Send As SMS

Steve's Soapbox

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Appreciating Historic Downtowns: Lobbyist buys small town's Main Street

Lobbyist buys small town's Main Street
Texan prepares to trade D.C. politics for simpler life
10:19 PM CST on Monday, November 28, 2005
By KAREN BROOKS / The Dallas Morning News
MARTINDALE, Texas – When this tiny Hill Country town celebrated its 150th birthday recently, only one thing generated more buzz on Main Street than the painstakingly assembled city museum featuring Lorraine Harper Harrison's wedding dress.
The man commanding the attention of the founding families was Carlton Carl – the Washington lobbyist who just bought Main Street.
"My dad is just dying to meet you," said resident Nancy Bagley Freels, wearing a straw hat and smiling up at the jovial, bearded Mr. Carl. "He said, 'I have got to see who this man is.' "
Mr. Carl has yet to commit to plans for his 36,000 square feet of downtown and riverfront property. But he has already won over the prominent Bagley, Martindale and Harper families, Mayor Lola Walker, the police chief, the council, and current and former residents who have long mourned the impending death of Martindale.
The 60-year-old native Texan sold his 900-square-foot townhouse in Washington, D.C., last year and recently purchased 16 seed silos, an old bank, a 10,000-square foot former feed store, and several other buildings that compose about 90 percent of downtown.
In doing so, Mr. Carl exchanged his life among the well-coiffed politicians of the nation's capital for a more peaceful existence among the well-coiffed matriarchs of the former Cotton Capital of the World – along with their small-town politics, high expectations, covered-dish dinners, family histories and welcoming, rose-scented hugs.

  • go here...
  • Historic Brownwood F.W. Woolworth Permit

    1948 Brownwood W.W. Woolworth Company Food Handler's Permit. Just a little bit of history as is relates to our stove in the Deli which was purchased from the W.W. Woolworth Store ( straight out of their Kitchen ! ) on the Square of Santa Fe New Mexico. VIVA Teresa Hernandez !

    The Frito Chile Pie, Santa Fe's F.W. Woolworth, The Brownwood Steves' & "The Stove" !

  • go here...

  • -----------
  • go here...

  • -------------
  • go here...

  • ------------
    The stove that we use to prepare our food items in the Deli was puchased from Woolworths on the Square of Santa Fe. This is the same stove that was used in the Woolworth Kitchen to prepeare their famous food items like the Frito Chile Pie above. A little bit of History for those who are interested in such things. Have you tried our Frito Chile Pie ?

    QUOTE

    “One of the things about him is he comes from a business background. He runs the country as if he were a CEO."

    ~ Fox News' Jim Angle comments on President GW Bush while in Brownwood on Monday Nov. 28,2005

    " Screwge ": Falwell, Donohue & O'Reilly ! Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas !

    It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas...or else!

    By Frank James and Jason George
    Tribune staff reporters
    Published November 29, 2005, 9:50 PM CST

    Fair warning to any public official who renames a Christmas tree a "holiday tree": You may get a call from one of hundreds of lawyers lined up by Christian legal groups to defend Christmas against those they say are bent on purging it from the holiday season.
    Two groups, Liberty Counsel, affiliated with Rev. Jerry Falwell, and the Alliance Defense Fund, say they have almost 1,600 lawyer-volunteers between them ready to battle what some conservative Christians view as a secular movement against nativity scenes, Christmas trees and even the greeting "Merry Christmas."
    Started three years ago, this year's campaign will be the group's largest effort yet. But the lawyers may have their work cut out for them, if interviews with Chicagoans on Tuesday are any indication. According to them, public use of the phrase "Merry Christmas" is already going the way of the one-horse open sleigh.
  • go here...

  • -------------------
    CHRISTMAS UNDER ATTACK: A MANUFACTURED CRISIS

    Ah it's that festive time of the year again. Time to deck the halls with boughs of holly, put up the ol' Christmas Tree, and use all of that to score political points with your Christian Reich base. This has been pretty much ignored because of how stupid it is, but someone has to say it, now that the usual suspects are singing that ol' Christmas refrain about how they are not allowed to celebrate Christmas - it's a phony concern. This year its them bullying Wal-Mart into saying "Merry Christmas" in their displays instead of "Happy Holidays" in respect to those customers who don't celebrate Christmas. That's an easy one for them, this being Wal-Mart and all, and the other ones either have been doing mentioning Christmas for decades anyway or don't care what neo-cons are trying to pull. In the end, all of this is all about how much of your holiday dollars Jerry Falwell and William Donohue can get out of those that are scared the anti-Christmas left are getting ready to oppress them. More and more, it is getting to be so that no matter what happens any given year, this routine becomes the stupidest one we have to deal for the entire year - and the Terri Schaivo case happened this time round! Well, we just remind people to do what you normally do with fruitcakes this holiday season.
  • go here...

  • -------------
    Note from Steve: Just finished reading an HEB flyers from the Abilene Reporter News (11.30.05) entitled "Happy Holidays" which includes descriptions of Hanukkah, Christmas, New Year, Three Kings Day, Las Posadas, Kwanzaa & Chinese New Year. I Guess Diversity of Celebrations is threatening to some folks in Brownwood ( listen to KXYL ) ! H.E.B. walking the walk .............
    H-E-B offers free community meal Tuesday at Abilene Civic Center
    December 5, 2005
    H-E-B, which has a grocery store at South 14th and Barrow streets in Abilene, brings its first Feast of Sharing community meal to the Abilene Civic Center, 1100 N. 6th St., from 3 to 7 p.m. Tuesday. Hundreds of volunteers are expected to serve more than 7,000 people.
    H-E-B says the Feast of Sharing Holiday Dinner is to bring the community together for a free meal. The event began in 1989 in Laredo and Corpus Christi, and has spread to 25 cities in Texas and five in Mexico this year.
    H-E-B donates most of the food, and any food left over will be donated to the Food Bank of West Central Texas.
    Jody Houston, the Food Bank's executive director, said H-E-B routinely provides significant donations of food.
    Other highlights are a children's area, Santa Claus, live music and social service booths.
    - Reporter-News staff report
    -----------
    Bill's "Corn Pone" is stale !
  • go here...

  • --------------
    Posted on Sun, Dec. 04, 2005
    STAR-TELEGRAM/JIM ATHERTON
    Killing Christmas
    Believers have an annual opportunity to bestow a profound blessing upon society. But some seem more interested in calling down fire from heaven.
    By ED CHINN
    Special to the Star-Telegram

    As a Christian, I naturally see Christmas as more than a cultural tradition. It is also (or should be) the year's clearest display window for presenting that grand story of the long-ago O Holy Night.
    And what is that story? God stooped down to enter and live on the Earth. That "stooping down" is what we call the Incarnation -- God became one of us. Luke gives a revealing little vignette of what God-with-us must have looked like:
    As he approached the town gate, a dead person was being carried out -- the only son of his mother, and she was a widow. And a large crowd from the town was with her.
    When the Lord saw her, his heart went out to her and he . . . touched the coffin, and those carrying it stood still. He said, "Young man, I say to you, get up!" The dead man sat up and began to talk, and Jesus gave him back to his mother.
    They were all filled with awe and praised God. "A great prophet has appeared among us," they said. "God has come to help his people."
    -- Luke 7:12-16
    Think of it: People watched as God felt -- and then acted on -- compassion for an "Earthling." They saw him raise her son from the dead and then give the boy back to her. (He didn't try to recruit or exploit him for his "movement.") That did it -- they reached a conclusion that was both logical and astonishing: "God has come to help his people."
    Sadly, that story -- "God has come to help his people" -- has almost disappeared from Christmas. It has been replaced by torrential capitalism, unmerciful stress and (worst of all) an irrational, seething anger from Christians toward the very people God came to help.
    So it seems that every holiday season now carries another angry blast from prominent Christians. This year we have two (so far).
    The reliably nutty Pat Robertson recently told the people of Dover, Penn., that God is so angry about their recent school board vote that they can just forget about his mercy. Short version: "Go to hell."
    And Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, sniffed some anti-Christmas attitudes from Wal-Mart. He went a little berserk, demanding an "apology for insulting Christians" and calling a Wal-Mart statement "flatulent." He also asked 126 religious organizations to boycott the retailer. His news release went on to taunt Wal-Mart with: "Don't forget, we have the next six weeks to pull out all the stops, and we will."
    Wouldn't it seem reasonable for Christian leaders to consult the Bible in order to form responses to perceived insults? Had they done so, they might have discovered classic Christian disciplines and graces.
    For example, Jesus said, "Blessed are you when men cast insults at you, and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely, on account of Me . . . Rejoice, and be glad." (Matthew 5:11-12)
    And, the apostle Paul wrote, "When we are cursed, we bless; when we are persecuted, we endure it; when we are slandered, we answer kindly." (1 Corinthians 4:12-13)
    Clearly, Robertson and Donohue did not rejoice, bless, endure or answer kindly.
    I find it incredible that many Christian leaders are essentially saying that the Bible, our "constitution," is irrelevant and not to be consulted on these matters. They are taking the same position toward the Bible that they often accuse liberals of taking toward the U.S. Constitution.
    Forget original intent. We cannot possibly know what Jesus and the other framers of our faith would do in these modern times. Therefore, the Bible ends up saying what we want it to say.
    Christians have an annual opportunity to bestow a profound blessing upon our society. Especially at this time of year, in the midst of so much pain, conflict and poverty, we Christians could display healing graces that come from another world.
    But some of us shoot right on past the heavenly attributes of love, blessing and kindness in our mad dash toward more modern tactics -- boycotts, marches, talk-show shouting matches, trading insults, etc. Many Christians now see themselves as merely another special-interest group, fighting for space on the airwaves, at funding troughs and at White House briefings.
    This is part of what is killing Christmas. Some things are too deep, too profound, too mysterious to talk about. In a very real sense, they are beyond language. That's why some Christmas carols seem aglow with holy and awesome silence.
    The woman at the heart of the Christmas story -- Mary, the mother of Jesus -- understood the silent interior rhythms of spiritual life. After glimpsing the spectacular majesties of that incredible "O holy night . . . of our Dear Savior's birth," she did not take to the streets to demand respect for Jesus; she didn't "engage the culture." She simply "kept and pondered these things in her heart" (Luke 2:19).
    Sadly, the quiet, meditative life is out of favor these days. Even President Bush, a follower of Jesus, often turns to the louder and more divisive Christian voices for counsel. (Yes, I am concerned about the effect of angry and reactionary Christians on our public policy.)
    I would like to read of him hosting a quiet dinner in the White House for the more insightful and contemplative "deep rivers" of spiritual leadership. I'd love to see a renaissance of "ponderers" such as Mary.
    Call me sentimental, but I hope I live to see another "silent night, holy night [where] all is calm, all is bright." Think of it: a post-marketing, stress-free, heart-deep Christmas. Kindness to strangers, generosity to the poor, good will toward the earth.
    To that end, it might be helpful if Christian leaders would go home to their families, read their Bibles and try to silently lay hold the exquisite truth of the Christmas story.
    As for me, I'm going to Wal-Mart. It's certainly the time, and that's probably the place to spread some old fashioned Christmas cheer.
    Ed Chinn is a consultant who lives in Fort Worth.
    Ed Chinn is a free-lance writer. ed@edchinn.com
    source : Fort Worth Star Telegram http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion/13319306.htm
    ---------------
    Abilene Reporter News Letter to the Editor

    Let us remember freedom of religion
    December 6, 2005

    Ms. Elam's argument, if we are to read it closely, is that businesses should be allowed to say ''Merry Christmas'' instead of ''Happy Holidays.'' She says that this is offensive to her and compares it to ''people dressed in gothic clothing'' and those who ''listen to music that is loud ...'' These are invalid argumentative points and have nothing to do with the purpose of why businesses are thoughtful enough to say ''Happy Holidays'' instead of ''Merry Christmas.''
    When I was growing up in Staten Island, N.Y., I went to school with kids who were Catholic, Jewish, Protestant, Buddhist, a few who were Islamic and some who belonged to no faith group at all. I learned a lot about Hanukkah, Advent, Bodhi Day and a few others.
    Ms. Elam speaks of freedom of religion. She apparently believes that freedom of religion pertains only to the Christian faith. While I, myself, am a Christian, I believe that it is more appropriate and more in accordance with the freedom that we have as Americans to celebrate our religious holidays in December with an inclusive greeting such as ''Happy Holidays.'' This way anyone celebrating a holiday in December may partake in the festive season.

    Happy Holidays to all, especially you, Ms. Elam!

    Susan Wright
    Abilene
    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/op_letters_editor/article/0,1874,ABIL_7984_4291834,00.html
    --------------
    Pick a holiday
    November 30, 2005

    I would like to extend my greetings to you and your readers. I pray that I do not ''offend'' anyone. I have been told by many businesses that they are not allowed to say ''Merry Christmas'' they are to say ''happy holidays'' instead for fear that they will offend someone that does not celebrate the day our Lord was born. What about those of us that are offended by the people dressed in gothic clothing, or listen to music that is loud and that contain words that are offensive. What happened to our constitutional right of freedom of religion? Wasn't our country founded on the faith of God? Doesn't the currency that we all use say ''In God We Trust''? I do realize that there are people of another faith that celebrate their own holiday. That's what's great about our country. We should be allowed to celebrate as our faith allows us to and not be ashamed to say Merry Christmas or happy Hanukkah as the case may be. May god bless us all regardless how we celebrate.

    Merry Christmas
    Charline Elam
    Abilene
    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/op_letters_editor/article/0,1874,ABIL_7984_4276232,00.html

    Tuesday, November 29, 2005

    Republican Cunningham: "Concealed my Conduct"

    Republican Tom Delay comments on Duke Cunningham: " Duke Cunningham is a hero,” “ He is an honorable man of high integrity."
    source: http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/061505/delay.html
    ------------------
    Calif. Congressman Admits Taking Bribes
    By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press Writer Mon Nov 28,11:51 PM ET
    SAN DIEGO - Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, an eight-term congressman and hotshot Vietnam War fighter jock, pleaded guilty to graft and tearfully resigned Monday, admitting he took $2.4 million in bribes mostly from defense contractors in exchange for government business and other favors.
    "The truth is I broke the law, concealed my conduct, and disgraced my office," the 63-year-old Republican said at a news conference. "I know that I will forfeit my freedom, my reputation, my worldly possessions, most importantly, the trust of my friends and family."
    He could get up to 10 years in prison at sentencing Feb. 27 on federal charges of conspiracy to commit bribery and fraud, and tax evasion.
    Investigators said Cunningham, a member of a House Appropriations subcommittee that controls defense dollars, secured contracts worth tens of millions of dollars for those who paid him off. Prosecutors did not identify the defense contractors by name.
    Cunningham was charged in a case that grew out of an investigation into the sale of his home to a defense contractor at an inflated price.
    The congressman had already announced in July — after the investigation became public — that he would not seek re-election next year. But until he entered his plea, he had insisted he had done nothing wrong.
    Cunningham's plea came amid a series of GOP scandals: Rep. Tom DeLay of Texas had to step down as majority leader after he was indicted in a campaign finance case; a stock sale by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is being looked at by regulators; and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff was indicted in the CIA leak case.
    Cunningham, a swaggering former flying ace with the Navy during the Vietnam War, was known on Capitol Hill for his interest in defense issues and his occasional outbursts.
    In court documents, prosecutors said Cunningham admitted receiving at least $2.4 million in bribes paid in a variety of forms, including checks totaling over $1 million, cash, antiques, rugs, furniture, yacht club fees and vacations.
    Among other things, prosecutors said, Cunningham was given $1.025 million to pay down the mortgage on his Rancho Santa Fe mansion, $13,500 to buy a Rolls-Royce and $2,081 for his daughter's graduation party at a Washington hotel.
    "He did the worst thing an elected official can do — he enriched himself through his position and violated the trust of those who put him there," U.S. Attorney Carol Lam said.
    Cunningham was allowed to remain free while he awaits sentencing. He also agreed to forfeit his mansion, more than $1.8 million in cash, and antiques and rugs.
    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will have 14 days to set a date for an election to replace Cunningham, the governor's office said.
    He is the first congressman to leave office amid bribery allegations since 2002, when former Rep. James Traficant, D-Ohio, was sentenced to eight years in prison after being convicted of racketeering and accepting bribes.
    The case began when authorities started investigating Cunningham's sale of his Del Mar house to defense contractor Mitchell Wade for $1,675,000. Wade sold the house nearly a year later for $975,000 — a loss of $700,000 in a hot real estate market.
    Prosecutors said the house purchase was part of Cunningham's guilty pleas.
    In addition to buying Cunningham's home at an inflated price, Wade let him live rent-free on Wade's yacht, the Duke Stir, at a yacht club. Wade's company, MZM Inc., also donated generously to Cunningham's campaigns.
    Around the same time, MZM was winning defense contracts.
    MZM does classified intelligence work for the military. It had $65.5 million of contracts for intelligence-related defense work in fiscal 2004, ranking No. 38 on the Pentagon's list. The company has established a presence in Iraq, fielding a small team of interpreters shortly after the invasion.
    Although prosecutors did not name Cunningham's four co-conspirators, details in the plea documents, including business addresses and occupations, make clear that Wade was one of them.
    The documents indicate another conspirator was Brent Wilkes, an associate of Wade's who headed a defense contracting company called ADCS Inc. that also provided campaign cash and favors to Cunningham while reaping valuable contracts.
    Another co-conspirator appears to be Thomas Kontogiannis, a New York developer. Cunningham interceded with prosecutors on Kontogiannis' behalf when he had legal troubles, and a mortgage company run by relatives of Kontogiannis' helped Cunningham finance a condo in Virginia and his house in Rancho Santa Fe.
    Attorneys for Wilkes and Wade declined to comment. Kontogiannis' attorney did not return a call.
    ___
    Associated Press reporter Erica Werner in Washington contributed to this report.
    source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051129/ap_on_go_co/congressman_s_house;_ylt=AlcLvRLhreOP3lh184f6A8as0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-
    ------------------
    "Concealed my Conduct" !

  • go here...

  • -----------
  • go here...
  • QUOTE

    "We are going to protect the border"

    ~ US President G.W.Bush 11.28.05

    Small Town Texas and Miscarriage of Justice....

    Pen again proves mighty in sordid tale
    How one reporter armed with nothing but a notebook took on a corrupt Texas town

    By Patrick Beach
    AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
    Sunday, October 30, 2005
    Tulia, like Vidor or Jasper, is one of those Texas towns with little to distinguish it but a deep, undying and much-deserved shame. A 1999 drug roundup in that West Texas town netted 39 people, all but a handful of them black, who were charged with dealing cocaine on the sole word of an undercover cop and raging sociopath named Tom Coleman.
    The busts, trials, appeals, national controversy and subsequent reversals revealed a criminal justice system -- this in a state that purports to prize individual liberty -- that would be laughed out of any self-respecting Third World country. Everybody -- from Coleman to the sheriff who protected him to the judges, defense lawyers and prosecutors who aided and abetted this grotesque process to John Cornyn (then the state's top law-enforcement official, now enjoying the finer pleasures of the U.S. Senate) -- played a hand in a breathtaking miscarriage of justice.
    And the world wouldn't have heard about it if it hadn't been for one guy with a reporter's notebook.
    A small group of locals begged for someone to publicize what looked like a concerted effort to railroad a good portion of Tulia's black population into prison forever. Most of the state's media outlets pronounced themselves too occupied with the latest inconsequential murmurings at the Capitol to take a look.
    But Nate Blakeslee was working for the Texas Observer, the small but influential publication that famously goes its own way. Blakeslee, who lives in Austin, headed to West Texas, broke the story and stayed on it for five years. Had it not been for his work, Tulia wouldn't have become a national story, the pressure wouldn't have built on the political and court systems, and those defendants would still be in prison, some of them serving terms of hundreds of years.
    Now Blakeslee's busted the story out into a book, and his achievement is no less heroic the second time around. As much as anything, "Tulia" is a near-superhuman feat of reporting, as Blakeslee tells the stories of dozens of luckless defendants -- the bootlegger/pig farmer/"drug kingpin," the fading athlete, the woman who was at a bank in Oklahoma City, 275 miles away, when she was allegedly making a dope deal with Coleman -- and numerous cops, lawyers, locals, out-of-town activists, politicians and legal muscle. With so much going on, it's amazing that Blakeslee can steer steady enough to keep this thing aimed between the ditches. (In fact, the first dozen or so pages of the prologue are, perhaps necessarily, slow and a tad confusing, as Blakeslee hauls his ensemble cast onstage.)
    But the book is much more than the story of what was, as he wrote three years back in the Observer, "a sort of perfect storm for drug policy reform advocates." It's about the agonizing death of rural America, a system that passes around dirty cops like the Catholic Church shuttled pedophile priests, a prison system that serves as a network of trade schools for criminals, the lockstep conformity of small towns and a culture of out-and-out drug hysteria that allowed one bent lawman to mount his own personal pogrom against a group of defenseless people he'd sworn to protect.
    It's also about race. As a black teenager says, "The only difference from 1920 and now is they can't take us out and hang us on a tree. They can just send us to prison for life. It's the same thing: We ain't never gonna be free again."
    All because of Coleman. "As a villain, he sold himself," Blakeslee writes. Coleman made his buys without buttressing his busts with video, audio or corroborating witnesses, and famously claimed to have taken notes on his leg. Asked on the witness stand if he still had those notes, Coleman replied, "No sir, I took a bath since then."
    The legal process that grew out of the Tulia scandal likely generated a metric ton of paper, and to Blakeslee's credit he's able to zoom in on a crucial question, answer or ruling and explain its implications. But Blakeslee's also contributed a metric ton of his own reporting that is equally revealing, especially when it comes to the network dedicated to freeing the Tulia defendants. There was factional infighting, for instance, between those who used certain cases to keep the story in the national spotlight and those who were simply working to free their clients.
    Blakeslee brings a cool and clear writing style to his story, which is welcome in a case that generated so much heat and light. Despite the Observer's lefty reputation and whatever Blakeslee's personal politics, this is not a partisan screech. There is no viable liberal-conservative debate to be waded into here; Tulia was about right and wrong, and the contrast was as obvious as -- you guessed it -- black and white. Through the whole wretched tale I was reminded of William Gaddis' opening of "A Frolic of His Own": "You get justice in the next world, in this world you have the law."
    Perfect storm though it might have been, to regard Tulia as an aberration, as something weird and unbelievable that happened in some shabby and forgettable hayseed backwater, would be a terrible mistake. It will happen again. It's probably happening right now. And if some young reporter gets wind of it but is unsure how to tackle the story, she'll have Blakeslee's book to show her how it's done.

    Texas Book Festival

    Nate Blakeslee will appear at the Texas Book Festival 1:45 p.m. today in Capitol Extension Room E2.010.
    Tulia: Race, Cocaine, and Corruption in a Small Texas Town
    Nate Blakeslee
    Public Affairs, $26.95
    pbeach@statesman.com; 445-3603
    source: http://www.statesman.com/life/content/auto/epaper/editions/sunday/life_entertainment_3436e16931a9027d00a3.html

    Sunday, November 27, 2005

    Brownwood Tortillas - We recommend Ricardos

    Tortillas, the new white bread ?
    As the Mexican staple goes mainstream, makers grind out millions more
    12:00 AM CST on Sunday, November 27, 2005
    By KAREN ROBINSON-JACOBS / The Dallas Morning News

    Two Jewish guys from Hollywood are shipping flavored tortillas to Mexico.
    Experts attribute some of the growth to the nation's rapidly expanding Hispanic population.
    Still others point to the popularity of flavored sandwich "wraps" and rapidly growing markets such as New Berlin, Wis., and Boise, Idaho, as evidence that the tortilla has crossed a cultural bridge and shows no signs of turning back.
    "The fastest growth part is the non-Hispanic market," said Rudy Guerra Jr., president of Dallas-based Rudy's Tortillas and a third-generation tortilla maker.
    "It's not just a Hispanic food now."
    The development has economic implications for Texas, home to more than 150 tortilla makers, including two of the nation's largest.
    Mission Foods, owned by Grupo Maseca's Gruma Corp. of Mexico, is in Irving. Bimbo Bakeries USA, maker of the Tia Rosa tortilla line, is in Fort Worth.
    Rising sales are attracting new companies with multimillion-dollar plants into an arena long populated by mom-and-pop shops.
    "The industry is not used to a corporate form and structure like we've set up here, with a CEO, COO, CFO," said John Sommerhalder, chief executive of Dallas-based Lobo Tortilla Factory, which counts one Hispanic among its C-suite officers.
    "We're trying to bring a corporate management style that you don't find pervasive across the industry."
    Lobo Tortilla Factory was launched in January.
    It was fueled largely by a $2.5 million equity investment from Brett Landes, who owns more than 70 percent of the company. Mr. Landes is a principal in Staubach Capital Partners, part of the Staubach Co.
    At first, Lobo was running two production lines. Now it's up to seven, with a bead on new customers that would ramp up production even more.
    Rudy's, too, is expanding.
    The need to boost production, and perhaps go after markets in Europe, inspired Mr. Guerra to invest $3.5 million in equipment and $3 million to buy a 104,000-square-foot plant one block from his current location on Regal Row in Dallas.
    When the new facility is ready early next year, Rudy's will have 10 tortilla lines – machines that handle production from dough to bagged product. The lines will run around the clock, turning out 15 million tortillas a day, Mr. Guerra said while walking the floor at the recent Tortilla Industry Association conference in Grapevine.
    "There's a point where you can't get any more business without the equipment," he said, as a tortilla bagger whirred softly in the background. "This is our opportunity to go to a larger type of customer – a national, even a global customer."
    Biting into bread
    About half of Mr. Guerra's sales are in flour tortillas. But that side of the business is growing faster than corn, he said, guessing that's partly due to the ability to add flavors.
    He said it also may be due to the flour tortilla's similarity to white bread – an affinity with implications for the makers of white bread.
    For seven decades, white bread reigned supreme as the undisputed starch of choice on U.S. tables. But as the nation grew more brown – and health-conscious – white bread began to look, well, a little too white-bread.
    Now the Hispanic-fueled growth of traditional tortillas and the broader market's taste for flavored and low-fat varieties are taking a bite out of white bread sales.
    For the 52 weeks ended Oct. 8, mass merchandisers sold $1.95 billion in prepackaged white bread, not counting sales at Wal-Mart, smaller grocers or bakeries, according to A.C. Nielsen.
    That's nearly double the $1 billion in tortilla sales at those stores in the same period – but the trajectories are headed in opposite directions.
    White bread sales are off 16 percent from $2.3 billion in 2001, and tortilla sales are up 23 percent from $811 million in 2001, Nielsen figures show.
    The tortilla association, based in Addison, argues that those figures underestimate the true retail market because so many tortillas are sold at small ethnic shops not tracked by services such as Nielsen.
    Kirk O'Donnell, vice president for education at the American Institute of Baking in Manhattan, Kan., said that white bread has gotten a bum rap from consumers who see it as overly processed and fattening.
    Tortillas are perceived to be healthier than white bread, but they can be higher in fat, he said.
    Good to go
    But Mr. O'Donnell conceded that tortillas can be a better fit than white bread with consumers' grab-and-go eating patterns – an attribute that has opened up a world of possibilities.
    Though flavored tortillas are a niche, chefs and sandwich makers across the globe are embracing sun-dried tomato, spinach and habanero-flavored tortillas to repackage traditional sandwiches and salads as wraps.
    "Chefs get to be creative with the product," said Mr. Guerra, who estimates that flavored tortillas account for up to 10 percent of Rudy's flour tortilla sales. He predicts that will be 15 percent within a year.
    Wraps often command a higher price in restaurants than traditional burritos, he said. "Maybe we think we're eating better if it's called a wrap and not a burrito."
    Health-conscious consumers have been a major marketing focus for Tumaro's Gourmet Tortillas, the Hollywood-based company that began selling flavored flour tortillas nationally in 1997.
    The company says that up to 93 percent of the ingredients in its tortillas, which come in 21 varieties, are organic. (Preservatives were added to lengthen shelf life.)
    About 75 percent of sales are to retailers outside Hispanic areas, said vice president Brian Jacobs, son of Herman Jacobs, who purchased Tumaro's in 1995.
    "We're selling to very few Hispanic-based retail outlets," Mr. Jacobs said. "We really haven't targeted that demographic."
    When the company began to market its nontraditional tortillas in the late 1990s, Mr. Jacobs felt some resistance.
    "I can't say that it's because I have white skin, but it's possible, especially when we would present to a Latin grocery store," he said. "The impression I got was, 'What have these crazy Californians come up with?' "
    It's a wrap
    It was in the mid-1990s that the tortilla made the leap from the Mexican diner to the deli.
    The word wrap helped push the momentum for flavored tortillas, Mr. Jacobs said. Wraps were associated with a variety of ingredients, from Thai food to baby greens, making the introduction of flavored versions less of a stretch.
    By 2002, low-carb dieters were shunning bread makers and seeking alternatives, which spurred the growth of low-carb tortillas.
    Sales also began picking up outside the Americas.
    "We had guys come from Sweden saying, 'Our business is going gangbusters,' " said Mr. O'Donnell of the baking institute. "I was just amazed to hear how their market was growing."
    Likewise, Mr. Jacobs has seen his market grow, though Tumaro's is still small compared with the industry biggies.
    "We sell 180 million tortillas a year – two Jewish guys who knew nothing about the tortilla business 12 years ago," he said.
    "We have shipped tortillas to Mexico, which is kind of funny."
    E-mail krobison@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-tortilla_27bus.ART.State.Edition1.2332f819.html

    Wednesday, November 23, 2005

    Brownwood PTSD

    Abilene reporter News Letter to the Editor

    Good reporting
    November 22, 2005

    I would like to thank you for your front page Nov. 13 reporting of returning U.S. military personnel who are in desperate need of medical services related to post-traumatic stress disorder.

    I believe you should be commended for your comprehensive coverage which included interviews and information from Lt. Col. Scott R. Bleichwehl of the Fort Hood Public Affairs Office, Billy Murphey of the Brown County Veterans Service Office, Veterans Administration, Amer ican Psychological Association, Associated Press, Military.com. as well as the Hounshell family.

    I would like to close with this:

    ''Research has already demonstrated that military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, like service in past combat zones, is having an adverse effect on the mental health of our men and women in uniform. More than one million men and women in uniform have rotated through combat in Iraq and Afghan-istan, and estimates of those affected by PTSD could be as high as one-in-five. Moreover, recent Government Account-ing Office reports indicate that Veterans Administration and the Department of Defense do not have the capacity to meet the increasing mental health needs of returning war veterans.''

    Source: www.optruth.org.

    Steve Harris
    Brownwood

    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/op_letters_editor/article/0,1874,ABIL_7984_4257524,00.html
    -------------
    for background information on Brownwood PTSD
  • go here...

  • ----------
    Why I went to Crawford Texas.......
  • go here...
  • Monday, November 21, 2005

    Murtha: In his own words without the Brownwood "Talking Head" Spin

    For Immediate Release
    November 17, 2005

    The Honorable John P. Murtha
    War in Iraq

    (Washington D.C.)- The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of us. The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction. Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.
    General Casey said in a September 2005 Hearing, “the perception of occupation in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency.” General Abizaid said on the same date, “Reducing the size and visibility of the coalition forces in Iraq is a part of our counterinsurgency strategy.”
    For 2 ½ years I have been concerned about the U.S. policy and the plan in Iraq. I have addressed my concerns with the Administration and the Pentagon and have spoken out in public about my concerns. The main reason for going to war has been discredited. A few days before the start of the war I was in Kuwait – the military drew a red line around Baghdad and said when U.S. forces cross that line they will be attacked by the Iraqis with Weapons of Mass Destruction – but the US forces said they were prepared. They had well trained forces with the appropriate protective gear.
    We spend more money on Intelligence than all the countries in the world together, and more on Intelligence than most countries GDP. But the intelligence concerning Iraq was wrong. It is not a world intelligence failure. It is a U.S. intelligence failure and the way that intelligence was misused.
    I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and Walter Reed hospitals almost every week since the beginning of the War. And what demoralizes them is going to war with not enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace; the devastation caused by IEDs; being deployed to Iraq when their homes have been ravaged by hurricanes; being on their second or third deployment and leaving their families behind without a network of support.
    The threat posed by terrorism is real, but we have other threats that cannot be ignored. We must be prepared to face all threats. The future of our military is at risk. Our military and their families are stretched thin. Many say that the Army is broken. Some of our troops are on their third deployment. Recruitment is down, even as our military has lowered its standards. Defense budgets are being cut. Personnel costs are skyrocketing, particularly in health care. Choices will have to be made. We can not allow promises we have made to our military families in terms of service benefits, in terms of their health care, to be negotiated away. Procurement programs that ensure our military dominance cannot be negotiated away. We must be prepared. The war in Iraq has caused huge shortfalls at our bases in the U.S.
    Much of our ground equipment is worn out and in need of either serious overhaul or replacement. George Washington said, “To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.” We must rebuild our Army. Our deficit is growing out of control. The Director of the Congressional Budget Office recently admitted to being “terrified” about the budget deficit in the coming decades. This is the first prolonged war we have fought with three years of tax cuts, without full mobilization of American industry and without a draft. The burden of this war has not been shared equally; the military and their families are shouldering this burden.
    Our military has been fighting a war in Iraq for over two and a half years. Our military has accomplished its mission and done its duty. Our military captured Saddam Hussein, and captured or killed his closest associates. But the war continues to intensify. Deaths and injuries are growing, with over 2,079 confirmed American deaths. Over 15,500 have been seriously injured and it is estimated that over 50,000 will suffer from battle fatigue. There have been reports of at least 30,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.
    I just recently visited Anbar Province Iraq in order to assess the conditions on the ground. Last May 2005, as part of the Emergency Supplemental Spending Bill, the House included the Moran Amendment, which was accepted in Conference, and which required the Secretary of Defense to submit quarterly reports to Congress in order to more accurately measure stability and security in Iraq. We have now received two reports. I am disturbed by the findings in key indicator areas. Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. Our reconstruction efforts have been crippled by the security situation. Only $9 billion of the $18 billion appropriated for reconstruction has been spent. Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. Only $500 million of the $2.2 billion appropriated for water projects has been spent. And most importantly, insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in the last year. Instead of attacks going down over time and with the addition of more troops, attacks have grown dramatically. Since the revelations at Abu Ghraib, American casualties have doubled. An annual State Department report in 2004 indicated a sharp increase in global terrorism.
    I said over a year ago, and now the military and the Administration agrees, Iraq can not be won “militarily.” I said two years ago, the key to progress in Iraq is to Iraqitize, Internationalize and Energize. I believe the same today. But I have concluded that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is impeding this progress.
    Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.
    I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will immediately redeploy. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a “free” Iraq.

    My plan calls:

    To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
    To create a quick reaction force in the region.
    To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
    To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq

    This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering.
    Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our OBLIGATION to speak out for them. That’s why I am speaking out.
    Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME.

    source: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/pa12_murtha/pr051117iraq.html
    ------------
    Hawkish Democrat Calls for Iraq Pullout
    By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer Thu Nov 17, 6:35 PM ET
    WASHINGTON - One of Congress' most hawkish Democrats called Thursday for an immediate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, sparking bitter and personal salvos from both sides in a growing Capitol Hill uproar over President Bush's war policies.
    "It's time to bring them home," said Rep. John Murtha (news, bio, voting record), a decorated Korean War and Vietnam combat veteran, choking back tears during remarks to reporters. "Our military has accomplished its mission and done its duty."
    The comments by the Pennsylvania lawmaker, who has spent three decades in the House, hold particular weight because he is close to many military commanders and has enormous credibility with his colleagues on defense issues. He voted for the war in 2002, and remains the top Democrat on the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.
    "Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence," he said.
    In a biting response, Republicans criticized Murtha's position as one of abandonment and surrender and accused Democrats of playing politics with the war and recklessly pushing a "cut and run" strategy.
    "They want us to retreat. They want us to wave the white flag of surrender to the terrorists of the world," said House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill.
    "It would be an absolute mistake and a real insult to the lives that have been lost," said Rep. David Dreier (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif.
    Just two days earlier, the GOP-controlled Senate defeated a Democratic push to force Bush to lay out a timetable for withdrawal. Spotlighting mushrooming questions from both parties about the war, though, the chamber approved a statement that 2006 should be a significant year in which conditions are created for the phased withdrawal of U.S. forces.
    Murtha estimated that all U.S. troops could be pulled out within six months. He introduced a resolution Thursday that would force the president to call back the military, but it was unclear when, or if, either GOP-run chamber of Congress would vote on it.
    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., stopped short of endorsing Murtha's position, even though he's one of her close advisers. Her counterpart in the Senate, Sen. Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) of Nevada, said, "I favor what the Senate did," referring to the statement the Senate adopted.
    Thursday's rhetorical dueling came in a week that had already seen Bush and other top administration officials lash out at war critics, who they say advocate a strategy that will only embolden the insurgency.
    Some Senate Democrats have already laid out plans for bringing home U.S. troops. Other House Democrats have called for the military to pull out, but none has Murtha's clout on military issues.
    Seldom overtly political, Murtha uncharacteristically responded to Vice President Dick Cheney's comments this week that Democrats were spouting "one of the most dishonest and reprehensible charges" about the Bush administration's use of intelligence before the war.
    "I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done," Murtha said.
    Referring to Bush, Murtha added, "I resent the fact, on Veterans Day, he criticized Democrats for criticizing them."
    Murtha once worked closely with the vice president when Cheney was defense secretary. During Vietnam, Bush served stateside in the National Guard while Cheney's five deferments kept him out of the service entirely.
    With a Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts, Murtha retired from the Marine Corps reserves as a colonel in 1990 after 37 years as a Marine, only a few years longer than he's been in Congress. Elected in 1974, Murtha has become known as an authority on national security whose advice was sought out by Republican and Democratic administrations alike.
    Murtha's shift from an early war backer to a critic advocating withdrawal reflects plummeting public support for a war that has cost more than $200 billion and led to the deaths of more than 2,000 U.S. troops.
    Known as a friend and champion of officers at the Pentagon and in the war zone, it is widely believed in Congress that Murtha often speaks for those in uniform and could be echoing what U.S. commanders in the field and in the Pentagon are saying privately about the conflict.
    Murtha, who normally shuns the spotlight, said he was spoke out because he has grown increasingly troubled by the war and has a constitutional and moral obligation to speak for the troops.
    But Republicans said Murtha does not represent the views of U.S. troops or military leaders.
    "This falloff of support among Democratic ranks is not shared by the war-fighting forces. It's not shared by our troops," said Rep. Duncan Hunter (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.
    Several times a year, Murtha travels to Iraq to assess the war on the ground and he often visits wounded troops in hospitals at home. And he sometimes just calls up generals to get firsthand accounts.
    "The war in Iraq is not going as advertised," Murtha said. "It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion."
    His voice cracked and tears filled his eyes as he related stories of one of his visits to wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.
    One man, he said, was blinded and lost both his hands but had been denied a Purple Heart because friendly fire caused his injuries.
    "I met with the commandant. I said, 'If you don't give him a Purple Heart, I'll give him one of mine.' And they gave him a Purple Heart," said Murtha, who has two.
    source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051117/ap_on_go_co/congress_iraq
    -----------------
    Now watch this Republican "Meltdown"......
  • punch here...

  • -------------
  • murtha interview...

  • -----------
    AT WAR

    Our Troops Must Stay
    America can't abandon 27 million Iraqis to 10,000 terrorists.

    BY JOE LIEBERMAN
    Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST

    I have just returned from my fourth trip to Iraq in the past 17 months and can report real progress there. More work needs to be done, of course, but the Iraqi people are in reach of a watershed transformation from the primitive, killing tyranny of Saddam to modern, self-governing, self-securing nationhood--unless the great American military that has given them and us this unexpected opportunity is prematurely withdrawn.
    Progress is visible and practical. In the Kurdish North, there is continuing security and growing prosperity. The primarily Shiite South remains largely free of terrorism, receives much more electric power and other public services than it did under Saddam, and is experiencing greater economic activity. The Sunni triangle, geographically defined by Baghdad to the east, Tikrit to the north and Ramadi to the west, is where most of the terrorist enemy attacks occur. And yet here, too, there is progress.
    There are many more cars on the streets, satellite television dishes on the roofs, and literally millions more cell phones in Iraqi hands than before. All of that says the Iraqi economy is growing. And Sunni candidates are actively campaigning for seats in the National Assembly. People are working their way toward a functioning society and economy in the midst of a very brutal, inhumane, sustained terrorist war against the civilian population and the Iraqi and American military there to protect it.
    It is a war between 27 million and 10,000; 27 million Iraqis who want to live lives of freedom, opportunity and prosperity and roughly 10,000 terrorists who are either Saddam revanchists, Iraqi Islamic extremists or al Qaeda foreign fighters who know their wretched causes will be set back if Iraq becomes free and modern. The terrorists are intent on stopping this by instigating a civil war to produce the chaos that will allow Iraq to replace Afghanistan as the base for their fanatical war-making. We are fighting on the side of the 27 million because the outcome of this war is critically important to the security and freedom of America. If the terrorists win, they will be emboldened to strike us directly again and to further undermine the growing stability and progress in the Middle East, which has long been a major American national and economic security priority.
    Before going to Iraq last week, I visited Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel has been the only genuine democracy in the region, but it is now getting some welcome company from the Iraqis and Palestinians who are in the midst of robust national legislative election campaigns, the Lebanese who have risen up in proud self-determination after the Hariri assassination to eject their Syrian occupiers (the Syrian- and Iranian-backed Hezbollah militias should be next), and the Kuwaitis, Egyptians and Saudis who have taken steps to open up their governments more broadly to their people. In my meeting with the thoughtful prime minister of Iraq, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, he declared with justifiable pride that his country now has the most open, democratic political system in the Arab world. He is right.
    In the face of terrorist threats and escalating violence, eight million Iraqis voted for their interim national government in January, almost 10 million participated in the referendum on their new constitution in October, and even more than that are expected to vote in the elections for a full-term government on Dec. 15. Every time the 27 million Iraqis have been given the chance since Saddam was overthrown, they have voted for self-government and hope over the violence and hatred the 10,000 terrorists offer them. Most encouraging has been the behavior of the Sunni community, which, when disappointed by the proposed constitution, registered to vote and went to the polls instead of taking up arms and going to the streets. Last week, I was thrilled to see a vigorous political campaign, and a large number of independent television stations and newspapers covering it.
    None of these remarkable changes would have happened without the coalition forces led by the U.S. And, I am convinced, almost all of the progress in Iraq and throughout the Middle East will be lost if those forces are withdrawn faster than the Iraqi military is capable of securing the country.
    The leaders of Iraq's duly elected government understand this, and they asked me for reassurance about America's commitment. The question is whether the American people and enough of their representatives in Congress from both parties understand this. I am disappointed by Democrats who are more focused on how President Bush took America into the war in Iraq almost three years ago, and by Republicans who are more worried about whether the war will bring them down in next November's elections, than they are concerned about how we continue the progress in Iraq in the months and years ahead.
    Here is an ironic finding I brought back from Iraq. While U.S. public opinion polls show serious declines in support for the war and increasing pessimism about how it will end, polls conducted by Iraqis for Iraqi universities show increasing optimism. Two-thirds say they are better off than they were under Saddam, and a resounding 82% are confident their lives in Iraq will be better a year from now than they are today. What a colossal mistake it would be for America's bipartisan political leadership to choose this moment in history to lose its will and, in the famous phrase, to seize defeat from the jaws of the coming victory.
    The leaders of America's military and diplomatic forces in Iraq, Gen. George Casey and Ambassador Zal Khalilzad, have a clear and compelling vision of our mission there. It is to create the environment in which Iraqi democracy, security and prosperity can take hold and the Iraqis themselves can defend their political progress against those 10,000 terrorists who would take it from them.
    Does America have a good plan for doing this, a strategy for victory in Iraq? Yes we do. And it is important to make it clear to the American people that the plan has not remained stubbornly still but has changed over the years. Mistakes, some of them big, were made after Saddam was removed, and no one who supports the war should hesitate to admit that; but we have learned from those mistakes and, in characteristic American fashion, from what has worked and not worked on the ground. The administration's recent use of the banner "clear, hold and build" accurately describes the strategy as I saw it being implemented last week.
    We are now embedding a core of coalition forces in every Iraqi fighting unit, which makes each unit more effective and acts as a multiplier of our forces. Progress in "clearing" and "holding" is being made. The Sixth Infantry Division of the Iraqi Security Forces now controls and polices more than one-third of Baghdad on its own. Coalition and Iraqi forces have together cleared the previously terrorist-controlled cities of Fallujah, Mosul and Tal Afar, and most of the border with Syria. Those areas are now being "held" secure by the Iraqi military themselves. Iraqi and coalition forces are jointly carrying out a mission to clear Ramadi, now the most dangerous city in Al-Anbar province at the west end of the Sunni Triangle.
    Nationwide, American military leaders estimate that about one-third of the approximately 100,000 members of the Iraqi military are able to "lead the fight" themselves with logistical support from the U.S., and that that number should double by next year. If that happens, American military forces could begin a drawdown in numbers proportional to the increasing self-sufficiency of the Iraqi forces in 2006. If all goes well, I believe we can have a much smaller American military presence there by the end of 2006 or in 2007, but it is also likely that our presence will need to be significant in Iraq or nearby for years to come.
    The economic reconstruction of Iraq has gone slower than it should have, and too much money has been wasted or stolen. Ambassador Khalilzad is now implementing reform that has worked in Afghanistan--Provincial Reconstruction Teams, composed of American economic and political experts, working in partnership in each of Iraq's 18 provinces with its elected leadership, civil service and the private sector. That is the "build" part of the "clear, hold and build" strategy, and so is the work American and international teams are doing to professionalize national and provincial governmental agencies in Iraq.
    These are new ideas that are working and changing the reality on the ground, which is undoubtedly why the Iraqi people are optimistic about their future--and why the American people should be, too.
    I cannot say enough about the U.S. Army and Marines who are carrying most of the fight for us in Iraq. They are courageous, smart, effective, innovative, very honorable and very proud. After a Thanksgiving meal with a great group of Marines at Camp Fallujah in western Iraq, I asked their commander whether the morale of his troops had been hurt by the growing public dissent in America over the war in Iraq. His answer was insightful, instructive and inspirational: "I would guess that if the opposition and division at home go on a lot longer and get a lot deeper it might have some effect, but, Senator, my Marines are motivated by their devotion to each other and the cause, not by political debates."
    Thank you, General. That is a powerful, needed message for the rest of America and its political leadership at this critical moment in our nation's history. Semper Fi.

    Mr. Lieberman is a Democratic senator from Connecticut.
    source: http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007611

    Sunday, November 20, 2005

    Brownwood/Bangs - Johnny Cash "Oddballs" : Damon Bramblett & The Rest of us Cash Fans

  • listen and see "HURT" here...

  • -----------
    Ride This Rocket
    By Lee Nichols

    MARCH 9, 1998: Well, I was hoping that this could be the first article written about me that didn't mention Johnny Cash," says Damon Bramblett, a mere 99 seconds into the interview. Oops. Oh well, might as well get it out of the way early. Yes, Damon Bramblett's voice does bear a certain resemblance to the Man in Black. But it's his own fault, really. That's what he gets for listening to something other than "Wal-Mart country" and daring to be out of step with the other kids in Bangs, Texas - population 1,869, about nine miles west of Brownwood.
    "But Johnny Cash was what got me into it," Bramblett continues. "My parents took me to see him when I was three years old. It was the very first concert I ever went to. I been drawn to his music ever since I could speak."
    That'll identify you as a real hip dude at the Continental Club or Stubb's, but in Bangs, it just made Bramblett an oddball. In fairness to the Brownwood Wal-Mart (Bangs isn't big enough for one of its own), they might carry a Cash tape or two, but not much else along those lines.
    "I never was exposed to anything other than Johnny Cash," reiterates Bramblett. "I could never find anything I liked in Bangs other than Johnny Cash until I reached high school - until I was about a senior. I discovered Bruce Springsteen in high school, and that was through Cash doing a Springsteen cover on a couple of his records. And the same thing with Bob Dylan, too. I was way into the Springsteen thing - he was at the height of his popularity - and I was like, 'Wow, I finally discovered something else that I can listen to.'
    "I also started getting into the Rolling Stones when I was in high school, and that was just... none of my friends listened to that. They were listening to rap and George Strait. I took plenty of ribbing for my musical tastes. Johnny Cash wasn't considered country by anybody, he was just considered old."
    From there, Bramblett found his way to Willie, Waits, and Westerberg - a seemingly diverse collection of influences, except perhaps in Austin. It shouldn't be at all surprising, then, that Bramblett found his way here. After all, this is where every kid who's too odd to live in Texas, but too Texan to live anywhere else, ends up. So, in 1989, Bramblett hit town and found fellow oddballs at the Continental Club, the Black Cat Lounge, and Hole in the Wall.
    And once here, he did... not a whole lot, actually. Some people hit town and their careers take off like a rocket - think Derailers or Dale Watson (well, a rocket by Austin standards, anyway). Despite putting out a somewhat rocket-themed tape, Shoot the Moon, including the song "Nobody Goes to the Moon Anymore," Bramblett just played around town a little bit and worked at Waterloo Records.
    Things first got rolling about two years ago when Bramblett picked up some spots on Kris McKay's "Too Many Guitars" songwriters showcases. In fact, he got so much exposure from the McKay shows that she should probably charge a fee if he ever gets rich and famous. It was an appearance there that brought Bramblett to the attention of songwriter Walter Salas-Humara, former leader of the Silos, a late-Eighties critics' darling.
    photograph by John Carrico
    "I played one of those and he was there, and after we were done, he said, 'Man, you need to come out to L.A. and let me produce and cut some tracks,'" remembers Bramblett. "And I had always worshipped his music. I was a huge fan of those Silos records. Cuba, when I first moved to town, that was one of my discoveries. That was something I would never have run across in Bangs. I was in awe that someone like this liked me."
    Then came numerous gigs opening up for Kelly Willis and the Robison brothers, an opportunity sure to entrench you with Austin's country crowd.
    "That was another one of those ["Too Many Guitars"] songwriter things. I met Bruce [and Kelly] and they really liked my stuff. They were always really encouraging me and still are. I've been cutting demos over at his house all week for free. Charlie's recorded one of my songs and Kelly's recorded one of my songs, although I don't know if they'll end up on one of their records yet."
    If it does, it won't be the first song Bramblett has landed with a semi-high-profile Austin artist. Sara Hickman has already recorded "Nobody Goes to the Moon Anymore," which landed on her Misfits album.
    "Same thing. She saw me at one of those Kris McKay shows. I think she's seen me play one time, and she heard me play three songs, and asked me for a tape of two of them. And then, two years later, she called me and said, 'I've recorded your song, I hope you don't mind. It's coming out.'"
    Record labels noticed, too. In addition to his songs, attendees of Bramblett's 1997 South by Southwest showcase couldn't help being taken by his commanding stage presence, big, booming voice, and tight trio, which includes bassist Brian Walsh and drummer Conrad Choucroun ("the best band I've ever played with. I can pull it off solo, but the band just makes everything better").
    The first nibbles came from Bloodshot Records, the Chicago indie that's practically a major label in the world of alternative country. Ironically, he was initially told that he was "too traditional" for them, the same accursed words that one might expect from Nashville country labels, but Bloodshot still knew a good thing when they heard it, and entered into contract negotiations with Bramblett.
    Austin's Watermelon Records also made a push, and is currently wooing Bramblett with a contract offer of their own (which puts Bramblett, still a Waterloo employee, in the strange position of negotiating with his boss, John Kunz, who is co-owner of both Watermelon and Waterloo). That means Bramblett could hit the ground running, since Watermelon has worked out a distribution deal with major label Sire, offering other Watermelon acts like the Derailers visibility of which they could previously only dream.
    Regardless of who he signs with, however, the level of attention Bramblett is getting now positions him as the clear frontrunner to be the "next big thing" to gush up from Austin's ever-flowing well of alternative country talent. This leaves him with mixed feelings. As he said, he isn't trying to be Johnny Cash, just Damon Bramblett. And to him, that isn't really country; he sees Damon Bramblett as more of that indefinable type of music that simply shares a kinship with country, kind of like one of the musician's heroes, Townes Van Zandt.
    "I've played traditional country places like Broken Spoke, Gruene Hall, and the Sons of Herman Hall [in Dallas]. Those are always great, but I only have a couple of songs that I think of as country. It's strange to see people dancing to 'Nobody Goes to the Moon.' But I want as many people to hear it as possible, and I certainly don't have any prejudice against country fans.
    "But if I stick a cowboy hat on, people think it's country. I don't know. I'm just as country as Bob Dylan, and I guess just as rocking as Johnny Cash."
  • source...

  • ----------
    Note from Steve: I grew up listening to and appreciating Johnny Cash. Guess I'm an "oddball" too ! Come to think of it, I guess both sides of my family are since we all enjoyed his music !
    ------------
    Johnny Cash is a part of Brownwood History...10/10/1955 @ Brownwood's Soldier and Sailors Memorial Hall

  • see date here...

  • ----------------
  • see picture here...

  • -------------
    Wanna see johnnycash.com ?
  • go here...
  • Brownwood's Big Picture

  • read more here...

  • --------------
  • and there's more...

  • -------------
  • and more...

  • ------------
  • your dollars at work...

  • -----------
  • follow the money...
  • All "Moral values" are Local !

    Op Ed: Columnists
    Re-thinking moral values — Britt Towery

    A few Sunday nights ago while tooling around my radio dial, I got a surprise. I heard Dr. Robin Meyers say he had been a columnist for six years for the Oklahoma Gazette and he held the record for sparking the greatest number of angry letters to the editor. I could identify with this guy.
    I was listening to an Oklahoma City radio station (KOMA 1520 kHz on the AM dial). The following is my take on remarks Meyers, the Oklahoma City Mayflower Church pastor, made that night.
    During the presidential campaigns of last year we heard a great deal about “moral values.” Meyers was angry “for having watched as the faith he loved had been taken over by those who claim to speak for Jesus, but whose actions are anything but Christian.”
    Many say it was the so-called “moral values” that swung the 2004 election to Bush. It is time to re-think our moral values.
    Of all the moral values discussed and dissected last year, I heard no mention of war as a moral value. And a war begun under false pretenses, justifying it as God’s will, is blatantly immoral.
    I was ordained to preach the gospel 1951. In these 54 years I have pastored seven churches and taught in six Baptist universities. I have had my faith strengthened by many fine Bible scholars and evangelists. I do not claim to know it all, nor to have “arrived,” but I do know when I am having the wool pulled over my eyes on so-called “moral values.”
    America helped establish the international rules for war in 1949, and for the treatment of prisoners of war. The Geneva Conventions contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war.
    U.S. Senator John McCain, who spent years as a POW in North Vietnam, introduced a bill to abide by these rules and not to permit torture to detainees in our present war on terror. The Senate voted 90 to 9 approving it.
    Immediately, Vice President Cheney wanted an exemption for the CIA. There is no justification for such an immoral exemption. To have secret prisons in other countries so “enemy combatants” and “suspects” can be tortured can only be labeled immoral.
    The present Bush Administration won the White House on “moral values” of their choosing. It is immoral to turn from the Sermon on the Mount (where Jesus taught we should not return violence for violence and those who live by the sword will die by the sword).
    We do not want to sink to the level of our jihad-crazy radical Islamists who lop off heads without a second thought. We live by a higher standard. Our history has proven to the world we live by a higher ideal. Masses have immigrated to our shores because this was a place that respected law and humanity. I don’t have to dive into a garbage dump to know it is filthy. Moral values says treat others as you would have them treat you.
    Meyers: “Every human being is precious. Arrogance is the opposite of faith. ... believing that one has never made a mistake is the mark of a deluded man, not a man of faith. And war — war is the greatest failure of the human race — and thus the greatest failure of faith.”

    Britt Towery, former pastor, teacher, missionary and Brownwood native, writes a column that appears in the Brownwood Bulletin every Friday. Comments are welcomed at britt.towery@cox.net.
    source: http://www.brownwoodbulletin.com/articles/2005/11/19/op_ed/columnists/opinion07.txt

    Ted Erski: What's going on behind your Cup of Java ?

    Who is Ted ?

  • read more here...

  • ----------
  • read more here...

  • ---------
  • can you hear this...

  • ---------

    "What could be more bigoted than to claim that you have a monopoly on God?"

    Rabbi: Right's anti-gay policies akin to Hitler's
    Jewish leader says conservatives claim 'monopoly on God'
    09:54 AM CST on Sunday, November 20, 2005
    Associated Press
    HOUSTON – The leader of the largest branch of American Judaism blasted conservative religious activists in a speech Saturday, calling them "zealots" who claim a "monopoly on God" while promoting anti-gay policies akin to Adolf Hitler's.
    Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the liberal Union for Reform Judaism, said "religious right" leaders believe "unless you attend my church, accept my God and study my sacred text you cannot be a moral person."
    "What could be more bigoted than to claim that you have a monopoly on God?" Rabbi Yoffie told the audience of about 5,000 in his keynote address during the movement's national assembly in Houston, which runs through Sunday.
    Rabbi Yoffie used particularly strong language to condemn conservative attitudes toward homosexuals. He said he understood that traditionalists have concluded gay marriage violates Scripture, but he said that did not justify denying legal protections to same-sex partners and their children.
    "We cannot forget that when Hitler came to power in 1933 one of the first things that he did was ban gay organizations," Rabbi Yoffie said. "Yes, we can disagree about gay marriage. But there is no excuse for hateful rhetoric that fuels the hellfires of anti-gay bigotry."
    The Union for Reform Judaism represents about 900 synagogues in North America with an estimated membership of 1.5 million people. It is one of the three major streams of U.S. Judaism; Orthodox and Conservative are the others. Reform Judaism is the only one that sanctions gay ordination and supports civil marriage for same-sex couples.
    Rabbi Yoffie's lengthy speech addressed other issues, and his criticism of conservative religious activists came in the middle. The audience was largely quiet until he reached that topic and responded with repeated, enthusiastic applause.
    He did not mention evangelical Christians directly in his speech, using the term "religious right." In an interview, he said the phrase encompassed conservative activists of all faiths, including those within the Jewish community.
    Rabbi Yoffie said the activists have little understanding of the liberal religious community, which he said also grounds its beliefs in biblical teaching. "We study religious texts day and night, but we have no direct lines to heaven, and we aren't always sure that we know God's will," he said. "We bring a measure of humility to our religious belief."
    Rabbi Yoffie said liberals and conservatives share some concerns, such as the potential damage to children from violent or highly sexual TV shows and other popular media. But he said, overall, conservatives too narrowly define family values, making a "frozen embryo in a fertility clinic" more important than a child, and ignoring poverty and other social ills.
    "When they cloak themselves in religion and forget mercy, it strikes us as blasphemy," Rabbi Yoffie said, urging a renewal of religious tolerance in the U.S. "We need beware the zealots who want to make their religion the religion of everyone else."
    One attendee, Judy Weinman of Troy, N.Y., said she thought Rabbi Yoffie was "right on target."
    "He reminded us of where we have things in common and where we're different," she said.
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/DN-zealots_20tex.ART.State.Edition1.26fe5c85.html

    Note to Don't Ask, Don't Tell Critics: It's the Hate, Stupid !

    U.S., UK differ over gays in military
    Critics wonder why U.S. hasn't revised policy on gay troops in light of recruiting crisis, British success
    09:55 PM CST on Saturday, November 19, 2005
    By RICHARD WHITTLE / The Dallas Morning News
    WASHINGTON – Denton native Stacy Vasquez is a former Army recruiter who was booted out for being a lesbian in 2003 after 12 years in uniform. Tommy Cook's tour in Army intelligence ended the same year at Fort Hood after he acknowledged he was gay. Both were in jobs the Army regards as crucial these days.
    If Ms. Vasquez and Mr. Cook had been in the British army, they would have fared differently. Since 1999, the United Kingdom has allowed gays and lesbians to serve openly. Starting next month, some gay couples will even be eligible for married housing on British bases.
    The U.S. military, by contrast, drums out hundreds of gays and lesbians each year under the 1993 law known as "don't ask, don't tell" – even as an Army stressed by major deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan falls thousands short of its recruiting goals.
    And while gay-rights advocates cite Britain's experience as evidence that gays could serve openly without disrupting the military's social fabric, neither Congress nor the Pentagon show any interest in repealing the statute.
    "I know of no move along those lines – none," Army Secretary Francis Harvey said this year.
    Congress based don't ask, don't tell on a finding that allowing gays to serve openly could disrupt the military's unit cohesion by creating tensions among soldiers and eroding morale.
    "People in the military are forced into situations with an extreme lack of privacy, in the barracks, in the foxhole and so forth," said Peter Sprigg, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council, a conservative research and lobbying group that focuses on family issues. "It is unfair to put people in the military in a position of forced intimacy with people who may be viewing them as a sexual object."
    More than 10,000 service members have been discharged in the dozen years since the law took effect, replacing a previous outright ban on gays in the military.
    Don't ask, don't tell allows gays and lesbians to serve, but only if they refrain from "homosexual conduct" – defined as "a homosexual act, an admission or statement of homosexuality, or marriage or attempted marriage between persons of the same gender."
    The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, found in February that 757 of the nearly 9,500 service members expelled during the first 10 years of the law held "critical occupations." They included 54 Arabic speakers, for example.
    "The war in Iraq highlights the shortsightedness of discharging Arabic linguists who happen to be gay," wrote Lt. Col. Allen B. Bishop, a West Point professor who argued for the law's repeal in a March Army Times commentary.
    Gay-rights advocates say the military has eased its enforcement of don't ask, don't tell under the pressure of wartime manpower needs. The number of those discharged for violating the law has declined sharply since President Bush declared the global war on terrorism, from 1,227 to 653 annually.
    "If you look at the decrease in numbers, they start immediately after Sept. 11, 2001," said Steve Ralls, a spokesman for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a group that seeks the law's repeal. "Whenever there is a conflict, the numbers go down."
    Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Brian Maka disputed that conclusion, saying it was "not based on scientific evidence" – and such evidence would be impossible to find.
    "How do you know why someone wasn't discharged?" Col. Maka said. "The numbers are what they are."
    Critics say don't ask, don't tell deprives the military of thousands of patriots who want to serve their country.
    Federal lawsuit
    Ms. Vasquez and Mr. Cook hold themselves out as examples. They are among 12 ousted service members represented in a federal lawsuit filed in Massachusetts by the service members defense network, which aims to overturn the law as unconstitutional and reinstate them in the military.
    Ms. Vasquez, 32, joined the Army in 1991 after graduation from Denton High School. She became a paralegal and served in Germany, South Korea and various domestic stations until May 2001, when she was assigned to recruiter duty in Plano.
    When she joined the Army with her mother's permission at age 17, Ms. Vasquez said, "They did ask me if I was a homosexual in my contract, and I honestly answered 'no.' During my first enlistment I was even married to a man."
    Only after 1997, the year her marriage ended, did she begin to "identify as a lesbian," she said.
    By 2003, she had risen to the rank of first sergeant and was one of her station's top recruiters. But "I was called into my commander's office one day, and I was told that a co-worker's wife had seen me kiss a girl in a gay bar," Ms. Vasquez said.
    The commander, she said, offered her a choice: She could either face a criminal charge of indecent conduct or write a statement declaring herself a lesbian and receive an honorable discharge.
    Citing the lawsuit, Ms. Vasquez declined to say whether she kissed a woman that night at Sue Ellen's, a lesbian club in Dallas. But "I did write the statement," she said, to avoid a criminal charge.
    Army spokesman Paul Boyce declined to comment on her case but said "generally speaking" a homosexual act that could lead to a discharge "involves much more than just an allegation of kissing someone of the same sex."
    Ms. Vasquez, now a paralegal for the service members' defense fund, said she wants to resume her Army career and believes she's needed.
    In an effort to overcome recruiting shortfalls that left the active-duty Army 6,667 troops short and the Army Reserve 4,626 below its goal for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the Army has added 2,166 recruiters over the past two years.
    "I would like to still be serving my country," Ms. Vasquez said.
    Accused of dodging Iraq
    If not for his discharge, Mr. Cook might have served in Iraq. His unit, the 312th Military Intelligence Battalion, was there from January 2004 to February 2005.
    Mr. Cook, 23, grew up in Lake Jackson, Texas, and joined the Army in April 2001. By October 2003, the specialist was in line for promotion to sergeant when the 312th went to the Army's National Training Center at Fort Irwin, Calif., to prepare for Iraq.
    For three weeks, he worked in a Humvee and lived in the field with two sergeants at the Mojave Desert base, Mr. Cook said. One day, after an "obviously gay" soldier walked by, Mr. Cook said, one of the sergeants remarked that "if he ever found out anybody on his team was gay, he would kill them."
    Mr. Cook said the sergeant's remark chilled him. "I just did not want to be working in a confined area with live ammo with this man," he said.
    Soldiers who feel threatened can confidentially inform the military police or inspector general, Army spokesman Mr. Boyce said. The service has "very strong policies against harassment for any reason involving sexual orientation, race, religion, language, ethnic background," he said.
    But on the advice of the service member's fund, Mr. Cook said, he wrote a letter to his company commander describing what had happened and asking for a transfer.
    Accused of looking for a way to avoid going to Iraq, Mr. Cook was told he would get a discharge that would leave him ineligible for many veterans benefits. He appealed and received an honorable discharge.
    Mr. Cook, now a nursing student at Lake Jackson's Brazosport College, insists he was willing to serve in Iraq. "I never asked to get out," he said.
    A number of the soldiers he served with had long known that he was gay and were unperturbed. The night before his discharge, he said, "the company commander and my first sergeant had a surprise party for me at a gay bar" in Temple. About 30 of the 40 or so members of his company showed up, he said.
    "They gave me a tiara," Mr. Cook recalled.
    Little hope for bill
    Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., has introduced a bill to repeal don't ask, don't tell, and has 100 co-sponsors, but there is no sign Congress will pass it.
    Uniformed military leaders are equally uninterested.
    "The leadership has said, 'We're not touching that with a 10-foot pole,' " said retired Army Lt. Gen. Dan Christman, a former superintendent of West Point and a key planner of the 1991 Gulf War.
    "They're comfortable with the law the way it is, and they really don't see anything to be gained," he said.
    The Army discharged 325 soldiers under don't ask, don't tell in fiscal 2004, the most recent year for which figures are available. All active-duty services discharged a total of 653. The Army and Army Reserve fell 11,253 recruits short in fiscal 2005.
    Charles Moskos, a military sociologist at Northwestern University who came up with the idea of don't ask, don't tell and sold it to the Clinton administration in 1993, said any gain in gay recruits might be offset by losses in heterosexuals wary of serving with them.
    Lawrence Korb of the pro-repeal Center for American Progress, a research group founded by former aides to President Bill Clinton, said the British example "could be really significant" for the U.S. debate.
    The British military had a ban on gays when the U.S. law was passed, Mr. Korb recalled, and one argument was that, unlike other militaries that had allowed gays and lesbians to serve openly, U.S. and British armed forces were more likely to be housed in close quarters because both deploy forces overseas and have nuclear submarines.
    Fifteen of the NATO alliance's 26 member militaries have no ban on gays serving openly, as is the case with Israel's much-vaunted armed forces. But the British experience since 1999, when the European Court of Human Rights forced the U.K. military to allow gays and lesbians to serve openly, "shows that all of the concerns people had just don't amount to much," Mr. Korb said.
    Defense analyst Michael Codner of the Royal United Services Institute, a research group closely tied to the British military, said the reaction among heterosexual troops to the removal of the ban had been "less dramatic than expected."
    "There was remarkably little fallout from the U.K. decision," Mr. Codner said by telephone from London. But that doesn't mean gays are accepted in all areas of the military, Mr. Codner said. "If you're a paratrooper and you're gay, you probably keep your head down, whereas in other units, such as the medical services, it's less important," he said.
    Ms. Vasquez said she was certain that many of her fellow soldiers knew she was a lesbian long before her discharge.
    "Service members have moved with society," she said. "They see a need for every single able-bodied American that can serve their country to have the ability to do so."
    E-mail rwhittle@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/112005dnintgaysoldiers.25ad8d56.html

    Saturday, November 19, 2005

    Red State CoffeeTalk: Lights, Camera, Action ?

  • see the promo here...

  • -----------
  • see more here...
  • QUOTE

    "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

    ~ John Stuart Mill

    The War Coming Home to Brownwood

    The War at Home
    By Celinda Emison / Reporter-News Staff Writer
    November 13, 2005

    Survival is something Brownwood's Jacob Hounshell knows all about.

    Spending 14 months in Iraq, Hounshell, a private first class in the U.S. Army, stared death in the face many times - but not like he has since he has been home.
    Seven months ago Hounshell, 20, distraught about having to report back for duty at Fort Hood, wrote his mom a note just before he got into his truck. He told his mom not to read it until he was gone, but she read it anyway.
    It was a suicide note.
    ''I ran and got in his truck and wouldn't let him go back,'' his mother, Bobbie Hounshell, recalled. ''We drove around Brownwood for six hours.''
    Hounshell wrote that he was going to drive head-on into an 18-wheeler.
    ''I told him he spent 14 months in Iraq and survived, and I wasn't going to let him die going back to Fort Hood,'' she said.
    Then, Bobbie and her husband, Larry, entered a battlefield of their own - to get medical treatment for their son, who is now considered AWOL by the Army. But to date, they have been unsuccessful, because they say the military ''just doesn't care.''
    ''We had him approved to go to a private treatment center,'' Bobbie Hounshell said. ''But they needed his military records, and we can't get them.''
    Prior to her son's suicide threat in May, Bobbie Hounshell said she began going through the proper channels at Fort Hood to get him help because he had threatened suicide numerous times before.
    She even went to Fort Hood with her son and begged officials to diagnose him and give him a medical hardship discharge.
    ''He was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress and paranoid schizophrenia after taking a computer-generated psychological test at the base,'' she said. ''But he has never been given medication or anything.''
    After the psychiatric evaluation, Hounshell stayed at Fort Hood, was counseled a few times by a chaplain and was confined to his barracks, alone.
    ''They took his roommates away and left him in his room alone with a loaded weapon,'' said Larry Hounshell. ''He said he tried to commit suicide then, but couldn't pull the trigger.''
    Then in May, Hounshell received some leave time and was allowed to come home. It was then that he wrote the suicide note and his mother kept him from going back to Fort Hood. He's been home, fighting a war of his own, since then.
    Now, the Hounshells are even more worried about their son because they have exhausted all the avenues for extending his military leave. The young soldier is considered absent without leave and faces five to 15 years in military prison for not reporting for duty.
    What's the solution?
    The best thing for Hounshell to do now is to turn himself in, said Billy Murphey of the Brown County Veterans Service Office.
    ''If he is truly AWOL and there are extenuating circumstances, he should go back and try to get treatment,'' Murphey said.
    Murphey said that the longer Hounshell fails to report, the worse it will be for him.
    ''He can be AWOL for no longer than 180 days, then he is considered a deserter, which is a federal offense, and that could be worse for him,'' Murphey said.
    He suggested that Hounshell's parents take him to the VA Hospital in Temple for evaluation. Murphey said he has not been contacted by the Hounshell family.
    Larry Hounshell said he has made regular calls to the local MHMR office but has not received any assistance.
    Officials at MHMR known in Brownwood as the Center for Life Resources said they will always conduct a patient assessment to see what type of treatment the patient needs. They would not comment on whether they have been contacted by the Hounshell family.
    Fort Hood's stance
    According to Lt. Col. Scott R. Bleichwehl of the Fort Hood Public Affairs Office, Hounshell has been AWOL since May 16 and dropped from the rolls on June 21.
    Bleichwehl would not comment further on the specifics of the Hounshell case.
    In general however, Bleichwehl said that a soldier who goes AWOL may be punished ''by confinement, reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay and allowances, a punitive discharge, and a fine,'' he said. ''The command makes a determination in each case of how to treat the misconduct.''
    He added that Fort Hood and the Army are concerned with the mental, physical and spiritual wellbeing of their soldiers.
    ''Fort Hood has a fully functional hospital offering both in-patient and out-patient services,'' he said. Additionally, a Resilience and Restoration Center was established to assist soldiers with any difficulties they may be experiencing with mental health issues.
    Hounshell's parents contend that their son did not receive any treatment other than a computer- generated psychiatric evaluation and confinement to his barracks.
    Tour of duty
    Hounshell said he became interested in signing up when he was just a junior at May High School. Military service was something that he felt was important because it dates back many generations in his family. So after graduating in 2003, he went to boot camp.
    In June 2004, almost 51 years to the day his grandfather Monroe Hounshell left for World War II, the then 19-year-old began his tour of duty, first to Kuwait and then onto Baghdad. Hounshell served as a driver and a scout in the First Platoon of the 9th Cavalry Division of the First Cavalry.
    He earned a commendation for finding some makeshift bombs in a vehicle and arresting two insurgents during a routine checkpoint stop. His story appeared in the military newspaper Stars and Stripes.
    He laughs nervously when he remembers how a 27-mm rocket landed next to him in the sand as he waited to leave in a convoy from what the soldiers called Camp Incoming near Baghdad.
    ''It didn't explode,'' he said.
    One of Hounshell's unpleasant duties was to pick up bodies of Iraqis killed by insurgents. Many had a note, weighted down with a rock that simply read ''this is what happens if you speak to Americans.''
    ''We'd just take them to the door of the mosque and leave them,'' he said.
    He remembered catching a fellow serviceman when he fell dead from a shot that penetrated his helmet and ''made a canoe out of his head.''
    It's these memories that haunt the soldier and keep him awake at night. After returning from a 14-month stint, during which he was stationed at various points in and around Baghdad, he found himself unable to sleep. Back at Fort Hood, Hounshell said he would just go to the mall or walk around in Wal-Mart all night.
    ''I stay awake for three days at a time, then I'm so tired I just sleep for 12 to 14 hours without dreaming,'' he said. ''And that's OK.''
    Larry Hounshell said the motivation for telling his son's story is to help other families who may be going through the same thing, he said.
    ''We love our servicemen and women,'' he said. ''The main reason we are doing this is that I don't want another child or family to deal with this.
    ''They (the military) treat our boys like a piece of equipment,'' he said. ''When it's broken, they just throw it away.''
    What is post-traumatic stress disorder?
    Once called shell shock or combat fatigue, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often develops after a soldier witnesses oexperiences a traumatic event. According to the Veterans Administration, about 1,700 soldiers were diagnosed with PTSD in 2004.
    Soldiers diagnosed with PTSD often suffer depression, hypervigilance, insomnia, emotional numbing, recurring nightmares and intrusive thoughts. In many cases, the symptoms worsen with time, leaving the victims at higher risk for alcohol and drug abuse, unemployment, homelessness and suicide.
    Source: American Psychological Association
    Army suicides
    There were at least 24 suicides among U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Kuwait in 2003, according to the Army's count. That number may increase because the circumstances of some other deaths are still in doubt.
    That equates to a suicide rate of 17.3 per 100,000 soldiers, compared with a rate of 12.8 for the entire Army in 2003 and an average rate of 11.9 for the Army during the 1995-2002 period, according to officials familiar with the mental health study. They spoke on condition of anonymity.
    The 24 suicides do not include soldiers who killed themselves after returning to the United States.
    Source: Associated Press and Military.com
    Contact Brownwood staff writer Celinda Emison at (325) 641-8804 or emisonc@reporternews.com.
    EDITOR'S CORRECTION NOTE: The following correction ran on Monday, Nov. 14, 2005: U.S. Army Pfc. Jacob Hounshell began his tour of duty in January 2004, 61 years after his grandfather began serving in World War II. A story beginning on Page 1A Sunday contained a math mistake in the number of years.
    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/nw_local/article/0,1874,ABIL_7959_4235375,00.html
    ------------
    Letters to the Editor

    Think of others
    November 16, 2005

    I am glad the young man in Brownwood (AWOL soldier, Nov. 13) did not commit suicide for his sake and his family. I have to say that it is horrible that he was going to run head on into an 18-wheeler! My husband and I drive a truck. We have two lovely children. Why do people not consider what harm they would cause to the truck driver if they were to do this? I can't imagine what I would feel like for the rest of my life if someone did this to me. What unimaginable horror this young man would have caused in the life of an innocent person! If you are thinking about suicide, find a way you won't involve an innocent person. Why make their life miserable because you were. I know that sounds harsh, but as a truck driver, I just can't begin to imagine the horror this young man would have brought to the life of a truck driver and his/her family. Not only emotional distress but possible death for him/her also!

    Julie Caulder
    Rising Star
    -----------------------
    Liberal media
    November 19, 2005

    I was amazed that the Reporter-News would put on the front page a story (Nov. 13) of a cowardly deserter. There are numerous stories you could have run, how about the hero who just gave his life for his country. I should be surprised at your actions but the sad thing is, nothing about the liberal press surprises me anymore. You have done a disservice to your community, your readers and your country.

    Dale Holt
    Abilene

    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/op_letters_editor/0,1874,ABIL_7984,00.html
    -----------------
    Military.com PTSD Forum. If you live in the land of Denial, you will want to bypass this site !
  • read more here...

  • ----------
    Notice how letter writers Dale Holt and Julie Caulder avoid the mere mention of PTSD in their letters ? The following link is one that they will most likely seek to avoid in their daily lives ! The Reality of War is uncomfortable !
  • read more here...
  • QUOTE

    "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in...to kind of catapult the propoganda."

    ~ George W. Bush May 24, 2005

    Friday, November 18, 2005

    QUOTE: Murtha on Cheney & Bush

    "I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done. I resent the fact, on Veterans Day, he criticized Democrats for criticizing them."

    ~ AP Nov. 17, 2005

    Brownwood: Small towns can get big problems

    Small towns can get big problems
    It's easier to keep quiet than to ask questions, but at what cost?
    01:22 AM CST on Friday, November 18, 2005
    Coaching high school football makes nomads of many men, so it might not seem unusual that Pat Ward's resume looks like a bus tour of Texas.
    Except for this: Ten Texas stops in 16 years, and Ward, a success by the numbers, worked mostly at the Class A level as a head coach.
    Maybe he just likes the feel of small towns and programs. Nothing wrong with that.
    Or maybe, as our Gary Jacobson reported in a riveting piece Sunday, the Texas towns facilitated a disturbing pattern.
    A long paper trail and first-hand accounts include allegations that Ward threatened, intimidated and ultimately bullied coaches, faculty and administrators.
    "A predator," one of Ward's former bosses called him.
    Of course, some liked him. One even hired him twice.
    High Schools
    Coaching up a storm (11/13)
    Others had no comment at all. Some couldn't. Any derogatory statements not only would violate settlements, they'd conflict with the glowing letters of recommendation required by the agreements.
    Why did school districts such as Carlisle, Marfa and Quinlan cave in? Money, for one thing. District legal fees in Marfa, normally $2,000 to $3,000, ran up to $41,000 in one of Ward's years there, a big hole in a small budget.
    But maybe it's more than money. Maybe it's fear. Fear of bad publicity, fear of hard feelings in a close-knit community, fear of lives disrupted.
    Other cases bear similar results. Remember Merkel? An investigation by Child Protective Services indicated improper relations between female students and some coaches had gone on for years.
    No one was really surprised. People grew up with the rumors, residents told the Abilene Reporter-News.
    And what happened? Nothing until a sexual harassment seminar at Merkel in the summer of 2004, when tips were called in to CPS and the probe began.
    Bottom line: Four teachers either resigned or were reassigned and two surrendered their teaching credentials.
    No one was indicted. But, as a Merkel city councilman put it, the stain on the town marks everyone.
    "This reputation will see me dead and buried," Steve Campbell told The Dallas Morning News. "I don't think it will ruin us, that we'll never survive, but when Merkel's name comes up, it will be associated with this for a long time."
    Remember Bremond? A couple of concerned taxpayers in the tiny town two hours south of Dallas questioned what was going on with money meant for schools, and an audit led to the indictment of the superintendent.
    And town reaction? "Maybe they've done an ounce of good," one resident said of the activists, "but they've done a pound of bad."
    The town uproar simply wasn't worth it, some said. One businessman told our Diane Jennings that, if dealt with at all, the scandal should have been handled the "hush-hush way."
    Other towns do it, and it's not hard to see why. The smaller the community, the more likely it's full of family. One coach mentioned in the Merkel allegations was the husband of a local principal.
    Even if residents aren't related, they've got to live with one another. They dine in the same cafes, go to the same schools, sit in the same pews.
    Who wants to start a fight with someone you have to live with day after day after day?
    And that's not unique to small towns, either. Every one of us is a member of some smaller community, whether it's a church or synagogue or booster club or lodge, and we understand the reservations when problems inevitably arise.
    Easier just to let it go. Don't take stands. Not publicly, anyway. Negotiate, if you have to, and avoid protracted court cases and bad publicity at all costs.
    That's how they handled Pat Ward's troubling case in Quinlan, Marfa and Carlisle.
    But here's the problem dealing with a coach like Ward that way: He just moves on down the road to another town, another school.
    And some he's left behind don't like it, either.
    "I don't believe in paying it off or mailing it off to another district," a former Marfa superintendent, Carl Robinson, told The News.
    "He's going to be a problem wherever he goes. That's just his nature."
    Ward's in New Mexico now. Escalante High School, a Class A school, didn't win a game last year. This season, Ward's first, it went 9-2.
    Best of luck from here on out, Escalante. Here's hoping the football team wins, too.
    E-mail ksherrington@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/columnists/ksherrington/stories/111805dnsposherrington.1c3790e5.html

    Wednesday, November 16, 2005

    Brownwood Texas: Midnight Cowboy and Brokeback Mountain

  • read more about it here...

  • --------------
  • see the promo here...

  • -------------
    Note From Steve:

    I can think of no other place that would be more appropriate to show Brokeback Mountain than West Texas ! I also think the only thing that has changed in Texas since the 60's, when this story was set, is the brand of coffee found in the Cowboy's campfire coffee tins or the brand of beans being cooked in the can !
    Will Brokeback Mountain play in Brownwood Texas ? * Why the Hell Not ! (* Slogan lifted from Kinky Friedman) If Brokeback does come to Brownwood/Early will it be boycotted, by the Brownwood Taliban, like the first Harry Potter Movie ? It's all about the censorship !
    Brokeback Mountain, in so many ways, has TEXAS, TEXAS, TEXAS written all over it: The story line, for starters, is the same today as it was in the 60's ! One of the leading characters is from Texas. Larry McMurtry, Author & Screenwriter of Brokeback Mountain, born in Wichita Falls Texas, and bookstore owner in Archer City Texas
  • read more here


  • This Just In:

    Childress theater bans ‘Brokeback Mountain’
    By David Webb Staff Writer
    Jan 12, 2006, 22:47

    Jack Twist leaves Brokeback Mountain and while riding on the rodeo circuit winds up in Childress, Texas, where he meets a barrel racer named Lureen. Twist marries Lureen, the wealthy daughter of a farm machinery dealer, and settles down in Childress. But four years after he last saw Ennis Del Mar, Twist rekindles their relationship with a postcard asking Del Mar if he wants to go fishing. The two carry on a long-distance relationship spanning two decades.
    As praise for the gay cowboy love story “Brokeback Mountain” builds momentum across the country, most residents of Childress, Texas, seem oblivious to the attention the movie is focusing on their sleepy town.
    And it is likely to stay that way.
    “Brokeback Mountain” will not play at Childress’ one theater, the Lone Star 4. The closest place for Childress residents to see the movie will be in Amarillo, which is about 116 miles to the north. It is also not playing in Lubbock or Wichita Falls, the two other larger cities closest to Childress.
    Vince LaCario, owner of the Lone Star 4, said the movie was not scheduled for showing in Childress because of its content.
    “We’re a real small community with a lot of church presence,” LaCario said. “I’m afraid it would shake up some turmoil.”
    The two cowboys in the movie, Jack Twist and Ennis Del Mar, fall in love while working together herding sheep on a mountain in Wyoming in the early 1960s. Jack later visits Childress with the rodeo where he meets and marries a local woman. The two men carry on a long distance relationship for two decades, with Jack driving from Childress to Wyoming to visit Ennis several times a year.
    Donna Ferguson, director of the Childress Chamber of Commerce, said she was unaware the town was a major setting in the movie, and she doubts many other people know about it either. Filming of the movie took place in Canada, rather than Texas and Wyoming.
    “I don’t think they know it,” Ferguson said. “I haven’t heard a word about it from anyone.”
    Ferguson said she is unsure what the conservative residents of Childress, which has a population of 6,874 residents, will think about a gay cowboy love story bringing attention to them. Childress is an agricultural town, and the largest employer is a prison on the outskirts of the city.
    “That’s a good question,” Ferguson said.
    Christopher Blackburn, editor of the Childress Index, said he had heard about Childress being featured in the movie, but he doubts many other residents are aware of it.
    Blackburn said he doubts Childress residents would be offended about their city being used as a setting in movie about a gay cowboy love story, unless the town is placed in a negative light. When told the movie implies that a gay man was brutally murdered on a rural road in Childress County, Blackburn said, “Oh, wonderful. People will probably be a little more negative toward that.”
    Ferguson said a few gay and lesbian people live in Childress today, and they seem to live there without any difficulties.
    “I don’t think there are many, but there are some,” Ferguson said. “I don’t think they have any problems.”
    Ferguson said she suspects most residents of Childress would not obsess about the subject of homosexuality.
    “Some of them might, of course,” she said.
    Blackburn said he also is aware of a few gay and lesbian people living in Childress.
    “You could probably count them on one hand per gender,” Blackburn said. “I’ve known a couple. They didn’t seem to have any problem living here.”
    Blackburn said some people in town might be homophobic, but he is unaware of any overt hostility. He describes himself as a “very tolerant individual.”
    “From a tolerance aspect, who knows what goes on behind their backs, or maybe even in front of them, in regard to name calling and things like that,” Blackburn said. “I’m sure the younger population is probably more accepting. It’s the older population that is probably a little short about it.”
    Perry Davidson, a gay Arkansas resident who was born in Childress, said his first reaction to hearing his hometown was a setting in the movie was to wonder if it was based on a true story.
    “I thought, I wonder who they were and did we know them?” Davidson said.
    Annie Proulx, the author of the short story “Brokeback Mountain,” indicates on her Web site that she traveled extensively in Texas and Wyoming before writing the work of fiction. The short story was published in The New Yorker in 1997.
    Davidson said when he was growing up there were several large ranches around Childress County.
    Davidson noted that he never experienced any difficulties about his sexual orientation in Childress when he returned to the town to visit family members, but he doubts the town’s residents would be very accepting of the movie.
    Davidson said “Brokeback Mountain” has not yet reached the Fayetteville, Ark., area where he now lives, but he plans to see the movie as soon as it does.
    “I can’t wait to see it,” Davidson said.
    Ferguson said she expects the fictional movie to draw attention to Childress. The “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” movie, which was released in 1974, mentioned Childress and many people think it was a true story that actually occurred near the town.
    “People will call me and ask me about it, and I tell them it didn’t really happen here,” Ferguson said.

    Dallas Voice staff writer David Webb was born and raised in Childress, Texas.
    E-mail webb@dallasvoice.com
    This article appeared in the Dallas Voice print edition January 13, 2006.
    source: http://www.dallasvoice.com/artman/publish/article_390.php
    -------------------
    Wednesday, June 16, 1999

    ‘Midnight Cowboy’ trial set (1970)

    June 16, 1970 — On the eve of an obscenity trial, the manager of a theater chain says his company has scrapped plans to build a twin theater in the West Commerce Shopping Center being constructed in Brownwood. The trial is to determine whether the movie “Midnight Cowboy” is obscene. The manager notes that no complaints were filed when the movie showed in November 1969 at a downtown Brownwood theater, but after showing at the Bluffvue Drive-In, manager Floyd Allred was arrested and the film was confiscated. A jury will find the movie not obscene and Allred not guilty.

    Source: Abilene Reporter-News files
    source: http://www.abilene2000.com/moments/mom0616.html
    ----------------------------
    "The Hoer" is from Brenda Black White’s book “Callahan County” copyright 1988. "The setting for this book spans the time from the late 1930's to the early 1950's"

    The Hoer

    The day was hot and humid,
    cumulus clouds boiled in the sky,
    and she was hoeing cotton.
    The ground was hard and dry.

    And as she hoed from west to east
    and then from east to west,
    her eyes would scan the sky
    for rain, and she would briefly rest

    her weight upon the handle
    and wipe her moistened brow.
    She wondered what was keeping the man
    who was supposed to come and plow.

    The sun so hot, there was not a stir
    of man or beast or bird.
    The rhythmic scraping of the hoe
    was all the sound she heard.

    Six rows more and then the barn
    for a drink, a rest, a moment's lull
    to find the file and sharpen blade
    that all day'd been dragging dull.

    The barn provided welcome shade.
    She dropped her glove and hoe.
    Tied to the hitch was the man's mule
    and a saddled horse she didnt know.

    The brightness of the afternoon
    made the barn as dark as night.
    Her eyes adjusted to the dimness,
    but no one was in sight.

    Inside was cool and shadowed
    and smelled of hay and dust,
    axle grease and dried manure,
    antiquity and rust.

    And then she heard a muffled sound,
    a throaty voice, deep and soft.
    Curiosity piqued her timorous thoughts;
    she catlike tiptoed to the loft.

    That moment marked the beginning:
    a lifetime of trying to untangle whys.
    Spellbound, awed, and strangely stirred,
    she viewed the scene with shocked surprise.

    She quickly, quietly retraced her steps
    and ran to fetch her hoe and glove.
    All afternoon she hoed bemused.
    She hadn't known that men make love.
    --------
    Where is Callahan County Texas ?
  • read more here

  • -------------------
    What Real Cowboys Think of 'Brokeback Mountain'
    Mixed Views on New Gay-Themed Hollywood Movie

    Dec. 11, 2005 — The cowboy — quiet, independent and decidedly heterosexual — has endured as one of our most cherished American icons.
    Now, a movie that already has generated Oscar buzz may turn that stereotypical belief on its head.
    "Brokeback Mountain" is the story of two cowboys in remote Wyoming who fall in love without quite realizing that's what's happened to them. Although it's been labeled a "gay cowboy movie," it's as much about the universal theme of longing and loss.
    What do real cowboys think? To find the answer, "Good Morning America Weekend Edition" traveled to the National Finals Rodeo in Las Vegas.
    Seven-time world champion cowboy Ty Murray, who is straight, actually welcomes the movie.
    "I think it's something that's now just being more understood," Murray said. "Hopefully, this movie helps people further understand it."
    But gay cowboys Robert Salcedo and Brian Helander aren't so sure and worry about an increase in homophobia.
    "I think it's going to give them reasons to be angry," Helander said, "not so much at the cowboy or the person, but that this exists."
    "I would just say that this could set us back a little bit further," Salcedo said.
    At a western trade show in Las Vegas, cowboys seemed to suggest that could be the case. One cowboy called it "a bit odd" and another said he wouldn't go see the film.
    But women said they'd give it a chance because it's a love story.
    Although people don't readily think of gay cowboys, one woman at the trade show said, "You have to kind of look past that and see what the whole story is about."
    source: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1395158
    -----------
  • read more here

  • --------------
    Sunday » December 18 » 2005

    Two confused cowpokes forced to play it straight

    Chris Knight
    National Post Friday, December 16, 2005

    In any other role, in any other movie, Jack Twist would be the taciturn one. The cowboy character played by Jake Gyllenhaal in Brokeback Mountain is a little too baby-faced to be a Marlboro Man (he shaves in the first scene, presumably to let us know he can), but he's got the gruff, just-the-facts cadence of the American West.
    Next to Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger), though, Jack's a chatterbox. Ennis receives a four-sentence postcard from Jack and writes back "You bet." But he's also a bit of a prairie poet, telling Jack, "All the travellin' I ever done was round a coffee pot lookin' for the handle."
    This and other memorable snippets of the film's sparse dialogue come directly from Annie Proulx, whose 1997 short story is the template for Ang Lee's quiet, moving film.
    "The gay cowboy movie" has worn out its welcome as a descriptor, and in any case is about as telling as calling Lawrence of Arabia "the one in the desert."
    The two cowpokes meet in 1963 Wyoming when they are both hired to tend a herd of sheep on Brokeback. Lee spends a lot of time capturing the mountain's dewy light, the gait and timbre of the weather and the slow rhythm of the men's work; it could as easily be 1863 up there.
    Ennis and Jack spend most of their time in apostrophic pursuits -- whittlin', spittin', drinkin', bitchin' -- until one cold night
    when Ennis is too tired and drunk to head out to their woolly charges and so bunks down with Jack. Their boss, played by Randy Quaid, has told them someone must "sleep with the sheep" to keep them safe. In another of Proulx's saddle-smooth lines, he later tells Jack, "You wasn't getting paid to leave the dogs baby-sit the sheep while you stemmed the rose."
    The two don't talk much about it, but they do find an eviscerated sheep the next morning, bloody and portentous. Later, the flock wanders into another grazing herd during a hailstorm, and the two groups, their paint brands faded, can't be completely unknotted. It's an apt metaphor -- somehow the two men's hearts get similarly tangled that summer.
    August arrives, and they soon find themselves parted and married, Ennis to his sweetheart Alma (Michelle Williams) and Jack to rodeo queen Nureen (The Princess Diaries' Anne Hathaway). When Jack's postcard arrives four yeas later, it finds Ennis balancing two mewling babes; when Jack follows, Ennis can hardly keep himself in his skin as he rushes to embrace his long-lost lover.
    What follows is a same-time-next-year romance, 20 years during which Ennis and Jack go fishing together, notable only for the fact that they never bring home any catch. The wives know what's going on (Alma's sick, confused look when she sees them kiss is perfectly poignant); they deal with the knowledge through a combination of denial, icy reserve and, in Alma's case, divorce. No one in the film has anyone to whom they can unburden themselves; the characters are bottled in their own solitude.
    Ledger and Gyllenhaal turn in a pair of lofty performances, all the more stand-out for their recent straight roles: Gyllenhaal as a grunt in Jarhead; Ledger in the title role in the upcoming Casanova.
    Their emotions are mostly defined by absence; Ennis rarely smiles or picks up his feet unless it's for Jack. Apart, they look lost, their eyes gazing past things rather than at them. But together they remain brusque and quiet alpha males. They may be gay but they're not twee.
    Something about the flat southwestern sky makes it an appealing canvas -- Tommy Lee Jones' The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, out next year, has a similar look. Lee lets the camera's gaze linger on the landscape, but ropes his characters to the natural world, Jack with his blue jeans and blue eyes, Ennis in dusty earth tones. The sounds are also natural, unmediated except for a periodic swell of orchestral backing.
    The subject matter hasn't hurt the film among critics; as awards season gets under way it's beginning to pick up nominations and well-deserved top-10 honours. Brokeback Mountain can be categorized as a love story, but that's almost as limiting as "gay cowboy film."
    How do you sum up feelings that bind two people together like planet and satellite? The best way is just to sit back and let the film show you. "Ain't no reins on this one," says Ennis. You bet.
    Rating four

    source: http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=00ab2013-4a03-4756-a9b7-94bc917cffcf&k=97530
    -------------------
    The Three B's: Brownwood Brokeback Background:

  • read more here

  • ----------
  • read more here

  • ----------
  • read more here

  • ----------
  • read more here

  • -----------
  • Brownwood Background


  • -------------------
    More Brownwood Texas and Midnight Cowboy History :

    " Of course, This same Police Chief closed down a drive-in Picture show one night and Confiscated the movie “Midnight Cowboy”. Seems a father complained when he took his family to what he thought was a WESTERN. Lol They actually had a big trial in my hometown about the movie “Midnight Cowboy”. The jury actually went to the Downtown Picture Show, which was managed at that time by Jim Tharp, who owned The Local Yamaha Shop at the time. Jim later told me, “Yeah that jury had to watch the movie a dozen times, before they found that it wasn’t obscene.” Lol Later after the trial and after several months the Movie was shown at the Drive-In Theater, it had been confiscated from in the first place, and it was so crowded, car to car, that heck we had to watch the movie. "

    source: http://www.flattrack.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=113&topic_id=32&mode=full&page=

    Saturday, November 12, 2005

    Sweeeeeeeet: Sweet Leaf Tea and Steves' Market & Deli

    We're now offering Sweet Leaf Tea in our Deli. Stop by for a "True Southern Tea" .

    visit their cool website here
  • taste it...
  • Friday, November 11, 2005

    Veterans Day Outrage......

    http://thinkprogress.org/ 2005/ 11/ 10/ veterans-day-outrage/ trackback/

    Veterans Day Outrage: Conservatives End 55-Year-Old Practice of Hearings for Vet Groups

    On Tuesday — three days before Veterans Day — House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Steve Buyer (R-IN) announced that for the first time in at least 55 years, “veterans service organizations will no longer have the opportunity to present testimony before a joint hearing of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.”
    Remember that Buyer was handpicked by criminally-indicted Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) to replace former veterans committee chairman Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), who had been extremely vocal about the consistent underfunding of veterans causes.
    The Disabled American Veterans, the “official voice of America’s service-connected disabled veterans,” just issued a scathing release calling the move “an insult to all who have fought, sacrificed and died to defend the Constitution.” The timing, they said, “could not have been worse.”
    Read the full release here. (More from The Hill.)
    ---------

    Department of veterans affairs
    Vets lash out at House over budget moves
    By Elana Schor
    As Veterans Day approaches and the war in Iraq rages on, veterans-service organizations are criticizing House leaders for ending a 55-year legislative tradition, and fearing that Congress will not fill next year’s budget gap for veterans healthcare.
    Senators erupted in frustration earlier this year after Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Jim Nicholson conceded that the department was more than $1 billion short for 2005. They will get a chance to vent again today when Nicholson appears before the Veterans Affairs Committee at a hearing on VA hospitals damaged by Hurricane Katrina.
    But lobbyists for veterans groups are most incensed at Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), the new House Veterans Affairs Committee chairman, who announced Tuesday that the groups would no longer have the opportunity to make legislative recommendations at joint House-Senate hearings.
    “We think it’s an absolutely abhorrent idea. These things were initiated somewhere around 1950, and they represent a crowning moment for our grassroots membership,” said Dennis Cullinan, national legislative director for the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).
    Buyer is replacing the joint hearings with a February series in which veterans groups would outline their budget priorities just as the White House finishes sending its budget request to Congress. In the past, that series of budget hearings has been held in March, after lobbyists for veterans groups have fully examined the president’s request.
    The lobbyists dismissed Buyer’s explanation that the earlier hearings would allow their groups greater influence on the VA’s annual budget. The chairman, the lobbyists charge, is seeking to avoid the public-relations headache of having disappointed veterans groups repeatedly blasting the White House budget.
    “Some people don’t want to be criticized for being deficient,” said Richard Fuller, legislative director for Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA). “What they want to do is get rid of these [joint] legislative presentations because they have become, unfortunately now in the climate on Capitol Hill, very partisan.”
    Brooke Alexander, spokeswoman for Buyer’s committee, said low attendance at the joint hearings prompted a reorganization of the schedule.
    “The current process is not as constructive as it could be. The [veterans groups] and their membership will still be coming to the Hill for spring conferences where they meet with members,” Alexander said.
    Senate Veterans Affairs spokesman Jeff Schrade defended the earlier hearings, adding that committee Chairman Larry Craig (R-Idaho) would consider inviting House members to his own hearings if necessary.
    “Meeting with them early in the budget process will probably be helpful, but whether we meet jointly with the House or not, the veterans of America will be heard,” Schrade said.
    The veterans-healthcare shortfalls that left many lawmakers disappointed this summer, meanwhile, has yet to be resolved. The House’s VA healthcare budget for 2006 is billions of dollars less than the Senate’s, which was negotiated after Nicholson acknowledged the deficit.
    The chambers have until Nov. 18 to resolve the two bills into one in conference, and press reports of a $1.2 billion compromise figure — nearly $700 million short of the Senate’s larger emergency infusion — have alarmed veterans lobbyists.
    Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who declared victory in press releases after successfully attaching $1.5 billion in extra 2005 VA funding to the Senate’s interior appropriations bill, warned that veterans are on the verge of being deprived again.
    “Veterans had a victory in July, but that victory is about to be snatched away because no one is watching,” Murray said. “The Senate allocation is the number that should be sent to President Bush for his signature. Every dollar below that Senate level is a dollar taken away from a veteran.”
    Murray said yesterday that the VA had saved $1 billion of her 2005 emergency funding and carried it over to 2006. That money could be used during conference negotiations to justify lowering the healthcare budget. But lobbyists for veterans groups were puzzled by the shift.
    “It seems odd to us that suddenly they would be able to carry over [money] when it was clear that the whole $1.5 billion was needed for 2005,” Cullinan said.
    The Independent Budget group, a coalition of veterans service organizations that issues its own VA budget proposal to Congress each year, wrote to House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) last week, urging him to meet the Senate’s healthcare numbers.
    “We believe that the House-passed appropriations figure, approved last spring, does not begin to approach the amount needed by the VA,” wrote the VFW, AMVETS, PVA and Disabled American Veterans (DAV).
    Though veterans groups have received assurances from House and Senate leaders that their healthcare would be exempted from any across-the-board budget cuts mandated by budget reconciliation, lobbyists were dismayed at the likelihood that the VA will end up with too little for 2006.
    “I wish I could be confident that the Senate will stay at their higher number, but I just don’t know,” said Joe Violante, national legislative director for the DAV.
    source:

    Kinky Friedman on the trail !

    Nov. 10, 2005, 9:56PM
    Would-be governor opens second office

    Friedman brings jokes, cigars, black hat to Fort Worth

    By ANGELA K. BROWN
    Associated Press

    FORT WORTH - At the opening of his second campaign office Thursday, gubernatorial hopeful Kinky Friedman's trademark black cowboy hat and burning cigar were upstaged by something on his face.
    "The zit on the end of my nose here — the Lord has punished me for supporting gay marriage," he said as about a dozen supporters erupted in laughter.
    Texas voters overwhelmingly approved amending the state constitution Tuesday to ban same-sex marriage, but Friedman said homosexual couples should have the right to marry.
    "I think they have every right to be just as miserable as the rest of us," Friedman said. He added that he supports prayer in public schools.
    "I'll also contend you won't find any other candidate that supports gay marriage and prayer in school, for a very good reason, and that is — the party tells these people what to think," Friedman said. "So that just shows that I'm honest and that I'm independent-thinking, and if you stop to think about it, that's not a bad trait for a governor."
    Petition drive
    A year before the 2006 gubernatorial election, the Texas author and musician has been holding fundraisers and speaking to groups, preparing for his spring petition drive. To be an independent candidate on the ballot, state law requires that Friedman get 45,540 signatures between March 8 and May 11 from registered voters who do not participate in any party primary or runoff.
    Republican Gov. Rick Perry is seeking re-election, but Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn is challenging him in the GOP primary. Former U.S. Rep. Chris Bell of Houston is the best-known Democratic candidate.
    Friedman, who announced his candidacy earlier this year and whose main campaign office is in Austin, chose conservative Fort Worth for his second site because the 1,200-square-foot space in the Stockyards was donated recently.
    "The two parties don't represent the people of Texas, and I'm ready for a change," said Mike Costanza, the building owner who donated the office. "I think Fort Worth will be a Kinky Friedman town because we have the pioneer spirit and want to bring out what's right. People who've voted Republican or Democrat are really fed up."
    Houston office
    Friedman plans to open offices in Houston, Lubbock, El Paso and the Rio Grande Valley as soon as his campaign staff secures donated space. He also is setting up volunteer bases in 100 counties, trying to register more voters. The campaign hopes to boost turnout, which was 29 percent — less than a third of eligible voters — in the gubernatorial election in 2002.
    "If we can get that up to 39 or 40 percent, get more people voting, I'm the governor. You don't even have to count the votes," Friedman said.
    Campaign manager Dean Barkley said Friedman has raised more than $700,000 so far and hopes to raise an additional $1 million before the petition drive. The campaign plans to raise another $6 million once Friedman is on the ballot.
    According to a recent poll conducted by Zogby International, Friedman would garner 21 percent of the vote. Former pro wrestler Jesse Ventura didn't reach 21 percent in a similar poll until a week before he was elected Minnesota governor in 1998.
    source: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3453761

    NRA to File Lawsuit Challenging San Francisco Gun Ban

    November 9, 2005

    Dear Steve Harris:

    Yesterday the voters of San Francisco, California voted to strip you of your gun rights.
    They approved Proposition H, a measure banning the lawful possession, sale and manufacture of handguns and ammunition within city limits. They also banned the transfer of all rifles and shotguns, even among family members.
    The effect of the measure is local but its supporters are sending a message across America that voters want to support gun bans at the ballot box. And they are hoping to spread that message to a politician near you.
    If they are successful, they will spark a national feeding frenzy in the elite media, spreading the lie that there is no political support for our Second Amendment rights. And some local, state and federal lawmakers will believe them.
    We have no intention of standing idly by while the anti-gun lobby tries to build momentum for gun ban measures in other communities.
    No, we intend to strike down this ill-advised, clearly illegal and unconstitutional measure - before it spreads like wildfire. I hope we can count on your help.
    In response to the passage of Proposition H, NRA is filing suit today to stop this unconstitutional ban.
    This gun ban scheme not only violates federal constitutional guarantees, but also the California statute that gives the state sole authority to regulate firearms. But the outcome of any court proceeding is far from guaranteed.
    We are bringing the finest legal minds and constitutional authorities to bear, and we will incur sizeable legal fees and expenses. But the defense of our Second Amendment rights demands no less. We will borrow the money if we have to...but we will fight this ban until freedom prevails.
    Will you stand with us by making a one-time, online, secure contribution to help fund our legal battle? Please click here to make your secure, online contribution by credit card right now. Your donation of $100, $50, or $25 will replenish our financial firepower to ensure that we have the resources to fight this battle in the California courts and across the nation.
    We will not stand idly by while the enemies of freedom conspire to undo our constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment rights. Your help in this most urgent matter is deeply appreciated.

    Sincerely,
    Chris W. Cox
    Executive Director, NRA-ILA

    ---------------
    “You’ve got the NAACP working with the ACLU working with the NRA.”

  • read about it here...
  • QUOTE

    “You’ve got the NAACP working with the ACLU working with the NRA.”

    ~ DMN 3.20.03

    Thursday, November 10, 2005

    Domestic Bullies & Terrorists ? "Kharma is something" !

    Accused eBay Bully Allegedly Terrorizes Online Users

    Station Investigates Threats, Calls

    UPDATED: 1:11 pm EST November 8, 2005
    SAN DIEGO -- Some consumers are discovering that when they bid on eBay, they're opening a portal to problems.
    Tina Schimke and her husband, Dwayne, began having trouble with eBay when they placed a bid on a bike from what looked to be a legitimate seller, San Diego television station KGTV reported.
    "He had quite an ad on the site -- it had lots of bikes. I admit, I didn't completely read the ad," Tina Schimke said.
    When the Schimkes e-mailed back with a question about the shipping cost, the seller allegedly blasted them with a nasty e-mail.
    "As soon as he got my e-mail, he was pounding the keyboard and venting," Tina Schimke said.
    The anger didn't stop there, she said.
    The seller allegedly left her a message that said, "Hey there, schmuck boy -- not answering the phone now?"
    The alleged eBay bully was on a roll.
    "I know exactly where you f---ing live. E-mail me again and see what happens to your little b---- a--," the accused bully said in the message.
    "I was afraid this person was a maniac and was going to show up on our front door," Tina Schimke told the station.
    The Schimkes aren't alone. This eBay bully had struck before, the station said.
    He allegedly called the Burleson household 37 times.
    Cindy Burleson and her daughter, both from Dallas, were also hammered over their questions about comic books the man was selling.
    Cindy Burleson said the accused bully threatened her life.
    "(He said,) 'I'm going to kill you. Scumbags like you shouldn't be allowed to live.' (He said) stuff like that," Burleson said.
    These women and the Schimkes filed police reports but got no results.
    So, the station went looking for the accused eBay bully and tracked him to a home in Cleburne, Texas, near Fort Worth, Texas. It's not only where he lives, but also where he does business.
    Frank Esquitin, the name of the alleged eBay bully, also goes by the following eBay aliases: Old School Riderz, Cool Cat Cycles and Cool Cat Biker, the station reported.
    He's been arrested on charges related to drugs, weapons violations and harassment, police records show.
    A Dallas TV station tried to get a response from Esquitin, but no one answered his door.
    Esquitin later told KGTV by phone that his accusers are deadbeats and sociopaths. He said that if he threatened them, they must have threatened him first.
    Despite complaints, Esquitin is still on eBay.
    The company said it assumes no responsibility for any encounters outside its Web site.
    "I think I'll use eBay again, but I'll hesitate," Tina Schimke said.
    Burleson and her daughter said they will tread more carefully after their experience with the alleged eBay bully.
    "We were terrorized. He terrorized us. If he wanted to terrorize us, it worked," Burleson said.
    10 Tips For Surviving eBay, from "eBay For Dummies."
    Don't exchange personal information.
    Read all of the information about the seller.
    Verify recommendations from other buyers.
    Read all of the information about the listing.
    Be patient. Allow sellers to respond to your question.
    Let eBay know if you receive racist, obscene or harassing language.
    Report invalid e-mail addresses.
    Tell eBay if you start receiving spam after a transaction.
    Tell eBay if someone tries to intimidate you by threatening to post negative feedback about you.
    Beware of anyone asking for your passwords to eBay or PayPal.
    source: http://www.wral.com/technology/5279126/detail.html
    --------------
    Posted on Tue, Nov. 08, 2005

    Gay-bashing turns deadly, attacker slain
    By G.W. MILLER III
    millerg@phillynews.com

    Lucas Dawson had just returned from an audition for "American Idol," and planned to tell his friends all about his experience on Oct. 29.
    But while walking to the bus stop to catch a ride downtown, around 10:30 that Saturday evening, Dawson ran into four teenagers less than one block from his East Mount Airy home.
    "They started calling him 'faggot,' saying 'You're gay,' stuff like that," said David Dawson, Lucas' stepfather.
    Lucas Dawson crossed the street, near Upsal and Musgrave, to avoid trouble, but he later told his family, the group threw a basketball at him, rushed him, and started pummeling him.
    "One of them punched him in the mouth," David Dawson said. "They knocked him to the ground. They kicked him. They stomped him. They called him faggot."
    Dawson, 21, of Upsal Street near Magnolia, managed to get to his feet, and he pulled out a small pocket knife. He waved it at the crowd a few times, David Dawson said, trying to push them back.
    Then, he ran.
    Gerald Knight, 17, allegedly followed and then reached out to grab Dawson, who still had the knife in his hand.
    During the ensuing struggle, Dawson plunged the knife into Knight's chest.
    Knight, of Hortter Street near Chew Avenue, died at Einstein Medical Center less than an hour later, police said.
    Dawson, an aspiring singer and performer, faces a preliminary hearing today on voluntary manslaughter charges in the slaying. He plans to plead not guilty, his family said.
    "There is nothing else to plead here," said Lisa Dawson, Lucas' mother. "Four guys attacked him... You're going to do whatever you have to to protect yourself."
    Lucas Dawson spent last week at Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility because his family has been unable to raise the $30,000 for his bail.
    "Because somebody died, I can understand he might have to do some jail time," David Dawson said. "But at the same time, let the truth be told about what really happened."
    David Dawson believes his stepson is the victim of a hate crime.
    "That's always been my biggest fear," Lisa Dawson said. "That someone would attack him just because he is gay."
    Knight's family declined to comment.
    The day before the attack, Lucas Dawson had performed in front of the American Idol judges. He was cut after the third round.
    "He and Randy (Jackson) got into a little argument over something," Lisa Dawson said. "But it was all just show business."
    Lucas, who temps as a clerical worker, dreams of performing, his mother said. After attending Lincoln High School and graduating through the Job Corps program, he attended modelling school in Philadelphia.
    He told his family he was gay nearly four years ago.
    On the night after the audition, he regaled his family with tales of his brush with fame during dinner, then changed into a pair of slim-fitting jeans, a T-shirt and leather jacket, and dashed off to meet friends.
    Within 15 minutes, his mother said, Lucas, bloodied and frantic, had returned to the house through the back door.
    "I think I cut one of them," Lucas told his family.
    One of the other teens told him, "Now we're going to have to shoot you."
    Lisa Dawson said that even if the charges are dropped, she fears for her son's safety.
    "I don't feel like he can come back home," she said. "There are three people out there who already made a threat."
    Their East Mount Airy neighborhood, where they have lived for seven years, is full of long-time residents, many of whom know each other, some of whom are related.
    "Its pretty much a good neighborhood," David Dawson said. "You hear about stuff happening but not around here."
    Since word of the killing spread, Lisa Dawson said that she has received numerous calls of support.
    "Lucas is a really positive person," she said. "No one believes that he did this."
    Friends have been stopping by and donating money for his defense. One friend said she didn't have any cash, but she would bake pies to sell as fund-raisers.
    Meanwhile, Lucas, who faces 30 years in prison if convicted, is waiting.
    "He's scared to death," said David Dawson. "But he's more hurt by the fact that he killed somebody."
    "Kharma is something," he added. "Because if they had just let him go on his way and get on that bus, none of this would have happened."
    source: http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/local/13109528.htm
    -------------
    UPDATE:
    Posted on Thu, Nov. 10, 2005

    Gay man freed in killing

    By ALYSHA BRENNAN & THERESA CONROY
    abrenna@phillynews.com

    LUCAS Dawson began carrying a knife after being attacked while kissing his male lover in a South Philadelphia Park four years ago.
    Now, after a second assault by gay bashers - one of whom he killed in self-defense - Dawson's thinking about getting a gun.
    The 21-year-old was cleared yesterday of charges in the fatal stabbing of a 17-year-old boy who was among a group that attacked him near his East Mount Airy home on Oct. 29.
    to read the entire article please visit http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/local/13130213.htm?source=rss&channel=philly_local

    Wednesday, November 09, 2005

    Brown County Texas Proposition 2 #'s

    Gay-marriage ban coasts
    Conservatives call vote victory for values; foes promise battle in court
    08:07 AM CST on Wednesday, November 9, 2005
    By ROBERT T. GARRETT / The Dallas Morning News
    AUSTIN – Texans voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to bolster the state's ban on same-sex marriage by writing it into the state constitution, rejecting concerns that the broadly worded amendment could go much further than intended.
    The measure swept most of the state's major urban counties, including Dallas and Tarrant. Overall, the amendment, Proposition 2 on the statewide ballot, prevailed by about a 3-to-1 ratio as voters decided nine amendments.

    In many rural areas and smaller cities, Proposition 2 carried by runaway margins. An exception was Travis County, where opponents rallied college students against the amendment. In almost all of the rest of the state, though, the vote wasn't even close. And turnout appeared higher than usual for such an election.
    "Texas is a huge conservative state and they've spoken on this issue," said Rep. Warren Chisum, the Pampa Republican who authored the amendment. "They're very family-oriented, and given the opportunity, they'll vote conservative. They still have a lot of moral values."
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/110905dntexgaymarriage.33aedcc.html
    ----------------
    Brown County Texas Prop. 2 Voting #'s:

    For 5,413 92.07%
    Against 466 7.92%

    Voter Turnout 24.27%

    source: http://204.65.107.70/enr3county24.htm

    Monday, November 07, 2005

    My Top 2 On Prop. 2

    Here are my Top 2 reasons for voting NO on Proposition 2 .......

    1) The KKK is rallying in support of Prop. 2 !

    KKK group claims local ties
    San Angelo man leads chapter to protest in Austin

    By PAUL A. ANTHONY, panthony@sastandardtimes or 659-8237
    November 6, 2005

    A Ku Klux Klan group claiming to be based in San Angelo demonstrated against gay marriage Saturday at Austin City Hall and was countered by a much larger group of Klan opponents.
    Fourteen members of the American White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan appeared at Austin City Hall for the group's ''pro-family values'' rally in favor of Proposition 2, a proposed constitutional amendment on Tuesday's election ballot stating marriage in Texas is only between a man and a woman.
    None wore the traditional hoods or robes of the white supremacist group. Some displayed Confederate flag symbols.
    ''We're asking Texans to support Proposition 2 because God supports it, not because the KKK supports it,'' Steven Edwards, the grand dragon of the Klan group, said during the rally.
    San Angelo is one of 10 Texas cities named as hosting a Klan chapter, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit advocacy group that deals with racial issues.
    Items posted under Edwards' name on KKK Internet message boards list San Angelo as his location. He also told the Austin American-Statesman on Saturday that the nine men and four women who attended the protest with him were from San Angelo.
    Edwards did not return an e-mail for comment Saturday evening, and his phone number is unlisted.
    The revelation a Klan group is based in San Angelo was met with surprise by local minority groups.
    ''I hadn't heard a thing,'' said Elma Jaques, president of the local chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens. ''This is news to me.''
    Likewise, the Rev. Floyd Crider, a past president of the local NAACP chapter, said rumors have existed about such a group and its potential members for years but that no one had ever confirmed those rumors.
    ''I know there was a small group,'' he said, ''but they never did anything public in the city.''
    If the group does exist in San Angelo, it would be the second in the past three years to attract the attention of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is based in Alabama.
    The SPLC's Intelligence Project, which tracks hate groups and hate crimes, listed the city in 2002. The League of the South, a southern heritage group that the Intelligence Project classified as being white supremacist, formed a San Angelo chapter in 2001, according to Standard-Times archives.
    It is unclear whether that chapter still exists.
    The American White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan's Web site features a full-screen picture of a burning cross on its introductory page. In a posting on an American White Knights message board, an announcement for the Austin rally under Edwards' name Saturday was titled, ''Texas Rally Against Legal Fag Marriages!''
    The American White Knights group has another chapter in Georgia, according to the SPLC report.
    A Web site registration search revealed the domain name was created in Georgia; however, the phone number provided by the group started with the prefix ''555,'' an extension commonly used on television and in movies.
    Searches for Edwards did not reveal a voting record in San Angelo or that he holds a driver's license with a local address. Likewise, he has no criminal record in Tom Green County and does not own a house in his name, according to searches of county records.
    In another post on the message board, Edwards gave a potential applicant a San Angelo post-office box address as a source of contact.
    The KKK rally Saturday was dwarfed by a counter-rally put on by the group's opponents.
    ''Let's meet their hate with love and understanding,'' Glen Maxey, an openly gay former legislator and a leader of the counter demonstration, told hundreds of supporters as they marched toward the Klan event.
    Proposition 2 would also prohibit homosexual couples from entering into any legal arrangement ''similar to marriage.''
    Maxey, director of No Nonsense in November, an anti-Proposition 2 campaign organization, said Tuesday's vote is important, but changing Texans' minds about discrimination is more important.
    An estimated 3,000 protesters showed up during the Klan event, said Austin Police Department spokeswoman Toni Chovanetz. Two people were arrested. One was carrying a club and causing a disturbance, and another was arrested on outstanding warrants, Chovanetz said.
    The city blocked several streets to keep members of the public at least a block away from the Klan in all directions. A contingent of 200 police officers - some wearing riot gear and at least one toting a rifle - stood along police barricades and patrolled the area.
    Many anti-Klan demonstrators carried yellow daisies, sang peace songs and chanted anti-Klan slogans. Some held banners or signs that said, ''Vote Against Bigotry,'' ''Vote Against the Klan'' and ''Killers, Kowards, Kooks Go Away.''
    Austin Mayor Will Wynn and other city leaders had declared Saturday a ''day of tolerance'' and urged citizens stay away from the Klan and do community work instead.
    But many came to speak their minds and get a glimpse of a faction of the white supremacist group that got its start in Texas in the 1860s.

    Kelley Shannon of the Associated Press contributed to this report from Austin.
    source: http://www.sanangelostandardtimes.com/sast/news_local/article/0,1897,SAST_4956_4216854,00.html

    I guess she was right....................
  • go here...


  • 2) I agree with Jim Keffer's ( Brownwood's Republican State. Representative ) son, Rob Keffer, and his testimony in Austin against Prop. 2.

    April 05, 2005

    State Rep. Jim Keffer's Gay Son Testifies Against HJR 6

    By Byron LaMasters

    [This post has been edited from the original post to correct an inaccuracy that was brought to my attention.]
    It is interesting how some of the most conservative legislators and elected officials have gay children. Dick Cheney and Alan Keyes are examples of conservative politicians with vocal and out gay children.
    Another incident of a conservative Republican's son or daughter speaking out can was seen here in Texas yesterday. At hr:min 8:13 of the state affairs committee meeting (available in ram format here), the son of State Rep. Jim Keffer (R-Eastland), Rob Keffer stated that he was the gay son of state rep. Jim Keffer and the gay nephew of State Rep. Bill Keffer (R-Dallas) in the hearing on HJR 6.
    State Rep. Jim Keffer (R-Eastland) voted against to table the 2001 James Byrd Hate Crimes Act (PDF format) before ultimately voting for the bill. Keffer has certainly been more moderate on GLBT interests than other politicians and ought to be commended for that. However, I wonder if he will decide to vote for or against the human and civil rights of marriage equality for his son that he has himself?

    Posted by Byron LaMasters at April 5, 2005 12:05 PM | TrackBack
    source: http://www.burntorangereport.com/mt/archives/003642.html

    listen to the testimony here:
  • go here...

  • ---------------

    Note: KXYL Newstalk 96.9 had Republicans Jim Keffer and Tina Benkiser ( Texas Republican Party Chairperson ) as call-in guests on the morning show discussing Prop 2. Tina did an excellent job of using the Fear Based GOP talking points in here presentation ! Wish we could have heard Jeff Gannon/Guckert interview her on this topic instead of KXYL's Jesse & JC ! Now that would make for entertaining radio ! Can anyone say "uncomfortable" ?

    Jeff Gannon
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
    James Guckert, a.k.a. Jeff Gannon, a.k.a. Bulldog.
    James Dale Guckert (c. 1958) worked under the pseudonym Jeff Gannon as a White House reporter between 2003 and 2005, representing Talon News. After Guckert came under public scrutiny, in particular for his journalistic background and involvement with various homosexual escort service websites using the professional name Bulldog, he resigned from Talon News on February 8, 2005. He has since created his own official homepage and become a columnist for the Washgington Blade newspaper, where he has come out as bisexual.
    Gannon had previously advertised his services on the internet as a male prostitute "top" at $1200 per weekend.
    Jeff Gannon stayed over on numerous occasions at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. White House overnight trysts were not uncommon, according to Secret Service logs of Jeff Gannon's White House entries and exits, requested by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) using the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act). White House logs furnished by the Secret Service show that the fake reporter Jeff Gannon (a.k.a James Guckert) stayed overnight at the White House on many occasions — even when press conferences or briefings were not scheduled.
    Guckert has stated that he obtained frequent daily passes to White House briefings. He attended four Bush press conferences and appeared regularly at White House press briefings. Americablog, a Weblog focusing on gay rights issues discovered Gannon's pseudonym and made public his past history, as Guckert, 'Gannon', and 'Bulldog'. Questions have arisen as to Guckert's relationship with the White House and with the Republican Party. Although he did not qualify for a Congressional press pass, Guckert was given daily passes to White House press briefings "after supplying his real name, date of birth and Social Security number." [1]
    Guckert first gained national attention during a presidential press conference on January 26, 2005, in which he asked United States President George W. Bush a question that contained a factual error, and that some in the press corps considered "so friendly it might have been planted."
    James Guckert is under investigation in the Valerie Plame affair. Democratic Representative Louise Slaughter of New York called for an investigation of these allegations and possibly related incidents where the Bush administration paid pundits to advocate their policies.
    Contents
    [hide]
    1 Background
    2 Career as a journalist
    2.1 White House press credentials
    2.2 Talon News
    2.3 Controversy
    2.4 Connection to Plame investigation
    2.5 Washington Blade
    3 House Judiciary Committee
    4 White House Logs
    5 See also
    6 External links and references
    6.1 News/comment
    6.2 Talon News
    [edit]
    Background

    James Guckert was a member of the Tau Kappa Epsilon fraternity when he attended West Chester University of Pennsylvania in West Chester, Pennsylvania, from which he graduated in 1980.
    Prior to becoming a journalist working for Talon News, Guckert was involved with homosexual pornography and prostitution. Guckert had registered several domain names of a sexual nature, including Hotmilitarystud.com and Militaryescorts4m.com. Guckert later said that he had registered the domain names for a client who ended up not using them. Many sexually explicit photos of Guckert existed online, with accompanying ads appearing to offer himself as a gay prostitute for clients seeking a military type. To rule out any question as to the nature of his business, Guckert advertised himself as a "top" who is "8 inches, cut." When these ads became public, Gannon commented that these activities were in his "past," however some noted that many of his online gay profiles were still active after he had resigned from Talon News [2].
    These findings had some critics questioning Guckert's sexual orientation. Supporters denounced this speculation as irrelevant, but others said that it revealed hypocrisy on the part of Guckert, his employers, the White House and/or the Republican Party. Opponents noted, for instance, that Guckert made statements in articles that could be perceived as anti-gay or homophobic. During the 2004 election, he wrote that John Kerry "might someday be known as ‘the first gay president,’" and that Kerry had supported "the pro-gay agenda." [3]
    [edit]
    Career as a journalist

    [edit]
    White House press credentials
    Guckert first attended a White House press conference on February 28, 2003, and there asked a question of then White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer. At this time Guckert had never had an article published, was not associated with any kind of news organization (Talon News had not been created yet), and was still actively advertising his services as a gay prostitute on several Web sites.
    White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan later claimed that there was no breakdown in security and no one intervened on Guckert's behalf to ensure his access, despite the fact that Gannon/Guckert had been able to get a press pass for the White House using an assumed name. Guckert's response was that the alias Jeff Gannon was a professional name used for convenience, claiming that his "real last name is hard to spell and pronounce," and that the Secret Service was aware of his identity.
    Journalists have pointed out that it can take months to get the kind of clearance Guckert received. Indeed, the Augusta Free Press reported that its acquisition of a single one-day pass was a two-week process. [4] Furthermore, it was said that, highly unusually, Gannon was issued one-day press passes for nearly two years, avoiding the extensive background checks required for permanent passes, and sidestepping Guckert's inability to gain the necessary Congressional press pass. Guckert applied for a Congressional press pass in April 2004 but was denied one by The Standing Committee of Correspondents, a group of congressional reporters who oversee press credential distribution on Capitol Hill, on the grounds that Talon did not qualify as a legitimate and independent news service.[5] On his resume Guckert claimed to be a "graduate of the Leadership Institute Broadcast School of Journalism." However, upon examination this was found to be a two day seminar for "conservatives who want a career in journalism".
    [edit]
    Talon News
    Talon News is a virtual organization (with no physical office or newsroom) owned by the Web site GOPUSA. "Talon News apparently consists of little more than (Robert) Eberle, (Jeff) Gannon, and a few volunteers, and is virtually indistinguishable from GOPUSA.com," says the Media Matters for America web site [6]. Robert Eberle is the president and CEO of both GOPUSA and Talon News. This has led to charges that Talon News was created specifically to give Gannon a news organization that he could ostensibly represent, to justify his continuing to work at the White House. As of mid-February, 2005, the Talon News website had shut down for an indefinite amount of time, according to the message on that site.
    Many of the articles that were published by Talon News were plagiarized from conservative press releases and the mainstream press. For one story, Guckert copied an entire paragraph word-for-word from an Associated Press article [7].
    [edit]
    Controversy
    The controversy over Gannon's background started after President George W. Bush's January 26, 2005 press conference, at which Gannon asked the president the following question:
    Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. (Senate Minority Leader) Harry Reid was talking about soup lines. And (Senator) Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work – you've said you are going to reach out to these people – how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?
    Guckert's question was ridiculed on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart (which dubbed him "Chip Rightwingenstein of the Bush Agenda Gazette") and by a number of liberal bloggers, who considered it an excessively deferential question for a reporter to ask at a presidential press conference. Some also noted that Guckert's reference to Sen. Harry Reid "talking about soup lines" was false, a canard that had apparently originated from a characterization Rush Limbaugh had made on his syndicated radio program.
    After the January 26, 2005 press conference, scrutiny into his background by news organizations and blogs began. On February 8, 2005, Guckert resigned from Talon News and shut down his website www.jeffgannon.com. Guckert said he was being stalked and his family was being harassed. He has revived his website since that time. http://www.whyareweback.blogspot.com/ claims to have shown Guckert's blog articles to be cut/paste jobs or small edits of existing news stories and press releases.
    [edit]

    read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Gannon

    Saturday, November 05, 2005

    Brownwood and Brown County Texas: Military Recruits More From Poor And Rural Areas

    Military Recruits More From Poor And Rural Areas
    Increasingly, Jobless Are Targets
    November 4, 2005
    By ANN SCOTT TYSON, Washington Post

    WASHINGTON -- As sustained combat in Iraq makes it harder than ever to fill the ranks of the all-volunteer force, newly released Pentagon demographic data show the military is leaning heavily for recruits on economically depressed, rural areas where youths' need for jobs may outweigh the risks of going to war.
    More than 44 percent of U.S. military recruits come from rural areas, Pentagon figures show. In contrast, 14 percent come from major cities. Youths living in the most sparsely populated ZIP Codes are 22 percent more likely to join the Army, with an opposite trend in cities. Regionally, most enlistees come from the South (40 percent) and West (24 percent).
    Many of today's recruits are financially strapped, with nearly half coming from lower-middle-class to poor households, according to new Pentagon data based on ZIP Codes and census estimates of mean household income. Nearly two-thirds of Army recruits in 2004 came from counties in which median household income is below the U.S. median.
    Such patterns are pronounced in such communities as Martinsville, Va., that supply the greatest number of enlistees in proportion to their youth populations. All the Army's top 20 counties for recruiting had lower-than-national median incomes, 12 had higher poverty rates, and 16 were non-metropolitan, according to the National Priorities Project, a nonpartisan research group that analyzed 2004 recruiting data by ZIP Code.
    "A lot of the high recruitment rates are in areas where there is not as much economic opportunity for young people," said Anita Dancs, research director for the NPP, based in Northampton, Mass.
    Senior Pentagon officials say the war has had a clear impact on recruiting, with a shrinking pool of candidates forcing the military to accept enlistees of lesser quality - and presumably many for whom military service is a choice of last resort. In fiscal 2005, the Army took in its least qualified group of recruits in a decade, as measured by educational level and test results. The war is also attracting youths driven by patriotism, including a growing fringe of the upper class and wealthy, but military sociologists believe that greater numbers of young people who would have joined for economic reasons are being discouraged by the prolonged combat.
    The Pentagon ZIP Code data, applied for the first time to 2004 recruiting results, underscores patterns already suggested by anecdotal evidence, such as analysis of the hometowns of troops killed in Iraq. Although still an approximation, the data offer a more detailed portrait of the socioeconomic status of the Americans most likely to serve today.
    Tucked into the Piedmont foothills of southern Virginia, where jobs in the local economy are scarce as NASCAR fans are plentiful, Martinsville is typical of the lower-income rural communities across the nation that today constitute the U.S. military's richest recruiting grounds.
    Albert Deal, 25, had struggled for years to hold onto a job in this rural Virginia community of rolling hills and shuttered textile mills. So when the lanky high school graduate got his latest pink slip, from a modular homes plant, he took a hard look at his life. Then he picked up the phone and dialed the steadiest employer he knew: the U.S. Army.
    Two weeks later, on Oct. 27, Deal sat in his parents' living room and signed one enlistment document after another as his fiancee, Kimbery Easter, somberly looked on.
    "This is the police check," said Sgt 1st Class Christopher Barber, a veteran Army recruiter, leading Deal through the stack of paperwork. "This is the sex-offender check." Barber spoke in a monotone, sounding like a tour guide who had memorized every word.
    Left adrift, young people such as Deal "are being pushed out of their communities. They want to get away from intolerable situations, and the military offers them something different," said Morten Ender, a sociologist at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.

    source: http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/hc-military1104.artnov04,0,2540159.story?coll=hc-headlines-nationworld

    Friday, November 04, 2005

    ABC"s Nightline Asbestos Special: The Brownwood Connection

    The asbestos-laced vermiculite that was mined in Libby, Montana, poisoned that town, and that tainted ore was shipped to processing plants across the country, poisoning those places, too. To keep your home safe from deadly asbestos, there are some simple, but crucial steps you can take.
    Related: Blood test may detect asbestos-related lung cancer
    Related: Keep Your Home Safe From Asbestos
    http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/
    ----------------
    Brownwood Texas

    Part 2

    W.R. Grace Indictment — A Texas Problem

    As Texas considers sweeping limits on a citizen's right to sue asbestos companies, federal prosecutors in Montana are taking the opposite approach, seeking and obtaining criminal indictments against notorious asbestos manufacturer W.R. Grace.

    On February 7, 2005, a federal grand jury for the first time ever handed down a multi-count criminal indictment against officials at an asbestos company, in this case W.R. Grace, charging them with withholding numerous studies spelling out the dangers that asbestos posed to its customers, employees and Libby residents. The indictment charges W.R. Grace and seven of its executives with criminal conspiracy, fraud and knowing endangerment in connection with its operation of an asbestos-contaminated mine in Libby, Montana. According to the indictment, W.R. Grace's operation of the mine has endangered the health of the 8,000 Libby residents and cost taxpayers over $55 million in environmental clean-up costs.

    The indictment specifically alleges that the company was aware of several studies documenting the dangers of asbestos exposure, but concealed this knowledge from EPA officials. These studies include a 1976 study which revealed a high incidence of asbestos-related lung problems in Libby employees, an animal study finding cancer in hamsters exposed to the asbestos fibers present at the mine, a 1981 health study of employees showing a high rate of asbestos-related lung problems, a 1982 mortality study showing a high incidence of respiratory cancers in Libby employees, and several specific case studies of employees with lung diseases.

    The impact of W.R. Grace's alleged criminal behavior extends well into Texas. At least 7,208 shipments amounting to more than 675,000 tons of vermiculite, were sent from the Grace mine in Libby, Montana to 24 locations in Texas between 1963 and 1992. More than 327,000 tons were shipped to Dallas, more than 193,000 tons to Houston, and 103,000 tons to San Antonio. The vermiculite shipped was contaminated with the most deadly form of asbestos, tremolite, which is a long, thin, spear-shaped mineral fiber that the body is completely unable to dissolve. Once it enters the lungs it penetrates deeper and deeper, often breaching the chest lining, where it can lead to the fatal asbestos cancer, mesothelioma.

    "The impact of W.R. Grace's alleged criminal behavior extends well into Texas... 675,000 tons of vermiculite were sent from the Grace mine in Libby, Montana..."

    Federal health and environmental officials have evaluated the risks to vermiculite plant workers and people who live near 11 of the largest 28 facilities nationwide that processed Libby vermiculite into insulation and other products. Their conclusion in every case was that workers at the plants, members of their families, and those living nearby had "most likely" been exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos and should be examined by doctors for asbestos diseases. No such evaluations have been conducted in Texas, but it is unlikely that the conclusions there will be any different when they are.

    Asbestos Shipments to Texas from the W.R. Grace Mine

    At least 7,208 shipments of vermiculite went from Libby, MT to 24 locations in Texas

    City Number of Shipments Tons Shipped*
    Dallas, TX
    • 2651 Manila Road 3,399 327,411
    Houston, TX (5 sites)
    • C/O Maragua lines
    • S.W. Greer Spur (3 separate companies invoiced)
    • unknown address 2,024 193,819
    San Antonio, TX
    • 354 Blue Star Street 1,094 103,889
    Bonham, TX
    • Highway 82 West 509 47,284
    Sweetwater, TX 49 2,532
    Laredo, TX 36 2,089
    Hamlin, TX 26 1,348
    Fort Worth, TX (3 sites)
    • 1628 Rogers Road
    • 2818 North Nicholas Street
    • 909 No. Main Street 19 121
    Irving, TX
    • County Line & Rock Island Roads 14 678
    Acme, TX (2 sites)
    • address in Acme, TX
    • address in Quanah,TX 12 624
    Galena Park, TX
    • 1201 Mayo Shell Road 11 563
    Celotex, TX 7 362
    Rotan, TX 5 136
    Liggett, TX 3 154
    Brownwood, TX
    • Count Bowie Ind. Park 2 38
    Laporte, TX
    • 3300 Barbours, Cut Boulevard 1 40
    Ambler, TX 3 unknown

    Source: EWG Action Fund analysis of shipment invoices from Libby, MT.

    *Numerous shipment invoices from Libby that were tallied by U.S. EPA did not include a specific street address for the destination, the tons shipped, or dates of shipment; some invoices lacked all this information, based on the EPA database in which the tabulations are recorded. As a result, the 'tons shipped' data presented here likely underestimate the actual amount of asbestos shipped to specific destinations, states, or for the United States as a whole.

    Lying to workers and withholding critical health information from customers, communities, and federal health officials was not limited to W.R. Grace, it was standard asbestos industry practice. Indeed, it took similar behavior at Exxon, Dow (Union Carbide), DuPont, Bendix (now Honeywell), The Travelers, Metropolitan Life, Dresser Industries (now Halliburton), National Gypsum, Owens-Corning, General Electric, Ford, and General Motors, just to name a few, to produce the ten thousand Americans currently dying each year of asbestos diseases. The list of companies that knowingly exposed their workers to deadly amounts of asbestos is a roll call of major American corporations.

    No company, not a single one, acted responsibly and informed workers of the deadly hazards of asbestos at any time. Not when the first information became available beginning in the 1930's, tying asbestos to fatal and debilitating lung disease. Not in the 1940's and 50's when asbestos exposure was unambiguously linked with lung cancer, and the signature asbestos cancer of the chest lining, mesothelioma. And not in the 60's, 70's, or 80's when thousands of workers a year began to die of asbestos-caused diseases.

    This deliberate concealment of critical information led to the debacle we face today, where 10,000 people a year die from asbestos disease, and thousands more are seriously disabled. This pattern of outrageous corporate misconduct is at the core of whatever success people injured by asbestos have had in the courtroom to date.

    http://www.ewg.org/reports/slowdeath/part2.php
    ----------
    Brownwood: Your Health and Politics.....It's all local !

  • read about it here...
  • Brownwood Politicians, Pulpits & Pew Sitters: Proposition 2 trumps PTSD ?

    Where have the Brownwood Pulpits & Pew Sitters been on PTSD issues facing our returning soldiers ?

    We're the Brownwood Pulpits & Pew Sitters too busy pushing the KKK supported Proposition 2 to notice what was going on in Brownwood's own backyard ?

    Brownwood PTSD:
  • read about it here...

  • ------
  • read about it here...

  • ---------
    Proposition 2:
    Posted on Fri, Nov. 04, 2005

    Lone Star State should be running away from Prop 2

    By Jack Z. Smith
    Star-Telegram Staff Writer

    When it comes to treating gays and lesbians as the full-fledged human beings that they are, Texas is shamefully moving in the opposite direction of what it should be.
    Texas, and indeed the nation, should be passing civil rights legislation to ensure that people cannot suffer discrimination based on their sexual orientation -- whether that orientation is heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual or whatever.
    Such discrimination should be made illegal nationwide in areas such as employment, housing and public accommodations (hotels, restaurants and other facilities), just as federal law already bars many acts of discrimination based on race, color, gender, religion or national origin.
    Loving gay couples who want to formalize their commitments should have a legal right to enter into a marriage recognized by the state. In general, such couples should enjoy all the legal rights of heterosexual married couples.
    Instead, Texans will be voting Tuesday on Proposition 2, which would incorporate an already existing state statutory ban on gay marriage into the state constitution. If the amendment passes, as expected, it also might be used to further restrict legal rights of gays and lesbians.
    Unsurprisingly, Prop 2 can count among its most fervent supporters the Ku Klux Klan, which is scheduled to hold a Pro Family Values Rally on Saturday in Austin in favor of this mean-spirited amendment, which is grounded in ignorance and homophobia.
    So if you feel a strong philosophical kinship with those white-robed purveyors of hate and bigotry, you'll undoubtedly want to vote for Prop 2 in Tuesday's state constitutional amendments election.
    Hey, this could be a springboard for a political comeback by the KKK, which generally has been suffering from waning political influence for the past 80 years or so. Perhaps the Triple-Ks could even merge with the Texas Republican Party, a big promoter of Prop 2, and thus regain some real political clout.
    On the other hand, if you favor equal treatment of American adults and oppose discrimination against select groups that are small minorities in our society, you should proudly vote against Prop 2 -- and urge other family members and friends to do so.
    One of the many reasons I'm proud to live in Fort Worth is that it is among a minority of Texas cities with an ordinance barring discrimination against homosexuals in areas such as housing and employment. In most instances, it's no longer legal here to fire people or boot them out of an apartment merely because they are gay.
    I'm also proud to serve on a newspaper editorial board that has opposed Prop 2, and proud to be a nearly 40-year member of a profession that includes a variety of other Texas papers that have editorially rejected Prop 2.
    I am baffled by those heterosexual couples who say they feel that their marriage is "threatened" by the prospect of legalized gay marriage. If so, some of them must have rather insecure marriages. Perhaps counseling would help.
    As a heterosexual who plans to be enjoying his 35th wedding anniversary this coming spring, I find it downright laughable that any heterosexual couple would be "threatened" by the prospect of any loving gay couple formalizing their commitment with wedding vows.
    If marriage indeed is a worthy institution (and I think it is, despite the substantial U.S. divorce rate), we should be seeking to expand rather than restrict it, as the evil Prop 2 would do.

    Jack Z. Smith is a Star-Telegram editorial writer. (817) 390-7724 jzsmith@star-telegram.com
    source: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion/13079789.htm

    No on Proposition 2 and the KKK !

    Be sure to vote 'No' on Proposition 2
    November 4, 2005

    Our phones are ringing: A state constitutional amendment must be passed to protect marriage between a man and a woman. That protection in Texas is already established-it's Texas law. This amendment is a mean-spirited attempt to further isolate and demean our homosexual family members, friends and neighbors. There is no threat to the time-honored marriage between a man and a woman except the unwillingness of partners to be faithful to their vows and abandon their commitment to each other. This amendment allows political and religious opportunists to energize the homophobia of our culture to believe it is the right thing to do to preserve family values. Proposition 2 disallows any rights established by marriage or anything like marriage to homosexual couples and their children. There are thousands of GLBT Texas families. Companies that value their GLBT employees and give them the same benefits for family members will not be allowed to do so. How does this in any way threaten marriage between a man and a woman? It devastates committed couples (denied marriage and civil union rights) and their children. It also lets a majority decide to choose a minority group of its citizens to humiliate, deny their identity, offend their dignity, and victimize their liberty. This state has already made it illegal for same sex couples to marry. Please vote no. Don't put more poison in the wound!

    H. Rudy Pace

    Retired United Methodist Pastor -Texas Annual Conference
    Abilene

    source: http://www.reporter-news.com/abil/op_letters_editor/article/0,1874,ABIL_7984_4210666,00.html
    -----------------------
    So who's on your side?

    Re: "KKK to rally for gay marriage ban," Tuesday news story.
    I see that the Ku Klux Klan is holding a big rally in Austin this weekend in support of the amendment banning gay marriage. Perhaps some other groups also supporting it will join them, and they can all stand around and get a good look at each other.
    Toni Clem, Paris

    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/letters/stories/DN-friletters_1104edi.ART.State.Edition1.3382a97.html
    -------------
    Texas Tech University
    Opinions
    GUEST COLUMN:
    Amendment outlawing gay marriage is an attack on civil rights, American freedom
    By Lane Powell/Guest Columnist
    November 07, 2005

    Most Texans appear to be very respectful and loyal to the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and the U.S. Constitution. But have they really thought about what they are supporting?
    Pledge of Allegiance: "... with liberty and justice for all."
    U.S. Constitution: " . . . all men (i.e. persons) are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
    Now apply these concepts to the hastily constructed Proposition 2, which, if passed, will amend the Texas constitution to define legal marriage as only between one man and one woman, and will not consider any other arrangement as a legal union.
    Will this proposition affirm or protect the legal rights of all people (including children raised in non-legal families)?
    Will this amendment support the inalienable right of everyone - regardless of sexual orientation, race or religion - to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
    Or is it protecting only heterosexual privilege to enter into one relationship? What if you divorce and want to enter into a second or third marriage?
    The main argument for passing this amendment is that it will protect marriage from "those people" and will affirm "our God-given rights."
    Persons who argue in favor of the amendment contend that allowing two consenting persons of the same sex to legally marry will weaken the institution of marriage.
    Doesn't the high divorce rate weaken the institution of marriage? What about the increasing numbers of people who choose to cohabit instead of marry?
    It also is curious that one of the frequent arguments against homosexual rights is that gay people are promiscuous and don't know how to commit to a relationship.
    Yet when gay or lesbian couples want to have their commitments legally recognized and their relationships affirmed, they are excluded from doing so.
    It is the same argument used by segregationists in the '40s and '50s to exclude blacks from business establishments (like laundromats and restaurants) and community events (like fairs or even the zoo).
    Segregationists argued blacks were dirty, uneducated and ill-bred and integration would "mongrelize" our society.
    So the so-called Jim Crow laws excluded blacks from the very places where they might be able to better themselves and become more acceptable by society.
    The Jim Crow laws were eventually struck down as unconstitutional, and our society has benefited from the contributions of many black people. So are all people created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights, or it is only some people?
    Your vote this week will decide about Texas.
    — Powell is a faculty associate in the human development and family studies department. E-mail Lane at Lane.Powell@ttu.edu.
    source: http://www.dailytoreador.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/11/07/436eb4892ba67

    Thursday, November 03, 2005

    QUOTE

    " From the Musical South Pacific

    CAREFULLY TAUGHT

    You've got to be taught to hate and fear
    You've got to be taught from year to year
    It's got to be drummed in your dear little ear
    You've got to be carefully taught

    You've got to be taught to be afraid
    Of people whose eyes are oddly made
    Or people whose skin is a different shade
    You've got to be carefully taught

    You've got to be taught before it's too late
    Before you are six or seven or eight
    To hate all the people your relatives hate
    You've got to be carefully taught
    You've got to be carefully taught


    ~ DMN 3.20.03

    Brownwood's "KXYL Talking Head" lands on front page of today's Dallas Morning News

    Citizen patrols try to shed vigilante image

    Groups tap into mainstream concerns, but critics say message hasn't changed
    11:16 PM CST on Wednesday, November 2, 2005
    By KAREN BROOKS / The Dallas Morning News

    FABENS, Texas – Radio talk-show host J.C. McClain could hardly contain his excitement as he recalled the time he had to pull his pistol in front of an illegal immigrant whose pants were still wet from splashing across the Rio Grande.
    The exasperated man told Mr. McClain to get out of the way, "the Border Patrol has already been through here." When a member of the man's group picked up a rock, Mr. McClain pulled his gun and held it in front of his belt, pointing at the ground. The man dropped the rock, and the group trudged back into Mexico.
    Mr. McClain related the story to his Brownwood audience the next day from an improvised radio booth in a house a few miles from the border near El Paso.
    "It just made our day," he said, laughing as he described the confrontation.
    A few years ago, such armed volunteer patrol groups were almost universally considered dangerous, vigilante racists on the fringe of society. And while elements still inhabit the "Minuteman movement," more sophisticated groups – such as the North Texas-based "Texas Minutemen" – are tapping into mainstream concerns about border security in a post-9/11 America.
    Also Online
    Plan aims to shore up borders
    "They're the next generation," said Devin Burghart, who directs an anti-racism project for the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group. "They're slightly more sophisticated, they've been able to reach a larger audience. ... The political terrain has shifted to where immigration is probably going to be the No. 1 issue in the 2006 electoral races. That's not something you saw when they got their start."
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/110305dntexminutemen.2109f494.html
    ----------
    Note from Steve: I was not surprised to read this in the Dallas Morning News as it relates to KXYL Talking Head JC Mclain's trip to the border. From JC's numerous "on air" mentions of border "turkey shoots" with Shannon McGauley ( Texas Minuteman Co-founder ), referring to people as "towel heads" to his detailing the story of the time he stopped at a gas station in the Metroplex, filled up with gas, took a beverage without paying for it (because he was used to doing that in Brownwood !) and was chased out into the parking lot by the station employee ( JC used his Indian/Muslim/Foreigner sounding mock voice for his audience !) who told him he needed to pay for the beverage. Fortunately, a caller to KXYL, said she agreed with the station employee and not JC ! Play the tapes !
    ..........and not suprising as I was reading the Dallas Morning News Article, I heard JC on this mornings show admit to being prejudiced against Muslims. After listening to his show for some time now, I know his prejudices include other groups besides Muslims (or those that he ASSumes are Muslim ! ). I wonder how JC determines who is a Muslim ?
    --------
    Is this what KXYL's JC McLain means by a "turkey shoot" on the Border ?
    Definitions of Turkey shoot on the Web:

    A turkey shoot is an opportunity for an individual or a party to very easily take advantage of a situation.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey_shoot
    source: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&client=safari&rls=en&oi=defmore&defl=en&q=define:Turkey+shoot
    ----------------
    Note from Steve: Is this the man ( see below who resigned ) that Phill Watts (KXYL Owner) and JC McLain will not have on their airwaves as a call-in guest ?

    President of Minuteman Civil Defense Corps of Texas resigns
    FRI 07.29.2005 16.13 PT
    The Victoria Advocate

    The president of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps of Texas resigned by e-mail late Monday evening, criticizing a lack of structure in the group and claiming racist undertones in the Goliad-area chapter.
    "The Sarco group has chosen to go a different course than what I feel is in the best interest of the organization nationally and locally," Bill Parmley of the small community near Goliad wrote in the letter e-mailed late Monday night to Chris Simcox, national president of the Arizona-based Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, and Goliad County Sheriff Robert DeLaGarza.
    source: http://www.sierratimes.com/minuteman.php
    ----------------
    Note from Steve: I wonder what JC's friend, Ray Stone (see Dallas Cowboys Football Report), would have to say on the topic below ? JC's had Ray on the air several times at KXYL.

    Alas, it really happened
    What's next at Cowboys games? Tackling dummies in Arab attire?
    08:42 PM CDT on Thursday, September 2, 2004
    By STEVE BLOW / The Dallas Morning News
    Please tell me that didn't really happen.
    It's not that I don't trust our letter writers. I just don't want to believe the scene described this week in a letter to the editor.
    In case you missed it, this happened at the Cowboys game Monday night.
    During a break in the game, Texas Stadium cameras showed various fans and the stadium announcer urged the crowd to select a "fan of the game" by cheers and applause.
    The camera first showed three men in military uniform. Naturally, the crowd cheered loudly. Some people stood and clapped. It was a nice tribute to our troops.
    Next, a woman with a sign of some sort was shown – to scattered applause.
    And then, incredibly, the stadium cameras were trained on a man and woman in Middle Eastern attire of some sort – turban and head scarf, along with Cowboys garb, too. And the crowd began to boo and hiss.
    Our letter writer was rightly mortified.
    Then, to make matters worse, the whole process was repeated – big cheers for the soldiers, polite applause for the sign-toting woman, boos and hisses for the Middle Eastern couple.
    And I want to say: Please tell me that didn't really happen.
    Even by the low standards of a football crowd, that is just numskull behavior.
    First, how did anyone in the Cowboys organization think it would be fun to match some U.S. troops against an innocent Middle Eastern couple in a crowd popularity contest?
    What's next? Tackling dummies in Arab attire? A little hanging in effigy from the goal posts to warm up the crowd?
    Thank goodness the Cowboys do realize that a huge blunder was made here. Spokesman Rich Dalrymple said they haven't had many calls about it, but they're apologizing profusely to those who have.
    "There was nothing intentional about it," he said. "But the matter has been addressed and dealt with accordingly in the organization, trust me."
    OK, but that doesn't let the crowd off the hook. Are there really so many simpletons who think our enemy is anyone in a headscarf?
    If so, our war on terror is doing more harm than good.
    So far I haven't found much to like about either campaign in this presidential race. But a real low has been Vice President Dick Cheney's mocking of John Kerry for saying he would wage a more "sensitive" war on terrorism.
    Sure, it makes for some easy tough-guy posturing. But as it turns out, Mr. Cheney's boss – the president – has used the very same word in talking about fighting terrorism effectively.
    And both the president and Mr. Kerry are right.
    It may not be as much fun as booing and hissing, but we're going to need lots of sensitivity to win this war on terrorism.
    In the good old days of past wars, it probably made sense to demonize a whole race or nation as our enemy.
    When I was growing up in the years after World War II, we spent a lot of time "playing war." And that meant fighting "Krauts" and "Japs."
    But we don't have the luxury of such mindless, broad-brush hate this time around.
    This war on terrorism is really more about ideas and attitudes than bombs and bullets. It's a war to win hearts and minds, as is often said. And in a way, we're all combatants in that war.
    Once, supporting the war effort back home just meant rolling bandages or rationing sugar.
    If only it were that easy now. Fighting this war on the home front means digging deep and learning about world affairs and our own foreign policy. It means stretching to understand cultures very different from our own. And it requires real sophistication in understanding who are enemies are and who they aren't.
    I'm afraid that in a few thoughtless minutes Monday night, we lost a skirmish in our war on terrorism.
    And lots of people proved themselves unfit for combat.
    E-mail sblow@dallasnews.com
    source: http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/dn/localnews/columnists/sblow/stories/090304dnmetblow.3f2c5.html
    ---------------
    Posted on Thu, Aug. 25, 2005

    'Illegals' are not as bad as militias
    By Bud Kennedy
    Star-Telegram Staff Writer

    Finally, the news is good for the so-called "illegal" immigrant workers who get nothing but criticism for their work helping to build a stronger and richer Texas.
    A Dallas restaurant worker from El Salvador has been awarded part of a 70-acre ranch after she and other immigrants were stopped, harassed and beaten in South Texas by a "volunteer border patrol" militia based in Arlington and Mansfield.
    In a grand twist of irony, Fatima Leiva of Dallas is now part owner of the Arizona ranch where the play soldiers of Ranch Rescue, a forerunner of today's Minuteman Project, used to hold their silly training games.
    Back before the Minutemen were slick enough to hold news conferences and avoid bigoted comments about race or culture, rancher Jack Foote of Arlington led the race-hating, immigrant-bashing Ranch Rescue, which operated from a Mansfield address and openly stirred racial fears about an "invasion" of Hispanic immigrants that might "swallow up" America.
    Meaning, of course, "white" America.
    Some of the Ranch Rescue volunteers came from the militia movement and from the old Republic of Texas crazies who wanted to overthrow the government. The wannabe soldiers were "guarding" a ranch near Hebbronville in 2003 when they caught Leiva and a Salvadoran man trespassing as they tried to go around a checkpoint 55 miles from the border.
    One of the volunteers was an ex-con bounty hunter from California, Casey Nethercott. According to news accounts of the case, he sicced a Rottweiler on the Salvadorans. Leiva said he pistol-whipped the man.
    A Texas Ranger eventually saw the injuries. He arrested Nethercott and another volunteer.
    Nethercott wound up in a Jim Hogg County courtroom facing trial on an assault charge. The jury deadlocked, and the case was not set for retrial. But he was sent to prison for six years as a convicted felon illegally carrying a firearm.
    Leiva, the Salvadoran man and a family from Mexico who were also harassed and threatened by the patrol sued Nethercott, Foote, the ranch owner and Ranch Rescue for assault, false imprisonment, negligence and "infliction of emotional distress."
    The ranch owner, Joe Sutton, once told the Dallas Observer that he wanted the border shut down "tighter than a bull's ass in fly season" and ranted that at Houston hotels, "four out of five employees are illegals. You can drive a few blocks and see 500 of them."
    Last month, he quietly paid $100,000 to settle his part of the lawsuit.
    Nethercott and Foote never responded and lost a $1 million judgment. According to The New York Times, Nethercott's sister last week signed over his only asset of value: the 70-acre Arizona ranch where Ranch Rescue once trained.
    The immigrants will probably sell the ranch, their lawyer told the Times. Leiva has been unavailable for comment, although she is still identified as working in Dallas pending a visa request.
    The immigrants were represented by civil-rights lawyers from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has labeled paramilitary "volunteer border patrol" groups as race- and culture-based hate groups and has warned the volunteers not to terrorize, threaten or harass anyone suspected of violating immigration laws.
    Let's spell it out.
    We talk a lot about "illegal aliens."
    But "illegal" immigration is not necessarily a crime at all. At most, a first-time offender in North Texas with no criminal record might face a rarely prosecuted federal misdemeanor charge of failure to possess a green card.
    The punishment: a maximum fine of $100 and up to 30 days in jail.
    Some so-called "illegal" aliens came into the country legally and overstayed a visa. They have committed no crime, only a civil immigration violation.
    So Fatima Leiva was a misdemeanor suspect caught trespassing on a private ranch.
    The way we punish that in America does not involve pistol-whipping or a Rottweiler.
    Yet we have become obsessed with labeling misdemeanor immigration violators as "illegals" and hatefully calling them the worst threat facing American society.
    I understand the concern about defending the seemingly indefensible northern and southern U.S. borders from genuine criminals. And I can see the damage and vandalism in border counties caused by the sheer number of immigrants passing through.
    I agree that our laws must be obeyed.
    But that includes civil-rights laws.
    What other Class C misdemeanor has us this obsessed? And why are we so obsessed with blaming illegal immigrants themselves?
    Could it be because of the color or language of some immigrants?
    There is no law against speaking any language in America. Our First Amendment guarantees free speech in any language.
    And some of our greatest Texas Revolution heroes spoke only Spanish.
    From the Texas Declaration of Independence -- printed in both languages by decree of the Founders -- Texas has always been a bilingual state and nation.
    Sure, uphold the rule of law in America.
    Just remember that law also protects people like Fatima Leiva.

    Bud Kennedy 's column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. (817) 390-7538 bud@budkennedy.com
    source: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/columnists/bud_kennedy/12471481.htm
    -------------

    Did this Stephenville Man listen to Brownwood Hate Radio ?

    2/19/02 Associated Press: "Felons Charged in Deaths of South Asians as `9-11
    Retaliation,'"
    DALLAS (AP) -- Police have charged an incarcerated felon with the death of
    Waqar Hasan, a former Milltown, N.J. resident and Pakistani national who was
    killed after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
    Mark Anthony Stroman, 32, was charged after an interview he had requested
    on Dallas television in which he confessed to Hasan's murder.
    Stroman, of Stephenville, TX, said he killed Hasan and another man and shot
    a third out of revenge for the terror attacks.
    The victims of all three crimes, two of which Stroman was already charged with,
    were of South Asian descent.
    According to a transcript of the tape from KDFW-T

    Wednesday, November 02, 2005

    Texas Borders

    Feature: Wednesday, August 17, 2005
    Uncivil Defense
    The Minutemen stumble into instant opposition in Texas.

    By DAN MALONE

    A Minuteman from Texas — who gave his name only as Haskell — scans the border near Douglas, Ariz., in April 2003.
    ‘The first time they cross that line, I’ll hammer them.’

    Garza: ‘If their elected leaders were doing their jobs, we wouldn’t have the Minutemen.’

    Simcox: ‘We’re not vigilantes.’

    The sign reflects the belief of some extremists that there is a Hispanic conspiracy to reconquer the southwestern U.S. and rename it Aztlan.
    We are not vigilantes, and we are not anti-immigration.”

    Chris Simcox was talking to a fresh group of recruits for the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps. The organization, which has made headlines nationwide in recent months for its armed “citizen patrols” along the Arizona border, is branching out into Texas. The meeting at a ranch near Hillsboro on Saturday was the first of several training sessions scheduled across the state this week, and a reporter for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram dutifully recorded Simcox’s statement.

    But charges of vigilantism, anti-immigration rhetoric, and racism, nonetheless, are exactly what the group has faced since it began its patrols and started organizing in Texas. In fact, you might call the meeting outside of Hillsboro a case of the group not starting up, but starting over in Texas.

    The group’s first Texas president resigned because he believed some members were just as interested in booting Hispanics out of political office as in keeping illegal immigrants out of the country. Another member angered a Texas sheriff with loose talk about shooting illegal aliens. The King Ranch, one of the largest in the United States, won’t let the Minutemen patrol any of its land along the border. And the Southern Poverty Law Center recently wrote, in its Intelligence Report magazine, about finding members of a violent neo-Nazi organization among the ranks of the group’s Arizona recruits.

    The Minutemen, it seems, may be facing a rough ride here in the Lone Star State.

    Al Garza, the new president of the Texas Minuteman chapter, said his volunteers are only filling a void created by the federal government’s inability to stop illegal immigration. “The ones they should be concerned about is their own ... government,’’ Garza said in a recent telephone interview. “If their elected leaders were doing their jobs, we wouldn’t have the Minutemen.’’

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection has about 11,000 agents patrolling the Mexican border. Even so, thousands of people elude the authorities every day. By some estimates, as many as 4 million people enter the country illegally in some years, and the problems they bring with them sometimes wreak havoc on lives and property. Just last week, New Mexico Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson, the nation’s only Hispanic governor, declared a state of emergency in four border counties that, as he told CNN, have been “devastated by the ravages and terror of human smuggling, drug smuggling, kidnapping, murder, destruction of property, and the death of livestock.’’

    When the Border Patrol cracks down on coyotes in one place, the people-smugglers move to another. The pipelines through which human cargo passes constantly shift. Earlier this year, one of these human pipelines began emptying its contents in Texas’ Goliad County, more than a hundred miles from the border.

    Before the Minutemen arrived, Goliad possessed the solemn distinction of being best known for a wartime atrocity committed long ago. On March 27, 1836, Mexican troops, acting on orders of General Santa Anna, marched more than 300 unsuspecting Texas prisoners of war to the outskirts of the town, took aim, and shot them to the ground. Their remains, which were later gathered and buried in a nearby mass grave, are marked with a monument to the “Goliad Massacre,” one of the bloodiest days of the Texas war of independence.

    Today, the outskirts of Goliad are a battlefield of a very different struggle. Shots haven’t been fired in this war yet — but some fear it’s only a matter of time.

    Bill Parmley is a petroleum geologist who lives in a rural community on the outskirts of Goliad. Earlier this year, he grew frustrated as the area around his land in South Texas was being overrun with illegal immigrants. The evidence was frequently sitting along the farm-to-market road that runs in front of his home.

    “They were coming through here in a caravan, three or four [vehicles] at a time,’’ he said. “They’d dump the people, and someone from Houston would come pick them up. They’d leave them here for a week at a time. There would be 20 or 30 [people] in your driveway. You’d try to get the license plate of the first vehicle, and before you could, there would be a second vehicle.’’

    Stranded for days in a strange place, the illegals did what they had to survive. Parmley said it was not uncommon for ranchers to find that their cattle, sheep, or goats had been slaughtered by starving immigrants.

    Parmley and others first tried to get help from state and federal officials. They wrote and called politicians and bureaucrats. When that failed, Parmley started thinking about the Minutemen, whose patrols along the Arizona border had been making the news. He decided to contact Simcox. In June, Parmley said, he flew Simcox to Texas, and the two men agreed to form two Minutemen chapters, one for the Goliad area and another for the entire state, with Parmley as president of both.

    Members trickled in as word of the newly formed organization began to spread. The group began reporting suspicious vehicles and strangers to Goliad County Sheriff Robert De La Garza. And for a while, the problem seemed to abate.

    “The sheriff had come in here and seized 160 vehicles in the last six months,’’ Parmley said. “You can’t fault him and say he’s not doing something with it. He’s probably one of only three sheriffs in the state that was pursuing illegal aliens.’’ Other members of the organization, however, remained critical of the sheriff — and Parmley began to suspect they were motivated by something other than working on Goliad’s immigration problem.

    Parmley said some of his members had previously approached him about “ trying to get the Hispanic people who are in office in Goliad [out] and replace them with white people.’’

    But Parmley wasn’t interested. He thought the sheriff was doing a good job. And Parmley had been working on immigration problems with local officials of the League of United Latin American Citizens — an overture that further alienated him from Minuteman membership. The split didn’t seem likely to heal, and Parmley resigned less than two months after Simcox named him president.

    “I don’t know of any other word to describe it other than racism,’’ he said. “They had a secret agenda before the organization ever got started. They rolled it into the Minutemen.’’

    Parmley’s resignation made headlines across South Texas and seemed to confirm suspicions held by some that the Minutemen might not be so alarmed about illegal immigrants had it been whites pouring across the border.

    After De La Garza learned of Parmley’s resignation, the sheriff said, he confirmed with his own sources that some of the Minutemen were working behind the scenes to get him out of office. Furthermore, he was flabbergasted when the wife of another Minuteman, in a conversation with him and other South Texas law enforcement officials, broached the possibility of shooting any illegals found trespassing. “They were talking about the illegals and what they could and couldn’t do’’ when the woman asked, “If these illegals come onto your property, can we shoot them?’’

    The good relations that initially existed between the Minutemen and the sheriff’s office are now long gone.

    “If they call me, we’re going to respond, but as far as an organization, I don’t want nothing to do with them,’’ the sheriff said. “They can stay out there as long as they don’t do anything illegal. The first time they cross that line, I’ll hammer them.’’

    Minutemen co-founder Simcox responded to the fallout of Parmley’s resignation by appointing Al Garza as president of the Texas organization and Kenneth Buelter to head the Goliad group. Garza, a retired private investigator, lives in Douglas, Ariz., but was born in Raymondville and grew up in Pharr. He said that, for an organization fighting allegations of racism, the fact that he is Hispanic is a benefit. “I can speak Spanish,’’ he said. “Being brown-skinned is a big plus.’’

    Buelter added that people should judge the Minutemen by their actions, not the words of others. “We are not a racist organization in any way, shape, or form,’’ he said. “If you watch what we do and listen to what we say, we will prove that.’’

    When Garza moved to Douglas a few years ago, he said he was at first oblivious to the illegal immigration problems he would face. “I thought it was going to be tranquil, serene, and peachy,’’ he said. “It turns out I made a big mistake.’’ Dogs in his neighborhood barked constantly through the night as strangers passed through.

    He contacted Simcox after seeing him on a local television news program. “Being Hispanic, I showed some concern because I thought this could possibly be a vigilante situation or white supremacists,’’ he said. Simcox, he said, took him “out in the field and showed me the different pipelines, the different trails, and whatnot, the debris that’s left behind — clothing, cans, paperwork, drivers’ licenses from Mexico. I could not believe my eyeballs.’’

    The two men encountered one group of about 30 illegals. Among them was an elderly man and woman who were “showing signs of distress.’’ Simcox impressed Garza by getting the couple something to drink and calling emergency medical technicians to the scene. “That really turned me on,’’ Garza said.

    “Break out the application,” he told Simcox. “Whatever it takes, I’m interested.’’

    Garza acknowledges the situation in Texas “looks bad,’’ but said it was the result of misinformation. He spent time with the Goliad members and found that in “no way, shape, or form were these people prejudiced or had any sort of agenda.’’ Nationally, the Minutemen’s web site disavows any association with “separatists, racists, or supremacy groups” or associated individuals.

    “A lot of the information coming through the media has been twisted,’’ he said. “The real story is simple. These people are frustrated.’’

    The Minutemen have been portrayed as trigger-happy vigilantes, when, Garza said, they’re really “quite the opposite. What possible reason as a Hispanic could I have to go join a group that [has the reputation of] shooting Mexicans on a wild safari? That’s the image that’s been portrayed.”

    On the other hand, Garza and other Minuteman leaders do acknowledge that many of their members carry guns on patrol — which may not make them much different from other people out in the rural parts of South Texas’ harsh landscape, where both drug runners and rattlesnakes are common.

    “I won’t say there won’t be anyone who’s armed,’’ said Buelter, the new Goliad Minutemen president. “No one will be carrying long arms. If someone has a concealed handgun license and has permission from the landowner, they will be able to carry their concealed handgun.’’

    Buelter said he has applied for a handgun permit but doesn’t know whether he’ll be taking a gun with him during a planned patrol all along the U.S.-Mexico border in October.

    “It’ll depend on where I’m stationed. That’s one of the things that as a group we are making a stipulation. If the landowner requests that you not carry, you won’t carry. He’s liable for anything that we do.’’

    As for the group’s national leadership, Simcox has already faced legal problems for carrying a pistol. In 2003, Simcox was arrested on federal firearm charges after crossing into a national forest with a concealed handgun. According to press reports, Simcox contended he was just taking a hike and did not realize he had entered federal property where firearms were banned. Park officials, however, according to press reports, said that they believed Simcox was on a patrol.

    Simcox was cited for two misdemeanors — carrying firearms on park land and giving false information to a park ranger about whether he was carrying a gun, a court official said. He was sentenced to two years probation and fined $1,000, according to published accounts. Simcox is in the process of appealing the case. He was not available for comment for this article.

    Garza said that carrying guns is part of the Southwestern culture. “In terms of us being vigilantes with guns, Arizona is a right-to-carry state,” he said. “I carry a gun, never used it. It’s simply a way of life out here.”

    Garza said he is in the process of reorganizing the Texas chapter and recruiting members for other local groups in the state. He estimated that there are about 600 Minuteman volunteers in Texas. There is, however, no way to verify those numbers — and Parmley says the group exaggerates its membership.

    “Every minute is a growth minute,’’ Garza said. But when asked for the names of other Texas Minutemen who could talk about the group’s plan, he said Buelter alone could “speak on my behalf.’’

    The group is now trying to recruit members across the state for a planned month-long patrol of the 2000-mile U.S. -Mexican border in October. They plan to set up observation posts on private property where illegal immigrants are believed to travel.

    Buelter said the Minutemen are in the process of persuading landowners along the border to let them come onto their property. “There’s 1,394 miles of border’’ in Texas, and all of it is privately owned, he said. His Minutemen will look to the ranchers for help in selecting observation posts. “The landowners know where the illegals come across their property,” he said.

    “As we see trespassers come across the landowner’s land, we will be reporting those trespassers to the border patrol,’’ Buelter said. “That’s all we do. The only way we interact with any of the trespassers is we provide humanitarian aid.’’

    One of the biggest landowners along the border is the King Ranch, and the Minutemen have not been able to obtain permission to search for illegals there. “They feel like the liability issue is too great,’’ Buelter explained.

    Roger Rocha, director of the Texas chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens, said ranchers should worry about Minuteman patrols. He said member of a similar organization several years ago pistol-whipped an illegal immigrant during a patrol on private property, and the rancher wound up being sued over the incident.

    Rocha also questions how the Minutemen will be able to make meaningful distinctions among the people they encounter. “How are the Minutemen going to distinguish who is a U.S. citizen and who is not? Certainly they don’t have the authority to ask anyone for identification. They’re not Homeland Security or the Border Patrol to be doing that.

    “Texas is not Arizona,’’ he said. Unlike Arizona, where the border runs through public lands, all of the Texas border with Mexico is on private land. “We are really concerned with an incident happening on the border, a loss of life, that would have a bigger impact on immigrants and Hispanics. There would be a backlash regardless of who was responsible,’’ Rocha said

    Carlton Jones, a spokesman for the Del Rio Border Patrol office, doesn’t know what to expect from the Minutemen. “It’s hard to answer that question,’’ he said. “We haven’t dealt with them there.’’

    Border ranchers frequently call in sightings of illegal crossings. “We’re always glad to have citizens help us,’’ he said. “Given [the length of] the border and the number of people we have to patrol, any rancher who calls us and lets us know what’s going on helps.’’

    And he’s resigned to the fact that his officers soon may not be the only armed patrols cruising the border. “From the standpoint of the Border Patrol, people are allowed to do things that don’t violate the law,” he said. “If they’ve got permits for [guns], there’s nothing we can do about it.’’

    When he was president of the Texas Minutemen, Parmley said, he was never keen on the idea of armed patrols. But the Arizona members, who Parmley said had been fired upon by Mexicans across the border, were intent on carrying weapons. Their attitude, he said, was, “They [illegal immigrants] could be armed, so we’d better be armed — that type of mentality. It’s a recipe for disaster.’’

    “These guys are kind of playing cowboy,’’ he said. “Somebody’s going to get hurt, and some attorney is going to sue the crap out of you.’’

    You can reach Dan Malone at dan.malone@fwweekly.com.

    Playing Army

    In Arizona, Minutemen leaders and their volunteers spouted racist rhetoric.

    By David Holthouse

    Vigilante militias have been capturing, pistol-whipping, and possibly shooting Latin American immigrants in Cochise County since the late ’90s, when shifts in U.S. border-control policies transformed the high desert region into the primary point of entry for Mexico’s two most valuable black market exports: drugs and people.

    But the Minuteman Project raised the stakes with a highly publicized national recruiting drive and a media blitz. These maneuvers generated massive and mostly positive nationwide coverage of a small gathering of weekend warriors who engaged in plenty of bigoted talk and became, at least for a while, the vanguard of America’s anti-immigration movement.

    The Minuteman Project was the brainchild of Jim Gilchrist, a retired accountant and Vietnam veteran from Orange County, Calif., and Chris Simcox, a former California kindergarten teacher who left his job and his family, moved to Tombstone, Ariz., and refashioned himself into a brash anti-immigration militant following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

    Before the Minuteman Project began, Gilchrist and Simcox repeatedly claimed they had recruited more than 1,300 volunteers. But when their plan lurched into action this year on April Fool’s Day in Tombstone, fewer than 150 volunteers actually showed up, and they were clearly outnumbered on the Wild West movie-set streets by a swarm of reporters, photographers, camera crews, anti-Minuteman protesters, American Civil Liberties Union legal observers, and costumed gunfight show actors.

    Their enlistees were nearly all white — although Gilchrist and Simcox had claimed prior to April 1 that 40 percent of their volunteers would be minorities, including, according to their web site, “American-Africans,” “American-Mexicans,” “American-Armenians,” four paraplegics and six amputees.

    California and Arizona were the most heavily represented states among the Minuteman enlistees, but the volunteers reported from all regions of the country. Many, if not most, were over 50 years old, and their ranks included a relatively high percentage of retired military men, police officers, and prison guards. Women made up nearly a third of the volunteers, including a bevy of white-haired ladies selling homemade Minuteman Project merchandise such as “What Part of ‘Illegal’ Don’t They Understand?” t-shirts and the quickly ubiquitous “Undocumented Border Patrol Agent” badges (which bore color-copy counterfeits of the official Department of Homeland Security seal).

    The keynote speaker at the opening day rally was U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, the Republican who chairs the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus.

    Tancredo addressed a crowd of about 100 inside an auditorium not far from the OK Corral. Outside, a phalanx of private security police hired by the state stood between the hall’s entrance and about 40 anti-Minutemen protesters who banged on pots and pans and drums while a traditional Aztec dance group leapt and whirled to the cacophonous rhythm.

    In late March, President George W. Bush had condemned the Minuteman Project at a joint press conference with Mexican President Vicente Fox. “I’m against vigilantes in the United States of America,” Bush said. “I’m for enforcing the law in a rational way.”

    Tancredo said that Bush should be forced to write, “I’m sorry for calling you vigilantes,” on a blackboard one hundred times and then erase the chalk with his tongue.

    “You are not vigilantes,” he roared. “You are heroes!”

    Tancredo told the Minutemen that each of them stood for 100,000 like-minded Americans who couldn’t afford to make the trip. He applauded Gilchrist and Simcox as “two good men who understand we must never surrender our right as citizens to do our patriotic duty and defend our country ... and stop this invasion ourselves.”

    Gilchrist is newly prominent on the anti-immigration front — he recently joined the California Coalition for Immigration Reform, a hate group whose leader routinely describes Mexicans as “savages.” But Simcox has been active since 2002, when he founded Civil Homeland Defense, a Tombstone-based vigilante militia that he brags has captured more than 5,000 Mexicans and Central Americans who entered the country without visas.

    “These people don’t come here to work. They come here to rob and deal drugs,” Simcox told the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report in a 2003 interview. “We need the National Guard to clean up our cities and round them up.”

    But that was the old Chris Simcox talking.

    The old Simcox described Citizens Homeland Defense as “a committee of vigilantes,” and “a border patrol militia.” The new Simcox — the one interviewed for dozens of national tv news programs and major newspaper articles — characterized his new and larger outfit of citizen border patrollers as “more of a neighborhood watch program.”

    The old Simcox said of Mexicans and Central American immigrants, “They have no problem slitting your throat and taking your money or selling drugs to your kids or raping your daughter, and they are evil people.” The new Simcox said he sympathizes with their plight and sees them as victims of their own government’s failed policies.

    Gilchrist gave his sound bites an even more extreme makeover by frequently comparing himself and most of his volunteers to “white Martin Luther Kings” and the Minuteman Project to the civil rights movement. He and Simcox both declared in interview after interview that they had designed the Minuteman Project to “protect America from drug dealers and terrorists” as much as to catch undocumented immigrants.

    For the most part, mainstream news coverage didn’t challenge these reinventions, even though Gilchrist’s militant rhetoric about immigrants “devouring and plundering our nation” was still up on the Minuteman Project’s web site, and Simcox’s statements had been published in his own newspaper and elsewhere.

    Early this year, white supremacist and neo-Nazi web sites began openly recruiting for the Minuteman Project. In response, Gilchrist and Simcox announced that neo-Nazi skinheads and race warriors from organizations such as the National Alliance and Aryan Nations were specifically banned from participating. The two organizers said they were working with the FBI to carefully check the backgrounds of all potential Minuteman volunteers — only to have the FBI completely deny this was the case.

    Gilchrist and Simcox then said they were personally checking out every potential volunteer using online databases. However, a computer crash wiped out the records of at least 75 pre-registered volunteers; perhaps as a result, during onsite registration at Tombstone, almost every person who showed up was issued a Minuteman Project badge and assigned to a watch post for the next day.

    Gilchrist and Simcox also told news media prior to April 1 that the only volunteers who would be allowed to carry firearms would be those who had a concealed-carry handgun permit from their home states, an indication that they had passed at least a cursory background investigation. In fact, virtually no one was checked for permits.

    While most of the Minuteman volunteers did not belong to racist groups, at least one member of Aryan Nations infiltrated the effort, and at least two members of the Phoenix chapter of the neo-Nazi National Alliance signed up as Minuteman volunteers. The two who identified themselves as members of the Alliance said four others from their group had arrived separately, to be less conspicuous. They said they intended to return in the fall and conduct small, roaming, National Alliance-only vigilante patrols, “when we can have a little more privacy,” as one Alliance member put it.

    The day after the registration meltdown, the Minuteman Project sponsored a protest across the street from the Border Patrol’s headquarters in Naco, Ariz. It drew about 75 demonstrators, including the two National Alliance members, who sat quietly in camp chairs, wearing sunglasses and holding placards.

    Their sign was decorated with a war-room graphic of arrows that represented armies marching north from Mexico and spreading throughout the United States.

    “Invasion?” it asked. “What Invasion?”

    This article was excerpted from Intelligence Report, a quarterly publication of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    source: http://www.fwweekly.com/content.asp?article=2338