyed he was to hear Daniels call because he corrected James and then Shayne went on to describe how when his own son does this to him he just wants to strangle him. Strangle Daniel and his own son for challenging his thought process ! Very telling indeed.....
    source of quote from hoot_baker: http://www.cityofbrownwood.com/topic.asp?whichpage=5&TOPIC_ID=421&FORUM_ID=23&CAT_ID=9&Forum_Title=Local+Political+News+Radio&Topic_Title=Talk+radio
    -------------------
    Gott mit uns information or google gott mit uns for yourself !
  • rest of story...

  • --------------------
    Next time KXYL's James Williamson leads you (his listener) to associate NAMBLA, Pimps, Pornographers,Pedophiles & Prostitutes with the Democratic Party (as he continually does), call James and have him look at this
  • rest of story...

  • and James want's to teach you that these issues are partisan issues. Shame on you James Williamson (the voice of the Brown County Republican Party) ! Why are you cloaking James ? Who are you covering for ? I believe you place more value in "Your" Republican Party than you place in the truth ! If these issues were truly moral issues to James, why would he refuse to expose his audience members to the "rest of the story" ? The truth will set you free James !

    James Williamson and the Klan Comments from Lake Brownwood Trish

    James always likes to speak of Democratic Senator Byrd and his Klan history but makes no mention of items like found below when it involves a Republican. I'll post this for James and his caller (Trish from Lake Brownwood !) who brought up Byrd out of the Blue.

    The Family Research Council and the Ku Klux Klan
    by John in DC - 6/8/2005 03:52:00 PM
    You always remember your first Klan...
    The Family Research Council's executive director, Tony Perkins, reportedly paid former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke over $80,000 for his who's-who-of-racist-America mailing list in 1996. This should be the death of the Family Research Council, one of the religoius right's lead organizations, and the end of Tony Perkins career.
    Who on the left is smart enough to plunk down some money to organize the campaign destroying the FRC and their executive director because of his dealings with the Ku Klux Klan?
    This was 1996, people. That is well beyond, years beyond, the date that the entire nation knew Duke to be a rabid KKK-loving racist. But our pinnacle of family values, Tony Perkins, had no problem enriching black-hater David Duke to the tune of $82,000. And what's more, Tony Perkins had no problem trying to woo David Duke's avowed racist following.
    With the religious right trying to reach out to black folk, and more generally trying to lecture the rest of us on morality, I want to know why Tony Perkins hasn't been forced to resign, or, why the Family Research Council hasn't been ostracized from the entire religious right community.
    Bob Knight and the rest of the Concerned Women for America, and the American Family Association and Lou Sheldon and all the rest of you supposed Christians, are you concerned that your good buddy Tony Perkins appears peppered with racism?
    From the Nation (I'd reported on this before, but this is big. This is the end of the Family Research Council and the religious right's efforts to woo the black community, if only some smart well-funded liberal had the sense to do something with this.):
    "Four years ago, Perkins addressed the Louisiana chapter of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), America's premier white supremacist organization, the successor to the White Citizens Councils, which battled integration in the South. In 1996 Perkins paid former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke $82,500 for his mailing list. At the time, Perkins was the campaign manager for a right-wing Republican candidate for the US Senate in Louisiana. The Federal Election Commission fined the campaign Perkins ran $3,000 for attempting to hide the money paid to Duke."
    What would I do in response? How about make sure the entire audience knows about Perkins' support for Duke and affinity for racists at EVERY event he attends. How about informing the black media and black churches about this tie between racists and the religious right. How about asking supposed religious right "black" leaders why they don't speak out against the FRC and its executive director's affinity for white supremacists. How about demanding that the other religious right groups speak out against Tony Perkins and his enabling of black-hating racists.
    This is a campaign begging to happen.
    source: http://www.americablog.org/

    Sounds like this writer has heard the James Williamson Show

    Dallas Morning News Letter to the Editor

    Uh, blame the Dems

    Austin failed to pass a school finance bill.
    The patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican-controlled House blames the patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican-controlled Senate. The patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican-controlled Senate blames the patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican-controlled House.
    The patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican governor blames the patriotic, Judeo-Christian, Republican-controlled House and Senate.
    Who's to blame? The Democrats, of course.

    Gary A. McDonald, Abilene
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/letters/stories/060805dnediwedletters.125dd784a.html
    --------------

    But KXYL TalkShow Host and Brown County Republican Spokesperson, James Williamson, would work in a "gay angle" to the above scenario if he could ! What am I talking about, James Williamson can be talking about anything and work in the "Gay Angle" ! What was it that Pete Monday said to James Williamson (on the air) regarding a man is what a man thinks about all day ? Well said, well said , well said !

    James Williamson, Bullying and "Six Degrees of Seperation"

    KXYL Talking Head and Brown County Republican Party Spokesperson, James Williamson, ,mentioned the (1)story below on his morning show but did not touch on a (2)local story below (dano(?)) did cover it in his reading of the news. Was it the local boys mother who wrote a letter to the editor defending James Williamson's son who had been personally targeted by ( 2 juvenilles (?) ), gathered his belongings and torched them because of his differences ( real or perceived ) ? A (3)poster at www.cityof brownwood.com took issue with someone mentioning James Williamsons son and the alledged incident at Krogers. Earth to sockermom, James Williamson gets paid by Phil Watts, via his advertisers, to attack other peoples children on a daily basis ! Where did James Williamson learn this behaviour ? Did he learn this at the BISD or HPU facilities ? Did it start by bullying "new comers" to Brownwood ? James did admit to "teasing a "Mr Atlas" in school on his radio show the other morning. What kind of teasing did you do james ? Who else did James "Tease" in school ? on Hayrides ! on Choir Trips ? or on in the schoolyard ? Was he calling it "being satirical" back then too ?

    1)
    Posted on Wed, Jun. 08, 2005
    STAR-TELEGRAM/KELLEY CHINN
    Casey Morgan, who fatally shot his father, now lives with his mother in Haltom City.
    Teen not indicted for killing his father
    By Deanna Boyd
    Star-Telegram Staff Writer
    FORT WORTH - Casey Morgan didn't plan on killing his father.
    He just wanted him to stop.
    But Arch Jack Morgan, 43, had been drinking and was angry.
    Morgan was mad that he had been arrested outside his brother's Fort Worth home the day before. He was enraged that his brother, fed up with his behavior, had told him that he was no longer welcome at his house.
    "The whole day we were gathering up all of his stuff in the house, and we put it all in the porch so he wouldn't have to come inside," said Casey, who was 17 at the time of the shooting. "He just barged in anyway and started ripping some pictures off the wall. Then he started threatening us, and that's when it happened. He was coming toward us pretty quick, and that's when I did it."
    Casey picked up a shotgun his uncle kept for protection, leveled it at his fast-approaching father and fired once, killing him.
    On Monday, a Tarrant County grand jury agreed that Casey was justified in the Jan. 11 shooting of his father and declined to indict the teen on a murder charge.
    ------------------------
    2) Teen jailed after shoving father through glass door
    By Steve Nash -- Brownwood Bulletin- A Brownwood teen remained jailed Monday on charges of aggravated assault on a public servant, aggravated assault with a weapon and possession of under 2 ounces of marijuana after a man told police his son shoved him through a plate glass door, Brown County Jail records show.
    Police arrested Steven Jay Polaski, 18, after responding to a report of a domestic dispute at 2:45 Sunday morning, according to a report by officer Art Shannon.
    Shannon and police Cpl. Mitch Slaymaker were initially told that the suspect was threatening his father with a shotgun, but no firearm was involved, Shannon's report states.
    As Shannon and Slaymaker prepared to park their patrol cars, Slaymaker radioed that the suspect had just struck his car. Shannon saw someone run toward his car, raising an object as though to strike Shannon's car. The person suddenly turned and ran, but stopped, dropped to his knees and dropped the object -- which turned out to be a fireplace poker -- when Shannon gave commands.
    Shannon and Slaymaker handcuffed and arrested the suspect after a struggle, Shannon's report states.

    3)
    sockermom
    Newbie
    15 Posts
    Posted - June 08 2005 : 05:51:52
    quote:

    quote:
    Why would anyone ask if they can complain to the FCC? I would assume you could complain about anything you want at anytime. It's a free country and all you have to do is go to the FCC site and point and click.. And haven't you said you don't listen to James Williamson's show? If not, how are you able to pass judgment? And I find it amazing how users of these message boards tolerate someone like DingLeiGoFai, who professes to be a Buddhist, call Christians vile and other names in a country where the majority of its citizens are of a Christian faith. It looks like a simple case of biting the hand that feeds you. Are you being forced to live in the evil U.S.A.?
    What does being forced to live in the evil U.S.A have to do with the fact the Williamson sucks. This sounds exactly like something he would say on his show "If you dont agree with me, then you are a pinko gay dumb liberal and you should move to Cuba and worship Castro". I am a conservative but I find him to be simple minded and frankly boring. I also find it funny how he can pass judgement everyone else but he can not manage his own family. His son was arrested for being drunk and riding his bike inside Kroger at midnight. I guess his son became a drunk because of pinko liberals?
    footballfan, you obviously can't read very well. I only asked ding if he was being forced to live in a country he's not happy with. It was a Q-U-E-S-T-I-O-N. Did I say he should move to Cuba? Did I call him a pinko commy liberal? You use those words a lot! Ding said in another message that he didn't even listen to James Williamson's show yet he calls him vile and Howard Sternish and calls Christians "bible thumpers". All I'm trying to say is if you can't stand James, why do you listen or if you don't listen, how can you complain? Why don't you call his show and put him in his place? As far as his son getting into trouble with the law, that's really a cheap shot. Did people accuse your dad of not controlling his family if you got into scrapes when you were young? I'm not a big James fan myself but I'm a fan of freedom of speech, the thing that so many of you have such a problem with. And no, I don't even know James or his wild son. Is that the wild son he said just graduated with an MBA from A&M?
    source: http://www.cityofbrownwood.com/topic.asp?whichpage=1&TOPIC_ID=421&FORUM_ID=23&CAT_ID=9&Forum_Title=Local+Political+News+Radio&Topic_Title=Talk+radio

    All "Self Hate" is Local !

    Wrestling with the conservative-approved model of `being gay'

    Leonard Pitts, a syndicated columnist based in Washington: Tribune Media Services
    Published June 7, 2005
    Is it just me, or does the mayor seem conflicted?
    Granted, James West has a lot to be conflicted about. Last month, the Spokane Spokesman-Review reported that it had caught the city's chief executive, a social conservative who has long opposed gay rights, in a gay online chat room making a date with a computer expert hired by the paper to pose as an 18-year-old male student. West is alleged to have used the perks of his office to lure men into sexual liaisons. What's worse, he's also alleged to have molested adolescent boys over the last 25 years under color of his authority as a sheriff's deputy and Boy Scout leader.
    Plenty of material for soul searching, but that's not what I'm talking about. Indeed, West has denied the alleged criminal and ethical transgressions and has been quite clear and forceful in doing so. He is considerably less clear and forceful in talking about his sexuality itself.
    Asked in a May 5 interview why he sought out young men on the Internet, West told the Spokesman-Review he could not explain, but added, "I wouldn't characterize me as gay." In an interview with the same paper four days later, he said, "I am being destroyed because I am a gay man."
    Last week on the "Today" show, co-host Matt Lauer tried to pin him down. Gay? Not gay?
    West's reply: "You know, Matt, bisexual, gay ..."
    There's more.
    West, who as a state legislator once backed a law that would have barred gays from working in schools or day-care centers, was asked how he could have taken such positions. He told Lauer that as a representative of a district where people oppose gay rights, he had no choice. As if someone had held a gun to his head and forced him to run for office in Bigot County.
    West, who in the privacy of the gay chat room referred to social conservatives as "sex Nazis," seemed at pains to burnish his conservative bona fides. "I'm not a closet liberal," he insisted, "pretending to be a conservative. I'm a conservative. And what's wrong with somebody who has what's called an alternative lifestyle or an alternative sexual orientation being a conservative?"
    Well, golly.
    Me, I've always thought being a gay social conservative was not unlike being a black Klansman. Even if you could get away with it, why in the world would you want to?
    I'm sure Mary Cheney is holding on Line 2, but the point stands. It eludes me how anyone can support a political philosophy that is defined in large part by its open hostility toward people like oneself.
    I suspect West belongs to that school of conservative thought that holds that being gay isn't the problem, "flaunting" it is. The reasoning, such as it is, always breaks down when you try to get them to define "flaunting." Does it mean the flamboyant character Jack from "Will and Grace" whose gayness is evident at 50 paces? Or does it mean, well, Will from "Will and Grace," whose sexuality you don't know until or unless you first get to know him?
    Trick question. Social conservatives draw no such distinction. For them, even a modest indication of gayness is a nuclear attack upon so-called "family values." When they say "flaunting," what they really mean is "existing."
    James West sought to split the difference, to have it both ways, to be gay but in the official conservative-approved manner--i.e., secretly and shamefacedly, skulking about in the dark as if one's sexual identity were somehow ignominious.
    You can see how well that's worked out. Now, like Rush Limbaugh discussing drug addiction, he finds himself forced to speak a language he has long derided, use words that don't seem to fit his mouth. "Alternative lifestyle," indeed.
    Maybe now some of us will stop pretending the conservative-approved model of being gay makes any sense. I mean, granted, West didn't flaunt his sexuality. But his hypocrisy is something else entirely.
    source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0506070233jun07,0,1250715.story?coll=chi-newsopinioncommentary-hed
    --------
    Comment - One would think that Brownwood's "Gay Guru" would have been covering this story on one of his two radio shows ! Would he have covered the story had the Mayor been a Democrat ? No mention of Jeff Gannon/Guckert either ? Seems to be some cloaking going on behind the microphone !

    guru n. [Unix] An expert. Implies not only wizard skill but also a history of being a knowledge resource for others.
    source: http://dict.die.net/guru/

    Monday, June 06, 2005

    Former supporter joins foes over war ( Texas roots )

    Speaks for peace after son's death
    By Michael Levenson, Globe Correspondent | June 5, 2005
    Two years ago, Brian T. Hart, an avid supporter of the American military mission in Iraq, wrote to the Board of Selectmen in Bedford to complain about a 20-foot banner strung from the front of the First Parish church that read, ''Speak Out For Peace."
    Today, Hart, now a blistering critic of the campaign in Iraq, plans to return to the church on the town green to speak out for peace at the pulpit.
    The reason for his transformation: His son, Private First Class John D. Hart was killed outside Kirkuk, Iraq, in October 2003 when insurgents firing small arms and rocket-propelled grenades attacked his unarmored Humvee.
    ''I don't care if they call me un-American," Brian Hart said Friday as he ignored a tall glass of iced tea sitting before him on the back porch of his home in Bedford. ''I've come full circle in saying the best way to support the troops today is to give them a plan to exit Iraq."
    Hart, 46, grew up in a conservative Texas family, served as president of the Republican club at the University of Texas, and voted for President Bush in 2000. His daughters, Rebecca, 18, and Elizabeth, 14, are members of the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps at Bedford High School.
    The peace banner went up in early 2003. That July, John Hart saw the sign as he prepared to leave for Iraq on his first tour of duty with his unit, the 173d Infantry Brigade. John asked his father to help get the sign removed.
    Brian Hart wrote to the Board of Selectmen, contending that the peace banner violated the town's historic zoning codes. At a board meeting, he threatened to file a lawsuit. John Eric Gibbons, the Unitarian minister whose congregation had hung the blue-and-white banner, agreed to take it down. Hart was pleased.
    Three months later, John was dead, one month past his 20th birthday. First Lieutenant David R. Bernstein of Phoenixville, Pa., was also killed in the attack. Bernstein was 24.
    Days later, at Bernstein's graveside, Hart said an Army sergeant told him that US troops were lacking supplies. At his son's funeral, Hart said a soldier who had been in the Humvee during the fatal attack also told him that their Army unit lacked armor and ammunition.
    Hart began studying the way the Army supplies its soldiers. He met with US Senator Edward M. Kennedy, spoke with other members of Congress, and developed contacts with military suppliers and service members. What he learned about Humvee armor disturbed him, he said.
    ''Congress was being told that the plants were at full capacity," Hart said. ''They were just lied to. Hundreds of kids died from over this issue alone."
    Gibbons and Hart have grown closer since they clashed over the banner two years ago. Now, they discuss the war.
    ''It seems to me that Brian's quest, like that of any father, is to make meaning of his son's death," Gibbons said. ''And it seems to me that his quest has been for the truth and to make sure that he knows and the American people know the conditions that we're asking young people to fight in."
    Hart's cousins and uncles in Texas no longer speak to him, he said.
    And he worries that some in Bedford, home of Hanscom Air Force Base, may turn against him.
    He never considered himself an activist. He laughs at the notion. ''Isn't that ironic?" Hart said. ''I mean, I'm no pacifist, that's for certain, but this is not right. Where we're at today is not right. It's not right for America. It's not right for the troops. It's not right for the Iraqis."
    US Representative Martin T. Meehan, who is also scheduled to speak at the church today, said Hart helped him to secure $700 million in funding for Humvee armor.
    Now, Hart is backing Meehan's plan to gradually withdraw US troops from Iraq.
    ''Oftentimes, when you work on military issues, political charges are that you're not being patriotic or you're not being American or you're not supporting the troops," said Meehan, Democrat of Lowell. ''The opportunity to work with Brian is a great opportunity because those arguments are particularly hollow. He's a military person through and through, and no one can question his love for his country."
    Hart said he hopes to ignite a discussion, starting in the small church he once challenged.
    ''Active Army officers are afraid to have this conversation in public, politicians are afraid to have this conversation in public," Hart said. ''So I wanted to start this discussion, and hopefully see where this leads."
    source: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/06/05/former_supporter_joins_foes_over_war/

    Surprised Governor Perry didn't choose Eldorado for his Bill Grandstanding !

    Texas Gov. Signs Bill at Church School
    By JAMIE STENGLE, Associated Press Writer Sun Jun 5,10:12 PM ET
    FORT WORTH, Texas - In a ceremony filled with religious references, Gov. Rick Perry signed a bill at a church school gymnasium Sunday that imposes more limits on late-term abortions and requires minors to get written parental consent for abortions.
    source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050606/ap_on_re_us/church_school_bill_signing;_ylt=AirOtdiR_ZMKO946DJvgDmus0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2bW85OXIzBHNlYwNwbA--
    ----------------
    Where in Eldorado ?
  • rest of story...

  • ----------------
    Posted on Tue, Jun. 07, 2005
    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/LM OTERO
    Gov. Rick Perry speaks Sunday at Calvary Christian Academy, with its mascot as his backdrop.

    Re-electing Rick Perry seems to be religious obligation now
    By Bud Kennedy
    Star-Telegram Staff Writer
    So now we see Gov. Rick Perry's secret weapon.
    To prove that his re-election campaign still has a prayer, he'll team up with TV preachers.
    At an event that was part state-government ceremony and part healing revival, Perry stood coiffure-to-coiffure with one of the darlings of TV-religion Sunday, then signed into law a bill protecting the unborn.
    The Calvary Cathedral International church in Fort Worth was careful not to let Perry campaign inside. Instead, he spoke next door in the school gym against a giant backdrop of a white Christian warrior.
    On an all-star lineup of political preachers, Perry shared top billing with Daystar TV personality Rod Parsley, here from Ohio to help organize 500 Texas ministers for the upcoming political campaign.
    Later, Parsley took his pitch and his new activist book, Silent No More, inside the church.
    And I do mean pitch.
    "This book comes with DVDs that sell for $60!" he shouted in the middle of the evening sermon long after Perry had left.
    "With the book, that's $80" -- he whirled and pointed at the crowd -- "except for you!
    "I'm going to give you all three DVDs absolutely free when you get the book!"
    Out of nowhere, ushers suddenly appeared carrying plastic-wrapped book-and-DVD sets.
    They rushed around the sanctuary grabbing the $20 bills that churchgoers waved wildly.
    "There you are, son!" Parsley said as a little boy came down an aisle with an outstretched $20 for the set. "Grow up and preach the gospel!"
    He didn't say which gospel.
    Preacher Parsley's book-and-DVD bargain capped a long day of various kinds of campaigns at Calvary Cathedral and its spinoff school, Calvary Christian Academy.
    Caught between serving a politicking candidate and its mission of serving God, the church and school managed to weather a tempest of conflicting principles and protests.
    Perry ostensibly came for a state-government ceremony open to the public, enacting a law requiring parental approval before a minor daughter can get an abortion.
    But the setting and purpose became issues when Perry's campaign and the Tarrant County Republican Party mistakenly announced that the signing would be in the church and invited "pro-family, Christian friends. ... We really need for you to help us turn out a very large crowd. We may also film part of this to be used later for TV."
    The gym crowd of about 1,000 included about 150 ministers. Many are already aligned with Perry's campaign in a new religious activist network, the Texas Restoration Project.
    The ministers say they want to restore Texas' "Judeo-Christian heritage." But the project also seems timed to restore Perry to the Governor's Mansion.
    Oddly, the children who will now be born thanks to the Parental Consent Act seemed almost forgotten.
    Preacher after preacher saved his biggest load of steam for bashing the newest political boogeyman: gay marriage.
    Perry also ceremonially endorsed the already passed resolution calling a November election on a definition-of-marriage constitutional amendment.
    Preaching from behind the official seal of the governor of Texas, Parsley said gay Americans cause 60 percent of syphilis cases and live barely half as long as heterosexual Americans. He argued against "sacrificing our children on the altar of the sexual lust of a few."
    Later in the school library, Perry was asked in a news conference how he would tell Texas gay and lesbian war veterans that they can't come home from war in Iraq and get married.
    Perry said if they don't like Texas law, they can just leave.
    "I'm going to say Texas has made a decision on marriage," he said, "and if there's a state with more lenient views than Texas, then maybe that's where they should live."
    In other words, Texas now welcomes politicking TV preachers from Ohio, but not our own native sons and daughters who might want to live lawfully in commitment with legal recognition.
    What's next?
    The Rick Perry Prayer Cloth?
    • • •
    I wrote last week that political commentator Oliver North had once spoken at Calvary Cathedral.
    That's how I remembered it, but Bob Nichols, the pastor, said North has never spoken there. I'll take Nichols' word.
    Bud Kennedy's Column Appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.
    (817) 390-7538 bud@budkennedy.com
    source: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/columnists/bud_kennedy/11834144.htm
    ----------------
    Letters to the Editor
    Posted on Tue, Jun. 07, 2005

    A godly man or self-absorbed poser?
    I normally read the newspaper while eating breakfast, but I lost my appetite Monday morning as I read the news story with the subhead: "Perry signs abortion bill and gay marriage resolution."
    The fact that Gov. Rick Perry signed these measures at an evangelical church school underscored his willingness to pander to people's fear and ignorance for political gain. It was a blatant manifestation of prejudice and hate-mongering.
    But what really made me sick were the quotes in the story by various preachers declaring what a godly man the governor is. Give me a break.
    If Jesus were pulled over for speeding, do you think he would intimidate the cop by saying, "I'm the Creator." Would Jesus favor executing retarded minors? Would Jesus cut utility assistance for the elderly? Would Jesus work to prevent an ethics bill from passing the Legislature? Would Jesus tell a segment of the population, "You're second-class citizens"?
    I could go on, but my point is that Perry is a poser.
    Wake up, religious people, and stop letting these self-absorbed politicians manipulate you!
    Frank Perez, Fort Worth
    --------
    I very much appreciated Bud Kennedy's Thursday column ("Perry taking politics through church doors"). It brought to light a lot of inconsistencies concerning Calvary Cathedral International _ specifically, inconsistencies regarding Kennedy's journalistic integrity.
    I listened to Kennedy and automobile columnist Ed Wallace on KLIF/570 AM a few weeks ago and enjoyed the exchange. I listen to Ed when I can and, although I don't always agree with his assessments, I certainly appreciate the fact that he thoroughly researches his topics and checks his facts.
    I incorrectly assumed that Kennedy would do the same before launching an attack on an institution such as Calvary Cathedral and Pastor Bob Nichols. He has done nothing but serve God and this community the best he knows how for the past 50 years.
    It's a free country with a free press, so Kennedy can disagree with Perry's politics if he wants. But he should leave the smear attacks on Nichols to the Star-Telegram's bathroom walls. Evidently, that's where he does his best work.
    Thank you for giving me a good reason for canceling my subscription. To borrow from the fourth line of Kennedy's column: This Texan no longer feels at home reading your newspaper.
    Byron Kauffman, Fort Worth
    --------
    Perry's decision to sign a resolution on gay marriage at Calvary Christian Academy in Fort Worth was yet another disgusting _ yet predictable _ example of political pandering.
    But we are in Texas, after all, where President Bush first discovered that pandering to the religious right can get you elected. And Perry, who faces an uphill battle for re-election, perhaps against a Republican heavyweight, U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, needs to pander to the evangelicals as much as he can.
    George Henson, Dallas
    -----------

    I didn't have much feeling for Perry either way. (I knew he was no friend of the gay community, but it seems that few politicians are. So what's new?) But this was an all-time low.
    The gall of the man to go to a church school and invite his "pro-family values" followers to surround him as he signed measures that are nothing but posturing to the far right wing!
    The two measures that he signed make little to no difference in the laws or in the lives of most Texans. It really makes me sick. These two measures are most important to him and ultra-conservatives.
    But who cares if kids grow up with sub-standard education? So what if they don't have teachers worth a hoot because the state won't pay them what they're worth? The kids will grow up believing what the ultra-conservatives want them to believe, thus keeping these bozos in power longer.
    But don't worry, Texas. Minors will still have to notify their parents before getting abortions, and gay marriage will still be illegal. Steve still won't be able to visit Tim in the hospital without costly legal documents and Rose still won't be able to will to Christi the home they've lived in for more than 20 years without Christi paying hefty inheritance taxes.
    I can't believe that these folks tried to vote themselves an increase in their pension benefits while doing nothing to better the lives of Texans.
    Heather Hartman, Fort Worth

    source: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion/local2/11829187.htm

    Linden to Brownwood: Old South racism lives in Texas town

    Billy Ray Johnson was beaten and tossed on top of an ant mound. His four white attackers received a slap on the wrist.
    By Howard Witt
    Tribune senior correspondent
    June 5, 2005
    LINDEN, Texas -- They picked up Billy Ray Johnson outside a convenience store in this East Texas bayou town, a place where Confederate flags fly in some front yards and a mural of barefoot slaves picking cotton greets patrons inside the local post office.
    On a cool September night in 2003, they drove the 42-year-old mentally retarded black man to a cow pasture where a crowd of white youths was having a party. They got Johnson drunk, they made him dance, they jeered at him with racial epithets.
    Then, according to court testimony, one of Johnson's assailants punched him in the face, knocking him out cold. They tossed his unconscious body into the back of a pickup and dumped him by the side of a dirt road, on top of a mound of stinging fire ants.
    Johnson, who family members say functioned at the level of a 12-year-old before the attack, was in a coma for a week. He suffered a brain hemorrhage that slurred his speech, weakened his legs and deprived him of his ability to take care of himself. His body was covered with hundreds of painful ant bites.
    Today he lives on public assistance, confined to a nursing home in nearby Texarkana, where his family fears he will have to remain for the rest of his life.
    The four young white men convicted of various charges in the incident are confined in the county jail, but not for long. A judge last month sentenced three of the four to terms of 30 days in jail, and the fourth to 60 days.
    Even that, however, was more than the jurors who heard two of the cases thought appropriate: They acquitted the defendants of the most serious charges and recommended no jail time at all.
    To many African-Americans in Linden, the impoverished county seat of Cass County hard by the Arkansas and Louisiana borders, what happened to Johnson was nothing less than a hate crime, frighteningly reminiscent of the worst racial attacks in the Old South.
    "There's people down here doing things to dogs, and they get more than a year in prison," said Lue Wilson, 58, Johnson's cousin and legal guardian. "You'll never get a jury in Cass County to convict a white man for doing something to a black man."
    But to many whites here, the incident was simply a story of some "good ole boys" drinking too much and getting out of hand.
    "It was a very unfortunate and senseless thing," said Wilford Penny, 73, who last month completed a 6-year term as Linden's mayor. "But I don't think there was anything racial about it. These guys were drinking, and this guy [Johnson] liked to dance. I'm not surprised when they get to drinking and use the n-word. The black boy was somewhere he shouldn't have been, although they brought him out there."
    Built on backs of slaves
    History weighs heavily on this town founded in the mid-1850s whose long-ago agricultural prosperity was built on the backs of slaves floated up the nearby Red River from Shreveport and New Orleans.
    The slave mural in the post office lobby was painted in the 1930s by Victor Arnautoff, a renowned artist of the social realism school, and despite periodic protests from black customers, postal officials say they have no plans to remove it.
    Today the word "boy" still falls easily from the lips of some whites when they are referring to African-American men, an indignity that Wilson, a Vietnam veteran and retired steelworker, said he long ago grew accustomed to.
    And troubling incidents tinged by race still divide Linden's 2,256 residents, one-fifth of them black and four-fifths of them white.
    There was the case in 1994 when a black man who had been dating a white woman was found dead from a gunshot to the groin. And another in 2001, when a black man who had been dating a white woman was found hanging from a tree. Local officials ruled the first case a hunting accident and the second a suicide, despite the persistent doubts of family members and civil rights officials.
    "There are a few areas in Texas that have kind of bypassed the civil rights era," said Gary Bledsoe, president of the Texas branch of the NAACP. "Linden is one of those. It's an island of the '50s up there."
    The Texarkana Gazette, the biggest newspaper in the region, wrote an editorial last month criticizing the light sentences imposed on Johnson's attackers.
    "Sad to say," the paper wrote, "most of us agree that if the circumstances were reversed--if four blacks had perpetrated this crime on a white person--things would have turned out differently."
    Others, however, see more shades of gray surrounding the Johnson case--and the state of local race relations.
    "I think it's unfair to the county to make it a total black-and-white issue," said Tina Richardson, the assistant district attorney who prosecuted the case and Cass County's only black lawyer. "I know the stigma at this point is that in Cass County it looks like whites are greatly prejudiced against blacks. But you have good and bad no matter what area of the country you're living in.
    "There were just as many if not more whites who were displeased at the outcome" of the Johnson case as were content with it, Richardson added.
    At the heart of the case
    Whether Johnson was victimized because he is black or because he is mentally retarded lies at the heart of the conflicting readings of the case. Witnesses who attended the pasture party on Sept. 27, 2003, gave authorities evidence on both counts.
    "Everybody knew [Johnson] was mentally challenged, that he wasn't quite right," said one 23-year-old white resident of Linden who attended the party but spoke on the condition that he not be identified. "He was having a good time, drinking. Then they started making fun of him a little bit, making him dance. It was kind of to have someone to amuse them, to make a monkey out of him."
    At one point during the party, Richardson said trial testimony showed, Johnson was directed to stick his hand into a bonfire to remove a burning log--evidence that he was being baited because of his mental disabilities.
    But many other witnesses reported that Johnson was also subjected to "a lot of racial slurs," Richardson said.
    "It was the n-word," she said, "and there were references made concerning the Ku Klux Klan, asking [Johnson] what he would do if the KKK had come out that night."
    As the party wound down after midnight, evidence showed, Christopher Colt Amox, who was 20 at the time, punched Johnson in the mouth, toppling him to the ground. As Johnson lay unconscious, vomiting and gagging, Amox and three other young men--James Cory Hicks, then 24; Dallas Chadwick Stone, then 18; and John Wesley Owens, then 19--debated whether to call an ambulance, authorities said. Instead, they loaded Johnson into a pickup truck and drove him 2 miles down a little-used dirt road, tossing him next to a public dump, on top of the nest of fire ants.
    Several hours later, Hicks, who at the time worked as a guard at the Cass County Jail, returned to the scene and called the local sheriff to report that he had found "a man passed out on the ground."
    The FBI and local law-enforcement officials investigated the case, and all came to the conclusion that what happened to Johnson was a crime based on his mental incapacity, not his race. Thus no state or federal hate crimes or civil rights charges were lodged.
    `Mean-spirited and cruel'
    "This was a bunch of guys who were mean-spirited and cruel, and they abused a black man who was retarded," said Malcolm Bales, chief of the criminal division in the U.S. attorney's office in Marshall, Texas, which covers Cass County. "That's terrible. But it doesn't give rise to a federal civil rights case."
    Instead, the four attackers were charged with various counts of aggravated assault and injury to a disabled person by omission that could have sent them to prison for up to 10 years. Stone and Owens pleaded guilty to the injury by omission charges and agreed to testify against Amox and Hicks, who opted for jury trials.
    The jurors in those cases, three of whom were black, acquitted Amox and Hicks of aggravated assault. Amox was convicted of misdemeanor assault, and Hicks was convicted of injury to a disabled person by omission.
    Both juries recommended suspended sentences and probation as punishment. But District Judge Ralph Burgess, using his authority to impose additional jail time, last month sentenced Owens, Stone and Amox to 30 days in jail, and sentenced Hicks to 60 days.
    "They were trying to make it out to be like a felony, like they beat him up, and he [Amox] hit him one time," said Michael Spencer, the jury foreman in the Amox trial. "It wasn't like they sat there and kicked him and beat him.
    "This wasn't just something where we're all biased and we were going to let these good ole boys go," Spencer added. "But the guy had a job, and we didn't feel he will be any more menace to society. . . . We didn't deem it necessary to put him in the county jail for a year."
    Family plans civil claims
    But the outcome of the case and the refusal of the authorities to press hate crimes charges against Johnson's attackers have outraged civil rights officials. Johnson's family is planning to file civil claims against the four men, and the NAACP is pressing state and federal officials to assign a special prosecutor to take another look at filing additional charges.
    "There's absolutely no question this was a racial case," said the NAACP's Bledsoe. "A bunch of folks got drunk and just happened to have a person of another race do bug dancing and ridicule him. It clearly should have been charged as a hate crime."
    Most of the defendants' families declined requests for interviews about the case. But Martha Howell, Hicks' mother, said her son never touched Johnson and didn't deserve to be punished.
    "These boys' names are ruined for life," Howell said. "And [Johnson] is better off today than he's ever been in his life. He roamed the streets, the family never knew where he was. Now in the nursing home he's got someone to take care of him."
    That is not how Johnson sees it.
    As he sat recently in the cramped, stuffy room he shares with another nursing home patient, idly thumbing some faded photos of old junk cars he'd like someday to restore, Johnson was asked how he's feeling these days.
    "I want to go home," he said emphatically, in his only words intelligible to a visitor. "Home."
    ----------
    hwitt@tribune.com
    ----------
    source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0506050298jun05,1,3751388.story?coll=chi-news-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

    Brownwood's Backyard & Bulletin Reporter/Columinist Steve Nash

    The polygamists next door
    Now's not the time to be neighborly to the religious sect members building a West Texas retreat, says NAOMI SCHAEFER RILEY
    12:55 AM CDT on Sunday, June 5, 2005
    About a year and a half ago, several men representing a company called YFZ Land LLC arrived in Eldorado, looking to buy a ranch outside town. They told real-estate agents and local police they were planning to open a hunting retreat. They were lying. Scores of members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (FLDS) have begun to descend on this sleepy West Texas town and are planning to make a permanent home for hundreds of their members – to be called Yearning for Zion (YFZ).
    Earlier this year, rumors flew that the leader of the secretive polygamous sect, self-proclaimed prophet Warren Jeffs, may be planning some kind of Waco-style violent end for the members.
    Town members have so far been relieved that the church members are keeping relatively quiet. A local sheriff's deputy told the Associated Press that they seem to be "hardworking folks" and "awesome contractors, great at what they do."
    Schleicher County Judge Johnny Griffin told a reporter that "they've done nothing to warrant any kind of great fear." And that any legal action might threaten the members' rights to privacy and religious freedom.
    It is perhaps commendable that the people of Eldorado want to be as welcoming as possible to their new neighbors – local clergy have tried to go introduce themselves – and believe that they are entitled to practice whatever religion they like.
    But the people of Eldorado should not be lulled into complacence. They have a serious crisis brewing in their back yard. And it would be no sign of bigotry for them to recognize that the newcomers do not represent an opportunity for interfaith dialogue, but rather a danger to themselves and any civil society that surrounds them.
    FLDS is one of a few fundamentalist sects that split off from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the late 19th century when the federal government forced Mormons to end polygamy. Polygamy, of course, remains illegal in all 50 states, despite the best efforts of polygamist Tom Green, who recently lost a bout in federal court in his suit to overturn Utah's 114-year ban on the practice.
    But several polygamous communities, each with a few thousand members, have been allowed to grow in Utah, Colorado and Arizona, among other places.
    Polygamy's negative effects on children in these communities are well-documented and truly shocking. We know from firsthand accounts and court cases that child rape, incest, physical abuse, sexual abuse and child marriage often occur within those closed sects.

  • rest of story...

  • ----------------------
    as this relates to Brownwood Bulletin Reporter/Columinist Steve Nash's Matt Hale Column:

    Supremacist should stay the heck out of Texas -- Steve Nash
    Thankfully, this group moved west instead of south. The white supremacist organization World Church of the Creator, led by the "Rev." Matt Hale, recently moved its headquarters from my old stomping grounds -- East Peoria, Ill. -- to a small town in r...3.9K - Jan. 2, 2003; scored 966.0
    -------------------
    Where are you Nash when it takes place in your own backyard ?
  • rest of story...
  • Friday, June 03, 2005

    Coming to Brownwood ? "Bark & Ride" & Kinky Friedman's "Little Fellars" trailer ?

    Camping it up in dog digs
    08:14 AM CDT on Friday, June 3, 2005
    By CONNIE DUFNER / The Dallas Morning News
    NEW YORK – It is an interesting sign of the times when our doghouses are cooler than our own homes.
    Unless, that is, you happen to have your own vintage Airstream. But if you don't, the next best thing is outfitting your pooch with the custom "Pet Camper" conceived by Canadian Judson Beaumont and on display at the recent International Contemporary Furniture Fair.
    Be warned: It's not a bargain canine shelter and will set you back about $2,500. For that you get a handmade, signed, limited edition with an aluminum chassis and a fiberglass shell, windows, stainless steel feeding bowls and hubcaps, and even a personalized license plate.

    Straight Line Designs
    Bark-and-ride: Dewey Beaumont has chic wheels.
    The digs for Fido are just the latest expression of a love affair with little dogs, says Mr. Beaumont, a children's furniture designer.
    "I'm in Vancouver, and you can walk down the street and see six or seven pet stores catering to small dogs," he says.
    "People aren't necessarily having kids right away. They live in small apartments. It's the perfect pet for them to have. Dogs are their babies; people like to pamper them."
    Mr. Beaumont calls his creation "sculpture" rather than "doghouse." He decided on the shape after his family bought a small dog and his daughter encouraged him to build its home.
    The old-style campers are "very American, a fun thing," he says.
    What's next? "A Winnebago or something, I don't know."
    For more information, see www.straightlinedesigns.com.
    E-mail cdufner@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/fea/texasliving/stories/060305dnlivhgpetcamper.108597cc4.html
  • rest of story...


  • ----------------------
    Dear Kinky People of Texas and the world,

    We've been posting this drawing for the last couple days to let you in on a little secret, a secret weapon, that is.
    Since even Kinky can't be in two places at once, we're building a surrogate to travel the state. This little trailer will represent all the "little fellers" of Texas, all the small towns that the fat cats ignore, and an independent spirit that will not be denied. We're asking you to help us put it on the road. Click here to contribute: http://kinkyfriedman.com/contribute/
    The drawing is by Bob 'Daddy-O' Wade, one of Texas' most renowned and sought after artists, the man who put a giant iguana on the roof of the Lone Star Cafe and dancing frogs atop Carl's Corner, and it depicts his design for a new secret weapon for our glorious campaign.
    We need your help building it. Daddy-o has, of course, waived his fee, but we must bring in skilled artisans to make this a reality. This buggy is scheduled to travel at least 50,000 miles over the next 17 months, through every city, town, burg and truck stop in Texas. It will carry the campaign swag, the volunteers and the Kinky message throughout every region of our great state.
    It will be a TV star, a press darling and an ambassador of choice, independence and peace. It will be Kinky's surrogate. When he is shacked up at Echo Hill, working through the programs that will make this Lone Star shine again, our little podner here will be driving through places like Big Sandy, Mineral Wells and Pecos, Texas. It will bring joy and wisdom to all Texans everywhere.
    We need about $12,000 to make this a reality. There are over 15,000 Kinky of you out there now, all pledged or volunteered for this campaign, and we need each of you to make another small commitment. If each of you sends us even a few bucks, we'll have this baby rolling by July. If y'all can send a bit more, we could even have a Kinky Friedman action figure by the fall.
    Start your checkbooks ladies and gentlemen. Please click here to contribute: http://kinkyfriedman.com/contribute/

    Cleve Hattersley
    Campaign Kinky

    Paid For By The Kinky Friedman For Governor Campaign
    John McCall, Treasurer, P.O. Box 293910, Kerrville, TX 78029
  • rest of story...
  • Brownwood Mentoring: Big Brothers & Big Sisters eyes Brownwood

    Mentor program plans to expand
    Big Brothers Big Sisters adds San Angelo, eyes Brownwood
    By Brye Butler / Reporter-News Staff Writer
    June 3, 2005
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Abilene is going regional.
    The national nonprofit organization that locally matches roughly 700 children with adult mentors each year is setting up a program in San Angelo. It also is considering starting a program in Brownwood within the next two years.
    Employees will formally announce the expansion and other changes Monday in Abilene and Tuesday in San Angelo.
    Although the agency is in Abilene, San Angelo and Brownwood would each function with individual directors and boards. The branches will be overseen by a new umbrella organization called Big Brothers Big Sisters of West Central Texas.
    The 26-year-old Big Brothers Big Sisters of Abilene will be known by this new name, said Janet Ardoyno, director of the Abilene branch.
    Ardoyno is now the chief executive officer of BBBS of West Central Texas in addition to serving as the Abilene branch's regional director. However, the organization will hire a new Abilene regional director in late summer.
    Ardoyno will remain based in Abilene.
    The goal of the regional expansion is ''to serve more children and to mentor where there is nothing available at all,'' she said.
    The organization is studying whether to place the program in Brownwood, where there is no nationally recognized mentor program. The study is in its early stages to determine whether enough people are willing to volunteer as mentors, and whether enough children want to participate.
    Meanwhile the BBBS in San Angelo doesn't have an office yet, but will absorb 41 child-adult matches from an organization that recently shut down, said San Angelo BBBS director Jenie Keeney.
    In 2003, Voyce Youth Mentoring was founded there. But it soon had problems resulting from insecure funding and a lack of name recognition, said Keeney, who was also the Voyce director.
    Meanwhile, BBBS in Abilene was receiving requests for the program in San Angelo, Ardoyno said.
    So, Voyce ''has dissolved to make way for Big Brothers Big Sisters to come in,'' Keeney said.
    BBBS in San Angelo will wait until fall to start new matches after more funding is secured to hire at least two additional
    employees, said Keeney, who is the only employee now.
    The program goal in San Angelo is to match 100 children with mentors within the first year.
    ''If we could be half of what Abilene has done in the past couple years, we would be so happy,'' Keeney said.
    No cost estimate was available for expanding BBBS to San Angelo.
    Contact nonprofits/higher education writer Brye Butler at butlerb@reporternews.com or 676-6765.
    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/nw_local/article/0,1874,ABIL_7959_3827246,00.html

    Brownwood "Cold Case" Murders & KXYL Media Bashing

    Brown County sheriff opening old cases
    No suspects indicted in '89, '96 homicides
    By Celinda Emison / Reporter-News Staff Writer
    June 3, 2005
    BROWNWOOD - Brown County Sheriff Bobby Grubbs is opening two unsolved homicide cases and hopes the Texas Rangers Cold Case Squad will offer assistance.
    Two of Brown County's unsolved homicides involve Amanda Goodman, 13, who was found dead on a country road south of Brownwood in May 1989; and the shooting death of Leon Laurales in May 1996.
    Grubbs said investigators ran into dead ends on these two cases.
    ''I investigated both cases when they happened, and I would like to see them solved,'' Grubbs said. ''It's like an albatross that I have carried for all these years.''
    A motorist found Goodman's body about 12 miles south of Brownwood on Indian Creek Road about an hour after classes were dismissed at Brownwood Middle School on May 16, 1989. Witnesses reported seeing Goodman, an eighth-grader, walking home from school that day. Goodman died of a gunshot wound to the head.
    Grubbs said several people were questioned at the time, but no one was ever indicted. Grubbs said the Goodman case has haunted him over the years and that her family deserves to know what happened.
    ''We believe she got in the car with someone she knew,'' he said. ''When she was found, she was laying on the side of the road with her school books next to her.''
    Goodman's mother, Barbara Nejtek, 54, of Early, said she wants to make finding her daughter's killer her life's work. She is seeking information from anyone who knows something about the case.
    ''These kids (who were classmates of Goodman) are men and women now, and anyone who knew her at the time, I beg them to please come forward,'' Nejtek said.
    Almost seven years later, on May 10, 1996, two motorists traveling on FM 2126 around 12:30 a.m. reported a car on fire. When firefighters arrived, they found the body of Leon Laurales, 29, a few feet from the car, dead from a gunshot wound to the back of the head.
    According to reports, Laurales was to have reported to his job at Kroger Food Store at midnight, but never showed up.
    ''We've had several leads and have investigated every tip we've heard of, but still we don't have a suspect,'' Grubbs said.
    In 1996, Laurales' older brother George Laurales, of Bangs, hired a Dallas private investigator to help with the case. In 2002, the family offered a $10,000 reward for information leading to an arrest. But no suspects have been identified.
    ''To me, whoever did this took advantage of my brother - he was bullied,'' said George Laurales, 51. ''I believe there is more than one person involved and I would like for them to be caught and brought to justice. I've been praying for that.''
    Grubbs said both cases will be presented to the Cold Case Squad soon. Old evidence will be reviewed and new technology, such as DNA testing, will be used.
    To report a tip in either case, call (325) 646-5510.
    Contact Brownwood staff writer Celinda Emison at (325) 641-8804 or emisonc@reporternews.com.
    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/nw_local/article/0,1874,ABIL_7959_3827255,00.html
    ----------------
    Note from Steve, The Brownwood Talking Heads at KXYL (Watts Communications) were heavily bashing the Abilene Reporter News this morning with the charge being led by Brown County Republican Party Spokesperson James Williamson. Thank God for the Abilene Reporter News, The Dallas Morning News (also heavily bashed this morning on the airwaves of KXYL) and other newspapers across the country who often report on "community issues and denial" that the local press refuses to cover. In 1996, when Leon laureles was murdered, who was "the bully of the airwaves" in Brownwood ? What "talkin head" was/is doing all the name calling, demonizing and gay bashing on his daily show ? Does the term "News and Views" ring a bell ? I guess some "Neo-conservatives" only believe in "negative influence" when it has to do with the evils of Harry Potter !

    Wednesday, June 01, 2005

    Political Deep Throating ?

    Gannogate......

  • rest of story...


  • rest of story...


  • ---------------
    Watergate.......

  • rest of story...
  • More corruption from within the Boy Scouts ?

    Look at this report and then read the report from scouting for all and compare the comments.
    ---------------
    Probe: Boy Scouts Lied About Black Members
    By DANIEL YEE
    The Associated Press
    Tuesday, May 31, 2005; 11:21 PM
    ATLANTA -- An independent investigation of the Atlanta-area Boy Scouts found that the organization inflated its number of black Scouts by more than 5,000 in a program for inner-city youth.
    The executive director of the Atlanta Boy Scouts resigned after the report was released.
    Auditors said Scout officials assigned to inner-city areas may have felt pressure to demonstrate membership growth, which is a part of their performance evaluations. Membership numbers also are used to help determined funding from the United Way, a major Scouts donor.
    The audit found that former Scouts too old to participate remained on the memberships lists and that boys who had only attended informational meetings about the program were signed up.
    In one example, an official changed the birth date of 87 Cub Scouts so they would be old enough to participate in the program. In another case, an official continued to report membership of a church Boy Scout unit although the church had burned down three years earlier.
    The inflated numbers also included 200 Scout units that did not exist.
    Edgar Sims Jr., an attorney with the law firm that conducted the audit, said the Atlanta Area Council claimed there were 10,238 Scouts in Operation First Class in 2004, but the audit found that only 5,361 were registered.
    Operation First Class was designed to increase participation by boys in the country's poorest areas, and it provides the boys' books, uniforms and other opportunities, including scholarships for camp.
    In resigning, David Larkin, executive director of the Atlanta Area Council, said he was "deeply disappointed both personally and professionally" and took fully responsibility for the false records.
    "As scout executive of the Atlanta Area Council, I am charged with overseeing all activities of the organization. When those activities do not reflect the principles and integrity of the Boy Scouts of America, at any level, I take full responsibility," he said.
    Joe Beasley, regional director of the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, claimed in October that the 13-county Boy Scouts council was reporting twice as many black participants as were actively involved.
    Georgia Boy Scout officials then commissioned a law firm to independently investigate the complaint. Directors of Atlanta's United Way voted May 18 to withhold money for area Boy Scouts pending an investigation.
    Similar allegations have been made in Alabama, where the FBI is investigating whether the Birmingham-based Greater Alabama Boy Scout Council padded its membership rolls.
    ____
    On the Net:
    Atlanta Area Council: http://www.atlantabsa.org
    Rainbow/PUSH Coalition: http://www.rainbowpush.org/atlanta
    United Way of Metropolitan Atlanta: http://www.unitedwayatl.org
    source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/31/AR2005053100794_pf.html
    ---------------------
    scouting for all
  • rest of story...
  • "American Taliban" Targeting Ford Motor Company

    American Family Association boycotting Ford Motor Co. over gay issues
    May 31, 2005, 4:40 PM
    DETROIT (AP) -- A conservative Christian group launched a boycott against Ford Motor Co. Tuesday, saying the second-largest U.S. automaker has given thousands of dollars to gay rights groups, offers benefits to same-sex couples and actively recruits gay employees.
    "From redefining family to include homosexual marriage, to giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to support homosexual groups and their agenda, to forcing managers to attend diversity training on how to promote the acceptance of homosexuality... Ford leads the way," American Family Association chairman Donald Wildmon said in a statement.
    Ford responded that it respects its customers and employees.
    "Ford values all people, regardless of their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation and cultural or physical differences," Ford vice president of human resources Joe Laymon said.
    Laymon added that other automakers -- including General Motors Corp. and Chrysler Corp. -- provide benefits for same-sex partners and market their vehicles to the gay community.
    "It is one of the things that makes us proud to be part of the auto industry," Laymon said.
    Tupelo, Miss.-based AFA said it e-mailed an announcement about the Ford boycott to 2.2 million supporters. AFA special projects director Randy Sharp said nearly 55,000 people had signed a pledge supporting the boycott by Tuesday afternoon.
    Ford was the only automaker among the 56 companies that got the highest rating last year from the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group. Companies are rated on several factors, including whether they offer benefits to gay partners, donate to gay rights groups and market their products to gays.
    Sharp is upset by Ford's marketing tactics in gay-oriented publications, including offering to donate $1,000 to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation for every Jaguar or Land Rover sold.
    "Ford is willing to do something they have refused to do for any other group," Sharp said.
    Ford spokesman Oscar Suris said the company donated $77.9 million to a wide variety of groups last year. The majority -- $39.6 million -- went to education, he said. A much smaller percentage went to community organizations for gays, Hispanics, blacks, Asians and other groups.
    The AFA recently ended a nine-year boycott of The Walt Disney Co. over Disney's decision to extend benefits to same-sex couples and promote gay-related events at its theme parks. The boycott appeared to have little effect, since Disney reported higher earnings and increased theme park attendance during that time.
    ------
    On the Net:
    American Family Association's Boycott Ford site: http://www.boycottford.com
    Ford Motor Co.: http://www.ford.com

    source: http://www.freep.com/news/statewire/sw116518_20050531.htm

    Brownwood "Dominion Theology": Who's spreading this message over the airwaves ?

    Tuesday 31 May 2005
    Death by stoning for atheists, adulterers, and practicing male homosexuals.
    Stoning - or possibly burning at the stake - for atheists, heretics, religious apostates, followers of other religions who proselytize, unmarried females who are unchaste, incorrigible juvenile delinquents, and children who curse or strike their parents.
    And, oh yes, death to witches, Satanists, and those who commit blasphemy.
    Does this sound like a radical Islamist nightmare, a replay of Afghanistan under the Taliban?
    Welcome to the United States of America as Christian Reconstructionists hope to run it. Not as a democracy, which they see as secular heresy. But as a reconstructed Christian nation, complete with biblically sanctioned flogging and slavery.
    The Bible rules, OK? And, in its name, a small elect of true believers are now seeking capital-D Dominion over every aspects of our government, laws, education, and personal lives.
    An Unlikely Prophet
    Reconstructionists have become the extremists to watch, and the key to understanding the current political zing of everyone on the religious right from Sunday-go-to-church Southern Baptists to neo-Nazis in Christian identity militias.
    Rev. Rousas J. Rushdoony, founder of the Christian Reconstuctions, who would replace the US Constitution with "Biblical Law."
    The movement and its "Dominion Theology" are relatively new, dating from the publication in 1973 of The Institutes of Biblical Law by the late Rousas John Rushdoony. A man of widely acclaimed brilliance and near-encyclopedic knowledge, Rushdoony claimed to descend from a long line of aristocratic Armenian clerics reaching back to the year 315. He himself was an ordained minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, not be confused with the generally liberal Presbyterian Church (USA).
    Rev. Rushdoony was no liberal. Though gentle in his personal demeanor, he and his Chalcedon Foundation preached nothing less than a holy war "to demolish every kind of theory, humanistic, evolutionary, idolatrous, or otherwise, and every kind of rampart or opposition to the dominion of God in Christ."
    As early as 1963, Rushdoony wrote a "Christian revisionist" historical account called The Nature of the American System, in which he rejected the separation of church and state. The authors of the Constitution, he wrote, intended "to perpetuate a Christian order."
    He similarly opposed the secular bent of American public schools, becoming an early proponent of Christian home-schooling, which he defended as a First Amendment right of their parents.
    "We must use the doctrine of religious liberty ... until we train up a generation of people who know that there is no religious neutrality, no neutral law, no neutral education, and no neutral civil government," explained his son-in-law Gary North. "Then they will get busy constructing a Bible-based social, political and religious order which finally denies the religious liberty of the enemies of God."
    Rushdoony opposed labor unions, women's equality, and civil rights laws. He favored racial segregation and slavery, which he felt had benefited black people because it introduced them to Christianity. He largely denied the Holocaust. And he made it kosher for Christian leaders like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell openly to despise democracy.
    "Supernatural Christianity and democracy are inevitably enemies," wrote Rushdoony, "Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life."
    In the highly divided world of Christian denominations, Rushdoony was - in journalist Marghe Covino's exquisite phrase - the most unlikely "Ayatollah of Holy Rollers." Few members of the Assembly of God or other evangelical, Pentecostal, or charismatic churches even know his name, and they are only now becoming comfortable with some of his ideas.
    Evangelicals, who provide most of the foot soldiers for the religious right, have long stressed a personal relationship with God and the importance of having a born-again religious experience. Rushdoony, as an Orthodox Presbyterian, focused less on how they felt their inner faith than on how they lived their lives and obeyed "God's law."
    Evangelicals immerse themselves in the New Testament and some of their mega-churches at times seem almost New Age. Rushdoony was an Old Testament patriarch, following in the more austere tradition of Puritan rule in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Calvin's theocratic governance of early 16th Century Geneva, and the Mosaic law of the ancient Israelites.
    Evangelicals - or at least most of them at present - believe that Christ will return to establish a Millennium of biblical rule, and many take as gospel the End Time stories of the Rapture that the Rev. Tim LaHaye has popularized in his "Left Behind" novels. Rushdoony saw LaHaye's dispensational prophecies as "cheap grace" and "escapist theology," preaching instead that Christ would return only after virtuous Christians created "a world order under God's law."
    Nor are Evangelical leaders rushing to proclaim their adherence to the terrifying Christian theocracy that Rushdoony's Reconstructionists now seek. Few Americans want to live like Puritans or die at the stake for committing a sin. "Dominion Theology" is not an easy revolution to sell, at least not yet.
    In the November 1998 issue of Reason, Walter Olson told of two of televangelist Jerry Falwell's associates who wrote an article in which they criticized the Reconstructionists for advocating ideas that even they, as biblical fundamentalists, found "scary." As an example, the authors mentioned "mandating the death penalty for homosexuals and drunkards."
    Rushdoony dashed off a letter to the editor complaining. Reconstructionists, he wrote, had no intention of putting drunkards to death.
    With denials like this, the Reconstuctions "allow everyone else to feel moderate," Olson concluded. "Almost any anti-abortion stance seems nuanced when compared with Gary North's advocacy of public execution not just for women who undergo abortions but for those who advised them to do so. And with the Rushdoony faction proposing the actual judicial murder of gays, fewer blink at the position of a Gary Bauer or a Janet Folger, who support laws exposing them to mere imprisonment."
    But the gap between the Biblical "moderates" and Reconstructions is getting shorter every day. As an Evangelical Southern Baptist, Falwell still distances himself from Rushdoony over questions of theology. But, he increasingly talks of Christians exercising dominion over America's secular institutions.
    So does the charismatic Pat Robertson. ""There is no way that government can operate successfully unless led by godly men and women operating under the laws of the God of Jacob," he wrote in The New World Order.
    So do evangelical preachers like James Dobson, Don Wildmon, D. James Kennedy, and Tim LaHaye. Whatever they might believe about the End Times, and no matter how often they deny that they've become Reconstructionists, today's evangelical leaders no longer leave the future to the power of prayer while waiting passively for Christ to return.
    "Christian Reconstructionism is a stealth theology, spreading its influence throughout the Religious Right," explains journalist Frederick Clarkson, who closely follows the field. As he sees it, the Reconstructionists gave evangelicals a new set of ideological tools. These included Rushdoony's apocalyptic vision of rule by biblical law, his analysis of America as a Christian nation, the prospect of complete control, intellectual self-confidence, and a positive program for political involvement.
    All of these the evangelicals had historically lacked, while the Reconstructionists wanted the one thing the evangelicals had - a huge army of followers they could mobilize with their churches, Bible colleges, publishing houses, and broadcasting stations.
    "As recently as the early 1990s, most evangelicals viewed Reconstructionists as a band of theological misfits without a following," says Clarkson. "All that has changed, along with the numbers and character of the Christian Right. The world of evangelicalism and, arguably, American politics generally will not be the same."
    If Clarkson is right, and the evidence suggests that he is, Rushdoony has inspired a major revolution in American religious thought, one that now threatens to provoke a political revolution as well. But before taking to the barricades with Bible in hand, his troops would do well to realize that Rushdoony has smuggled into their kit some very un-Christlike politics.
    Witch Hunting
    No surprise to those who track the religious right, Rushdoony enjoyed a long friendship with Robert Welch, the founder of the John Birch Society and the man who accused President Dwight Eisenhower of being a knowing Communist agent. Rushdoony took great interest in how the Birchers worked and even mentioned them admiringly in his epic Institutes of Biblical Law. "The key to the John Birch Society's effectiveness has been a plan of operation which has a strong resemblance to the early church," he wrote. Rushdoony denied ever becoming a Bircher himself, but not because of any political disagreement. As he told Marghe Covino of the Sacramento News & Review, "Welch always saw things in terms of conspiracy and I always see things in terms of sin." A witty bon mot, Rushdoony's response overstated the divergence. He, too, found conspiracies everywhere. But where his friend Welch saw Reds, Rushdoony saw Satan and his modern-day hellhounds, the followers not only of Karl Marx, but also of Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, John Dewey, and - of course - the Unitarians.
    "All sides of the humanistic spectrum are now, in principle, demonic; communists and conservatives, anarchists and socialists, fascists and republicans," he explained.
    Pushing his rightwing politics, Rushdoony was one of the first members of the secretive Council for National Policy, which the Rev. Tim LaHaye and others started to bring right-wing Christians, other conservative activists, and John Birchers together with wealthy patrons willing to fund them. He also served on the board of Dr. Jay Grimstead's Coalition on Revival (COR), an umbrella group that attempted to bridge the theological differences of competing sects within an increasing emphasis on dominating secular institutions.
    Characteristically, Rushdoony soon found fault with both the Council and Coalition, as he did with most religious and political organizations. But both succeeded in selling his far right politics and theocratic religious ideas to millions of unsuspecting evangelicals, who had once led America's fight to keep church and state forever separate.
    They should have known better, and so should we all. "The purpose of regeneration is that man reconstruct all things in conformity to God's order, not in terms of man's desire for peace," Rushdoony warned in his Institutes of Biblical Law. "This purpose and mission involves law and coercion."

    A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France, where he writes for t r u t h o u t.
    -------
    source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/053105A.shtml